Comparison between robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal and hilar lymph node dissection in lung cancer surgery

A comparative study of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and conventional approaches for short-term outcomes of anatomical segmentectomy

OBJECTIVES

Since anatomical segmentectomy requires meticulous dissection of the segmental pulmonary vessels and bronchus, robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) has been widely adopted in recent years. We investigated the usefulness of RATS segmentectomy by comparing perioperative outcomes with conventional approaches including open thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). We compared perioperative outcomes of segmentectomy between RATS and conventional approaches including open thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

METHODS

This single-institutional retrospective study comprised 231 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent segmentectomy by RATS or conventional approaches between January 2011 and December 2022. Surgical outcomes and postoperative complications were analyzed among patients whose background factors were adjusted by propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Before PSM, there were significant differences in age, smoking status, and types of segmentectomy. After PSM, 126 patients (63 patients in each group) were included in this analysis. The RATS group had significantly shorter operative time (154 vs 210 min; p < 0.01), fewer bleeding amounts (10 vs 40 mL; p < 0.01), and shorter duration of chest drainage (2 vs 2 days; p = 0.04) than the conventional-approach group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of all complications; however, the incidence of postoperative pneumonia was significantly lower than in the conventional-approach group (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

RATS segmentectomy is proposed to be useful. It was suggested that RATS segmentectomy may be useful with better perioperative results than the conventional approach. Further studies on oncological long-term outcomes and cost-benefit comparisons are needed.

Postoperative leukocyte counts as a surrogate for surgical stress response in matched robot- and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cohorts of patients: A preliminary report

The objective is to preliminary evaluated postoperative leukocyte counts as a surrogate for the surgical stress response in NSCLC patients who underwent RATS or VATS for further prospective analyses with proper assessment of surgical stress response and tissue trauma. We retrospectively analyzed patients with stageI-IIIA NSCLC who underwent RATS or VATS at a hospital between 8 May 2020 and 31 December 2021. Analysis of leukocytes (including neutrophils and lymphocytes) and albumin on postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 3 in patients with NSCLC treated with RATS or VATS after propensity score matching (PSM). In total, 1824 patients (565 RATS and 1259 VATS) were investigated. The two MIS groups differed significantly with regard to operative time (p < 0.001), chronic lung disease (p < 0.001), the type of pulmonary resection (p < 0.001), the excision site of lobectomy (p = 0.004), and histology of the tumor (p = 0.028). After PSM, leukocyte and neutrophil levels in the RATS group were lower than those in the VATS group on PODs 1 and 3, with those on POD 3 (p < 0.001) being particularly notable. While lymphocyte levels in the RATS group were significantly lower than those in the VATS group only at POD 1 (p = 0.016). There was no difference in albumin levels between the RATS and VATS groups on PODs 1 and 3. The surgical stress response and tissue trauma was less severe in NSCLC patients who underwent RATS than in those who underwent VATS, especially reflected in the neutrophils of leukocytes.

Assessment of Quality Outcomes and the Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Anatomical Lung Resections

Background: To determine the perioperative quality assessment results and learning curves for robot-assisted anatomical lung resection. Methods: We analyzed the data of the initial 400 patients who underwent lobectomies or segmentectomies by 1 surgeon from January 2020 to November 2021. The learning curve was analyzed using cumulative sum analysis. Results: The surgical experience was divided into an initial phase (1st-40th procedures), a transition phase (41st-131st procedures), and a proficient phase (132nd procedure onward). The operative time showed a conspicuously continuous improvement over the 400 consecutive patients. After the 120th procedure, there were significant improvements in the rate of persistent air leakage (11.7% versus 3.9%; P = .003), chest tube duration (3.92 ± 1.91 versus 2.99 ± 1.31, P = .00), and postoperative hospital stay (6.22 ± 2.02 versus 4.93 ± 1.44, P = .00). Conclusions: In conclusion, 40 patients were necessary to pass the learning curve, and technical proficiency with favorable perioperative outcomes was achieved after 120-130 patients.

