Prolonged use of linezolid in bone and joint infections: a retrospective analysis of adverse effects

Tedizolid for osteoarticular infections: Evaluation of the published evidence

INTRODUCTION

Tedizolid phosphate, an oxazolidinone antibiotic, has been approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). However, its off-label use has been reported in various infections, including osteoarticular infections.

METHODS

A systematic review of data from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted to evaluate the antimicrobial activity, safety, and effectiveness of tedizolid in patients with bone and joint infections, including prosthetic joint infections, osteomyelitis, and septic arthritis. The review encompassed clinical trials, prospective and retrospective studies, and case reports.

RESULTS

A total of 6 in vitro antimicrobial and 15 clinical studies were included in the review. Tedizolid demonstrated high antimicrobial activity across all in vitro studies. In 106 patients from the included clinical studies, tedizolid showed high effectiveness, with therapy success ranging from 76.5 % to 100 % in 4 cohort studies. Additionally, favorable outcomes were reported in 7 of 9 case reports. Tedizolid exhibited a favorable safety profile, with 11 of 15 clinical studies reporting no adverse events in 37 patients. Adverse events leading to therapy discontinuation were observed in 9 out of 124 patients included in the remaining studies.

CONCLUSION

The current appraisal suggests that tedizolid is a promising antibiotic for the treatment of bone and joint infections. Nonetheless, its use should be reserved for multi-drug resistant infections when other approved therapeutic options are limited. Further clinical studies are warranted to substantiate the effectiveness and safety of tedizolid in this patient population.

Oral tetracyclines for bone and joint infections: what do we know?

Background and aim: Complex bone and joint infections (BJIs), including prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and infections associated with osteosynthetic materials, present significant treatment challenges that often require surgical intervention and prolonged antibiotic therapy. In France, the incidence of PJIs in knee and hip arthroplasties ranges from 0.79 % to 2.4 %, with staphylococci being the primary pathogens involved. Recent studies have suggested that oral antibiotic therapy may be as effective as intravenous therapy and that 12 weeks of antibiotic treatment are needed. Tetracyclines, particularly doxycycline and minocycline, are of interest because of their broad-spectrum activities, good oral bioavailability, and potential efficacy in treating BJIs. We aimed to provide a literature review on the role of oral tetracyclines in the management of BJIs. Method: We performed a systematic review of the literature identified via an electronic search of PubMed and ScienceDirect. Results: A total of 648 articles were screened, and 31 studies were included. Pharmacological studies demonstrated that the bone to blood penetration ratio ranged from 0.06 to 0.75. Less than 20 % of strains implicated in BJIs exhibited resistance to oral tetracyclines. Four studies demonstrated potential inhibition of strain growth. Eight studies that included 62 patients reported curative treatment, with a success rate ranging from 82 % to 100 % for PJIs regardless of the surgical management. For suppressive therapy, 10 studies that included 201 patients reported success rates ranging from 57 % to 100 %. The rate of adverse effects ranged from 0 % to 14 % for curative treatment and from 0 % to 57 % for suppressive treatment, leading to treatment discontinuation in less than 20 % of cases. Conclusion: This review highlights that the number of studies supporting the use of oral tetracyclines for the treatment of BJIs is limited. More robust pharmacological and clinical studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy profiles of oral tetracyclines for the treatment of BJIs.

Bedaquiline and linezolid regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) remains a global public health challenge, complicating treatment strategies and requiring advanced therapeutic approaches. The persistence of MDR-TB has led to a demand for regimens that are more effective in improving treatment outcomes and controlling transmission. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to examine the efficacy of linezolid (LZD) and bedaquiline (BDQ) in MDR-TB treatment regimens, evaluating their roles in enhancing therapeutic success and informing optimized management of MDR-TB.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted across MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of LZD and BDQ in MDR-TB patients up to September 14, 2024. We analyzed treatment outcomes, reporting favorable outcomes (cured and treatment completed) and unfavorable outcomes (death, treatment failure, and loss to follow-up) with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 11 trials, with a total of 1,999 participants. The findings indicate that BDQ+LZD-containing regimens yield significantly higher favorable treatment outcomes (84.5%; 95% CI, 79.8%-88.2%) and lower unfavorable outcomes (15.4%; 95% CI, 11.6%-20.2%). In contrast, regimens lacking either LZD or BDQ show lower efficacy, with favorable outcomes at 66.8% (95% CI, 59.5%-73.4%) and unfavorable outcomes at 33.0% (95% CI, 25.6%-41.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

MDR-TB treatment regimens including BDQ and LZD lead to significantly better patient outcomes. The combined bactericidal and protein synthesis-inhibiting effects of BDQ and LZD create a powerful therapeutic synergy. Adding pretomanid further enhances this effectiveness, highlighting its value in complex cases. Future research should focus on optimizing these regimens for safety and efficacy and explore adjunctive therapies to improve MDR-TB outcomes even further.

