Interindividual variability of once-daily ritonavir boosted saquinavir pharmacokinetics in Thai and UK patients

Low-dose versus standard-dose ritonavir-boosted atazanavir in virologically suppressed Thai adults with HIV (LASA): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Thai patients with HIV have higher exposure to HIV protease inhibitors than do white people and dose reduction might be possible. We compared the efficacy of low-dose with standard-dose ritonavir-boosted atazanavir in virologically suppressed Thai patients with HIV.

METHODS

In this randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older who were receiving ritonavir-boosted protease-inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) with HIV plasma viral loads of less than 50 copies per mL, an alanine aminotransferase concentration of less than 200 IU/L, and a creatinine clearance of at least 60 mL/min from 14 hospitals in Thailand. We excluded patients who had active AIDS-defining disease or opportunistic infections, had a history of an HIV viral load of 1000 copies per mL or more after 24 weeks of any ritonavir-boosted protease-inhibitor-based ART, used concomitant medications that could interact with the study drugs, were pregnant or lactating, had illnesses that might change the effect of the study drugs, or had a history of sensitivity to the study drugs. A biostatistician at the study coordinating centre randomly allocated patients (1:1) to switch the protease inhibitor for oral atazanavir 200 mg and ritonavir 100 mg or for atazanavir 300 mg and ritonavir 100 mg once daily, both with two nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors at recommended doses. Randomisation was done with a minimisation schedule, stratified by recruiting centre, use of tenofovir, and use of indinavir as a component of the preswitch regimen. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with viral loads of less than 200 copies per mL at week 48, and we followed up patients every 12 weeks. Treatments were open label, the non-inferiority margin was -10%, and all patients who received at least one dose of study medication were analysed. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01159223.

FINDINGS

Between July 6, 2011, and Dec 23, 2013, we randomly assigned 559 patients: 279 to receive atazanavir 200 mg and ritonavir 100 mg (low dose) and 280 to atazanavir 300 mg and ritonavir 100 mg (standard dose). At week 48, 265 (97·1%) of 273 in the low-dose group and 267 (96·4%) of 277 in the standard-dose group had viral loads of less than 200 copies per mL (difference 0·68; 95% CI -2·29 to 3·65). Seven (3%) of 273 in the low-dose group and 21 (8%) of 277 in the standard-dose group discontinued their assigned treatment (p=0·01). 46 (17%) of 273 participants in the low-dose group and 97 (35%) of 277 in the standard-dose group had total bilirubin grade 3 or higher toxicity (≥3·12 mg/dL; p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

A switch to low-dose atazanavir should be recommended for Thai patients with well controlled HIV viraemia while on regimens based on boosted protease inhibitors.

FUNDING

The National Health Security Office and Kirby Institute for Infection and Immunity in Society.

Pharmacokinetics of atazanavir/ritonavir among HIV-infected Thai children concomitantly taking tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

BACKGROUND

Atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) is a recommended once-daily protease inhibitor. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) can reduce ATV exposure. The authors studied ATV pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters among children who received atazanavir/ritonavir co-administered with TDF.

METHODS

HIV-infected children aged 6-18 years with a body weight of 25-50 kg were eligible. Branded ATV 200 mg/capsule was taken with generic ritonavir 100 mg/tablet once daily plus TDF and lamivudine. A 24-hour PK study was performed at week 4 at t = 0 (pre-dose), 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours. PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods with WinNonlin software. Targeted ATV AUC 0-24 was 15 mg h/L and C trough was 0.15 mg/L. Comparisons of geometric means of ATV PK parameters between different weight bands were made using regression models.

RESULTS

Eighteen HIV-infected children with a median (IQR) age of 13 (11-14) years were enrolled. Median (range) body weight and body surface area were 35 (25-42) kg and 1.21 (0.96-1.35) m2, respectively. Median (IQR) CD4 cell count was 735 (540-1233) cells/mm3. Median (range) of ATV was 164 (145-209) mg/m2. Geometric mean (SD) ATV AUC 0-24 was 35.05 (1.06) mg h/L, and ATV C trough was 0.31 (1.13) mg/L. No child had ATV AUC 0-24 or C trough below target levels. There were no significant differences in PK parameters among weight bands.

CONCLUSION

Atazanavir/ritonavir 200/100 mg dosing provided adequate ATV AUC 0-24 when used with TDF in HIV-infected Thai children weighing between 25 and 50 kg.

