Therapeutic serum concentrations of daptomycin after intraperitoneal administration in a patient with peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis

Stability of Daptomycin in Dextrose and Icodextrin-Based Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions

Background: With emerging antibiotic resistance, many patients on peritoneal dialysis require newer antibiotic treatment such as daptomycin. Inadequate clinical information exists across different peritoneal dialysis solutions, including icodextrin, for the stability of intraperitoneal daptomycin. To guide the clinical practice of intraperitoneal daptomycin treatment, we need to establish the stability of daptomycin at dextrose concentration higher than 1.5% and icodextrin, as well as the duration of stability. Methods: We tested the stability of daptomycin in three types of peritoneal dialysis bags (UltraBag dextrose 2.5%, UltraBag icodextrin 7.5%, and Stay-Safe Balance 2.3%). Daptomycin was reconstituted with water for injection (50 mg/mL), followed by administration to peritoneal dialysis bags to obtain the final daptomycin concentrations of 70 μg/mL (equivalent to 140 mg/2L, the maintenance level) and 245 μg/mL (equivalent to 490 mg/2L, the loading level). The bags were then placed at ambient temperature (25°C) followed by withdrawing 5 mL samples at 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h for UltraBag dextrose 2.5% and UltraBag icodextrin 7.5% and 0, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h for Stay-Safe Balance 2.3%. The concentrations of daptomycin in the collected samples were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detector (HPLC-DAD). Results: Under ambient condition, daptomycin was stable at maintenance level in UltraBag dextrose 2.5% for 48 h and in UltraBag icodextrin 7.5% or Stay-Safe Balance 2.3% for 24 h. For loading level, daptomycin was stable in UltraBag dextrose 2.5% and Stay-Safe Balance 2.3% for 12 h and in UltraBag icodextrin 7.5% for 48 h. Conclusions: Current stability results support and guide the use of intraperitoneal daptomycin in different dialysis solutions. Patients with peritonitis requiring icodextrin exchange and assisted preparation of daptomycin can benefit from nurses who provide daily home visit based on our stability results.

Intraperitoneal daptomycin dosing for peritonitis may be inadequate: a Monte Carlo simulation approach to optimize dosing and outcomes

A two-compartmental mathematical pharmacokinetic model with first-order elimination of patients receiving CAPD of 4 exchanges for 6 h with 2 L of dialysate used in each cycle was developed to predict daptomycin disposition in 120 h of therapy. The pharmacodynamic target was plasma AUC/MIC equal to or greater than 666. The dose that achieved at least 90% of the probability of target attainment was defined as an optimal dose. Administering intraperitoneal 300 mg daily for 1 exchange daily regimen would be sufficient to treat peritonitis with S. aureus infection with MICs of 0.25 mg/L in patients undergoing CAPD. A higher dosage may be required for infections with a higher minimum inhibitory concentration. Pharmacodynamic targets and MICs significantly contributed to daptomycin doses in this setting. Clinical validation of our recommendations is recommended.

Pharmacokinetics of culture-directed antibiotics for the treatment of peritonitis in automated peritoneal dialysis: A systematic narrative review

The objectives of this study were to provide a summary of the pharmacokinetic data of some intraperitoneal (IP) antibiotics that could be used for both empirical and culture-directed therapy, as per the ISPD recommendations, and examine factors to consider when using IP antibiotics for the management of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD)-associated peritonitis. A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, MEDLINE and Google Scholar for articles published between 1998 and 2020 was conducted. To be eligible, articles had to describe the use of antibiotics via the IP route in adult patients ≥18 years old on APD in the context of pharmacokinetic studies or case reports/series. Articles describing the use of IP antibiotics that had been recently reviewed (cefazolin, vancomycin, gentamicin and ceftazidime) or administered for non-APD-associated peritonitis were excluded. A total of 1119 articles were identified, of which 983 abstracts were screened. Seventy-three full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Eight records were included in the final study. Three reports had pharmacokinetic data in patients on APD without peritonitis. Each of cefepime 15 mg/kg IP, meropenem 0.5 g IP and fosfomycin 4 g IP given in single doses achieved drug plasma concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration for treating the susceptible organisms. The remaining five records were case series or reports in patients on APD with peritonitis. While pharmacokinetic data support intermittent cefepime 15 mg/kg IP daily, only meropenem 0.5 g IP and fosfomycin 4 g IP are likely to be effective if given in APD exchanges with dwell times of 15 h. Higher doses may be required in APD with shorter dwell times. Information on therapeutic efficacy was derived from case reports/series in individual patients and without therapeutic drug monitoring. Until more pharmacokinetic data are available on these antibiotics, it would be prudent to shift patients who develop peritonitis on APD to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, where pharmacokinetic information is more readily available.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Daptomycin