Comparison of the results of medical approach and surgical approach of septic arthritis in native joints: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The consequences of septic arthritis of natural joints may be devastating. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional results of medical approach and surgical approach for septic arthritis of native joints, and to explore whether the number of drainage tubes after arthroscopic surgery will affect the knee function of patients.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with septic arthritis from January 2018 to January 2023. According to the improvement of clinical symptoms and daily activity ability of the joints, functional results of patients were divided into Complete recovery, Basic recovery, Minor recovery and No recovery. The main results are the joint function after medical and surgical approaches. The secondary outcome was knee function with different number of drainage tubes after arthroscopic surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors related to joint function. In addition, the types of bacteria were analyzed to explore whether they were related to the initial surgical failure rate.

RESULTS

Among the 77 patients with septic arthritis, 27 patients were treated with medical approach, and 50 patients were treated with surgical approach (knee arthroscopy + synovectomy). There was no significant difference in the results of joint function at discharge and 6 months after discharge. There was no significant difference in the number of drainage tubes after knee arthroscopy on the recovery of knee joint function. There were no risk factors independently associated with joint function outcomes in this study. In the cases of initial surgical failure, the treatment failure rate was 13.0% in the multidrug-sensitive bacteria group, 100% in the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus group, and 58.3% in the other multidrug-resistant bacteria group (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that medical methods may be as effective as surgical methods for functional recovery in patients with septic arthritis. The number of drainage tubes after knee arthroscopy had no significant effect on the recovery of knee joint function. Maybe the type of bacteria (gram negative or more aggressive ones) can play a role in the choice of treatment strategy. Further prospective studies with better methodology are needed.

Oral antimicrobial options for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus isolates in urine culture

Objectives

The present study aimed to investigate the susceptibility profiles of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus isolates in urine culture to create an antibiogram to guide selection of oral antimicrobials in British Columbia (BC), Canada.

Methods

An audit was conducted on all urine cultures reported from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023, in LifeLabs BC microbiology laboratories. Enterococcus species in urine were routinely tested with ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, tetracycline, and vancomycin. Linezolid and fosfomycin were tested in selected cases.

Results

Three hundred and thirty-five vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, 47 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, 48 Enterococcus gallinarum, 25 Enterococcus casseliflavus, and no Enterococcus flavescens isolates were reported in urine culture. Vancomycin-resistant E. faecium isolates were >90% susceptible to linezolid, but <15% susceptible to ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and tetracycline. Vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis isolates were >90% susceptible to ampicillin, linezolid, and nitrofurantoin, but <10% susceptible to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline. E. casseliflavus isolates were >90% susceptible to ampicillin, nitrofurantoin, and tetracycline. E. gallinarum isolates were >90% susceptible to ampicillin and nitrofurantoin. In the seven and 263 selected cases of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium and E. faecalis, respectively, fosfomycin susceptibility rates were 57% and 86%, respectively.

Conclusions

Ampicillin and nitrofurantoin may be considered for urinary tract infections secondary to vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis, E. casseliflavus, and E. gallinarum. Tetracycline may also be considered for E. casseliflavus. Linezolid remained to be the only reliable oral antimicrobial for vancomycin-resistant E. faecium.

Severe Optic Neuropathy Induced by Very Prolonged Tedizolid as Suppressive Therapy: Description of a Case Report and Implication for Better Assessment

The long-term tolerability of linezolid is low because of mitochondrial toxicity, whereas tedizolid may represent a better option for suppressive therapy. We report a first presumed case of tedizolid-associated optic neuropathy after a very prolonged (18-month) intake and believe that screening for optic neuropathy should be considered for patients undergoing tedizolid suppression.