HIV and noncommunicable diseases: the Asian perspective

Asia is seeing a rise in noncommunicable diseases in their general population and among people living with HIV. Many Asians have low body weight, which can lead to higher plasma concentrations of antiretrovirals and, as a result, their toxicities. Examples are metabolic complications from protease inhibitors, chronic kidney disease from tenofovir, and hepatotoxicity from nevirapine. Asia has not only the highest burden of hepatitis B viral infection than any other continent but also a predominance of genotypes B and C, the latter associated with higher risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders are equally common among Asians as other populations. Diastolic dysfunction and asymptomatic myocardial ischemia are not infrequent. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is the most common AIDS-related cancer, whereas Kaposi sarcoma is relatively infrequent. Emerging data show high prevalence of human papillomavirus-associated anal dysplasia in men who have sex with men. Resource-limited countries in Asia suffer from lack of resources for national screening programs of noncommunicable diseases, which, in turn, limits the epidemiologic data that exist to guide the use of national health resources.

Pharmacokinetics of and short-term virologic response to low-dose 400-milligram once-daily raltegravir maintenance therapy

Because studies showed similar viral suppression with lower raltegravir doses and because Asians usually have high antiretroviral concentrations, we explored low-dose raltegravir therapy in Thais. Nineteen adults on raltegravir at 400 mg twice daily (BID) with HIV RNA loads of <50 copies/ml were randomized to receive 400 mg once daily (QD) or 800 mg QD for 2 weeks, followed by the other dosing for 2 weeks. Intensive pharmacokinetic analyses were performed, and HIV RNA was monitored. Two patients were excluded from the 400-mg QD analysis due to inevaluable pharmacokinetic data. The mean patient weight was 58 kg. Mean pharmacokinetic values were as follows: for raltegravir given at 400 mg BID, the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC₀₋₁₂) was 15.6 mg/liter-h and the minimum plasma drug concentration (C(trough)) was 0.22 mg/liter; for raltegravir given at 800 mg QD, the AUC₀₋₂₄ was 33.6 mg/liter-h and the C(trough) was 0.06 mg/liter; and for raltegravir given at 400 mg QD, the AUC₀₋₂₄ was 18.6 mg/liter-h and the C(trough) was 0.08 mg/liter. The HIV RNA load was <50 copies/ml at each dose level. Compared to the adjusted AUC₀₋₂₄ for Westerners on raltegravir at 400 mg BID, Thais on the same dose had double the AUC₀₋₂₄ and those on raltegravir at 400 mg QD had a similar AUC₀₋₂₄. More patients had a C(trough) of <0.021 mg/liter on raltegravir at 400 mg QD (9/17 patients) than on raltegravir at 800 mg QD (1/19 patients) or 400 mg BID (0/19 patients). Seventeen patients used raltegravir at 400 mg QD for a median of 35 weeks; two had confirmed HIV RNA loads between 50 and 200 copies/ml, and both had low C(trough) values. Low-dose raltegravir could be a cost-saving option for maintenance therapy in Asians or persons with low body weight. However, raltegravir at 400 mg QD was associated with a low C(trough) and with a risk for HIV viremia. Raltegravir at 200 or 300 mg BID should be studied, but new raltegravir formulations will be needed.

The rainbow cohort: 96 week follow-up of saquinavir-containing regimens in previously antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive and pre-treated but protease inhibitor (PI)-naive HIV-infected patients

Objective

We have previously reported data from the German cohort of the multinational observational prospective RAINBOW survey which assessed the tolerability and efficacy of ritonavir-boosted saquinavir (SQV/r)-containing regimens over 48 weeks in routine clinical practice. This analysis presents data from antiretroviral (ART)-naïve and pretreated but protease inhibitor (PI)-naïve patients treated in a long-term one line (96 weeks) follow-up of the initial study.

Methods

All ART-and PI-naïve patients from the initial RAINBOW cohort who had recorded data to one line 96 weeks of treatment were eligible for inclusion in the current analysis. Efficacy assessments included the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 and < 400 copies/mL and changes in CD4 cell count from baseline to week 96. Tolerability assessments included changes in liver enzymes and lipid levels from baseline to week 96. For evaluation of efficacy, intent-to-treat analysis, in which missing values were recorded as failure (ITT), and last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) analysis were used. Metabolic parameters were assessed using LOCF analysis.

