Elimination of daptomycin in a patient with acute renal failure undergoing extended daily dialysis

Removal of common antimicrobial agents by sustained low-efficiency dialysis

Adequate dosing of antimicrobials is paramount for treating infections in critically ill patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy; however, little is known about antimicrobial removal by sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED). The objective was to quantify the removal of cefepime, daptomycin, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and vancomycin in patients undergoing SLED. Adult patients ≥18 years with acute kidney injury (AKI) or end-stage kidney disease receiving one of the select antimicrobials and requiring SLED were included. Blood and dialysate flow rates were maintained at 250 and 100 mL/min, respectively. Simultaneous arterial and venous blood samples for the analysis of antibiotic concentrations were collected hourly for 8 hours during SLED (on-SLED). Arterial samples were collected every 2 hours for up to 6 hours while not receiving SLED (off-SLED) for the calculation of SLED clearance, half-life (t1/2) on-SLED and off-SLED, and the fraction of removal by SLED (fD). Twenty-one patients completed the study: 52% male, mean age (±SD) 53 ± 13 years, and mean weight of 98 ± 30 kg. Eighty-six percent had AKI, and 4 patients were receiving cefepime, 3 daptomycin, 10 meropenem, 6 piperacillin-tazobactam, and 13 vancomycin. The average SLED time was 7.3 ± 1.1 hours, and the mean ultrafiltration rate was 95 ± 52 mL/hour (range 10-211). The t1/2 on-SLED was substantially lower than the off-SLED t1/2 for all antimicrobials, and the SLED fD varied between 44% and 77%. An 8-hour SLED session led to significant elimination of most antimicrobials evaluated. If SLED is performed, modification of the dosing regimen is warranted to avoid subtherapeutic concentrations.

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020)

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members.As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020)

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members. As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Daptomycin

Due to the low level of resistance observed with daptomycin, this antibiotic has an important place in the treatment of severe Gram-positive infections. It is the first-in-class of the group of calcium-dependent, membrane-binding lipopeptides, and is a cyclic peptide constituted of 13 amino acids and an n-decanoyl fatty acid chain. The antibacterial action of daptomycin requires its complexation with calcium. Daptomycin is not absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and needs to be administered parenterally. The distribution of daptomycin is limited (volume of distribution of 0.1 L/kg in healthy volunteers) due to its negative charge at physiological pH and its high binding to plasma proteins (about 90%). Its elimination is mainly renal, with about 50% of the dose excreted unchanged in the urine, justifying dosage adjustment for patients with renal insufficiency. The pharmacokinetics of daptomycin are altered under certain pathophysiological conditions, resulting in high interindividual variability. As a result, therapeutic drug monitoring of daptomycin may be of interest for certain patients, such as intensive care unit patients, patients with renal or hepatic insufficiency, dialysis patients, obese patients, or children. A target for the ratio of the area under the curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration > 666 is usually recommended for clinical efficacy, whereas in order to limit the risk of undesirable muscular effects the residual concentration should not exceed 24.3 mg/L.

Principles of Drug Dosing in Sustained Low Efficiency Dialysis (SLED) and Review of Antimicrobial Dosing Literature

The use of sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) as a renal replacement modality has increased in critically ill patients with both acute kidney injury (AKI) and hemodynamic instability. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of data regarding the appropriate dosing of medications for patients undergoing SLED. Dose adjustment in SLED often requires interpretation of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic factors and extrapolation based on dosing recommendations from other modes of renal replacement therapy (RRT). This review summarizes published trials of antimicrobial dose adjustment in SLED and discusses pharmacokinetic considerations specific to medication dosing in SLED. Preliminary recommendation is provided on selection of appropriate dosing for medications where published literature is unavailable.

Minimal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling of DSTA4637A, A novel THIOMAB™ antibody antibiotic conjugate against Staphylococcus aureus, in a mouse model

DSTA4637A, a THIOMAB™ antibody-antibiotic conjugate targeting Staphylococcus aureus, has shown promising bactericidal activity in a mouse model. DSTA4637A consists of a monoclonal anti-S. aureus antibody with an average of two rifalogue antibiotic molecules, dmDNA31, linked to its light chains. The goal of this study was to develop a minimal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (mPBPK) model to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of three analytes of DSTA4637A (i.e., total antibody, antibody-conjugated dmDNA31, and unconjugated dmDNA31) in mice, and to predict pharmacokinetics of DSTA4637A analytes in humans, as well as to provide an initial assessment for potential PK drug-drug interactions (DDI) in clinical trials via cross-species scaling of the mPBPK model. In the proposed model, selected organs, including heart, liver, and kidney, were connected anatomically with plasma and lymph flows. Mouse plasma and tissue concentrations of the three analytes of DSTA4637A were fitted simultaneously to estimate the PK parameters. Cross-species scaling of the model was performed by integrating allometric scaling and human physiological parameters. The final mPBPK model was able to successfully capture PK profiles of three DSTA4637A analytes in mouse plasma and in investigated organs. The model predicted a steady-state peak unbound dmDNA31 concentration lower than 5% of the IC₅₀ of dmDNA31 towards cytochrome P450 following 100 mg/kg weekly intravenous dose, which suggests a low risk of PK DDI in humans for DSTA4637A with co-administered cytochrome P450 substrates. The proposed mPBPK modeling and cross-species scaling approaches provide valuable tools that facilitate the understanding and translation of DSTA4637A disposition from preclinical species to humans.