Modern Microbiological Methods to Detect Biofilm Formation in Orthopedy and Suggestions for Antibiotic Therapy, with Particular Emphasis on Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI)

Biofilm formation is a serious problem that relatively often causes complications in orthopedic surgery. Biofilm-forming pathogens invade implanted foreign bodies and surrounding tissues. Such a condition, if not limited at the appropriate time, often requires reoperation. This can be partially prevented by selecting an appropriate prosthesis material that prevents the development of biofilm. There are many modern techniques available to detect the formed biofilm. By applying them we can identify and visualize biofilm-forming microorganisms. The most common etiological factors associated with biofilms in orthopedics are: Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS), and Enterococcus spp., whereas Gram-negative bacilli and Candida spp. also deserve attention. It seems crucial, for therapeutic success, to eradicate the microorganisms able to form biofilm after the implantation of endoprostheses. Planning the effective targeted antimicrobial treatment of postoperative infections requires accurate identification of the microorganism responsible for the complications of the procedure. The modern microbiological testing techniques described in this article show the diagnostic options that can be followed to enable the implementation of effective treatment.

Repurposing of anti-malarial drugs for the treatment of tuberculosis: realistic strategy or fanciful dead end?

BACKGROUND

Drug repurposing offers a strategic alternative to the development of novel compounds, leveraging the known safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of medications, such as linezolid and levofloxacin for tuberculosis (TB). Anti-malarial drugs, including quinolones and artemisinins, are already applied to other diseases and infections and could be promising for TB treatment.

METHODS

This review included studies on the activity of anti-malarial drugs, specifically quinolones and artemisinins, against Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC), summarizing results from in vitro, in vivo (animal models) studies, and clinical trials. Studies on drugs not primarily developed for TB (doxycycline, sulfonamides) and any novel developed compounds were excluded. Analysis focused on in vitro activity (minimal inhibitory concentrations), synergistic effects, pre-clinical activity, and clinical trials.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies, including one ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial, were analysed: primarily investigating quinolones like mefloquine and chloroquine, and, to a lesser extent, artemisinins. In vitro findings revealed high MIC values for anti-malarials versus standard TB drugs, suggesting a limited activity. Synergistic effects with anti-TB drugs were modest, with some synergy observed in combinations with isoniazid or pyrazinamide. In vivo animal studies showed limited activity of anti-malarials against MTC, except for one study of the combination of chloroquine with isoniazid.

CONCLUSIONS

The repurposing of anti-malarials for TB treatment is limited by high MIC values, poor synergy, and minimal in vivo effects. Concerns about potential toxicity at effective dosages and the risk of antimicrobial resistance, especially where TB and malaria overlap, further question their repurposing. These findings suggest that focusing on novel compounds might be both more beneficial and rewarding.

Adverse drug events associated with linezolid administration: a real-world pharmacovigilance study from 2004 to 2023 using the FAERS database

Introduction: Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic that is active against drug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria and multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Real-world studies on the safety of linezolid in large populations are lacking. This study aimed to determine the adverse events associated with linezolid in real-world settings by analyzing data from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: We retrospectively extracted reports on adverse drug events (ADEs) from the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2004 to that of 2023. By using disproportionality analysis including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), along with the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), we evaluated whether there was a significant association between linezolid and ADE. The time to onset of ADE was further analyzed in the general population and within each age, weight, reporting population, and weight subgroups. Results: A total of 11,176 reports of linezolid as the "primary suspected" drug and 263 significant adverse events of linezolid were identified, including some common adverse events such as thrombocytopenia (n = 1,139, ROR 21.98), anaemia (n = 704, ROR 7.39), and unexpected signals that were not listed on the drug label such as rhabdomyolysis (n = 90, ROR 4.33), and electrocardiogram QT prolonged (n = 73, ROR 4.07). Linezolid-induced adverse reactions involved 27 System Organ Class (SOC). Gender differences existed in ADE signals related to linezolid. The median onset time of all ADEs was 6 days, and most ADEs (n = 3,778) occurred within the first month of linezolid use but some may continue to occur even after a year of treatment (n = 46). Conclusion: This study reports the time to onset of adverse effects in detail at the levels of SOC and specific preferred term (PT). The results of our study provide valuable insights for optimizing the use of linezolid and reducing potential side effects, expected to facilitate the safe use of linezolid in clinical settings.