1
|
Ekezie W, Martin CA, Baggaley RF, Teece L, Nazareth J, Pan D, Sze S, Bryant L, Woolf K, Gray LJ, Khunti K, Pareek M. Association between ethnicity and migration status with the prevalence of single and multiple long-term conditions in UK healthcare workers. BMC Med 2023; 21:433. [PMID: 38031115 PMCID: PMC10688453 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03109-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare workers' (HCW) well-being has a direct effect on patient care. However, little is known about the prevalence and patterns of long-term medical conditions in HCWs, especially those from ethnic minorities. This study evaluated the burden of multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs), i.e. the presence of two or more single long-term conditions (LTCs), among HCWs in the United Kingdom (UK) and variation by ethnicity and migration status. METHODS We used baseline data from the UK-REACH cohort study collected December 2020-March 2021. We used multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for demographic, occupational and lifestyle factors to examine the relationship between self-reported LTCs/MLTCs and ethnicity, migration status and time since migration to the UK. RESULTS Of 12,100 included HCWs, with a median age of 45 years (IQR: 34-54), 27% were overseas-born, and 30% were from non-White ethnic groups (19% Asian, 4% Black, 4% Mixed, 2% Other). The most common self-reported LTCs were anxiety (14.9%), asthma (12.2%), depression (10.7%), hypertension (8.7%) and diabetes (4.0%). Mental health conditions were more prevalent among UK-born than overseas-born HCWs for all ethnic groups (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) using White UK-born as the reference group each time: White overseas-born 0.77, 95%CI 0.66-0.95 for anxiety). Diabetes and hypertension were more common among Asian (e.g. Asian overseas, diabetes aOR 2.97, 95%CI 2.30-3.83) and Black (e.g. Black UK-born, hypertension aOR 1.77, 95%CI 1.05-2.99) groups than White UK-born. After adjustment for age, sex and deprivation, the odds of reporting MLTCs were lower in most ethnic minority groups and lowest for those born overseas, compared to White UK-born (e.g. White overseas-born, aOR 0.68, 95%CI 0.55-0.83; Asian overseas-born aOR 0.75, 95%CI 0.62-0.90; Black overseas-born aOR 0.52, 95%CI 0.36-0.74). The odds of MLTCs in overseas-born HCWs were equivalent to the UK-born population in those who had settled in the UK for ≥ 20 years (aOR 1.14, 95%CI 0.94-1.37). CONCLUSIONS Among UK HCWs, the prevalence of common LTCs and odds of reporting MLTCs varied by ethnicity and migrant status. The lower odds of MLTCs in migrant HCWs reverted to the odds of MLTCs in UK-born HCWs over time. Further research on this population should include longitudinal studies with linkage to healthcare records. Interventions should be co-developed with HCWs from different ethnic and migrant groups focussed upon patterns of conditions prevalent in specific HCW subgroups to reduce the overall burden of LTCs/MLTCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winifred Ekezie
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Centre for Ethnic Health Research, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands (ARC EM), Leicester, UK
- School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Christopher A Martin
- Department of Infection and HIV Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester, NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Development Centre for Population Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Rebecca F Baggaley
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Development Centre for Population Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Lucy Teece
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Joshua Nazareth
- Department of Infection and HIV Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester, NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Development Centre for Population Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Daniel Pan
- Department of Infection and HIV Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester, NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Development Centre for Population Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Oxford Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Shirley Sze
- Development Centre for Population Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Luke Bryant
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Laura J Gray
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Centre for Ethnic Health Research, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands (ARC EM), Leicester, UK
| | - Manish Pareek
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands (ARC EM), Leicester, UK.