Results

The analysis included 175 ART-naïve and 109 pretreated but PI-naïve patients. After 96 weeks, a similar proportion of patients in the ART-naïve and in the pretreated but Pi-naïve group had HIV-1 RNA levels < 400 copies/mL (68.0% and 70.6% [ITT], respectively; 96.6% and 90.8% [LOCF], respectively). The proportion of patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL was higher in the ART-naïve group compared with the pretreated but PI-naïve group (61.1% and 56.9% [ITT], respectively; 84.0% and 75.2% [LOCF], respectively). Median change in CD4 cell count from baseline to week 96 was'+263 cells/mm³ (IQR 170; 384. LOCF; p < 0.0001) in the ART-naïve group, and one line +181 cells/mm³ (IQR 60; 309. LOCF; p < 0.0001) in the pretreated but PI-naïve group. Treatment was well tolerated, with only 2.5% of patients withdrawing from treatment due to side effects. There were no clinically relevant changes in liver enzyme levels. Overall total cholesterol, triglyceride, and low-and high-density lipoprotein levels increased to week 96, although levels remained within normal ranges in the majority of ART-naïve and pretreated patients.

Conclusions

This follow-up analysis confirms the long term efficacy and tolerability of SQV/r in ART-naïve and pretreated but PI-naïve patients in the real-life clinical setting.

Immunomodulation in female B₆C₃F₁ mice following treatment with the HIV protease inhibitor saquinavir for 28 days by gavage

Saquinavir (SQV) is a protease inhibitor that binds to the protease active site of the human immunodeficiency virus and prevents the cleavage of viral polyproteins resulting in the formation of non-infectious virus particles. The purpose of these studies was to determine the potential effects of SQV on the immune system in female B₆C₃F₁ mice. SQV was administered by gavage twice daily for 28 days at total doses of 300, 600, and 1200 mg/kg/day. No significant differences were observed in body weight, or the weights of spleen, thymus, liver, kidneys, or lungs. Exposure to SQV produced no biologically meaningful changes in hematological parameters. However, a statistically significant increase in the number of T-cells (23%) was observed at the high dose level of SQV. The number of splenic immature T-cells (CD4+CD8+ cells) also showed increases of 46% and 92% at the 600 and 1200 mg/kg dose levels, respectively. The immunoglobulin M antibody-forming cell (AFC) response was significantly increased by 41% when the data were expressed as AFC/10⁶ spleen cells at the 1200 mg/kg dose level. Treatment with SQV had no effects on the mixed leukocyte response. Overall, the activities of natural killer cells and cytotoxic T-cells were not altered in SQV-treated animals when compared to vehicle controls. In addition, exposure to SQV did not affect host resistance in the B16F10 melanoma model. In conclusion, SQV produced an enhancement of the humoral immune response, possibly through modulating T-cell function in female B₆C₃F₁ mice.

Safety and efficacy of a saquinavir-containing antiretroviral regimen in previously ART-naïve or pretreated but protease inhibitor-naïve HIV-positive patients

BACKGROUND

The RAINBOW survey is a multinational observational study assessing the tolerability and efficacy of ritonavir-boosted saquinavir (SQV/r), using the 500-mg film-coated SQV formulation, in routine clinical practice. This analysis presents data from the German subgroup of antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve and pretreated but protease inhibitor (PI)-naïve patients.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, 48-week observational cohort study. Tolerability assessments included changes in liver enzymes and lipid levels from baseline to week 48. Efficacy assessments included changes in the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 and <400 copies/ml, and changes in CD4 cell count from baseline to week 48.

RESULTS

The analysis included 275 ART-naïve and 179 pretreated but PI-naïve patients. The proportion of ART-naïve patients achieving <50 copies/ml by 48 weeks was 53.1% by intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis and 67.3% using last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis. In pretreated but PI-naïve patients, the proportions achieving <50 copies/ml by 48 weeks were 53.1% (ITT) and 70.4% (LOCF). The median increase in CD4 count at week 48 was +174 cells/mm3 (interquartile range [IQR] 86, 265) in the ART-naïve group and +100 cells/mm3 (IQR 0, 209) in the pretreated but PI-naïve group (p < 0.01 for both; LOCF). Drug-related adverse events were reported in 7.6% of ART-naïve and 2.8% of pretreated but PI-naïve patients. Treatment with SQV/r was stopped in 21.5% of ART-naïve and 17.9% of pretreated but PI-naïve patients (due to side effects in 3.3% and 2.8%, respectively). There were no clinically relevant changes in liver enzyme levels. Overall, the total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein levels increased to week 48, although the levels remained within normal ranges in the majority of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this observational cohort study of treatment with the 500-mg tablet formulation of SQV are consistent with high efficacy and tolerability results seen in controlled studies of SQV/r. This analysis confirms that SQV/r is effective and well tolerated in ART-naïve and pretreated but PI-naïve patients in 'real-world' clinical settings.