Due to the low level of resistance observed with daptomycin, this antibiotic has an important place in the treatment of severe Gram-positive infections. It is the first-in-class of the group of calcium-dependent, membrane-binding lipopeptides, and is a cyclic peptide constituted of 13 amino acids and an n-decanoyl fatty acid chain. The antibacterial action of daptomycin requires its complexation with calcium. Daptomycin is not absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and needs to be administered parenterally. The distribution of daptomycin is limited (volume of distribution of 0.1 L/kg in healthy volunteers) due to its negative charge at physiological pH and its high binding to plasma proteins (about 90%). Its elimination is mainly renal, with about 50% of the dose excreted unchanged in the urine, justifying dosage adjustment for patients with renal insufficiency. The pharmacokinetics of daptomycin are altered under certain pathophysiological conditions, resulting in high interindividual variability. As a result, therapeutic drug monitoring of daptomycin may be of interest for certain patients, such as intensive care unit patients, patients with renal or hepatic insufficiency, dialysis patients, obese patients, or children. A target for the ratio of the area under the curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration > 666 is usually recommended for clinical efficacy, whereas in order to limit the risk of undesirable muscular effects the residual concentration should not exceed 24.3 mg/L.

Pharmacokinetics of Intraperitoneal Daptomycin in Patients with Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis

Background

Antibiotics are preferentially delivered via the peritoneal route to treat peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis (PDRP) to ensure that maximal concentrations are delivered to the site of infection. Our study focused on the pharmacokinetics of daptomycin (DAP) administered via the intraperitoneal (IP) route in patients with PDRP.

Methods

According to the DaptoDP protocol (Clinical Trial No. 2012-005699-33), IP DAP was administered daily, i.e., during the 6-h Nutrineal (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL, USA) dwell time period, for 14 days, in addition to administration of the antibiotics used for the usual care of patients with PDRP. The plasma and IP levels of DAP were measured on days 1 and 5. The tested dose was 200 mg/day. The principal endpoint was the dialysate concentration after 6 hours of dwell time > 16 mg/L (corresponding to 4 x minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] for E. faecalis).

Results

Three participants were evaluated. On day 5, the IP concentrations after 6 hours of dwell time were between 6.3 and 23.4 mg/L, and the peak plasma concentrations were between 13.0 and 15.3 mg/L.

Conclusion

The results suggest that 200 mg/day is very likely sufficient for the treatment of PDRP by Staphylococci or Streptococci whereas it could be insufficient to treat PRDP by Enterococci. The good peritoneal bioavailability of DAP was quantitatively established, suggesting that IP administration could also be used as an alternate route for patients with damaged venous access. No DAP accumulation that could lead to toxic concentrations after repeated administration is expected, even in anuric patients. The protocol will further continue to assess whether a higher dose achieves the pharmacokinetic objectives.

Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis: challenges and solutions

Peritoneal dialysis is an effective treatment modality for patients with end-stage renal disease. The relative use of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis varies widely by country. Data from a 2004 survey reports the percentage of patients with end-stage renal disease treated with peritoneal dialysis to be 5%-10% in economically developed regions like the US and Western Europe to as much as 75% in Mexico. This disparity is probably related to the availability and access to hemodialysis, or in some cases patient preference for peritoneal over hemodialysis. Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis remains the major complication and primary challenge to the long-term success of peritoneal dialysis. Fifty years ago, with the advent of the Tenckhoff catheter, patients averaged six episodes of peritonitis per year on peritoneal dialysis. In 2016, the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis proposed a benchmark of 0.5 episodes of peritonitis per year or one episode every 2 years. Despite the marked reduction in peritonitis over time, peritonitis for the individual patient is problematic. The mortality for an episode of peritonitis is 5% and is a cofactor for mortality in another 16% of affected patients. Prevention of peritonitis and prompt and appropriate management of peritonitis is essential for the long-term success of peritoneal dialysis in all patients. In this review, challenges and solutions are addressed regarding the pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis from the viewpoint of an infectious disease physician.