Daptomycin Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Septic and Critically Ill Patients

Infections, including sepsis, are associated with high mortality rates in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Appropriate antibiotic selection and adequate dosing are important for improving patient outcomes. Daptomycin is bactericidal in bloodstream infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus and other Gram-positive pathogens cultured in ICU patients. The drug has concentration-dependent activity, and the area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration ratio is the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index that best correlates with daptomycin activity, whereas toxicity correlates well with daptomycin plasma trough concentrations (or minimum concentration [C min]). Adequate daptomycin exposure can be difficult to achieve in ICU patients; multiple PK alterations can result in highly variable plasma concentrations, which are difficult to predict. For this reason, therapeutic drug monitoring could help clinicians optimize daptomycin dosing, thus improving efficacy while decreasing the likelihood of serious adverse events. This paper reviews the literature on daptomycin in ICU patients with sepsis, focusing on dosing and PK and PD parameters.

Survey of pharmacists’ antibiotic dosing recommendations for sustained low-efficiency dialysis

BACKGROUND

The use of hybrid renal replacement therapies like sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED) is increasing in ICUs worldwide. However, pharmacokinetic studies designed to inform therapeutic antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients receiving SLED are limited. SLED operational characteristics vary across institutions. Pharmacists in institutions that utilize SLED are challenged to recommend therapeutic doses for antibiotics.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize pharmacist-recommended antibiotic regimens for SLED.

METHODS

An electronic survey was sent to pharmacist members of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy in the Nephrology or Critical Care Practice and Research Network. Dosing recommendations for a hypothetical critically ill septic patient were collected for cefepime, ceftaroline, daptomycin, levofloxacin, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam. Main outcome measure Antibiotic regimens for the six antibiotics, their frequency, pharmacist’s experience with renal replacement therapies (RRT), post-graduate training, years of clinical experience, number of staffed beds in their hospital, and RRT employed in their ICUs.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 69 clinical pharmacists who had 8.5 ± 7.5 (mean ± SD) years of experience. All pharmacists had experience dosing medications for patients receiving RRT. The most frequently recommended regimen for each antibiotic was: cefepime 1000 mg every 24 h, ceftaroline 200 mg every 12 h, daptomycin 6 mg/kg every 24 h, levofloxacin 500 mg every 24 h, meropenem 1000 mg every 12 h, and piperacillin/tazobactam 2250 mg every 8 h. Up to nine distinct regimens were recommended for each antibiotic, and the total daily dose between these regimens ranged by as much as a 12-fold. Neither pharmacist’s experience with SLED, post-graduate training, nor years of clinical experience were significantly associated with particular dosing recommendations for the antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists working in institutions that utilize SLED make antibiotic dosing recommendations that vary 4–12-fold depending on the drug. Published research does not provide adequate guidance to optimally dose antibiotics in patients receiving SLED. More SLED pharmacokinetic trials, real-time serum concentration monitoring and advanced pharmacokinetic modeling techniques are necessary to ensure therapeutic dosing in patients receiving SLED.

Origin of de novo daptomycin non susceptible enterococci

The emergence of daptomycin non-susceptible enterococci (DNSE) poses both treatment and infection control challenges. Clinicians should be vigilant that DNSE may be isolated from patients with or without (de novo DNSE) prior use of daptomycin. Recent epidemiological data suggest the presence of a community reservoir for DNSE which may be associated with environmental, foodborne and agricultural exposures. The mechanisms of nonsusceptibility to daptomycin have not been well characterized and may not parallel those for Staphylococcus aureus. The identification of daptomycin resistance genes in anaerobes, in farm animals and in an ecosystem that has been isolated for million years, suggest that the environmental reservoir for de novo DNSE may be larger than previously thought. Herein, the limited available scientific evidence regarding the possible origin of de novo DNSE is discussed. The current existing evidence is not sufficient to draw firm conclusions on the origin of DNSE. Further studies to determine the mechanisms of de novo daptomycin nonsusceptibility among enterococci are needed.