Plasma concentrations of generic lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV type-1-infected individuals

BACKGROUND

Generic drugs can contribute to access to treatment for HIV-infected patients. However quality and safety remains an issue of concern. Therefore, we evaluated minimal plasma concentrations and short-term safety of a generic lopinavir/ritonavir 200/50 mg tablet formulation.

METHODS

In a single-centre prospective pilot study, patients receiving protease-inhibitor-based antiretroviral treatment were switched to a generic lopinavir/ritonavir tablet at the standard dose (400/100 mg twice daily). Minimum drug concentrations (C(min)) of lopinavir and ritonavir were performed before switching (in 16 patients who were on Kaletra((R)) soft-gel capsules) and after 4 weeks (in all patients). Plasma levels of lopinavir and ritonavir were determined by a validated HPLC method. Either the Wilcoxon signed-rank or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients (18 females) were included in the study. Two stopped their study medications prematurely because of intolerance. The median (interquartile range) lopinavir C(min) was 7.2 mg/l (5.8-8.3) and no patients had subtherapeutic levels <1.0 mg/l. No significant difference of lopinavir C(min) levels was found between Kaletra((R)), and the generic product (P=0.224). By contrast, the C(min) of generic ritonavir was higher (P=0.012). Food did not affect the drug levels. Mild gastrointestinal complaints were reported in 12 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The generic lopinavir/ritonavir tablet showed C(min) plasma concentrations similar to what is described for the branded product, with good stability, independent of food intake. These data support the efforts in scaling up access to generic second-line treatment in middle- and low-income countries.

Reducing the boosting dose of ritonavir does not affect saquinavir plasma concentrations in HIV-1-infected individuals

Currently, the optimal boosting dose for saquinavir is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics profiles in a cross over setting comparing saquinavir/ritonavir 1500/50 mg (plus NRTI backbone) to saquinavir/ritonavir 1500/100 mg in the same HIV-infected, Thai individuals. The 50% reduction of ritonavir boosting did not result in a change in the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir, whereas the ritonavir exposure was significantly lower when a dose of 50 mg was administered.

Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor pharmacokinetics in a large unselected cohort of HIV-infected women

BACKGROUND

Small intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of medications in early-phase trials cannot identify the range of factors that influence drug exposure in heterogenous populations. We performed PK studies in large numbers of HIV-infected women on nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) under conditions of actual use to assess patient characteristics that influence exposure and evaluated the relationship between exposure and response.

METHODS

Two hundred twenty-five women on NNRTI-based antiretroviral regimens from the Women's Interagency HIV Study were enrolled into 12-hour or 24-hour PK studies. Extensive demographic, laboratory, and medication covariate data were collected before and during the visit to be used in multivariate models. Total NNRTI drug exposure was estimated by area under the concentration-time curves.

RESULTS

Hepatic inflammation and renal insufficiency were independently associated with increased nevirapine exposure in multivariate analysis: crack cocaine, high fat diets, and amenorrhea were associated with decreased levels (n = 106). Higher efavirenz exposure was seen with increased transaminase, albumin levels, and orange juice consumption; tenofovir use, increased weight, being African American, and amenorrhea were associated with decreased exposure (n = 119). With every 10-fold increase in nevirapine or efavirenz exposure, participants were 3.3 and 3.6 times likely to exhibit virologic suppression, respectively. Patients with higher drug exposure were also more likely to report side effects on therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identifies and quantitates previously unrecognized factors modifying NNRTI exposure in the "real-world" setting. Comprehensive PK studies in representative populations are feasible and may ultimately lead to dose optimization strategies in patients at risk for failure or adverse events.

