OUP accepted manuscript

Complications associated with intra-aortic balloon pump treatment in critically ill patients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

In recent decades, intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) technology has made significant progress (sheathless insertion technique, different balloon diameters, percutaneous technique and fibre optic IABP) in reducing complications and increasing patient support. Nonetheless, IABP-related complications are still frequent and are associated with a poor prognosis.

AIM

The aim of this systematic review was to identify complications associated with IABP treatment in critically ill patients with a compromised cardiac function.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines based on searches in CINAHL (EBSCO), Medline and Embase (Ovid) from January 2012 to April 2023. Quantitative studies were included if they reported as their primary outcome(s) complications of IABP in adult patients because of cardiovascular conditions and were published in English, Norwegian, Swedish or Danish. Study selection, methodological quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by two authors. The results were synthesized narratively.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies were included in the review, most of which were retrospective (eight of nine). Bleeding was the most frequently occurring complication, followed by limb ischaemia, stroke, infection, IABP malfunction, haematoma and other vascular complications. In addition, a correlation between IABP duration and vascular complications was found in three out of nine studies. Lastly, the incidence rate of stroke was higher in patients with axillary IABP than in those with femoral IABP.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review revealed that bleeding and limb ischaemia were the two most frequent complications associated with IABP therapy. We identified a correlation between (a) IABP support time and the development of vascular complications and (b) stroke and implantation of IABP catheter in the axillary artery. Further studies are needed to explore these findings directly.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Increasing critical care nurses' knowledge regarding complications related to IABP support could lead to early identification, potentially lowering the incidence rate of complications.

The intra-aortic balloon pump as a rescue device: Do we need to shift our strategy for cardiogenic shock rescue after cardiac surgery?

OBJECTIVE

The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is widely used to rescue patients from complications following cardiac surgery. Given improvements in rescue strategies over the past decade, the appropriateness of IABP must be reexamined. This study assessed the risk factors, outcomes, and predictors of survival of rescue IABP placement.

METHODS

Patients receiving an isolated rescue IABP during or after cardiac surgery from 2012 to 2020 were studied. All adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery except transplantation and primary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) procedures were included.

RESULTS

Of 10,591 patients, 397 (3.7%) received a perioperative IABP, including 182 (45.8%) with rescue IABP placement. The indications for rescue IABP were postcardiotomy shock (n = 66; 36.3%), failure to wean off cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 58; 31.9%), myocardial ischemia (n = 30; 16.5%), cardiac arrest (n = 25; 13.7%), and ventricular arrhythmia (n = 3; 1.6%). The in-hospital failure to rescue rate was 17.6% (n = 32 of 182) with a 90-day survival of 80.8% and 1-year survival of 76.9%. The most common etiology of mortality was ongoing cardiogenic shock (61.9%; n = 26 of 42). IABP use for >4 days and cardiac arrest as an indication for IABP were risk factors for 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.68 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.31-5.50] and 2.69 [95% CI, 1.11-6.54], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Rescue IABP following cardiac surgery is associated with increased early and 1-year mortality. Prolonged IABP use beyond 4 days or cardiac arrest as an indication portended a significantly worse prognosis. Rescue IABP may not be the optimal first-line temporary MCS for all patients, as the level of support provided might not match the severity of cardiogenic shock. Alternative MCS strategies should be considered early.

Age- and sex-related differences in risk factors for perioperative intra-aortic balloon pump application in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Background

An intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is a mechanical circulatory device frequently used in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). As a treatment for perioperative haemodynamic instability, IABP insertion often implicates an adverse outcome. This study aimed to investigate the age- and sex-related disparity in risk factors for perioperative IABP insertion in CABG patients.

Methods

A total of 2,460 CABG patients were included and divided into subgroups by age (elderly subgroup, ≥65 years; young subgroup, <65 years) and sex. Basic characteristics were compared between IABP and non-IABP patients in the overall patient group and the subgroups. Multivariate logistic analysis was used to investigate the significant risk factors for perioperative IABP application, and interaction effects among the potential risk factors were analysed. Combined receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate the prediction value of combined risk factors.