Antibiotic Dosing in Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: "Enough But Not Too Much"

Increasing evidence suggests that antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) often does not achieve pharmacodynamic goals, and the continued high mortality rate due to infectious causes appears to confirm these findings. Although there are compelling reasons why clinicians should use more aggressive antibiotic dosing, particularly in patients receiving aggressive renal replacement therapies, concerns for toxicity associated with higher doses are real. The presence of multisystem organ failure and polypharmacy predispose these patients to drug toxicity. This article examines the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences of critical illness, AKI, and renal replacement therapy and describes potential solutions to help clinicians give "enough but not too much" in these very complicated patients.

Evaluation of antibiotic prescribing patterns in patients receiving sustained low-efficiency dialysis: opportunities for pharmacists

OBJECTIVES

Sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) is a 'hybrid' form of continuous renal replacement therapy; however, there is very limited information on drug disposition during this procedure. Individuals requiring SLED are often critically ill and require antibiotics. The study aim was to evaluate antibiotic orders for patients requiring SLED compared to literature-based recommendations. We also evaluated whether doses were administered as prescribed and assessed clinical and microbiologic cure.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed over a 2-year period for patients who received concurrent SLED and antibiotic therapy. Demographic data, prescribed antibiotic dosing regimens and doses delivered as prescribed were determined for 10 antibiotics: cefepime (C), daptomycin (Da), doripenem (D), gentamicin (G), imipenem-cilastatin (I), linezolid (L), meropenem (M), piperacillin-tazobactam (P), tobramycin (T) and vancomycin (V). Dosing regimens were compared to recommendations from the literature where available. The incidence of clinical and microbiologic cure was also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients met inclusion criteria: mean age 54 ± 14 years, 60% male, 58% white. Prescribed doses were evidence-based for 37% of Da, 97% of L, 15% of M and 7% of V orders. The majority of discrepancies were due to under-dosing. There were 129 (11%) antibiotic doses missed. Of the 13 patients who met criteria for assessment of clinical and microbiologic cure, 10 achieved a microbiologic cure and none reached clinical cure.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescribed antibiotic dosing regimens varied substantially and under-dosing was common. There is a need to further define appropriate dosing regimens for antibiotics administered during SLED and determine how pharmacists may help to ensure appropriate therapy.

Drug dosing consideration in patients with acute and chronic kidney disease-a clinical update from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)

Drug dosage adjustment for patients with acute or chronic kidney disease is an accepted standard of practice. The challenge is how to accurately estimate a patient's kidney function in both acute and chronic kidney disease and determine the influence of renal replacement therapies on drug disposition. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) held a conference to investigate these issues and propose recommendations for practitioners, researchers, and those involved in the drug development and regulatory arenas. The conference attendees discussed the major challenges facing drug dosage adjustment for patients with kidney disease. In particular, although glomerular filtration rate is the metric used to guide dose adjustment, kidney disease does affect nonrenal clearances, and this is not adequately considered in most pharmacokinetic studies. There are also inadequate studies in patients receiving all forms of renal replacement therapy and in the pediatric population. The conference generated 37 recommendations for clinical practice, 32 recommendations for future research directions, and 24 recommendations for regulatory agencies (US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency) to enhance the quality of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information available to clinicians. The KDIGO Conference highlighted the gaps and focused on crafting paths to the future that will stimulate research and improve the global outcomes of patients with acute and chronic kidney disease.

Determination of daptomycin in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Clinical application

BACKGROUND

Daptomycin is a recently developed cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic active against most Gram-positive pathogens including vancomycin-resistant enterococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. To optimize treatment efficacy and safety, especially in patients undergoing multiple drug regimens and/or co-morbidities, a specific liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed for the quantification of daptomycin in plasma.

METHODS

A C18 column was used for separation, with a mobile phase initially consisting of 0.1% formic acid, water, and acetonitrile (ACN) in a linear gradient from 20% to 70%. After protein precipitation with ACN, the clear upper layer was diluted in water:ACN (50:50, v/v) before injection. Detection was performed using an electrospray ionization technique. MS/MS transitions, monitored in the positive ion mode were m/z 811.1 → m/z 313.1 for daptomycin, and m/z 609.4 → m/z 194.9 for reserpine, used as internal standard.

RESULTS

Elution of daptomycin and reserpine occurred at 4.5 and 3.9 min, respectively. The method was validated over a range of concentrations from 1 mg/L to 120 mg/L. The assay met recommended acceptance criteria: coefficients of variation were <6.3% and <7.4%, and accuracies were between -5.9% and +11.2% and between -3.5% and +3.7%, for intra- and inter-day validations, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This method appears well-adapted to routine hospital practice for therapeutic drug monitoring of daptomycin considering its time of analysis, range of concentrations measured, precision and accuracy.