Saquinavir exposure in HIV-infected patients with chronic viral hepatitis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus co-infection and the extent of liver fibrosis on saquinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected subjects without liver function impairment.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, comparative study enrolling HIV-infected adults receiving saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg twice daily or 1500/100 mg once daily was conducted. Patients with chronic viral hepatitis (HEP+) were grouped as having advanced liver fibrosis (HEP+/FIB+) or not (HEP+/FIB-) based on the FIB-4 index. Saquinavir and ritonavir trough concentrations (C(trough)) in plasma were determined by HPLC. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) was used to compare saquinavir and ritonavir C(trough) between HEP- and HEP+ patients, and the influence of the extent of liver fibrosis on saquinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics was explored using analysis of variance.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-eight patients on twice-daily saquinavir/ritonavir (67 HEP-, 71 HEP+) and 36 patients on once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir (12 HEP-, 24 HEP+) were included. Saquinavir C(trough) was comparable between HEP- and HEP+ patients receiving either saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg twice daily [GMR 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-1.37; P = 0.655] or 1500/100 mg once daily (GMR 0.88, 95% CI 0.39-1.97; P = 0.752). Similarly, ritonavir C(trough) was also comparable between HEP- and HEP+ patients. The extent of liver fibrosis was not significantly related to saquinavir or ritonavir C(trough) in patients receiving either of the two studied doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Saquinavir C(trough) was not increased in HIV-infected patients with chronic viral hepatitis in the absence of liver function impairment. These results confirm that no specific dose modification of saquinavir/ritonavir should be recommended in this setting.

Safety and efficacy of a double-boosted protease inhibitor combination, saquinavir and lopinavir/ ritonavir, in pretreated children at 96 weeks

Background

This study aimed to assess the long-term efficacy, safety and use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of a double-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) combination, saquinavir (SQV) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), in Thai HIV type-1 (HIV-1)-infected children who had failed on reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Methods

In total, 50 children from two sites in Thailand were treated with standard dosing of SQV and LPV/r. CD4+ T-cell count and percentage, viral load (VL; HIV-1 RNA), minimum plasma drug concentrations (Cmin) and drug safety laboratory evaluations were monitored. Virological failure was defined as having two consecutive VL measures >400 copies/ml after week 12. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

Results

Baseline data were a median age of 9.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 7.1–11.2), VL 4.8 log10 copies/ ml (IQR 4.5–5.1) and CD4+ T-cell percentage 7% (IQR 3.0– 9.5). CDC classifications were N=4%, A=14%, B=68% and C=14% of participants. Median CD4+ T-cell percentage and CD4+ T-cell count increase were 14% (IQR 7–19) and 558 cells/mm3 (IQR 308–782), respectively (both P<0.001). Overall, 37 (74%) children achieved VL<50 copies/ml with significant differences between sites (90% versus 63%). Over 96 weeks, 10 patients had virological failure. Total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein increased significantly over time, whereas the triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein did not. Approximately 50% of participants reported no change in body shape, and 33%, 43% and 39% reported fatter arms, face and abdomen, respectively. LPV and SQV Cmin were high and stable over time.

Conclusions

Double-boosted SQV+LPV/r was an effective and safe alternative for a second-line regimen in children. Hypercholesterolaemia needs close follow-up. On the basis of the TDM results, PI dose reduction in this population should be considered.

Population pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted saquinavir regimens in HIV-infected individuals

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic model in order to describe ritonavir-boosted saquinavir concentrations dosed twice and once daily in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients from the UK, Uganda and Thailand and to identify factors that may influence saquinavir pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic data from 10 clinical studies were combined. Non-linear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM version V) was applied to determine the saquinavir pharmacokinetic parameters, interindividual/interoccasion variability (IIV/IOV) and residual error. Various covariates potentially related to saquinavir pharmacokinetics were explored, and the final model was validated by means of 95% prediction interval and testing the predictive performance of the model with data not included in the model-building process.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients were included from the UK (n = 52), Uganda (n = 18) and Thailand (n = 27), contributing 347 saquinavir profiles (1-14 profiles per patient). A one-compartment model with zero-order absorption and lag-time best described the data with IIV/IOV on apparent oral clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F) and with IIV on duration and absorption lag-time. The ritonavir area under the curve over the dosing interval was significantly associated with saquinavir CL/F and V/F. A typical patient from the UK had approximately 1.5- and 3-fold higher saquinavir CL/F compared with patients from Uganda (89.0 versus 49.8 L/h) and Thailand (89.0 versus 26.7 L/h), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A model to characterize ritonavir-boosted saquinavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected adults has been developed and validated. The model could be used for dosage adaptation following therapeutic drug monitoring and to assess patients' suitability for once-daily boosted saquinavir therapy.

