Lymph node dissection in thymic carcinomas and neuroendocrine carcinomas

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Thymic Epithelial Tumor Staging Project: A Re-Assessment of the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lymph Node Map for Thymic Epithelial Tumors for the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors

INTRODUCTION

A lymph node map is the pillar on which accurate assignment and documentation of nodal classification stands. The International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group created the first map for thymic epithelial malignancies in conjunction with the eighth edition of the TNM classification, representing the first official TNM classification of thymic epithelial malignancies. The map was based on clinical experience and published studies, but it was largely empirical because of limited available data. Dissemination of the map and implementation of a standard thymic stage classification across the world in 2017 have provided more consistent and granular data.

METHODS

More than twice as many cases of node involvement are available for analysis in the current database compared with that of the eighth edition database, allowing validation of many aspects of the eighth edition map. This article details the process and considerations for refinement of the thymic map for the ninth TNM used by the Thymic Domain of the Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. The committee evaluated a large international collaborative data set, published anatomical and clinical studies pertaining to lymph node spread from thymic epithelial tumors, in conjunction with the analysis underlying refinements of the TNM components for the ninth edition TNM classification.

RESULTS

The node map boundaries of the N1 and N2 categories remain unchanged. Visual clarifications have been added to the nomenclature of nodal stations within these regions.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the recommendation to keep the N component unchanged for the ninth edition TNM classification, the lymph node map remains unchanged as well; however, clarifications have been added to facilitate clinical use.

The maximal contrast-enhanced range of CT for differentiating the WHO pathological subtypes and risk subgroups of thymic epithelial tumors

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of maximal contrast-enhanced (CEmax) range using contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) imaging in differentiating the pathological subtypes and risk subgroups of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs).

METHODS

The pre-treatment-CECT images of 319 TET patients from May 2012 to November 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The CEmax was defined as the maximum difference between the CT value of the solid tumor on pre-contrast and contrast-enhanced images. The mean CEmax value was calculated at three different tumor levels.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the CEmax among the eight main pathological subtypes [types A, AB, B1, B2, and B3 thymoma, thymic carcinoma (TC), low-grade neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and high-grade NET] (p < 0.001). Among the eight subtypes, the CEmax values of types A, AB, and low-risk NET were higher than those of the other subtypes (all p < 0.001), and there was no difference among types B1-B3 and high-risk NET (all p > 0.05). There was no difference for CEmax values between NET and TC (p = 0.491). For the risk subgroups, the CEmax of TC (including NET) was 35.35 ± 11.41 HU, which was lower than that of low-risk thymoma (A and AB) (57.73±21.24 HU) (P < 0.001) and was higher than that of high-risk thymoma (B1-B3) (27.37±8.27 HU) (P < 0.001). The CEmax cut-off values were 38.5 HU and 30.5 HU respectively (AUC: 0.829 and 0.712; accuracy, 72.4% and 67.7%).

CONCLUSION

The tumor CEmax on CECT helps differentiate the pathological subtypes and risk subgroups of TETs.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

In this study, an improved simplified risk grouping method was proposed based on the traditional (2004 edition) simplified risk grouping method for TETs. If Type B1 thymoma is classified as high-risk, radiologists using this improved method may improve the accuracy in differentiating risk level of TETs compared with the traditional method.

Real-world clinicopathological features and outcome of thymic neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective single-institution analysis

Background

Thymic neuroendocrine tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of rare diseases. This study aimed to investigate the real-world clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes of thymic neuroendocrine tumors.

Results

A total of 104 patients diagnosed with thymic neuroendocrine tumors in a single institution from 1983 to 2021 were eligible. Fourteen (13.46%) and 28 (26.92%) patients diagnosed with thymic neuroendocrine tumors suffered from multiple endocrine neoplasia and ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome, respectively. Ninety-seven (93.27%) patients underwent surgical resection, including 79 (81.44%) with radical resection. Except for 5 patients lost during follow-up, the 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 91.8%, 70.2% and 54.6%, respectively. The median overall survival was 61.57 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that years at diagnosis (HR 0.559, 95% CI 0.364–0.857, p = 0.008), radical resection (HR 2.860, 95% CI 1.392–5.878, p = 0.004), pathological grade (HR 1.963, 95% CI 1.058–3.644, p = 0.033) and Masaoka–Koga stage (HR 2.250, 95% CI 1.548–3.272, p = 0.000) exerted significant differences in overall survival among 99 patients. In the surgery group, multivariate Cox regression analysis exhibited significant overall survival differences in years at diagnosis (HR 0.563, 95% CI 0.367–0.866, p = 0.009), neoadjuvant therapy (HR 0.248, 95% CI 0.071–0.872, p = 0.030), radical resection (HR 3.674, 95% CI 1.685–8.008, p = 0.001), pathological grade (HR 2.082, 95% CI 1.098–3.947, p = 0.025) and Masaoka–Koga stage (HR 2.445, 95% CI 1.607–3.719, p = 0.000).

Conclusions

Radical resection and Masaoka–Koga stage were independent prognostic factors for the survival of patients with thymic neuroendocrine tumors. Systemic therapy and integrated management of patients with advanced-stage disease require high-level clinical evidence.