Dosage adjustment and clinical outcomes of long-term use of high-dose tobramycin in adult cystic fibrosis patients

Population Pharmacokinetics and AUC-Guided Dosing of Tobramycin in the Treatment of Infections Caused by Glucose-Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacteria

PURPOSE

Tobramycin (TOB) exhibits variable pharmacokinetic properties due to the clinical condition of patients. This study aimed to investigate the AUC-guided dosing of TOB based on population pharmacokinetic analysis in the treatment of infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted between January 2010 and December 2020 after obtaining approval from our institutional review board. For 53 patients who received therapeutic drug monitoring of TOB, a population pharmacokinetic model was developed with covariates of estimated glomerular filtration rate using serum creatinine (eGFRcre) on clearance (CL) and weight on both CL and V_d in exponential error modeling (CL = 2.84 × [weight/70] × eGFRcre^0.568, interindividual variability [IIV] = 31.1%; V_d = 26.3 × [weight/70], IIV = 20.2%; residual variability = 28.8%).

FINDINGS

The final regression model for predicting 30-day mortality was developed with risk factors of AUC during a 24-hour period after the first dose to MIC ratio (odds ratio [OR] = 0.996; 95% CI, 0.968-1.003) and serum albumin (OR = 0.137; 95% CI, 0.022-0.632). The final regression model for predicting acute kidney injury was developed with the risk factors of C-reactive protein (OR = 1.136; 95% CI, 1.040-1.266) and AUC during a 72-hour period after the first dose (OR = 1.004; 95% CI, 1.000-1.001). A dose of 8 or 15 mg/kg was beneficial for achievement of AUC during a 24-hour period after the first dose/MIC >80 and trough concentration <1 µg/mL in patients with preserved kidney function and TOB CL >4.47 L/h/70 kg in the events of MIC of 1 or 2 µg/mL, respectively. We propose that the first dose of 15, 11, 10, 8, and 7 mg/kg for eGFRcre >90, 60 to 89, 45 to 59, 30 to 44, and 15 to 29 mL/min/1.73 m² be followed by therapeutic drug monitoring at peak and 24 hours after the first dose.

IMPLICATIONS

This study suggests that TOB use encourages the replacement of trough- and peak-targeted dosing with AUC-guided dosing.

Intravenous antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis is a multi-system disease characterised by the production of thick secretions causing recurrent pulmonary infection, often with unusual bacteria. Intravenous antibiotics are commonly used in the treatment of acute deteriorations in symptoms (pulmonary exacerbations); however, recently the assumption that exacerbations are due to increases in bacterial burden has been questioned.

OBJECTIVES

To establish if intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis improve short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews and ongoing trials registers.Date of last search of Cochrane trials register: 27 July 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials and the first treatment cycle of cross-over studies comparing intravenous antibiotics (given alone or in an antibiotic combination) with placebo, inhaled or oral antibiotics for people with cystic fibrosis experiencing a pulmonary exacerbation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The authors assessed studies for eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 40 studies involving 1717 participants. The quality of the included studies was largely poor and, with a few exceptions, these comprised of mainly small, inadequately reported studies.When comparing treatment with a single antibiotic to a combined antibiotic regimen, those participants receiving a combination of antibiotics experienced a greater improvement in lung function when considered as a whole group across a number of different measurements of lung function, but with very low quality evidence. When limited to the four placebo-controlled studies (n = 214), no difference was observed, again with very low quality evidence. With regard to the review's remaining primary outcomes, there was no effect upon time to next exacerbation and no studies in any comparison reported on quality of life. There were no effects on the secondary outcomes weight or adverse effects. When comparing specific antibiotic combinations there were no significant differences between groups on any measure. In the comparisons between intravenous and nebulised antibiotic or oral antibiotic (low quality evidence), there were no significant differences between groups on any measure. No studies in any comparison reported on quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The quality of evidence comparing intravenous antibiotics with placebo is poor. No specific antibiotic combination can be considered to be superior to any other, and neither is there evidence showing that the intravenous route is superior to the inhaled or oral routes. There remains a need to understand host-bacteria interactions and in particular to understand why many people fail to fully respond to treatment.

Kill kinetics and regrowth patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exposed to concentration-time profiles of tobramycin simulating in vivo infusion and bolus dosing

Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was exposed to tobramycin concentration-time profiles modelling in vivo bolus and infusion dosing. Dependence of bactericidal and bacteriostatic activity on the initial profile of peak concentration (bolus effect > infusion) and area under the antibiotic concentration-time curve was observed at peak concentration/MIC ratios of 10 or below.

Minimisation of aminoglycoside toxicity in patients with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that administration of higher doses of aminoglycosides given less frequently improves the bactericidal effect and reduces the potential to cause side effects. To investigate this, a prospectively randomised open label therapeutic trial was undertaken in stratified groups of patients with cystic fibrosis to examine the efficacy and toxic potential of an aminoglycoside dosing regimen designed to generate high peak drug concentrations at 12 hourly intervals compared with conventional dosing at eight hourly intervals.

METHODS

Patients in group A received tobramycin eight hourly using a dose aimed at generating a peak concentration of 10 mg/l with trough concentrations below 2 mg/l, and those in group B received the total daily dose required to achieve eight hourly target concentrations administered as two equal 12 hourly doses. Clinical outcomes measured and assessed included vestibular symptoms, hearing and renal function, length of hospital stay, readmission rate, and mortality.

RESULTS

Twenty nine patients were recruited during a six month period, 20 to group A and nine to group B. The average peak tobramycin level was higher in group B (12.5 (2.2) mg/l) than in group A (7.9 (1.9) mg/l), whilst the average trough level was higher in group A (0.8 (0.3) mg/l) than in group B (0.5 (0.2) mg/l). There was a difference in the number of ototoxic events between patients in group A (seven of 18, 38.9%) and group B (none of eight), but no difference was found in other outcome measures assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that 12 hourly high peak aminoglycoside dosing may be less toxic than equivalent eight hourly dosing, without any apparent difference in efficacy.

Aminoglycoside dosing: one, two or three times a day?

The safety and efficacy of conventional aminoglycoside dosing regimens have been proven in clinical trials. Higher doses at longer intervals may be more effective if they result in higher peak serum levels of the drug, but few trials of "once-a-day" dosing have shown improved clinical outcome. The clinical safety of allowing trough serum levels to fall below the minimum inhibitory concentration is not established. Literal "once-a-day" dosing will result in drug accumulation and toxicity in patients with reduced renal clearance, and in potential lack of efficacy and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant organisms in those with increased renal clearance. However, modified "once-a-day" dosing, with the interval determined by the individual's renal clearance rate (hence avoiding subtherapeutic trough levels), will avoid these problems.