Double boosted protease inhibitors, saquinavir, and lopinavir/ritonavir, in nucleoside pretreated children at 48 weeks

OBJECTIVES

To assess the 48-week efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and resistance of double boosted protease inhibitors (PI), saquinavir (SQV), and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), in children who have failed nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitors /non-nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitors-based regimens.

METHODS

Fifty children at 2 sites in Thailand were treated with standard dosing of SQV and LPV/r. CD4, HIV-RNA viral load (VL), plasma drug concentrations and safety laboratory evaluations were monitored. Virologic failure was defined as having 2 consecutive VL >400 copies/mL after week 12 of therapy. Intention to treat analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Baseline data were a median age of 9.3 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.1-11.2), Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification N:A:B:C 4%:14%:68%:14%, VL 4.8 log10 (IQR: 4.5-5.1), CD4 7% (IQR: 3-9.5). At 48 weeks, 3 had died of bacterial infection but no cases had progressed CDC classification. Median CD4% rise was 9 (IQR: 5-16) and median HIV RNA reduction was -2.8 log10 (IQR: -3.2 to -1.4), both P < 0.001. Thirty-nine (78%) and 32 (64%) children had VL <400 and <50 with significant differences between the 2 sites. Five children (10%) had VL failure as a result of poor adherence to the drug regimen but no one had major PI mutations. Median serum cholesterol and triglyceride increased significantly (+35 mg/dL, +37 mg/dL, respectively, both P < 0.001). Mean minimum plasma concentrations (Cmin) of LPV and SQV were 4.6 and 1.24 mg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Double boosted SQV/LPV/r resulted in significant CD4 rise and VL decline at 48 weeks. Hyperlipidemia was common. Cmin of both PIs exceeded therapeutic concentrations. Poor adherence caused failure in 10%. No major PI mutations were found.

Pharmacokinetic analysis to assess forgiveness of boosted saquinavir regimens for missed or late dosing

OBJECTIVES

One potential concern of once-daily protease inhibitor administration is low trough concentrations and ultimately the 'forgiveness' or robustness in comparison with the originally licensed twice-daily dose. To give an estimation of 'forgiveness', we determined the length of time plasma drug concentrations were below target in HIV-infected patients receiving saquinavir/ritonavir regimens.

METHODS

Seventy-seven pharmacokinetic profiles (saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg twice daily, n = 34; 1600/100 mg once daily, n = 26; 2000/100 mg once daily, n = 17) from five studies were combined, presented as twice- and once-daily percentiles (P10-P90) and compared. At percentiles where trough concentrations fell below the alleged minimum effective concentration (MEC; 100 ng/mL), the length of time below MEC was determined.

RESULTS

Saquinavir concentrations were below MEC at P10 for 0.7 h for twice-daily saquinavir/ritonavir when compared with 8.6 and 6.6 h for 1600/100 and 2000/100 mg once daily, respectively. At P25, 1600/100 mg once daily produced suboptimal concentrations for 5.5 h in contrast to 0.5 h for 2000/100 mg once daily.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we provide substantive data that indicate once-daily saquinavir, in particular 1600/100 mg, is not as robust as the twice-daily regimen based on a population of UK patients; this raises concern over late or missed doses. However, pharmacokinetic data can only ever be a guide to the impact on long-term efficacy.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Therapy with Once-Daily Saquinavir/Ritonavir

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of first-line treatment with once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs).

Methods

A total of 272 antiretroviral-naive patients with a CD4+ T-cell count of 200–350 cells/mm3 were treated with two NRTIs and saquinavir/ritonavir 1,600/100 mg per day for ≥24 weeks. Patients were followed up every 12 weeks for CD4+ T-cell counts, HIV RNA levels, clinical and laboratory toxicities. Intention-to-treat analyses were used for the first 24 weeks of treatment and as-treated analysis after week 24.

Results

The median baseline CD4+ T-cell count was 269 cells/mm3 and HIV RNA was 4.7 log10 copies/ml. At a median follow-up time of 56 (interquartile range [IQR] 25–113) weeks, 262/272 (96.3%) had HIV RNA <400 copies/ml, with a median HIV RNA decline of -2.89 (IQR 3.31–2.37) log10 copies/ml ( P<0.001) and a median rise in CD4+ T-cell count of 192 (IQR 117–317) cells ( P<0.001). At weeks 24, 48, 72 and 96, 249/272 (91.5%), 157/164 (95.7%), 113/126 (89.7%) and 84/90 (93.3%) had HIV RNA <400 copies/ml, respectively; at the same time points, 83.8%, 92.7%, 85.7% and 85.6% had HIV RNA <50 copies/ml. Drug-related adverse events were reported in 6.3%. Significant rises in total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein were seen.

