Once-daily azithromycin in the treatment of adult skin and skin-structure infections

Formulation and Evaluation of Azithromycin-Loaded Niosomal Gel: Optimization, In Vitro Studies, Rheological Characterization, and Cytotoxicity Study

Several novel, innovative approaches for improving transdermal delivery of BCS class III drugs have been proposed. Despite their great aqueous solubility, BCS class III drugs have the drawback of limited permeability. The objective of the current work was to screen the suitability of niosomes as a nanocarrier in permeation enhancement of azithromycin (AZM) transdermal delivery. Niosomes were prepared by an ether injection method using a nonionic surfactant (Span 60) and cholesterol at different concentrations. The ζ potential (ZP), polydispersity index (PDI), and particle size (PS) of AZM-loaded niosomes were evaluated. The size of the niosomes was found to vary between 288 and 394 nm. The results revealed that the niosomes prepared in a ratio of 2:1 (Span 60: cholesterol) had larger vesicle sizes, but all of them were characterized by narrow size distributions (PDI <0.95). Niosomal gel was successfully prepared using different polymers. The appearance, pH, viscosity, and ex vivo drug release of niosomal gel formulations were all examined. The flow curves showed that the niosomal gel displayed lower viscosity values than its corresponding conventional gels. Niosomal and conventional gels exhibited a domination of the elastic modulus (G') over the viscous modulus (G″) (G'>G″) in the investigated frequency range (0.1-100 rad/s), indicating stable gels with more solid-like properties. Ex vivo skin permeation studies for the niosomal gel show 90.83 ± 3.19% of drug release in 24 h as compared with the conventional gel showing significantly lower (P < 0.001) drug release in the same duration (1.25 ± 0.12%). Overall, these results indicate that niosomal gel could be an effective transdermal nanocarrier for enhancing the permeability of AZM, a BCS class III drug. In conclusion, this study suggests that transdermal formulations of AZM in the niosomal gel were successfully developed and could be used as an alternative route of administration.

Combination of kaempferol and azithromycin attenuates Staphylococcus aureus-induced osteomyelitis via anti-biofilm effects and by inhibiting the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and SAPK

Osteomyelitis is bacterial infection of bone, commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus. This work aims to study the potential of azithromycin and kaempferol against chronic osteomyelitis induced by azithromycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ARSA). It was noticed that rats tolerated the treatments with no diarrhoea or weight loss; also, no deaths were observed in rats. The treatment by azithromycin alone failed to inhibit bacterial growth and also had no effect on the infection condition of bone, although the treatment decreased the levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), but did not improve the oxidative stress levels. Kaempferol monotherapy slightly inhibited bacterial growth and bone infection; the treatment also inhibited the levels of IL-6 and (TNF-α). The treatment also improved the antioxidant status. However, the combined treatment of azithromycin and kaempferol significantly suppressed bacterial growth and bone infection and modulated oxidative stress. In vitro, the combined treatment inhibited the levels of IL-6 and TNF-α, and also suppressed the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK). The combined treatment also showed anti-biofilm activity in ARSA. The combination attenuates ARSA-induced osteomyelitis in rats compared with their treatments alone by reducing oxidative stress, inhibiting the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and SAPK and inhibiting biofilm formation.

Efficacy of mass drug administration with ivermectin for control of scabies and impetigo, with coadministration of azithromycin: a single-arm community intervention trial

BACKGROUND

In small community-based trials, mass drug administration of ivermectin has been shown to substantially decrease the prevalence of both scabies and secondary impetigo; however, their effect at large scale is untested. Additionally, combined mass administration of drugs for two or more neglected diseases has potential practical advantages, but efficacy of potential combinations should be confirmed.

METHODS

The azithromycin ivermectin mass drug administration (AIM) trial was a prospective, single-arm, before-and-after, community intervention study to assess the efficacy of mass drug administration of ivermectin for scabies and impetigo, with coadministration of azithromycin for trachoma. Mass drug administration was offered to the entire population of Choiseul Province, Solomon Islands, and of this population we randomly selected two sets of ten sentinel villages for monitoring, one at baseline and the other at 12 months. Participants were offered a single dose of 20 mg/kg azithromycin, using weight-based bands. Children weighing less than 12·5 kg received azithromycin oral suspension (20 mg/kg), and infants younger than 6 months received topical 1% tetracycline ointment. For ivermectin, participants were offered two doses of oral ivermectin 200 μg/kg 7-14 days apart using weight-based bands, or 5% permethrin cream 7-14 days apart if ivermectin was contraindicated. Our study had the primary outcomes of safety and feasibility of large-scale mass coadministration of oral ivermectin and azithromycin, which have been previously reported. We report here the prevalence of scabies and impetigo in residents of the ten baseline villages compared with those in the ten 12-month villages, as measured by examination of the skin, which was a secondary outcome of the trial. Further outcomes were comparison of the number of all-cause outpatient attendances at government clinics in Choiseul Province at various timepoints before and after mass drug administration. The trial was registered with the Australian and New Zealand Trials Registry (ACTRN12615001199505).