Results

The overall patient group had a mean age of 61.5 years. The application rate of perioperative IABP was 8.0%. A left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% significantly correlated with perioperative IABP application in the overall patient group and the subgroups. Traditional factors such as myocardial infarction history, atrial fibrillation history, and intraoperative estimated blood loss were significant risk factors in certain subgroups. Small dense low-density lipoprotein levels were significantly associated with IABP insertion in the male subgroup and young subgroup. The area under the curve of combined risk factors was significantly higher than that of LVEF <50% alone in the overall patient group and subgroups.

Conclusion

Age- and sex-related differences were present in the risk factor distribution for perioperative IABP insertion in CABG patients.

Temporary mechanical circulatory support & enhancing recovery after cardiac surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights the integration of enhanced recovery principles with temporary mechanical circulatory support associated with adult cardiac surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Enhanced recovery elements and efforts have been associated with improvements in quality and value. Temporary mechanical circulatory support technologies have been successfully employed, improved, and the value of their proactive use to maintain hemodynamic goals and preserve long-term myocardial function is accruing.

SUMMARY

Temporary mechanical circulatory support devices promise to enhance recovery by mitigating the risk of complications, such as postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock, organ dysfunction, and death, associated with adult cardiac surgery.

Impact of prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump on early outcomes in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to analyse whether prophylactic preoperative intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) improves outcomes in hemodynamically stable patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤30%) undergoing elective myocardial revascularization (CABG) using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Secondary aim was to identify the predictors for low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS).

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of 207 consecutive patients with LVEF ≤30% undergoing elective isolated CABG with CPB from 01/2009 to 12/2019, 136 with and 71 patients without IABP, were retrieved retrospectively. Patients with prophylactic IABP were matched 1:1 with patients without IABP by a propensity score matching. Stepwise logistic regression was conducted to identify predictors of postoperative LCOS in the propensity-matched cohort. P value ≤0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Reduced postoperative LCOS (9.9% vs. 26.8%, P = 0.017) was observed in patients receiving prophylactic IABP. Stepwise logistic regression identified preoperative IABP as preventive factor for postoperative LCOS [Odds Ratio (OR) 0.19,95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.06-0.55, P = 0.004]. The need of vasoactive and inotropic support was lower in patients with prophylactic IABP at 24, 48 and 72 h after surgery (12.3 [8.2-18.6] vs. 22.2 [14.4-28.8], P < 0.001, 7.7 [3.3-12.3] vs.16.3 [8.9-27.8], P < 0.001 and 2.4 [0-7] vs. 11.5 [3.1-26], P < 0.001, respectively). The patients in both groups did not differ in terms of in-hospital mortality (7.0% vs. 9.9%, P = 0.763). There were no major IABP-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30% undergoing CABG with CPB and prophylactic IABP insertion had less low cardiac output syndrome and similar in-hospital mortality.

Sheathless Versus Sheathed Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Implantation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is the most widely available mechanical support device, but its use has been disputed in recent decades. Although several efforts have been made to reduce the associated complication rate, contemporary data on this matter is lacking. The present study aims to evaluate the differences in vascular complications between the sheathless and the sheathed IABP implantation technique in cardiac surgery patients. A retrospective multi-center cohort, consisting of patients treated in 8 cardiac surgical centers, was evaluated. Patients who underwent cardiac surgery with peri-operative IABP support were included. Primary outcome was a composite end point of vascular complications. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, and a multivariable regression model was applied to evaluate predictors of vascular complications. The unmatched cohort consisted of 2,615 patients (sheathless n = 1,414, 54%, sheathed n = 1,201, 46%). A total of 878 patients were matched (n = 439 for both groups). The composite vascular complication end point occurred in 3% of patients in the sheathless group, compared with 8% in the sheathed group (p <0.001). Vascular complications were significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR] 3.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01 to 7.40, p <0.001). Peripheral arterial disease was associated with vascular complications (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.46 to 6.55, p = 0.003), whereas the sheathless implantation technique was found to be protective (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.73, p = 0.005). In conclusion, the present retrospective multi-center analysis demonstrated the sheathless implantation technique to be associated with a significant reduction in vascular complication rate. Future studies should focus on even less invasive implantation techniques using smaller-sized catheters, sheathless implantation, and imaging guiding.