Conclusion

First-line highly active antiretroviral therapy with once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir plus two NRTIs showed strong antiviral efficacy.

Interindividual variability in the effect of atazanavir and saquinavir on the expression of lymphocyte P-glycoprotein

OBJECTIVES

ABCB1 encodes the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp), which regulates the intracellular concentration of many xenobiotics, including several HIV protease inhibitors (PIs). Exposure to some xenobiotics, such as the antibiotic rifampicin, increases P-gp expression. In the present study, we investigated the effect of the HIV PIs saquinavir and atazanavir on the expression and function of ABCB1 and P-gp in primary and cultured lymphocytes, as well as the molecular interactions between these drugs and P-gp. ABCB1 and P-gp expression and function were examined in lymphocyte samples from healthy subjects before and after atazanavir-boosted saquinavir treatment. Expression and function were also studied in CEM cells following exposure to atazanavir and saquinavir. The inhibitory effects of these drugs were investigated in ABCB1-transfected HEK293T cells.

METHODS

P-gp expression and function were measured by flow cytometry. ABCB1 mRNA expression was evaluated using quantitative RT-PCR.

RESULTS

There were no overall changes in ABCB1 or P-gp expression or function after saquinavir-atazanavir treatment in primary lymphocyte samples. However, there was considerable interindividual variability in baseline lymphocyte ABCB1 expression, as well as in the degree of change in ABCB1 expression after saquinavir-atazanavir administration. In cell culture, 5 microM saquinavir increased ABCB1 levels, although it did not affect P-gp expression. Atazanavir inhibited P-gp function at concentrations above therapeutic levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in lymphocyte ABCB1 expression, which may be caused by genetic polymorphisms in ABCB1 or its regulatory partners, are a likely cause of interindividual variation in the disposition and efficacy of clinically relevant P-gp substrates, including HIV PIs.

Reaching undetectable viral loads after initial HIV treatment

An HIV patient’s chance for long-term treatment success is maximized when their first-line regimen produces an undetectable viral load. A persistently detectable viral load leads to the development of resistance and subsequent immunological and virological failure. It is important to select a regimen with excellent efficacy, tolerability and toxicity profile that is also easy to administer. Tenofovir/emtricitabine provides an effective and well-tolerated nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) combination. Regimens with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are superior to ritonavir-unboosted PIs and NRTIs in reducing viral load. Data suggest that regimens with lopinavir/ritonavir or efavirenz have the best long-term chance of producing an undetectable viral load.

No change in calculated creatinine clearance after tenofovir initiation among Thai patients

OBJECTIVES

Thai patients have a lower average body weight than patients from western Europe or the USA. Tenofovir is largely prescribed at the standard dosage of 300 mg once daily: therefore, the per kilogram dose is higher in Thailand than in the USA. We asked the question whether this higher per kilogram dose was associated with more nephrotoxicity.

METHODS

Thai patients from the Staccato trial were treated with tenofovir/lamivudine combined with ritonavir-boosted saquinavir. Creatinine values were measured before the start of tenofovir and then every 12 weeks. Renal function was assessed using the Cockcroft-Gault formula and the MDRD formula. To compare CL(CR) before and after tenofovir, the t-paired or Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used. One-way analysis of variance and Spearman's correlation coefficient were used to study CL(CR) longitudinally.

RESULTS

CL(CR) remained stable after a median of 21 weeks on tenofovir (difference of +1.06 mL/min; 95% CI -2.7-4.8, P=0.58), even among patients with underlying diseases. The mean CL(CR) remained stable across time (P=0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find renal dysfunction on tenofovir among Thai patients included in the Staccato trial. Tenofovir could be safely prescribed at a standard dosage of 300 mg once daily in the Thai population.

