Efficacy of different dosing schedules of tobramycin for treating a murine Klebsiella pneumoniae bronchopneumonia

Efficacy of meropenem and amikacin combination therapy against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae mouse model of pneumonia

BACKGROUND

The emergence and spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is a global health problem due to its high mortality and limited treatment options. Combination antimicrobial therapy is reported to be effective against CRE in vitro; however, its efficacy in vivo has not been thoroughly evaluated. Thus, this study assessed the efficacy of combination therapy of meropenem (MEPM) and amikacin (AMK) in a carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-Kp) mouse model of pneumonia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Agar-based bacterial suspension of CR-Kp clinical isolates was inoculated into the trachea of BALB/c mice. Treatment was initiated 6 h post infection, with 100 mg/kg MEPM every 6 h, 100 mg/kg AMK every 12 h, or in combination; survival was evaluated for 7 days. The number of viable bacteria in the lungs, lung histopathology, and neutrophil counts in broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were evaluated 42 h after infection.

RESULTS

All mice in the untreated control group died in 48 h, while all the mice in treatment groups survived past 7 days following infection. The bacterial count in the lungs (log₁₀ CFU/mL, mean ± SEM) in the combination group (2.00 ± 0.00) decreased significantly compared to that in control (10.19 ± 0.11, p < 0.0001), MEPM (6.38 ± 0.17, p < 0.0001), and AMK (6.17 ± 0.16, p < 0.0001) groups. BALF neutrophil count reduced only in the combination therapy group. Combination therapy prevented the progression of lung inflammation, including alveolar neutrophil infiltration and hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates in vivo efficacy of MEPM and AMK combination therapy against CR-Kp pneumonia.

Reappraisal of Contemporary Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Principles for Informing Aminoglycoside Dosing

Therapeutic drug management is regularly performed for aminoglycosides in an effort to maximize their effectiveness and safety. The ratio of maximum plasma drug concentration to minimum inhibitory concentration (Cmax/MIC) has long been regarded as the primary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index of clinical efficacy for aminoglycosides due to their concentration-dependent killing. In this review, however, we discuss why the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratio may be a more reliable indicator of bacterial killing and clinical efficacy for these agents. The definitive AUC/MIC efficacy targets for aminoglycosides are less clear, unlike those that exist for fluoroquinolones. Evaluation of available literature suggests that an AUC/MIC ratio of 30-50 for aminoglycoside therapy may provide optimal outcomes when targeting non-critically ill immunocompetent patients with low-bacterial burden gram-negative infections such as urinary tract infections or in patients receiving additional gram-negative therapy with good source control. However, an AUC/MIC target of 80-100 may be more prudent when treating patients with aminoglycoside monotherapy or in critically ill patients with high-bacterial burden infections, such as nosocomial pneumonia. Reappraisal of current antimicrobial susceptibility breakpoints for aminoglycosides against gram-negative bacteria may also be necessary to achieve these AUC/MIC targets and ensure that current empiric doses are not grossly suboptimal in critically ill patients. Although it has been historically difficult to calculate AUCs in clinical practice, equation-based and Bayesian approaches now can be used to estimate the AUC in clinical practice, with limited PK sampling. Additional research is needed to better define optimal AUC/MIC targets for efficacy, especially when drugs are used in combination, as well as PK/PD targets associated with suppression of resistance. It is also important to determine if AUC can predict nephrotoxicity of these agents or whether trough concentrations should be used instead.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Profiles of Tiamulin in an Experimental Intratracheal Infection Model of Mycoplasma gallisepticum

