1
|
Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, Augoustides JG, Beck AW, Bolen MA, Braverman AC, Bray BE, Brown-Zimmerman MM, Chen EP, Collins TJ, DeAnda A, Fanola CL, Girardi LN, Hicks CW, Hui DS, Schuyler Jones W, Kalahasti V, Kim KM, Milewicz DM, Oderich GS, Ogbechie L, Promes SB, Ross EG, Schermerhorn ML, Singleton Times S, Tseng EE, Wang GJ, Woo YJ, Faxon DP, Upchurch GR, Aday AW, Azizzadeh A, Boisen M, Hawkins B, Kramer CM, Luc JGY, MacGillivray TE, Malaisrie SC, Osteen K, Patel HJ, Patel PJ, Popescu WM, Rodriguez E, Sorber R, Tsao PS, Santos Volgman A, Beckman JA, Otto CM, O'Gara PT, Armbruster A, Birtcher KK, de Las Fuentes L, Deswal A, Dixon DL, Gorenek B, Haynes N, Hernandez AF, Joglar JA, Jones WS, Mark D, Mukherjee D, Palaniappan L, Piano MR, Rab T, Spatz ES, Tamis-Holland JE, Woo YJ. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 166:e182-e331. [PMID: 37389507 PMCID: PMC10784847 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
AIM The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes). METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. STRUCTURE Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.
Collapse
|
2
|
Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, Augoustides JG, Beck AW, Bolen MA, Braverman AC, Bray BE, Brown-Zimmerman MM, Chen EP, Collins TJ, DeAnda A, Fanola CL, Girardi LN, Hicks CW, Hui DS, Schuyler Jones W, Kalahasti V, Kim KM, Milewicz DM, Oderich GS, Ogbechie L, Promes SB, Gyang Ross E, Schermerhorn ML, Singleton Times S, Tseng EE, Wang GJ, Woo YJ. 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2022; 146:e334-e482. [PMID: 36322642 PMCID: PMC9876736 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 338] [Impact Index Per Article: 169.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AIM The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes). METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. Structure: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Bruce E Bray
- AHA/ACC Joint Committee on Clinical Data Standards liaison
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Y Joseph Woo
- AHA/ACC Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines liaison
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black Iii J, Augoustides JG, Beck AW, Bolen MA, Braverman AC, Bray BE, Brown-Zimmerman MM, Chen EP, Collins TJ, DeAnda A, Fanola CL, Girardi LN, Hicks CW, Hui DS, Jones WS, Kalahasti V, Kim KM, Milewicz DM, Oderich GS, Ogbechie L, Promes SB, Ross EG, Schermerhorn ML, Times SS, Tseng EE, Wang GJ, Woo YJ. 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 80:e223-e393. [PMID: 36334952 PMCID: PMC9860464 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AIM The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes). METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. STRUCTURE Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kakar S, Adam S, Panda A, Sabry H, Harky A. Replace it or preserve it? How outcomes differ using different techniques. J Card Surg 2022; 37:4406-4407. [PMID: 36183402 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sahil Kakar
- Centre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Sana Adam
- Centre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, St George's University, London, UK
| | - Abinash Panda
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Haytham Sabry
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Amer Harky
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hartley P, Salmasi MY, Morosin M, Mensah K, Asimakopoulos G. Comparison of outcomes between aortic root replacement and supra-coronary interposition graft for type A aortic dissection: A retrospective case series. J Card Surg 2022; 37:4398-4405. [PMID: 36183392 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The decision to conserve or replace the native aortic valve following acute type-A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is an area of cardiac surgery without standardized practice. This single-center retrospective study analysed the long-term performance of the native aortic valve and root following surgery for ATAAD. METHODS Between 2009 and 2018 all cases ATAAD treated at Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust were analysed. Patients were divided into two groups: (a) ascending aorta (interposition) graft (AAG) without valve replacement and (b) nonvalve-sparing aortic root replacement (ARR). Preoperative covariates were compared, as well as operative characteristics and postoperative complications. Long-term survival and echocardiographic outcomes were analysed using regression analysis. RESULTS In total, 116 patients were included: 63 patients in the AAG group and 53 patients in the ARR group. In patients where the native aortic valve was conserved, nine developed severe aortic regurgitation and two patients developed dilation of the aortic root requiring subsequent replacement during the follow-up period. Aortic regurgitation at presentation was not found to be associated with subsequent risk of developing severe aortic regurgitation or reintervention on the aortic valve. Overall mortality was observed to be significantly lower in patients undergoing AAG (17.5% vs. 41.5%, p = .004). CONCLUSIONS With careful patient selection, the native aortic root shows good long-term durability both in terms of valve competence and stable root dimensions after surgery for ATAAD. This study supports the consideration of conservation of the aortic valve during emergency surgery for type-A dissection, in the absence of a definitive indication for root replacement, including in cases where aortic regurgitation complicates the presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Hartley
- Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, London, UK
| | - M Yousuf Salmasi
- Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, London, UK
| | - Marco Morosin
- Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, London, UK
| | - Kwabena Mensah
- Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, London, UK
| | - George Asimakopoulos
- Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Malaisrie SC, Szeto WY, Halas M, Girardi LN, Coselli JS, Sundt TM, Chen EP, Fischbein MP, Gleason TG, Okita Y, Ouzounian M, Patel HJ, Roselli EE, Shrestha ML, Svensson LG, Moon MR. 2021 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery expert consensus document: Surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 162:735-758.e2. [PMID: 34112502 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- S Christopher Malaisrie
- Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute and Division of Cardiac Surgery in the Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
| | - Wilson Y Szeto
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Monika Halas
- Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute and Division of Cardiac Surgery in the Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill
| | - Leonard N Girardi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Joseph S Coselli
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Thoralf M Sundt
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Edward P Chen
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC
| | | | - Thomas G Gleason
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Yutaka Okita
- Cardio-Aortic Center, Takatsuki General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Maral Ouzounian
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Himanshu J Patel
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Eric E Roselli
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Malakh L Shrestha
- Division of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Lars G Svensson
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Marc R Moon
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St Louis, Mo
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Beliaev AM, Bergin CJ. Impact of the Duration of Global Cardiac Ischaemia on Outcomes of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair. Heart Lung Circ 2021; 30:1067-1074. [PMID: 33589401 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current management of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAD) repair does not consider the safe duration of cardiac ischaemia as an operative strategy. We aimed to evaluate whether the duration of cardiac ischaemia during ATAD repair can predict operative mortality and to determine the optimum cardiac ischaemia time that is associated with better outcomes. METHODS This was a retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent ATAD repair from 2003 to 2020 were identified from our hospital records. RESULTS Three hundred and sixty three (363) ATAD patients met eligibility criteria. The median patient age was 61 years, 221 (61%) patients were male. Duration of cardiac ischaemia was associated with operative mortality (Odds ratio [OR] =1.01; p<0.0005). Its optimal cut-off point was equal to or above 149.5 minutes (95% CI: 126.2-172.8). In patients with a shorter period (less than 150 mins) of cardiac ischaemia, a valve-sparing root repair was used more often (OR=2.5; 95% CI: 1.6-3.9; p<0.001). Procedures that had the longer period of cardiac ischaemia included the Bentall procedure (OR=10.9; 95% CI: 4.9-27.4; p<0.001), descending thoracic aorta replacement (OR=4.3; 95% CI: 1.007-18.7; p=0.049) and concomitant cardiac surgery (OR=4.7; 95% CI: 2-11.1; p<0.001). Operations associated with shorter cardiac ischaemia were associated with lower in-hospital mortality and better long-term survival. CONCLUSION This study determined that the duration of cardiac ischaemia in ATAD repair is linked to operative mortality. Further studies are required to confirm that ATAD patients with surgical repair involving less than 150 minutes of cardiac ischaemic time have lower in-hospital mortality and better long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei M Beliaev
- Green Lane Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Colleen J Bergin
- Anatomy with Medical Imaging FMHS University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|