New therapeutic choices for infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

In recent years, a marked increase in the incidence of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has occurred in many countries. This review addresses the effectiveness and limitations of drugs classically used for the treatment of MRSA, e.g. vancomycin, and also newer anti-MRSA antimicrobials, e.g. second-generation glycolipopeptides, tigecycline, and beta-lactams.

Dosing of daptomycin in intensive care unit patients with acute kidney injury undergoing extended dialysis--a pharmacokinetic study

BACKGROUND

Daptomycin is a new intravenous cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic, licensed for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections caused by Gram-positive organisms including both susceptible and resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and for the treatment of various infections due to susceptible organisms, including serious and life-threatening Gram-positive infections, vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections and right-sided endocarditis with associated bacteremia. Currently, no dosing recommendations exist for this drug for patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) undergoing renal replacement therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate pharmacokinetics of daptomycin in critically ill patients with AKI undergoing extended dialysis (ED), a frequently used mean of renal replacement therapies in intensive care units (ICUs) around the world. Patients and methods. A prospective, single-dose pharmacokinetic study was performed in the medical and surgical ICUs of a tertiary care center. The aim was to investigate critically ill patients with anuric AKI being treated with ED and receiving daptomycin (n = 10). Daptomycin (6 mg/kg) was administered 8 h before ED was started.

RESULTS

Key pharmacokinetic parameters like half-life in critically ill patients treated with ED were comparable to healthy controls. The dialyser clearance for daptomycin was 63 +/- 9 ml/min. Based on the amount of the drug recovered from the collected spent dialysate, the mean fraction of the drug removed by one dialysis treatment was 23.3%.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that patients treated with ED using a high-flux dialyzer (polysulphone, 1.3 m(2); blood and dialysate flow, 160 ml/min; ED time, 480 min) and employing current dosing regimen, 6 mg/kg daptomycin every 48 h, run the risk of becoming significantly under dosed if one adheres to a twice daily dosing schedule that is recommended for patients on maintenance haemodialysis. Our data suggest that a daily dose of 6 mg/kg daptomycin is necessary in this special patient population to avoid under dosing, which may have detrimental effects in critically ill patients suffering from life-threatening infections.

Risk of underdosing of ampicillin/sulbactam in patients with acute kidney injury undergoing extended daily dialysis--a single case

The fixed antibacterial combination of ampicillin and sulbactam is frequently used for various infections. The normal kidneys eliminate approximately 60% of ampicillin (371.39 Da) and sulbactam (255.22 Da). Concomitant with the decline in renal function, the terminal elimination half-life increases from 1 up to 24 h in patients with ESRD. Patients on three times weekly low flux haemodialysis exhibit a half-life of 2.3 h on and 17.4 h off dialysis. In contrast, in the present observation the elimination half-life in a single patient with acute kidney injury undergoing extended daily dialysis (EDD) with a polysulphone membrane was 1.5 h, indicating that the current dosing regimen for haemodialysis outpatients (ampicillin/sulbactam 2.0/1.0 g/day) would result in a significant underdosing for patients undergoing EDD.

Antimicrobial activity of daptomycin and selected comparators tested against bloodstream Staphylococcus aureus isolates from hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Patients on long-term hemodialysis are at a significantly higher risk for catheter-related bloodstream infections (BSI) than the general population. These infections are generally caused by gram-positive organisms, especially Staphylococcus aureus. In the present study, we evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of S. aureus causing BSI in dialysis patients compared to those causing BSI in other patient populations.

METHODS

The potencies of daptomycin and various comparator agents were evaluated by reference broth microdilution methods for S. aureus bloodstream isolates from dialysis patients (606 strains) in 43 hospitals in North America and Europe. Susceptibility patterns for the dialysis isolate set were compared to those S. aureus causing BSI in other patient populations in the same hospitals and time period.

RESULTS

Daptomycin was highly potent against S. aureus causing bacteremia in dialysis patients (MIC(50)/MIC(90), 0.25/0.5 microg/ml). Vancomycin (MIC(50)/MIC(90), 1/1 microg/ml) and linezolid (MIC(50)/MIC(90), 2/2 microg/ml) showed similar potency, and overall susceptibility rates for the three antibiotics were 99.8-100.0% susceptible. Linezolid and vancomycin were four- to eight-fold less potent than daptomycin.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall susceptibility patterns of S. aureus strains from dialysis patients were very similar to those of non-dialysis patients.