Outcomes of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer in a National Cancer Institute-Comprehensive Cancer Center vs. National Cancer Database

Background

There continues to be a rise in the proportion of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the recent expansion of criteria for low-dose lung cancer screening. These are increasingly being treated with minimally invasive techniques. Our study aims to compare outcomes of robotic lobectomy (RL) for NSCLC at a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCI-CCC) to those of open lobectomy (OL), video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VL), or RL as reported in the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Methods

The first 1,021 patients with NSCLC who underwent RL between 2010 and 2020 were matched with peers from the NCDB who had OL, VL, or RL. Matching was performed based on a propensity score calculated by logistic regression using multiple variables. Surgical outcomes included numbers of examined lymph nodes, performance of mediastinal lymphadenectomy, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using log-rank tests.

Results

Most common postoperative complications were persistent air leak, atrial fibrillation, and pneumonia. Median LOS was 4 days, and the 30-day mortality rate was 1% (n=10/1,021). Compared to NCDB patients who underwent OL, NCI-CCC patients had a higher mean number of retrieved lymph nodes (P=0.001), higher rate of mediastinal lymphadenectomy (P<0.001), and shorter median LOS (4 vs. 6 days; P<0.001). There was no difference in 30-day mortality (P=0.176). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no differences in median OS (log-rank P=0.953) or 5-year OS (P=0.774). Compared to NCDB VL, NCI-CCC patients had a higher nodal yield (P<0.001), higher rates of mediastinal lymphadenectomy (P<0.001), and lower conversion rates (4.1% vs. 13.8%, P<0.001). There were no differences in 30-day mortality (P=0.379) or in median LOS (P=0.351). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no differences in median OS (P=0.720) or 5-year OS (P=0.735). NCI-CCC patients were also matched with NCDB RL patients and had a higher nodal yield (P<0.001), higher rates of mediastinal lymphadenectomy (P<0.001), and lower conversion rates (4.1% vs. 9.5%; P <0.001). There were no differences in 30-day mortality (P=0.899) or in median LOS (P=0.252). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no differences in median OS (P=0.484) or 5-year OS (P=0.524).

Conclusions

RL for NSCLC performed in an NCI-CCC appears to have improved perioperative outcomes with comparable long-term OS compared to national benchmarks in OL and VL.

Initial perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy using a confronting setting

PURPOSE

Most robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) is performed from the vertical view. This study evaluates the initial outcomes of our novel confronting RATS technique, in which the patient was viewed horizontally, as in open thoracotomy.

METHODS

We reviewed data on patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy between January, 2019 and April, 2022. Perioperative outcomes were compared between RATS and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), using propensity-score matching.

RESULTS

RATS and VATS were performed for 83 and 571 patients, respectively. After propensity-score matching, data on 81 patients from each of the two groups were retrieved. The operative time was significantly longer for RATS than for VATS (199 ± 44 min vs. 173 ± 37 min, p < 0.001). There was no mortality or conversion to thoracotomy in either of the groups. The rates of overall complications and prolonged air leak did not differ significantly between the groups. The serum creatine phosphokinase level on postoperative day 4 was higher after RATS than after VATS. The number of resected lymph nodes and the rates of nodal upstaging did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The initial perioperative outcomes of RATS using the confronting settings were comparable to those of VATS.

A Comparison of Total Thoracoscopic and Robotic Surgery for Lung Cancer Lymphadenectomy

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is used increasingly frequently in major lung resection for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but has not yet been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of lymph node dissection (LND) performed via RATS with those from totally thoracoscopic (TT) four-port videothoracoscopy.

METHODS

Clinical and pathological data were collected retrospectively from patients with clinical stage N0 NSCLC who underwent pulmonary resection in the form of lobectomy or segmental resection between June 2010 and November 2022. The assessment criteria were number of mediastinal lymph nodes and number of mediastinal stations dissected via the RATS approach compared with the four-port TT approach.