Successful Treatment of a Pacemaker Infection with Intraperitoneal Daptomycin

We investigated the pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal administration of daptomcyin in a peritoneal dialysis (PD) patient treated for a pacemaker infection with Staphylococcus epidermidis. After initial start of intravenous daptomycin at 9 mg/kg body weight every 48 hours, the therapy was switched to intraperitoneal administration of 5.3 mg/kg body weight in 1 L icodextrin 7.5% with a dwell time of 12 hours overnight every 48 hours. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was performed at 4 hours and 24 hours after dose administration. Due to high peak concentration above target peak concentration, the dose was reduced to a final maintenance dose of 3.2 mg/kg body weight. Data from this single case suggest that serum drug concentration above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) can be easily achieved with intraperitoneal administration of daptomycin every 48 hours even with a lower dose, as recommended for the intravenous administration, but measurement of serum concentration and dose adjustments are mandatory in such cases.

Newer antibiotics for the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis

Peritonitis is a debilitating infectious complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Drug-resistant bacterial peritonitis typically has a lower response rate to antibiotics. In the past 15 years, newer antibiotics with activities against drug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria have been developed. In most circumstances, peritonitis due to methicillin-resistant staphylococci responds to vancomycin. If vancomycin cannot be used due to allergy and/or non-susceptibility, there is increasing evidence that linezolid and daptomycin are the drugs of choice. It is reasonable to start linezolid orally or intravenously, but subsequent dose reduction may be necessary in case of myelosuppression. Daptomycin can be given intravenously or intraperitoneally and has excellent anti-biofilm activity. Other treatment options for drug-resistant Gram-positive bacterial peritonitis include teicoplanin, tigecycline and quinupristin/dalfopristin. Teicoplanin is not available in some countries (e.g. the USA). Tigecycline can only be given intravenously. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is ineffective against Enterococcus faecalis and there is only low-quality evidence to support its efficacy in the treatment of peritonitis. Effective newer antibiotics against drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are lacking. Polymyxins can be considered, but evidence on its efficacy is limited. In this review, we will discuss the potential use of newer antibiotics in the treatment of drug-resistant bacterial peritonitis in PD patients.

Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus in a Patient with Cirrhosis: The Potential Role for Daptomycin and Review of the Literature

Gram-positive cocci are emerging causes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), especially in patients with healthcare-associated infections. We report the case of a 68-year-old man with hepatitis C virus and alcohol-related cirrhosis who developed SBP due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treated with daptomycin. We discuss the potential role of daptomycin in this setting with a review of the literature about the use of daptomycin in primary or secondary bacterial peritonitis.

The influence of different peritoneal dialysis fluids on the in vitro activity of ampicillin, daptomycin, and linezolid against Enterococcus faecalis

Intraperitoneal administration of antibiotics is recommended for the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis. However, little data are available on a possible interference between peritoneal dialysis fluids and the activity of antimicrobial agents. Thus, the present in vitro study set out to investigate the influence of different peritoneal dialysis fluids on the antimicrobial activity of ampicillin, linezolid, and daptomycin against Enterococcus faecalis. Time-kill curves in four different peritoneal dialysis fluids were performed over 24 h with four different concentrations (1 × MIC, 4 × MIC, 8 × MIC, 30 × MIC) of each antibiotic evaluated. Cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth was used as the comparator solution. All four peritoneal dialysis fluids evaluated had a bacteriostatic effect on the growth of Enterococcus faecalis. Compared to the cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth comparator solution, the antimicrobial activity of all antibiotics tested was reduced. For ampicillin and linezolid, no activity was found in any peritoneal dialysis fluid, regardless of the concentration. Daptomycin demonstrated dose-dependent activity in all peritoneal dialysis fluids. Bactericidal activity was observed at the highest concentrations evaluated in Dianeal® PDG4 and Extraneal®, but not in concentrations lower than 30 × MIC and not in Nutrineal® PD4 and Physioneal® 40. The antimicrobial activity of ampicillin and linezolid is limited in peritoneal dialysis fluids in vitro. Daptomycin is highly effective in peritoneal dialysis fluids and might, thus, serve as an important treatment option in peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical impact of the present findings.