Clinical and pharmacokinetic data support once-daily low-dose boosted saquinavir (1,200 milligrams saquinavir with 100 milligrams ritonavir) in treatment-naive or limited protease inhibitor-experienced human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

We evaluated the plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety of once-daily low-dose boosted saquinavir (SQVr; 1,200 of saquinavir [SQV] with 100 mg of ritonavir) plus two nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive or limited protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. A prospective study without entry restrictions on the plasma HIV-RNA (VL) or CD4 cell count was carried out. Plasma and intracellular SQV levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Efficacy was evaluated by an intention-to-treat analysis; treatment failure was defined as virological failure (a VL of >50 copies/ml after 24 weeks or a confirmed rebound to >50 copies/ml) or interruption for any reason. A total of 151 patients were included in the study (106 of them either had never received PI or had no previous virological failure on PIs) and could be characterized as follows: previous C3 stage, 28.9%; injection-drug users, 69.1%; subjects with chronic viral hepatitis, 53%; and subjects with cirrhosis, 10%. The median baseline CD4 level was 184/mul, and the median VL was 4.8 log(10) copies/ml. Median C(max), area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h, and C(min) plasma and intracellular SQV levels were 3,672 and 10,105 ng/ml, 34,283 and 99,535 ng.h/ml, and 359 and 1,062 ng/ml, respectively. The efficacy as determined by intention to treat at 52 weeks was 69.7% (96% in the on-treatment analysis), with similar results regardless of the baseline VL and CD4 counts. Only five patients had virological failure despite adequate C(min) levels, but with a poor adherence (the only variable related to virological failure). Adverse events caused the withdrawal of the treatment in four patients (2.6%). In conclusion, given the pharmacokinetic profile, efficacy, and tolerability of this regimen, once-daily low-dose SQVr may be considered a treatment option in treatment-naive or limited PI-experienced HIV-infected patients, with the additional benefit of being currently the least-expensive PI-based regimen available.

Gender: a possible determinant in dosing of dermatologic drugs--an overview

The role of gender in pharmacokinetics could play a significant role in tailoring HIV and other drug regimens. Here we investigate sex as a factor in saquinavir pharmacokinetics. The HIV-positive women who use saquinavir in combination with other protease inhibitors frequently demonstrate higher saquinavir concentrations than their male counterparts. The majority of the data indicates that the root of women's higher saquinavir concentrations is not inherent to their gender. Rather, extenuating factors associated with HIV play a prominent role in the observed difference between men and women's pharmacokinetic parameters. The source of observed differences in saquinavir pharmacokinetics could not be definitively traced to CYP3A, the enzyme responsible for saquinavir's metabolism or drug transporters. Hormonal changes associated with HIV infection together with concurrent use of other protease inhibitors could help explain development of sex differences. These findings can be used to further investigate when and why gender-based differences in saquinavir pharmacokinetics exist and possible future dosage and therapy considerations. Our knowledge of gender-related pharmacokinetics should be extended for other systemic drugs in dermatology.

Effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir-500 mg formulation with ritonavir in healthy male and female volunteers

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have described reduced absorption of certain protease inhibitors when administered with agents known to increase gastric pH. No clinically significant interactions between saquinavir absorption and gastric pH have previously been shown. We evaluated the effect of omeprazole, a proton-pump-inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of the recently developed saquinavir-500 mg formulation co-administered with ritonavir.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy subjects (n = 6 women and 12 men) received 1000/100 mg saquinavir/ritonavir twice daily in an open-label study for 15 days. On days 11-15, subjects were administered omeprazole 40 mg daily with the morning dose. Serial plasma samples were collected for 12-h pharmacokinetic profiles of saquinavir and ritonavir on days 10 and 15 and safety analysis on days 1, 4, 10, 15 and 29.

RESULTS

The geometric mean and 95% confidence interval (CI), for the area under time-concentration curve (AUC; ng h/ml), trough plasma concentration (C trough; ng/ml) and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax; ng/ml) of saquinavir were 20599 (14396-29360) and 37511 (28733-48970); 737 (482-1127) and 1521 (1039-2227); 3227 (2370-4393) and 5611 (4507-7710) on days 10 and 15, respectively, with geometric mean ratios of 1.82, 2.06 and 1.75. No significant changes were observed in saquinavir elimination half life, ritonavir pharmacokinetic parameters or in safety laboratory tests. No unexpected adverse events attributed to study medication were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of omeprazole, total saquinavir plasma exposure is significantly increased (82% increase in AUC). The mechanism of this interaction requires elucidation. Despite the significant increase in saquinavir exposure, no short term toxicities were observed.