- Department of Infection and HIV Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester, NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
- Development Centre for Population Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martin CA, Woolf K, Bryant L, Goss C, Gogoi M, Lagrata S, Papineni P, Qureshi I, Wobi F, Nellums L, Khunti K, Pareek M. Coverage, completion and outcomes of COVID-19 risk assessments in a multi-ethnic nationwide cohort of UK healthcare workers: a cross-sectional analysis from the UK-REACH Study. Occup Environ Med 2023:oemed-2022-108700. [PMID: 37221040 DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2022-108700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There are limited data on the outcomes of COVID-19 risk assessment in healthcare workers (HCWs) or the association of ethnicity, other sociodemographic and occupational factors with risk assessment outcomes. METHODS We used questionnaire data from UK-REACH (UK Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers), an ethnically diverse, nationwide cohort of UK HCWs. We derived four binary outcomes: (1) offered a risk assessment; (2) completed a risk assessment; (3) working practices changed as a result of the risk assessment; (4) wanted changes to working practices after risk assessment but working practices did not change.We examined the association of ethnicity, other sociodemographic/occupational factors and actual/perceived COVID-19 risk variables on our outcomes using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS 8649 HCWs were included in total. HCWs from ethnic minority groups were more likely to report being offered a risk assessment than white HCWs, and those from Asian and black ethnic groups were more likely to report having completed an assessment if offered. Ethnic minority HCWs had lower odds of reporting having their work change as a result of risk assessment. Those from Asian and black ethnic groups were more likely to report no changes to their working practices despite wanting them.Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with lower odds of being offered a risk assessment and having adjustments made to working practices. DISCUSSION We found differences in risk assessment outcomes by ethnicity, other sociodemographic/occupational factors and actual/perceived COVID-19 risk factors. These findings are concerning and warrant further research using actual (rather than reported) risk assessment outcomes in an unselected cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher A Martin
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Department of Infection and HIV Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Katherine Woolf
- Research Department of Medical Education, University College London Medical School, London, UK
| | - Luke Bryant
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Charles Goss
- Department of Occupational Health, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Mayuri Gogoi
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Susie Lagrata
- Queen Square Insitute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Padmasayee Papineni
- Department of Infectious Diseases, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK
| | - Irtiza Qureshi
- Population and Lifespan Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Fatimah Wobi
- Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
- School of Law, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Laura Nellums
- Population and Lifespan Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Manish Pareek
- Department of Infection and HIV Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harrison D, McManus IC, Rees EL, Woolf K. Institutional choice among medical applicants: a profile paper for The United Kingdom Medical Applicant Cohort Study (UKMACS) prospective longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060135. [PMID: 36167376 PMCID: PMC9516324 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To generate a large cohort of those in 2019 seriously considering applying to study Medicine, collecting data on a range of socioeconomic and other demographic factors that influence choice of medical schools and to link to other datasets to form a longitudinal study of progress through medical school and careers in medicine. DESIGN Cross-sectional questionnaire studies, part of the longitudinal UK Medical Applicant Cohort Study (UKMACS). SETTING UK medical school admissions in 2020. PARTICIPANTS UK residents aged 16+ and seriously considering applying to study Medicine. The cohort was primarily drawn from those registering in 2019 for the U(K)CAT (University Clinical Aptitude Test (formerly the UK Clinical Aptitude Test)) with additional potential applicants responding to an open call. Participants consented to their data being linked within the UK Medical Education Database. FINDINGS TO DATE UKMACS Wave 1 questionnaire respondents consisted of 6391 consenting respondents from across the UK. In 2019, 14 980 of the 17 470 UK-domiciled medicine applicants were first-time applicants. The questionnaires show that many of these applicants have a need for more help and guidance to make informed choices, with less advantaged groups reporting themselves as being at a disadvantage when applying due to limited understanding of information and limited access to guidance to enable informed and effective decision-making. FUTURE PLANS To link the cohort with successive Universities and Colleges Admissions Service and other datasets to analyse outcomes of applications and establish national longitudinal evidence to understand how medical choices are made and how they impact on educational, career and workforce outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Harrison
- Research Department for Medical Education, University College London, London, UK
| | - I C McManus
- Research Department for Medical Education, University College London, London, UK
| | - Eliot L Rees
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
- Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Katherine Woolf
- Research Department for Medical Education, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|