Amoxycillin-clavulanic acid (Augmentin) antibiotic prophylaxis against wound infections in renal failure patients

Perioperative antibiotics for preventing post-surgical site infections in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant recipients are at high risk for infections due to the complexity of surgical procedures combined with the impact of immunosuppression. No consensus exists on the role of antibiotics for surgical site infections in solid organ transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of prophylactic antimicrobial agents for preventing surgical site infections in solid organ transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies was searched up to 21 April 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in any language assessing prophylactic antibiotics in preventing surgical site infections in solid organ transplant recipients at any time point after transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently determined study eligibility, assessed quality, and extracted data. Primary outcomes were surgical site infections and antimicrobial resistance. Other outcomes included urinary tract infections, pneumonias and septicaemia, death (any cause), graft loss, graft rejection, graft function, adverse reactions to antimicrobial agents, and outcomes identified by the Standardised Outcomes of Nephrology Group (SONG), specifically graft health, cardiovascular disease, cancer and life participation. Summary effect estimates were obtained using a random-effects model and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The quality of the evidence was assessed using the risk of bias and the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified eight eligible studies (718 randomised participants). Overall, five studies (248 randomised participants) compared antibiotics versus no antibiotics, and three studies (470 randomised participants) compared extended duration versus short duration antibiotics. Risk of bias was assessed as high for performance bias (eight studies), detection bias (eight studies) and attrition bias (two studies). It is uncertain whether antibiotics reduce the incidence of surgical site infections as the certainty of the evidence has been assessed as very low (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.85; 5 studies, 226 participants; I² = 25%). The certainty of the evidence was very low for all other reported outcomes (death, graft loss, and other infections). It is uncertain whether extended duration antibiotics reduces the incidence of surgical site infections in either solid organ transplant recipients (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.48; 2 studies, 302 participants; I² = 0%) or kidney-only transplant recipients (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.48; 1 study, 205 participants) as the certainty of the evidence has been assessed as very low. The certainty of the evidence was very low for all other reported outcomes (death, graft loss, and other infections). None of the eight included studies evaluated antimicrobial agent adverse reactions, graft health, cardiovascular disease, cancer, life participation, biochemical and haematological parameters, intervention cost, hospitalisation length, or overall hospitalisation costs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Due to methodological limitations, risk of bias and significant heterogeneity, the current evidence for the use of prophylactic perioperative antibiotics in transplantation is of very low quality. Further high quality, adequately powered RCTs would help better inform clinical practice.

Postoperative infections in immunocompromised patients after oncological surgery

Immunodeficiency secondary to cancer chemotherapy (chemotherapy for less than 3 months, or intensive chemotherapy with bone marrow transplant) may be responsible for postoperative infections. To estimate the value of this hypothesis, a prospective study was done over a period of 18 months in patients who had undergone pulmonary surgery. Antibiotic prophylaxis was by pefloxacin, one tablet (400 mg) 1 h before surgery then 11 h after. Clinical examination, a chest X-ray and blood cell count were carried out every day for 10 days and on the 15th day. All the drain-tips were cultured. In a case of infection, samples were obtained and cultured. One group comprised 22 immunodeficient patients (group A), and 33 patients (group B) had received no prior chemotherapy (bone-marrow transplantation = 36.7%). There were differences between the two groups in age (A:33.5 +/- 12.3 years; B:50.8 +/- 18.4 years), and type of tumour (A: metastasis = 95.5%; B: lung cancer = 51.5%). Surgical operation was bilateral for 36.4% of the patients in group A. There was more anatomical resection (pneumonectomy and lobectomy) in group B. Lung function did not differ between the two groups (abnormalities: A = 54.6%; B = 63.6%). In group A, there were 3 pulmonary infections (13.7%), but in group B 10 infections (30.3%) with 9 pulmonary infections (4 with bacteraemia) and 1 wound infection. The bacteriological finding showed two pathogens in 7 cases and no bacteriological isolates in 2 cases. With broad-spectrum antibiotherapy all the patients were cured except 1. There was one postoperative death in group B. This patient died of respiratory distress after pneumonectomy complicated by pneumonia and septicaemia (Streptococcus pneumoniae) in the remaining lung. Surgical procedures are performed with increasing frequency on patients with immunocompromised status. Classically the risk of infection is more important for these patients. In this study prior cancer chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation did not seem to be an aggravating factor of the risk of infection. But further methodological analysis would not allow us to distinguish between a real impact of chemotherapy and the influence of group heterogeneity.

A meta-analysis of the use of amoxycillin-clavulanic acid in surgical prophylaxis

The efficacy of amoxycillin-clavulanic acid as antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery has been assessed in numerous clinical studies, chiefly in abdominal and gynaecological surgery. A meta-analysis of 21 trials covering 2685 patients given amoxycillin-clavulanic acid and 2220 patients given comparator regimens is presented. Monotherapy with amoxycillin-clavulanic acid was as effective as the comparators, including combination regimens utilizing gentamicin or metronidazole, in preventing wound infections (median wound infection rates were 6% and 10% respectively). The antibacterial activity of amoxycillin-clavulanic acid covers the broad range of aerobic Gram-negative and anaerobic organisms that have a major role in postoperative infections. In addition, amoxycillin-clavulanic acid may have benefits in terms of convenience, tolerance and cost.