Mycoplasma gallisepticum is the most important pathogen in poultry among four pathogenic Mycoplasma species. Tiamulin is a pleuromutilin antibiotic that shows a great activity against M. gallisepticum and has been approved for use in veterinary medicine particularly for poultry. However, the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) profiles of tiamulin against M. gallisepticum are not well understood. Therefore, in the current studies, we investigated the in vivo PK/PD profiles of tiamulin using a well-established experimental intratracheal infection model of M. gallisepticum. The efficacy of tiamulin against M. gallisepticum was studied in 8-day-old chickens after intramuscular (i.m.) administration at 10 doses between 0–80 mg/kg. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to evaluate the PK parameters of tiamulin following i.m. administration at doses of 5, 40, and 80 mg/kg in Mycoplasma gallisepticum-infected neutropenic chickens. Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) was used for quantitative detection of M. gallisepticum. The MIC of tiamulin against M. gallisepticum strain S6 was 0.03 μg/mL. The PK/PD index, AUC_24h/MIC, correlated well with the in vivo antibacterial efficacy. The in vivo data suggest that animal dosage regimens should supply AUC_24h/MIC of tiamulin of 382.68 h for 2 log₁₀ ccu equivalents M. gallisepticum reduction. To attain that goal, the administered dose is expected to be 45 mg/kg b.w. for treatment of M. gallisepticum infection with an MIC₉₀ of 0.03 μg/mL.

Pharmacodynamic Properties of Antibiotics: Application to Drug Monitoring and Dosage Regimen Design

The goal of antimicrobial chemotherapy is to effectively eradicate pathogenic organisms while minimizing the likelihood of drug-related adverse effects. In this era of cost containment, consideration should also be given to performing this task with the smallest total dose of drug and the shortest duration of therapy. Determination of the appropriate dose and dosing interval of an antimicrobial requires knowledge and integration of both its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.

In vivo pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles of valnemulin in an experimental intratracheal Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection model

Valnemulin, a semisynthetic pleuromutilin antibiotic derivative, is greatly active against Mycoplasma. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of valnemulin against Mycoplasma gallisepticum in a neutropenic intratracheal model in chickens using a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) method. The PK of valnemulin after intramuscular (i.m.) administration at doses of 1, 10, and 20 mg/kg of body weight in M. gallisepticum-infected neutropenic chickens was evaluated by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) was used for quantitative detection of M. gallisepticum. The ratio of the 24-h area under the concentration-time curve divided by the MIC (AUC24/MIC) correlated well with the in vivo antibacterial effectiveness of valnemulin (R(2) = 0.9669). The AUC24/MIC ratios for mycoplasmastasis (a reduction of 0 log10 color-changing unit [CCU] equivalents/ml), a reduction of 1 log10 CCU equivalents/ml, and a reduction of 2.5 log10 CCU equivalents/ml are 28,820, 38,030, and 56,256, respectively. In addition, we demonstrated that valnemulin at a dose of 6.5 mg/kg resulted in a reduction of 2.5 log10 CCU equivalents/ml. These investigations provide a solid foundation for the usage of valnemulin in poultry with M. gallisepticum infections.

Animal model pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: a critical review

Animals have been extensively used in the evaluation of antimicrobials. The value of animals in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterization of antimicrobials is critically reviewed. Animal studies have demonstrated that the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target determining efficacy can vary for different classes of antimicrobials. However, the magnitude of the target required for bacteriological efficacy is relatively similar for various sites of infection, various pathogens and various drugs within the same class, provided free drug levels are used.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of outpatient intravenous antimicrobial therapy

Outpatient intravenous antimicrobial therapy has been widely accepted over the past decade. Knowledge of both the pharmacokinetics of antimicrobials and the pharmacodynamics predictive of antimicrobial efficacy enables one to design reasonable outpatient intravenous regimens for most agents. This article summarizes current knowledge of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of agents commonly used in outpatient intravenous treatment regimens.

In vivo antibacterial effects of simulated human serum profiles of once-daily versus thrice-daily dosing of amikacin in a Serratia marcescens endocarditis experimental model