FINDINGS

During September, 2015, over 4 weeks, 26 188 people (99·3% of the estimated population of Choiseul [n=26 372] as determined at the 2009 census) were treated. At baseline, 1399 (84·2%) of 1662 people living in the first ten villages had their skin examined, of whom 261 (18·7%) had scabies and 347 (24·8%) had impetigo. At 12 months after mass drug administration, 1261 (77·6%) of 1625 people in the second set of ten villages had their skin examined, of whom 29 (2·3%) had scabies (relative reduction 88%, 95% CI 76·5-99·3) and 81 (6·4%) had impetigo (relative reduction 74%, 63·4-84·7). In the 3 months after mass drug administration, 10 614 attended outpatient clinics for any reason compared with 16 602 in the 3 months before administration (decrease of 36·1%, 95% CI 34·7-37·6), and during this period attendance for skin sores, boils, and abscesses decreased by 50·9% (95% CI 48·6-53·1).

INTERPRETATION

Ivermectin-based mass drug administration can be scaled to a population of over 25 000 with high efficacy and this level of efficacy can be achieved when mass drug administration for scabies is integrated with mass drug administration of azithromycin for trachoma. These findings will contribute to development of population-level control strategies. Further research is needed to assess durability and scalability of mass drug administration in larger, non-island populations, and to assess its effect on the severe bacterial complications of scabies.

FUNDING

International Trachoma Initiative, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Scobie and Claire Mackinnon Trust, and the Wellcome Trust.

Azithromycin pharmacokinetics in the serum and its distribution to the skin in healthy dogs and dogs with pyoderma

Serum and skin tissue azithromycin (AZM) concentrations were analysed in healthy and pyoderma affected dogs to determine AZM pharmacokinetics and to establish the effect of disease on AZM skin disposition. AZM was administered orally to two groups of healthy dogs: (1) at 7.02 mg/kg (n=7) and (2) at 11.2mg/kg (n=9). A crossover design was used on five of them. Seven dogs with pyoderma were treated with AZM at 10.7 mg/kg. The two groups of healthy dogs received AZM once daily over three consecutive days and dogs with pyoderma received the same treatment repeated twice with an interval of 1 week. AZM concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. AZM was rapidly absorbed and slowly excreted. In healthy dogs, maximum serum concentrations appeared 2h after administration and were (mean ± standard deviation) 0.60 ± 0.25 μg/mL and 1.03 ± 0.43 μg/mL, and the half-lives were 49.9 ± 5.10 and 51.9 ± 6.69 h for doses of 7.02 and 11.2mg/kg, respectively. Clearance (CL0-24/F) was similar in both dosing groups (1.24 ± 0.24 and 1.29 ± 0.24 L/h/kg) and the respective mean residence time (MRT0-24) was 11.1 ± 0.8 and 8.4 ± 2.2h. The skin concentration in healthy dogs was 3.5-6.5 and 5.0-12.0 times higher than the corresponding serum concentration after the two doses and increased after the cessation of AZM administration. The ratio increased significantly in inflamed tissue (9.5-26.2).

Interventions for cellulitis and erysipelas

BACKGROUND

Cellulitis and erysipelas are now usually considered manifestations of the same condition, a skin infection associated with severe pain and systemic symptoms. A range of antibiotic treatments are suggested in guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of interventions for non-surgically-acquired cellulitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

In May 2010 we searched for randomised controlled trials in the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the ongoing trials databases.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials comparing two or more different interventions for cellulitis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 25 studies with a total of 2488 participants. Our primary outcome 'symptoms rated by participant or medical practitioner or proportion symptom-free' was commonly reported. No two trials examined the same drugs, therefore we grouped similar types of drugs together.Macrolides/streptogramins were found to be more effective than penicillin antibiotics (Risk ratio (RR) 0.84, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.97). In 3 trials involving 419 people, 2 of these studies used oral macrolide against intravenous (iv) penicillin demonstrating that oral therapies can be more effective than iv therapies (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.98).Three studies with a total of 88 people comparing a penicillin with a cephalosporin showed no difference in treatment effect (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.43).Six trials which included 538 people that compared different generations of cephalosporin, showed no difference in treatment effect (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to1.06).We found only small single studies for duration of antibiotic treatment, intramuscular versus intravenous route, the addition of corticosteroid to antibiotic treatment compared with antibiotic alone, and vibration therapy, so there was insufficient evidence to form conclusions. Only two studies investigated treatments for severe cellulitis and these selected different antibiotics for their comparisons, so we cannot make firm conclusions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We cannot define the best treatment for cellulitis and most recommendations are made on single trials. There is a need for trials to evaluate the efficacy of oral antibiotics against intravenous antibiotics in the community setting as there are service implications for cost and comfort.