RESULTS

A total of 246 pulmonary resections with LND for clinical stages I-II NSCLC were performed: 85 via TT and 161 via RATS. The clinical characteristics of the patients were similar in both groups. The number of mediastinal nodes dissected and mediastinal stations dissected was significantly higher in the RATS group (TT: mean ± SD, 10.72 ± 3.7; RATS, 14.74 ± 6.3 [p < 0.001]), except in the inferior mediastinal stations. There was no difference in terms of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with early stage NSCLC undergoing major lung resection, the quality of hilomediastinal LND performed using RATS was superior to that performed using TT.

Comparison of the Outcomes between Systematic Lymph Node Dissection and Lobe-Specific Lymph Node Dissection for Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study compares the surgical and long-term outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS), between lobe-specific lymph node dissection (L-SND) and systematic lymph node dissection (SND) among patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 107 patients diagnosed with clinical stage I NSCLC undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy (exclusion of the right middle lobe) from January 2011 to December 2018 were enrolled. The patients were assigned to the L-SND (n = 28) and SND (n = 79) groups according to the procedure performed on them. Demographics, perioperative data, and surgical and long-term oncological outcomes were collected and compared between the L-SND and SND groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-duration was 60.6 months. The demographic data and surgical outcomes and long-term oncological outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. The 5-year OS of the L-SND and SND groups was 82% and 84%, respectively. The 5-year DFS of the L-SND and SND groups was 70% and 65%, respectively. The 5-year CSS of the L-SND and SND groups was 80% and 86%, respectively. All the surgical and long-term outcomes were not statistically different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

L-SND showed comparable surgical and oncologic outcomes with SND for clinical stage I NSCLC. L-SND could be a treatment choice for stage I NSCLC.

Propensity score-matched comparison of robotic- and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer patients aged 75 years or older

Introduction

Although robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) has been widely applied in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its advantages remain unclear for very old patients. The present study compared the perioperative outcomes and survival profiles among RATS, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and open lobectomy (OL), aiming to access the superiority of RATS for NSCLC patients aged ≥75 years.

Methods

Pathological IA-IIIB NSCLC patients aged ≥75 years who underwent RATS, VATS, or OL between June 2015 and June 2021 in Shanghai Chest Hospital were included. Propensity score matching (PSM, 1:1:1 RATS versus VATS versus OL) was based on 10 key prognostic factors. The primary endpoints were perioperative outcomes, and the secondary endpoints were disease-free (DFS), overall (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CS).

Results

A total of 504 cases (126 RATS, 200 VATS, and 178 OL) were enrolled, and PSM led to 97 cases in each group. The results showed that RATS led to: 1) the best surgical-related outcomes including the shortest operation duration (p <0.001) and the least blood loss (p <0.001); 2) the fastest postoperative recoveries including the shortest ICU stay (p = 0.004), chest tube drainage duration (p <0.001), and postoperative stay (p <0.001), and the most overall costs (p <0.001); 3) the lowest incidence of postoperative complications (p = 0.002), especially pneumonia (p <0.001). There was no difference in the resection margins, reoperation rates, intraoperative blood transfusion, and volume of chest tube drainage among the three groups. Moreover, RATS assessed more N1 (p = 0.009) and total (p = 0.007) lymph nodes (LNs) than VATS, while the three surgical approaches dissected similar numbers of N1, N2, and total LN stations and led to a comparable incidence of postoperative nodal upstaging. Finally, the three groups possessed comparable DFS, OS, and CS rates. Further subgroup analysis found no difference in DFS or OS among the three groups, and multivariable analysis showed that the surgical approach was not independently correlated with survival profiles.

Conclusion

RATS possessed the superiority in achieving better perioperative outcomes over VATS and OL in very old NSCLC patients, though the three surgical approaches achieved comparable survival outcomes.