Once-daily dosage of aminoglycosides is currently under consideration. The lower toxicity of this regimen has been clearly established, but there are conflicting experimental and clinical data concerning its efficacy. It is inadvisable to optimize human therapy by extrapolation from experimental studies since animal and human pharmacokinetics differ. The simulation of human pharmacokinetics in experimental infectious models would seem to offer a more rational approach. We used computer-controlled infusion of amikacin at a variable flow rate to simulate human pharmacokinetics in a Serratia marcescens rabbit endocarditis model and to compare two therapeutic regimens (once-daily versus thrice-daily doses). The doses corresponded to simulations of 15 and 30 mg/kg of body weight per day in humans, and antibacterial activity was measured in vegetations (Veg) after 24 h of treatment. The results show that the dose corresponding to 15 mg/kg/day failed to produce a significant reduction of CFU (6.8 +/- 0.9 and 6.4 +/- 0.8 log10 CFU/g of Veg, respectively, for once-daily and thrice-daily doses versus 7.6 +/- 1.0 for controls). A significant reduction was observed only for the dose corresponding to 30 mg/kg/day in humans (5.2 +/- 1.5 and 5.4 +/- 1.1 log10 CFU/g of Veg, respectively, for the two regimens). With this model, the efficacy of amikacin was similar for both regimens after 24 h of treatment simulating human pharmacokinetics.

Effect of gentamicin dosing interval on therapy of viridans streptococcal experimental endocarditis with gentamicin plus penicillin

This study compares the effects of a total daily dose of gentamicin given once a day (q.d.) or three times a day (t.i.d.) in the therapy of experimental endocarditis in rabbits caused by penicillin-susceptible, penicillin-tolerant, or penicillin-resistant viridans streptococci. Four isolates were used in vivo: one penicillin susceptible (MIC < or = 0.03 microgram/ml), one penicillin tolerant (MBC/MIC, < or = 0.03/ > 32 micrograms/ml), and two penicillin resistant (MICs = 0.5 and 2 micrograms/ml). Animals were infected with one of the four isolates and assigned to one of the following treatment regimens: no treatment, procaine penicillin at 1.2 million IU intramuscularly (i.m.) t.i.d., procaine penicillin plus gentamicin at 1 mg/kg of body weight i.m. t.i.d., procaine penicillin plus gentamicin at 3 mg/kg i.m. q.d., or procaine penicillin plus gentamicin at 1 mg/kg i.m. q.d. (only animals infected with the penicillin-susceptible isolate). Serum drug concentrations measured 30 min after administration of 1.2 million IU of penicillin and 1 or 3 mg of gentamicin per kg were 22.6, 3.8, and 8.5 micrograms/ml, respectively. The reduced total daily dose of gentamicin was ineffective among animals infected with penicillin-susceptible viridans streptococci; treatment with 1 mg of gentamicin per kg per day plus penicillin was less effective (P < 0.05) than was treatment with 3 mg of gentamicin per kg per day plus penicillin. The 1-mg/kg/day gentamicin treatment regimen was not further studied. The gentamicin dosing interval did not significantly affect (q.d. versus t.i.d., P > 0.05) the relative efficacy of penicillin plus gentamicin for treatment of experimental endocarditis among animals infected with each of the four isolates tested.

Pharmacokinetic contributions to postantibiotic effects. Focus on aminoglycosides

The postantibiotic effect (PAE) refers to a period of time after complete removal of an antimicrobial during which there is no growth of the target organism. The PAE appears to be a feature of most antimicrobial agents and has been documented with a variety of common bacterial pathogens. Various factors influence the presence or duration of the PAE including the type of organism, type of antimicrobial, concentration of antimicrobial, duration of antimicrobial exposure, antimicrobial combinations, and inoculum and medium used. beta-Lactams demonstrate a PAE against Gram-positive cocci, but produce only a short PAE with Gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrobial agents that inhibit RNA or protein synthesis have a PAE against Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative bacilli. In vivo studies of aminoglycosides suggest that area under the plasma concentration-time curve is the pharmacokinetic parameter that best correlates with clinical efficacy. This is thought to be due to the concentration-dependent killing and PAE possessed by these antimicrobials. Animal and human studies have reported that once-daily administration of aminoglycoside is as effective as, or more effective than, and possibly less toxic than traditional multiple daily administration.

What is the evidence for once-daily aminoglycoside therapy?