Prevention of chronic furunculosis with low‐dose azithromycin

BACKGROUND

Chronic furunculosis is a recurrent staphylococcal abscess of the hair follicle. Besides ensuring personal hygiene, the management consists of long-term treatment with topical and systemic antibiotics.

OBJECTIVE

An open-labeled, prospective study was conducted to assess the clinical and in vitro efficacy of azithromycin in the long-term suppressive treatment of chronic furunculosis.

METHODS

Patients with a history of three or more episodes of furuncles were assigned to receive 12 weeks of suppressive treatment with azithromycin at a weekly dosage of 500 mg. In vitro susceptibility of azithromycin was evaluated with E-test. The primary efficacy parameter was complete absence of furuncles during the 3 months of azithromycin treatment. The secondary efficacy parameter was further absence of furuncles during the 3-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

At the end of 3 months of therapy, azithromycin was found to be effective in 19 (79.2%) of 24 patients; 18 of these patients remained in remission during the 3 months of follow-up. All of the strains were methicillin-sensitive. The results of the E-test showed that 15 of 18 strains (83.3%) were susceptible to azithromycin.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that azithromycin is an effective and safe alternative in the treatment of chronic furunculosis caused by methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus.

Do systemic antibiotics increase the survival of a full thickness graft on the nose?

BACKGROUND

Full thickness grafts on the nose do not always heal without problems. Partial or entire necrosis of the graft is likely to lead to less favourable cosmetic results and prolonged wound care. No consensus exists as to the use of systemic antibiotics to increase the success rate of survival of a full thickness skin graft on the nose after non-melanoma skin cancer surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of systemic antibiotics on the survival of full thickness grafts on the nose.

METHODS

We performed a randomized, controlled trial in which we compared azithromycin with standard treatment in 30 patients, who underwent a full thickness graft reconstruction of a surgical defect on the nose after surgery for non-melanoma skin cancer. Percentage survival of the graft was the main outcome measure.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference in favour of the grafts treated with azithromycin was seen (P=0.002). Of all the variables analysed, only smoking had a significant negative effect on the survival of the graft.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic antibiotics with an accurate bacterial spectrum should be advised in full thickness skin graft reconstruction after surgery for non-melanoma skin cancer of the nose. Smoking should be strongly discouraged.

Macrolides and ketolides: azithromycin, clarithromycin, telithromycin

The advanced macrolides, azithromycin and clarithromycin, and the ketolide telithromycin are structural analogues of erythromycin. They have several distinct advantages when compared with erythromycin including enhanced spectrum of activity, more favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, once daily administration, and improved tolerability. This article reviews the pharmacokinetics, antimicrobial activity, clinical use, and adverse effects of these antimicrobial agents.

Treatment of bullous impetigo and the staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome in infants

Impetigo is a common, superficial, bacterial infection of the skin characterized by an inflamed and infected epidermis. The rarer variant, bullous impetigo, is characterized by fragile fluid-filled vesicles and flaccid blisters and is invariably caused by pathogenic strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Bullous impetigo is at the mild end of a spectrum of blistering skin diseases caused by a staphylococcal exfoliative toxin that, at the other extreme, is represented by widespread painful blistering and superficial denudation (the staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome). In bullous impetigo, the exfoliative toxins are restricted to the area of infection, and bacteria can be cultured from the blister contents. In staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome the exfoliative toxins are spread hematogenously from a localized source causing widespread epidermal damage at distant sites. Both occur more commonly in children under 5 years of age and particularly in neonates. It is important to swab the skin for bacteriological confirmation and antibiotic sensitivities and, in the case of staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome, to identify the primary focus of infection. Topical therapy should constitute either fusidic acid (Fucidin, Leo Pharma Ltd) as a first-line treatment, or mupirocin (Bactroban, GlaxoSmithKline) in proven cases of bacterial resistance. First-line systemic therapy is oral or intravenous flucloxacillin (Floxapen, GlaxoSmithKline). Nasal swabs from the patient and immediate relatives should be performed to identify asymptomatic nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus. In the case of outbreaks on wards and in nurseries, healthcare professionals should also be swabbed.