Treatment of enterococcal peritonitis with intraperitoneal daptomycin in a vancomycin-allergic patient and a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Intraperitoneal (IP) administration of antibiotics is a mainstay of therapy in the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis. The therapeutic options against gram-positive organisms in patients intolerant to vancomycin are limited.

METHODS

This case report and review of the literature used a search of PubMed with the terms "daptomycin," "intraperitoneal," and "peritoneal" for 2004 through 7 February 2013 to find relevant publications.

RESULTS

In addition to our patient, we identified 6 case reports of IP daptomycin for the treatment of peritonitis. Our patient was treated with a 14-day course of IP daptomycin, with resolution of signs and symptoms of peritonitis. She presented again 7 weeks later with signs and symptoms of peritonitis and was treated with a repeat course of IP daptomycin. Among the 6 patients reported in the literature, 4 received loading doses of daptomycin. Daptomycin 20 mg per liter of dialysate was administered in 4 patients, and the other 2 patients received higher doses based on body weight (milligrams per kilogram). Treatment duration averaged 10 or 14 days. In all 6 cases, clinical cure was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Although limited to case reports, the available literature suggests that IP daptomycin is a viable alternative for peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis. However, routine use of this agent must be cautioned, because further prospective studies are required.

Successful salvage of peritoneal catheter in unresolved methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus peritonitis by combination treatment with daptomycin and rifampin

Peritoneal dialysis patients are at an increased risk of Gram-positive organism infections because of disrupted skin barrier function, presence of a peritoneal catheter, and a deficient immunological system. In particular, the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections is clinically challenging. Herein, we present a case of MRSA peritonitis that showed no response to a 14-day treatment with intraperitoneal vancomycin. To overcome unresponsiveness to vancomycin, we shifted the regimen to intraperitoneal daptomycin (given every 6 h through manual peritoneal dialysate exchanges) and oral rifampin (300 mg twice daily). The peritonitis resolved without sequelae or relapse. We suggest daptomycin and rifampin as an alternative combination therapy for MRSA infections that may otherwise remain unresolved.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous daptomycin during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study sought to (1) characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of intravenous (i.v.) daptomycin among patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD); (2) identify optimal i.v. CAPD dosing schemes; and (3) determine extent of daptomycin penetration into the peritoneal space after i.v. administration.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

A PK study was conducted among eight CAPD patients. Population PK modeling and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) were used to identify CAPD dosing schemes providing efficacy and toxicity plasma profiles comparable with those obtained from MCS using the daptomycin population PK model derived from patients in the Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia-infective endocarditis (SAB-IE) study. The primary efficacy exposure target was the area under the curve (AUC). For toxicity, the goal was to identify CAPD dosing schemes that minimized plasma trough concentrations in excess of 24.3 mg/L. Finally, peritoneal cavity penetration was determined.

RESULTS

Administration of i.v. daptomycin 4 or 6 mg/kg, depending on indication, every 48 h was identified as the optimal CAPD dosing scheme. This regimen provided cumulative (AUC(0-48)) and daily partitioned (AUC(0-24 h) and AUC(24-48 h)) plasma AUC values similar to the SAB-IE or "typical patient" simulations. In addition, the proportion of patients likely to experience an elevated trough concentration in excess of 24.3 mg/L was similar between every 48 h CAPD dosing and the referent group. Penetration into the peritoneal cavity was 6% of plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

Daptomycin 4 or 6 mg/kg, on the basis of indication, i.v. every 48 h was found to be the optimal i.v. CAPD dosing scheme.