Aminoglycosides are important antibacterial agents for the treatment of serious infection. Evidence suggests that high peak plasma concentrations must be achieved early in the course of treatment if these agents are to be effective, but prolonged high concentrations may cause ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Peak plasma concentrations of 6 to 10 mg/L and trough concentrations of less than 2 mg/L for gentamicin and tobramycin have been traditional goals of therapy. Extensive recent evidence from in vitro, animal and human studies suggests that these target concentrations need revision. Aminoglycosides display concentration-dependent bacterial killing, have a long postantibiotic effect, and induce adaptive resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. All of these factors support the use of larger doses of aminoglycosides that are given less frequently than conventional therapy. Studies in vitro support this approach, showing greater activity when aminoglycosides are given less frequently. Animal studies comparing different dosage intervals have shown varying results, with only a slight bias favouring the longer dosage interval. However, the short elimination half-lives for the drugs in animals limit the applicability of these models to humans. Importantly, there is convincing evidence in animal studies that nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity are both reduced when the same total daily dose is administered in less frequent doses. There have been at least 29 clinical trials comparing once-daily administration of aminoglycosides with conventional administration 2 to 4 times daily. In general, efficacy has not been shown to be different between regimens, although one trial showed an advantage for once-daily administration compared with administration 3 times daily. A small number of trials have shown less nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity with once-daily administration, leading several authors to suggest that there is sufficient evidence to warrant a change to once-daily administration of aminoglycosides. However, once-daily administration has not been well studied in the paediatric population, or in patients with renal failure or endocarditis, and cannot be recommended in these patients as yet. The choice of a 24-hour dosage interval is somewhat arbitrary, and the optimal interval may not necessarily be 24 hours. No studies have included dosage adjustment based on pharmacokinetic modelling methods, and the effect of this on treatment outcome needs to be assessed. The best method of administering aminoglycosides once daily is yet to be determined.

Once daily aminoglycoside dosing: maintained efficacy with reduced nephrotoxicity?

Animal studies report equal or greater clinical efficacy with once daily versus multiple daily aminoglycoside dosing; however, results are inconsistent. Extrapolation of these animal data to human data is difficult, since marked variability exists in terms of pharmacokinetic disposition of aminoglycosides. Human data suggest that once daily aminoglycoside dosing regimens are as effective as multiple dosing regimens. However, studies need to be performed assessing the efficacy of once daily aminoglycoside dosing for infectious sites other than intra-abdominal and the urinary tract. In addition, the results of these studies should not be extrapolated to those with renal dysfunction, the immunocompromised, or in patients with aminoglycoside treatment durations of greater than 8 days, as the efficacy of once daily dosing in these patient populations has not been proven. Animal studies assessing nephrotoxicity suggest that multiple daily aminoglycoside dosing results in more frequent or more severe nephrotoxicity compared to once daily dosing. Nine human studies have been published comparing the nephrotoxicity of once daily versus multiple daily aminoglycoside dosing. The majority of investigators have studied nonimmunocompromised patients with urinary tract infections. Netilmicin has been the most frequently used aminoglycoside, although other agents such as gentamicin, amikacin, and sisomicin have been studied. The most common netilmicin dosage regimen has ranged from approximately 4 to 6 mg/kg administered once daily. Eight of the nine trials performed have documented no significant differences in serial serum creatinine concentrations between once daily and multiple daily aminoglycoside dosing regimens, by the end of the study period. In conclusion, preliminary data suggest that once daily aminoglycoside dosing in nonimmunocompromised patients is equally efficacious and nephrotoxic compared to multiple daily dosing regimens.

Pharmacokinetics of tobramycin in pregnant women. Safety and efficacy of a once-daily dose regimen

The pharmacokinetics of tobramycin, an aminoglycoside antibiotic, was investigated after a short intravenous infusion and once-daily dose regimen in two groups of nine pregnant women during the second (Group 1) and the third (Group 2) trimester of pregnancy. During these periods, the risk of infectious diseases is increased. Plasma concentrations of tobramycin were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. The decrease in clearance (21%), at 28 weeks and more of gestation leads to an increase in half-life and the mean residence time (MRT) in the second group (33 and 29% respectively). The volume of distribution was unchanged in the two groups. No accumulation of the drug was observed in pregnant women. Pharmacokinetic disorders are correlated with the term and moreover with the weight deviation of women, i.e. the growth of the fetus. These findings suggest accumulation of the aminoglycoside antibiotic in the fetus. Moreover, the efficacy and the safety of this therapeutic regimen were excellent. To limit the potential nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity of tobramycin for the mother and the fetus, a once-daily dose regimen seems to be acceptable for the treatment of non-neutropenic pregnant women.

