1
|
Drug-Related Hypersensitivity Reactions Leading to Emergency Department: Original Data and Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11102811. [PMID: 35628936 PMCID: PMC9143688 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study is to describe pharmacological characteristics of drug-related allergies and anaphylaxis leading to the emergency department (ED). An 8-year post hoc analysis on the MEREAFaPS Study database was performed (2012−2019). Subjects who experienced drug-related hypersensitivity leading to an ED visit were selected. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the reporting odds ratios (RORs) of drug-related allergies and anaphylaxis adjusting for sex, age classes, and ethnicity. In addition, a systematic review of observational studies evaluating drug-related hypersensitivity reactions leading to ED visits in outpatients was performed. Out of 94,073 ED visits, 14.4% cases were drug-related allergies and 0.6% were anaphylaxis. Females accounted for 56%. Multivariate logistic regression showed a higher risk of drug-related allergy among males and all age classes < 65 years, while a higher risk of anaphylaxis was observed for females (ROR 1.20 [1.01−1.42]) and adults (ROR 2.63 [2.21−3.14]). The systematic review included 37 studies. ED visits related to allergy and anaphylaxis ranged from 0.004% to 88%, and drug-related allergies and anaphylaxis ranged from 0.007% to 88%. Both in our analysis and in primary studies, antibacterials, analgesics, and radiocontrast agents were identified as the most common triggers of hypersensitivity.
Collapse
|
2
|
Aung AK, Walker S, Khu YL, Tang MJ, Lee JI, Graudins LV. Adverse drug reaction management in hospital settings: review on practice variations, quality indicators and education focus. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 78:781-791. [PMID: 35171316 PMCID: PMC9005418 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03287-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) contribute significantly to healthcare burden. However, they are largely preventable through appropriate management processes. This narrative review aims to identify the quality indicators that should be considered for routine monitoring of processes within hospital ADR management systems. It also examines the potential reasons behind variation in ADR management practices amongst HCPs, and explores possible solutions, focusing on targeted education programmes, to improve both the quality and quantity indicators of ADR management processes. Methods A comprehensive literature review was conducted to explore relevant themes and topics concerning ADR management, quality indicators and educational interventions. Results Substantial variability exists in ADR management amongst healthcare professionals (HCPs) with regard to reporting rates, characteristics of ADRs reported, quality of assessment, completeness of reports and, most importantly, risk communication practices. These variable practices not only threaten patient safety but also undermine pharmacovigilance processes. To date, quality indicators to monitor ADR management practices within hospital settings remain ill-defined. Furthermore, evidence behind effective interventions, especially in the form of targeted education strategies, to improve the quality of ADR management remains limited. Conclusions The focus of ADR management in hospitals should be to promote patient safety through comprehensive assessment, risk communication and safe prescribing. There is a need to develop a system to define, measure and monitor the quality of ADR management. Educational strategies may help improve the quality of ADR management processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ar Kar Aung
- Department of General Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. .,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Steven Walker
- Department of Pharmacy, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Yin Li Khu
- Department of General Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mei Jie Tang
- Department of General Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennifer I Lee
- Department of Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.,Quality Improvement Academy, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Delabeling Delayed Drug Hypersensitivity: How Far Can You Safely Go? THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 8:2878-2895.e6. [PMID: 33039012 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Delayed immune-mediated adverse drug reactions (IM-ADRs) are defined as reactions occurring more than 6 hours after dosing. They include heterogeneous clinical phenotypes that are typically T-cell-mediated reactions with distinct mechanisms across a wide spectrum of severity from benign exanthems through to life-threatening cutaneous or organ-specific diseases. For mild reactions such as benign exanthem, considerations for delabeling are similar to immediate reactions and may include a graded or single-dose drug challenge with or without preceding skin or patch testing. Evaluation of challenging cases such as the patient who is on multiple drugs at the time a severe delayed IM-ADR occurs should prioritize clinical ascertainment of the most likely phenotype and implicated drug(s). Although not widely available and validated, procedures such as patch testing, delayed intradermal skin testing, and laboratory-based functional drug assays or genetic (human leukocyte antigen) testing may provide valuable information to further help risk stratify patients and identify the likely implicated and/or cross-reactive drug(s). The decision to use a drug challenge as a diagnostic or delabeling tool in a patient with a severe delayed IM-ADR should weigh the risk-benefit ratio, balancing the severity and priority for the treatment of the underlying, and the availability of alternative efficacious and safe treatments.
Collapse
|
4
|
Martelli A, Ippolito R, Votto M, De Filippo M, Brambilla I, Calvani M, Cardinale F, Chiappini E, Duse M, Manti S, Marseglia GL, Caffarelli C, Cravidi C, Miraglia Del Giudice M, Tosca MA. What is new in anaphylaxis? ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2020; 91:e2020005. [PMID: 33004775 PMCID: PMC8023066 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v91i11-s.10308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Available information suggests that anaphylaxis must be promptly recognized keeping in mind the airway patency, breathing (ventilation and respiration), circulation and mental status and treated. The first treatment is adrenaline. After successful treatment of an anaphylactic episode, attention must be paid to the prevention of early recurrences (biphasic anaphylaxis) and assessment of causes. Children should not be discharged before prescribing self-injectable adrenaline and explain how and under what circumstances it must be injected, An action plan must be communicated to their communities. Inform the school about potential reactions, how to prevent them and avoidance measures. (www.actabiomedica.it)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Martelli
- Department of Pediatrics, G. Salvini Hospital, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan - Italy.
| | - Rosario Ippolito
- Pediatric Clinic Department of Pediatrics, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Martina Votto
- Pediatric Clinic Department of Pediatrics, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Maria De Filippo
- Pediatric Clinic Department of Pediatrics, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Ilaria Brambilla
- Pediatric Clinic Department of Pediatrics, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Mauro Calvani
- UOC di Pediatria. Azienda Ospedaliera S. Camillo Forlanini, Roma, Italy.
| | - Fabio Cardinale
- Department of Pediatrics and Emergency, Pediatric Allergy and Pulmunology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Consorziale-Policlinico, Ospedale Pediatrico Giovanni XXIII, Bari, Italy..
| | - Elena Chiappini
- Division of Paediatric Infectious Disease, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| | - Marzia Duse
- Department of Pediatrics, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
| | - Sara Manti
- UOC Broncopneumologia Pediatrica e Fibrosi Cistica, AOUP "Vittorio-Emanuele", San Marco Hospital, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy.
| | - Gian Luigi Marseglia
- Pediatric Clinic Department of Pediatrics, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Carlo Caffarelli
- Clinica Pediatrica, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università di Parma, Italy.
| | - Claudio Cravidi
- Agenzia Tutela della Salute, ATS (National Healthcare System), Pavia, Italy.
| | - Michele Miraglia Del Giudice
- Department of Woman, Child and of General and Specialized Surgery. University of Campania"Luigi Vanvitelli" Naples, Italy.
| | - Maria Angela Tosca
- Allergy Center, Department of Pediatrics, Istituto G. Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|