Effect of high-dose rifampicin on efavirenz pharmacokinetics: drug-drug interaction randomized trial

A Literature Review of Liver Function Test Elevations in Rifampin Drug-Drug Interaction Studies

Although rifampin drug–drug interaction (DDI) studies are routinely conducted, there have been instances of liver function test (LFT) elevations, warranting further evaluation. A literature review was conducted to identify studies in which combination with rifampin resulted in hepatic events and evaluate any similarities. Over 600 abstracts and manuscripts describing rifampin DDI studies were first evaluated, of which 30 clinical studies reported LFT elevations. Out of these, 11 studies included ritonavir in combination with other drug(s) in the rifampin DDI study. The number of subjects that were discontinued from treatment on these studies ranged from 0 to 71 (0–100% of subjects in each study). The number of subjects hospitalized for adverse events in these studies ranged from 0 to 41 (0–83.67% of subjects in each study). LFT elevations in greater than 50% of subjects were noted during the concomitant administration of rifampin with ritonavir‐boosted protease inhibitors and with lorlatinib; with labeled contraindication due to observed hepatotoxicity related safety findings only for saquinavir/ritonavir and lorlatinib. In the lorlatinib and ritonavir DDI studies, considerable LFT elevations were observed rapidly, typically within 24–72 h following co‐administration. A possible sequence effect has been speculated, where rifampin induction prior to administration of the combination may be associated with increased severity of the LFT elevations. The potential role of rifampin in the metabolic activation of certain drugs into metabolites with hepatic effects needs to be taken into consideration when conducting rifampin DDI studies, particularly those for which the metabolic profiles are not fully elucidated.

Alterations in molecular response of Mycobacterium tuberculosis against anti-tuberculosis drugs

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB), an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, has plagued humans since the early middle-ages. More than one million deaths are recorded annually due to TB, even in present times. These deaths are primarily attributed to the constant appearance of resistant TB strains. Even with the advent of new therapeutics and diagnostics techniques, tuberculosis remains challenging to control due to resistant M. tuberculosis strains. Aided by various molecular changes, these strains adapt to stress created by anti-tuberculosis drugs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The review thus is an overview of ongoing research in the genome and transcriptome of antibiotic-resistant TB. It explores omics-based research to identify mutation and utilization of differential gene expression.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows several mutations distinctive in the first- and second-line drug-resistant M. tuberculosis strains. It also explores the expressional differences of genes involved in the fundamental process of the cells and how they help in drug resistance. With the development of transcriptomics-based studies, a new insight has developed to inquire about gene expression changes in drug resistance. This information on expressional pattern changes can be utilized to design the basic platform of anti-TB treatments and therapeutic approaches. These novel insights can be instrumental in disease diagnosis and global containment of resistant TB.

High-dose rifamycins in the treatment of TB: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is growing interest in using high-dose rifamycin (HDR) regimens in TB treatment, but the safety and efficacy of HDR regimens remain uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing HDR to standard-dose rifamycin (SDR) regimens.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and clinicaltrials.gov for prospective studies comparing daily therapy with HDRs to SDRs. Rifamycins included rifampicin, rifapentine and rifabutin. Our primary outcome was the rate of severe adverse events (SAEs), with secondary outcomes of death, all adverse events, SAE by organ and efficacy outcomes of 2-month culture conversion and relapse. This study was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020142519).

RESULTS

We identified 9057 articles and included 13 studies with 6168 participants contributing 7930 person-years (PY) of follow-up (HDR: 3535 participants, 4387 PY; SDR: 2633 participants, 3543 PY). We found no significant difference in the pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) of SAE between HDR and SDR (IRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.23, I ²=41%). There was no significant difference when analysis was limited to SAE possibly, probably or likely medication-related (IRR 1.07, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.41, I ²=0%); studies with low risk of bias (IRR 0.98, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.20, I ²=44%); or studies using rifampicin (IRR 1.00, 95% CI 0. 0.75-1.32, I ²=38%). No significant differences were noted in pooled outcomes of death, 2-month culture conversion and relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

HDRs were not associated with a significant difference in SAEs, 2-month culture conversion or death. Further studies are required to identify specific groups who may benefit from HDR.

Evidence for Implementation: Management of TB in HIV and Pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pregnant people living with HIV (PLWH) are at especially high risk for progression from latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) to active tuberculosis (TB) disease. Among pregnant PLWH, concurrent TB increases the risk of complications such as preeclampsia, intrauterine fetal-growth restriction, low birth weight, preterm-delivery, perinatal transmission of HIV, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. The grave impact of superimposed TB disease on maternal morbidity and mortality among PLWH necessitates clear guidelines for concomitant therapy and an understanding of the pharmacokinetics (PK) and potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between antitubercular (anti-TB) agents and antiretroviral therapy (ART) in pregnancy.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review discusses the currently available evidence on the use of anti-TB agents in pregnant PLWH on ART. Pharmacokinetic and safety studies of anti-TB agents during pregnancy and postpartum are limited, and available data on second-line and newer anti-TB agents used in pregnancy suggest that several research gaps exist. DDIs between ART and anti-TB agents can decrease plasma concentration of ART, with the potential for perinatal transmission of HIV. Current recommendations for the treatment of LTBI, drug-susceptible TB, and multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) are derived from observational studies and case reports in pregnant PLWH. While the use of isoniazid, rifamycins, and ethambutol in pregnancy and their DDIs with various ARTs are well-characterized, there is limited data on the use of pyrazinamide and several new and second-line antitubercular drugs in pregnant PLWH. Further research into treatment outcomes, PK, and safety data for anti-TB agent use during pregnancy and postpartum is urgently needed.

Standard versus high dose of rifampicin in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

A growing amount of evidence suggests that the rifampicin dosing currently recommended for tuberculosis treatment could be associated with inadequate exposure and unfavourable outcomes. We aimed to compare clinical and microbiological efficacy and safety outcomes of standard and higher rifampicin dosing.

METHODS

Data sources were MEDLINE, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library. This was a systematic review and meta-analysis that included experimental or observational studies comparing 8-week sputum culture conversion, treatment failure, or safety outcomes in naïve patients with pulmonary tuberculosis treated with standard (10 mg/kg) or higher doses of rifampicin.

RESULTS

Of a total of 9683 citations screened, eight randomized controlled trials were included, accounting for 1897 subjects; the risk of bias was low in three studies, high in two and intermediate in three. At week 8 a higher proportion of patients in the high-dose group obtained a sputum culture conversion than those in the standard dose group (83.7% versus 80.6%, RR 1.06; 95%CI 1.01-1.12, p 0.028); this result was confirmed in the sub-analysis including patients treated with a rifampicin dose of ≥20 mg/kg, but not in those treated with 11-19 mg/kg. Events of treatment failure at end of treatment showed no significant difference between the two groups (RR 0.84; 95%CI 0.59-1.21, p 0.362). In the analysis evaluating safety outcome, the difference in the occurrence of a grade 3 or 4 liver toxicity or adverse drug reactions leading to discontinuation was not significant at the statistical analysis among the groups (7.2% versus 5.4%, RR 1.19; 95%CI 0.81-1.73, p 0.370, and 1.5% versus 0.6%, RR 2.31; 95%CI 0.65-8.21, p 0.195, respectively). No statistical heterogeneity among studies was observed for each outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

High doses of rifampicin were associated with an increased rate of sputum culture conversion at 8 weeks of treatment, particularly in patients receiving ≥20 mg/kg.