The macrolides: erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin

In addition to erythromycin, macrolides now available in the United States include azithromycin and clarithromycin. These two new macrolides are more chemically stable and better tolerated than erythromycin, and they have a broader antimicrobial spectrum than erythromycin against Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), Haemophilus influenzae, nontuberculous mycobacteria, and Chlamydia trachomatis. All three macrolides have excellent activity against the atypical respiratory pathogens (C. pneumoniae and Mycoplasma species) and the Legionella species. Azithromycin and clarithromycin have pharmacokinetics that allow shorter dosing schedules because of prolonged tissue levels. Both azithromycin and clarithromycin are active agents for MAC prophylaxis in patients with late-stage acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), although azithromycin may be the preferable agent because of fewer drug-drug interactions. Clarithromycin is the most active MAC antimicrobial agent and should be part of any drug regimen for treating active MAC disease in patients with or without AIDS. Although both azithromycin and clarithromycin are well tolerated by children, azithromycin has the advantage of shorter treatment regimens and improved tolerance, potentially improving compliance in the treatment of respiratory tract and skin or soft tissue infections. Intravenously administered azithromycin has been approved for treatment of adults with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia or pelvic inflammatory diseases. An area of concern is the increasing macrolide resistance that is being reported with some of the common pathogens, particularly Streptococcus pneumoniae, group A streptococci, and H. influenzae. The emergence of macrolide resistance with these common pathogens may limit the clinical usefulness of this class of antimicrobial agents in the future.

The clinician's choice of antibiotics in the treatment of bacterial skin infection

The development of modern antibiotics has vastly improved the therapy of cutaneous bacterial infections, particularly those caused by Staphylococcus aureus. This organism and beta-haemolytic streptococci are the most common cutaneous pathogens. A growing body of evidence suggests that proteins from S. aureus and some strains of streptococci can act as superantigens and cause polyclonal T-cell activation by binding directly to antigen-presenting cells. This process is a likely explanation of Kawasaki's syndrome as well as staphylococcal and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Sudden aggravation of atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis and some cases of psoriasis can be similarly explained. Bacterial toxins can precipitate the staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome. Specific and effective eradication of bacteria and programmes to prevent recurrences are important, particularly in immune suppressed persons. Topical antibiotics used primarily for superficial infections of limited extent and for the prevention of recurrences in carriers of S. aureus should be combined with the use of topical disinfectants. The treatment of selected bacterial skin infections based on clinical examples will be discussed. These include secondarily infected dermatoses, cellulitis and streptococcal carriage in the ano-genital region and staphylococcal folliculitis and nasal carriage.

Antibiotics in the management of pediatric skin disease

An increasingly large number of antibiotics are available for the treatment of uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections in children. Primary factors in the choice among these agents are the antibiotic resistance profile of the target pathogen(s), and the antibiotic's spectrum of activity, pharmacologic properties, potential adverse reactions and interactions and propensity to select for the emergence of resistant organisms. Based on a consideration of these principles, this article provides a practical guide to the use of antibiotics in the management of common cutaneous infections in the pediatric population.

Azithromycin. A review of its pharmacological properties and use as 3-day therapy in respiratory tract infections

The azalide antibacterial agent azithromycin is a semisynthetic acid-stable erythromycin derivative with an expanded spectrum of activity and improved tissue pharmacokinetic characteristics relative to erythromycin. The drug is noted for its activity against some Gram-negative organisms associated with respiratory tract infections, particularly Haemophilus influenzae. Azithromycin has similar activity to other macrolides against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Moraxella catarrhalis, and is active against atypical pathogens such as Legionella pneumophila, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Once-daily administration of azithromycin is made possible by the long elimination half-life of the drug from tissue. Azithromycin is rapidly and highly concentrated in a number of cell types after absorption, including leucocytes, monocytes and macrophages. It undergoes extensive distribution into tissue, from where it is subsequently eliminated slowly. A 3-day oral regimen of once-daily azithromycin has been shown to be as effective as 5- to 10-day courses of other more frequently administered antibacterial agents [such as erythromycin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin V)] in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, pneumonia, sinusitis, pharyngitis, tonsillitis and otitis media. Adverse effects of azithromycin are mainly gastrointestinal in nature and occur less frequently than with erythromycin. Azithromycin is likely to prove most useful as a 3-day regimen in the empirical management of respiratory tract infections in the community. Its ease of administration and 3-day duration of therapy, together with its good gastrointestinal tolerability, should optimise patient compliance (the highest level of which is achieved with once-daily regimens). Azithromycin is also likely to be useful in the hospital setting, particularly for outpatients and for those unable to tolerate erythromycin.