Pharmacodynamic properties of antibiotics: application to drug monitoring and dosage regimen design

The goal of antimicrobial chemotherapy is to effectively eradicate pathogenic organisms while minimizing the likelihood of drug-related adverse effects. In this era of cost containment, consideration should also be given to performing this task with the smallest total dose of drug and the shortest duration of therapy. Determination of the appropriate dose and dosing interval of an antimicrobial requires knowledge and integration of both its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.

Impact of the dosage schedule on the efficacy of ceftazidime, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin in Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia and septicemia in leukopenic rats

The impact of the dosage schedule on the therapeutic efficacy of antibiotics was investigated in experimental Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia and septicemia in leukopenic rats. The daily doses (mg/kg) that protected 50% of the animals from death, when calculated for administration at 6 h intervals or by continuous infusion, were as follows: ceftazidime 24.4 and 1.5 (p less than 0.001), gentamicin 2.8 and 3.8 (p greater than 0.05), and ciprofloxacin 3.3 and 6.5 (p less than 0.05), respectively. This correlates with the observation that ceftazidime killed Klebsiella pneumoniae slowly but constantly, and relatively independently of concentration, whereas killing by gentamicin or ciprofloxacin was rapid, and markedly dependent on antibiotic concentration. Exposure of bacteria for 1 h to concentrations of fivefold the MBC did not give rise to a postantibiotic effect for any of the drugs. In our model ceftazidime was far more effective when given continuously than when administered at 6 h intervals. On the other hand, the activity of gentamicin was not influenced by the mode of administration, whereas ciprofloxacin was slightly more effective when given intermittently. However, to avoid misleading conclusions regarding the use of antibiotics in humans, the pharmacokinetic differences between rats and man must be considered when interpreting these results.

Alternative dosing strategy for aminoglycosides: impact on efficacy, nephrotoxicity, and ototoxicity

Accumulating evidence suggests that the therapeutic margin of aminoglycoside therapy may be improved by manipulation of dosing strategy. Recent understanding of concentration-dependent bactericidal activity and postantibiotic effect argues that the aminoglycosides may be administered in larger doses and at longer dosing intervals than currently recommended without compromising efficacy. Preliminary clinical experience suggests that once-daily regimens are as efficacious as conventional intermittent injections in the treatment of gram-negative infectious including urinary tract infections, cystic fibrosis, and bacteremia in nonneutropenic patients. The transient, high peak serum concentrations achieved in once-daily dosing have not been associated with excessive nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity thus far. Decreased accumulation in renal cortex as a result of saturable renal uptake after the single daily dose may even reduce the incidence or severity of renal damage. Further studies on more patients are required to substantiate these preliminary findings.

Pulse dosing versus continuous infusion of antibiotics. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations

The issue of whether it is better to administer antibiotics as an intermittent bolus dose or a continuous intravenous infusion has been debated for several decades. This paper reviews the extensive literature on the topic, considering both the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of antibacterials as well as experimental results from studies conducted in vitro, in animals and in humans. It is evident from reviewing the literature that neither mode of administration is clearly superior to the other. The decision regarding the mode of administration must take into account the antibiotic being used, the bacteria, the patient and the infection, as well as the pharmacokinetics of the particular drug in the individual patient. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) are useful indicators of the relative in vitro effectiveness of antibiotics, but it is not clear what relevance these parameters have to the desired antibiotic concentrations in vivo. Furthermore, questions of serum vs tissue fluid concentrations, peak concentrations vs AUC, and free vs total concentration are all important issues to consider in assessing the optimal mode of administration. The importance of newer indices such as the post-antibiotic effect are now beginning to be recognised. A number of scientists are actively engaged in developing a system to identify the most appropriate mode of administration based upon the integration of an antibiotic's pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. Within the next few years we anticipate that appropriate guidelines should have been developed to aid the optimisation of parenteral administration, at least for some antibiotics.