Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and therapeutic drug monitoring of ceftazidime/avibactam administered by continuous infusion in patients with MDR Gram-negative bacterial infections

A descriptive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of ceftazidime-avibactam in a case series of critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance

To describe the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of a 2 h infusion of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) in critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC). A retrospective review of all critically ill patients with ARC who were treated with CAZ-AVI between August 2020 and May 2023 was conducted. Patients whose 12-h creatinine clearance prior to CAZ-AVI treatment and steady-state concentration (Css) of CAZ-AVI were both monitored were enrolled. The free fraction (fCss) of CAZ-AVI was calculated from Css. The joint PK/PD targets of CAZ-AVI were considered optimal when a Css/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio for CAZ ≥4 (equivalent to 100% fT > 4 MIC) and a Css/CT ratio of AVI >1 (equivalent to 100% fT > CT 4.0 mg/L) were reached simultaneously, quasioptimal when only one of the two targets was reached, and suboptimal when neither target was reached. The relationship between PK/PD goal achievement, microbial eradication and the clinical efficacy of CAZ-AVI was evaluated. Four patients were included. Only one patient achieved optimal joint PK/PD targets, while the other three reached suboptimal targets. The patient with optimal PK/PD targets achieved microbiological eradication, while the other three patients did not, but all four patients achieved good clinical efficacy. Standard dosages may not enable most critically ill patients with ARC to reach the optimal joint PK/PD targets of CAZ-AVI. Optimal drug dose adjustment of CAZ-AVI in ARC patients requires dynamic drug concentration monitoring.

Ceftazidime-avibactam induced renal disorders: past and present

With the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial pathogens worldwide, antimicrobial resistance has become a significant public health concern. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) exhibited excellent in vitro activity against many carbapenemase-producing pathogens, and was widely used for the treatment of various complicated infections. CAZ-AVI is well tolerated across all dosing regimens, and its associated acute kidney injury (AKI) in phase II/III clinical trials is rare. However, recent real-world studies have demonstrated that CAZ-AVI associated AKI was more frequent in real-world than in phase II and III clinical trials, particularly in patients receiving concomitant nephrotoxic agents, with critically ill patients being at a higher risk. Herein, we reviewed the safety data related to renal impairment of CAZ-AVI, and discussed its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets and dosage adjustment in patients with impaired renal function. This review aimed to emphasize the importance for healthcare professionals to be aware of this adverse event of CAZ-AVI and provide practical insights into the dosage optimization in critically ill patients with renal dysfunction.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of ceftazidime/avibactam: why one leg is not enough to run

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is becoming an increasingly recommended approach for assessing optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of ceftazidime/avibactam. Some authors hypothesized that the PK/PD target attainment of ceftazidime/avibactam could be assessed by means of the TDM of solely ceftazidime, since avibactam concentrations might be extrapolated based on the fixed 4:1 ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratio present in the vial. The reliability of this hypothesis could be called into question if a wide interindividual variability in the ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratio would exist among patients. This study aimed to assess the distribution of the individual ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratios in relation to renal function in a cohort of adult patients who were treated with continuous infusion ceftazidime/avibactam and underwent TDM of both ceftazidime and avibactam.

METHODS

Individual ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratio was calculated at each TDM assessment. Receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed for testing the potential impact of renal function on ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratio variability.

RESULTS

A total of 188 TDM assessments were collected from 107 patients. The ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratios ranged from 1.29:1 to 13.46:1. Seventy-seven out of 188 ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratios (41.0%) were >5:1, and 36 (19.1%) were >6:1. Patients without renal dysfunction had significantly higher proportions of ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratio >5:1 (59.3% versus 23.8%; P < 0.001) and >6:1 (32.1% versus 6.3%; P < 0.001) compared with those with mild-to-severe renal dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings may strengthen the contention that for properly assessing the PK/PD target attainment of ceftazidime/avibactam, both ceftazidime and avibactam concentrations should be measured, given the unpredictability of the ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratio occurring among patients.