Sputum and serum pharmacokinetics of loracarbef (LY163892) in patients with chronic bronchial sepsis

Prolonged antibiotics for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children and adults

BACKGROUND

The vicious cycle hypothesis for bronchiectasis predicts that bacterial colonisation of the respiratory tract perpetuates inflammatory change. This damages the mucociliary escalator, preventing bacterial clearance and allowing persistence of pro-inflammatory mediators. Conventional treatment with physiotherapy and intermittent antibiotics is believed to improve the condition of people with bronchiectasis, although no conclusive data show that these interventions influence the natural history of the condition. Various strategies have been tried to interrupt this cycle of infection and inflammation, including prolonging antibiotic treatment with the goal of allowing the airway mucosa to heal.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits of prolonged antibiotic therapy in the treatment of patients with bronchiectasis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register and reference lists of identified articles. Searches were current as of February 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials examining the use of prolonged antibiotic therapy (for four or more weeks) in the treatment of bronchiectasis compared with placebo or usual care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors to ask for missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighteen trials met the inclusion criteria, randomly assigning a total of 1157 participants. Antibiotics were given for between four weeks and 83 weeks. Limited meta-analysis was possible because of the diversity of outcomes reported in these trials. Based on the number of participants with at least one exacerbation, the meta-analysis showed significant effects in favour of the intervention (odds ratio (OR) 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.52; P value < 0.00001), with events occurring in 271 per 1000 people in the intervention arm (95% CI 126 to 385) and in 546 per 1000 in the control population, based on evidence of moderate quality. A non-statistically significant reduction in hospitalisation favoured the use of prolonged antibiotics with a moderate quality grade of supporting evidence (37 per 1000 in the intervention arm (95% CI 13 to 96) and 87 per 1000 in control (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.11; P value = 0.08). Drug resistance developed in 36 of 220 participants taking antibiotics compared with 10 of 211 participants given placebo or standard therapy (OR 3.48, 95% CI 1.20 to 10.07; P value = 0.02), translating to natural frequencies of 155 per 1000 in the intervention arm (95% CI 59 to 346) and 50 per 1000 in the control arm. The intervention was well tolerated with no overall significant difference in withdrawal between treatment and placebo groups (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.49). Diarrhoea was commonly reported as an adverse event, particularly with an oral intervention.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence shows benefit associated with use of prolonged antibiotics in the treatment of patients with bronchiectasis, at least halving the odds of exacerbation (with 275 fewer exacerbations per every 1000 people treated in the antibiotic arm compared with the control arm) and hospitalisation (50 fewer hospitalisations per 1000 people in the antibiotic arm compared with the control arm). However, the risk of emerging drug resistance is increased more than threefold. This review is limited by diversity of trials and by evidence of moderate to low quality. Further randomised controlled trials with adequate power and standardised end points are required.

Delivering Antibacterials to the Lungs

An important determinant of clinical outcome of a lower respiratory tract infection may be sterilization of the infected lung, which is also dependent on sustained antibacterial concentrations achieved in the lung. For this reason, recently there has been increased interest in measuring the concentration of antimicrobial agents at different potential sites of infection in the lung. Levels of antibacterials are now measured in bronchial mucosa, epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar macrophages, as well as in sputum. Penicillins and cephalosporins reach only marginal concentrations in bronchial secretions, whereas fluoroquinolones and macrolides have been shown to achieve high concentrations. The extent of penetration of different antibacterials into the bronchial mucosa is relatively high. This is also true for beta-lactams, although their tissue concentrations never reach blood concentrations. Antibacterials penetrate less into the ELF than into the bronchial mucosa, but fluoroquinolones appear to concentrate more into alveolar lavage than into bronchial mucosa. Pulmonary pharmacokinetics is a very useful tool for describing how drugs behave in the human lung, but it does not promote an understanding of the pharmacological effects of a drug. More important, instead, is the correlation between pulmonary disposition of the drug and its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for the infectious agent. The addition of bacteriological characteristics to in vivo pharmacokinetic studies has triggered a 'pharmacodynamic approach'. Pharmacodynamic parameters integrate the microbiological activity and pharmacokinetics of an anti-infective drug by focusing on its biological effects, particularly growth inhibition and killing of pathogens. Drugs that penetrate well and remain for long periods at the pulmonary site of infection often induce therapeutic responses greater than expected on the basis of in vitro data. However, although the determination of antibacterial concentrations at the site of infection in the lung has been suggested to be important in predicting the therapeutic efficacy of antimicrobial treatment during bacterial infections of the lower respiratory tract, some studies have demonstrated that pulmonary bacterial clearance is correlated more closely to concentrations in the serum than to those in the lung homogenates, probably because they better reflect antibacterial concentration in the interstitial fluid.

The effect of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection on clinical parameters in steady-state bronchiectasis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection on clinical parameters in Chinese patients with noncystic fibrosis and steady-state bronchiectasis.

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional clinicomicrobiological study with informed consent.

SETTING

Consecutive outpatient recruitment from a specialist bronchiectasis respiratory clinic.

PATIENTS

Outpatients (n = 100; 62 women; 55.1+/-16.7 years old; FEV1/FVC 1.4+/-0.7/2.1+/-0.9 L), who had stable respiratory symptoms for more than 3 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Respiratory pathogens isolated from the sputum were: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (33), Haemophilus influenzae (10), Moraxella catarrhalis (2), other Gram-negative bacilli (5), Streptococcus pneumoniae (6), Staphylococcus aureus (5), mycobacteria (3), and yeast (1). Clinical parameters in patients with positive isolation of P aeruginosa were compared with those without the organism in the sputum culture (non-P aeruginosa). In the P aeruginosa group, the FEV1/FVC ratio and sputum volume were lower (p < 0.005) and higher (p < 0.0001), respectively, than those of the non-P aeruginosa group. The FEV1/FVC ratio (< 60%) and sputum volume (grading > 5) were independently associated with a positive sputum isolation of P aeruginosa with odds ratios of 3.1 (confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 8.4; p < 0.01) and 4.7 (CI 1.6 to 13.3; p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

P aeruginosa is the predominant respiratory pathogen isolated in the sputum of Chinese patients with steady-state bronchiectasis, and its isolation is associated with high sputum output (> or = 75th quartile) and moderately severe airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC < 60%).