High level of HIV drug resistance informs dolutegravir roll-out and optimized NRTI backbone strategy in Mozambique

Affordable drug resistance genotyping of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, protease and integrase genes, for resource limited settings

BACKGROUND

As use of dolutegravir (DTG) becomes more common in resource limited settings (RLS), the demand for integrase resistance testing is increasing. Affordable methods for genotyping all relevant HIV-1 pol genes (i.e., protease (PR), reverse transcriptase (RT) and integrase (IN)) are required to guide choice of future antiretroviral therapy (ART). We designed an in-house HIV-1 drug resistance (HIVDR) genotyping method that is affordable and suitable for use in RLS.

METHODS

We obtained remnant plasma samples from CAPRISA 103 study and amplified HIV-1 PR, RT and IN genes, using an innovative PCR assay. We validated the assay using remnant plasma samples from an external quality assessment (EQA) programme. We genotyped samples by Sanger sequencing and assessed HIVDR mutations using the Stanford HIV drug resistance database. We compared drug resistance mutations with previous genotypes and calculated method cost-estimates.

RESULTS

From 96 samples processed, we obtained sequence data for 78 (81%), of which 75 (96%) had a least one HIVDR mutation, with no major-IN mutations observed. Only one sample had an E157Q INSTI-accessory mutation. When compared to previous genotypes, 18/78 (23%) had at least one discordant mutation, but only 2/78 (3%) resulted in different phenotypic predictions that could affect choice of subsequent regimen. All CAPRISA 103 study sequences were HIV-1C as confirmed by phylogenetic analysis. Of the 7 EQA samples, 4 were HIV-1C, 2 were HIV-1D, and 1 was HIV-1A. Genotypic resistance data generated using the IDR method were 100% concordant with EQA panel results. Overall genotyping cost per sample was estimated at ~ US$43-$US49, with a processing time of ~ 2 working days.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully designed an in-house HIVDR method that is suitable for genotyping HIV-1 PR, RT and IN genes, at an affordable cost and shorter turnaround time. This HIVDR genotyping method accommodates changes in ART regimens and will help to guide HIV-1 treatment decisions in RLS.

Pre-treatment HIV-1 drug resistance in antiretroviral therapy-naive adults in Eastern Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pre-treatment HIV drug resistance (PDR) may result in increased risk of virological failure and acquisition of new resistance mutations. With recently increasing ART coverage and periodic modifications of the guidelines for HIV treatment, there is a need for an updated systematic review to assess the levels of the PDR among adults newly initiating ART in Eastern Africa.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search for studies published between 1 January 2017 and 30 April 2022 in the MEDLINE Complete and CINAHL Complete, searched simultaneously using EBSCOhost, and Web of Science. To determine the overall PDR prevalence estimates, we extracted data from eligible articles and analysed prevalence estimates using Stata 14.2.

RESULTS

A total of 22 eligible observation studies were selected. The studies included a total of 5852 ART-naive people living with HIV. The overall pooled prevalence of PDR was 10.0% (95% CI: 7.9%-12.0%, I2 = 88.9%) and 9.4% (95% CI: 7.0%-11.9%, I2 = 90.4%) for NNRTIs, 2.6% (95% CI: 1.8%-3.4%, I2 = 69.2%) for NRTIs and 0.7% (95% CI: 0.3%-1.2%, I2 = 29.0%) for PIs. No major integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI)-related mutations were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a moderate overall PDR prevalence among new ART initiators in this study. PDR to NNRTIs is more prevalent, underscoring the importance of the current WHO recommendation for replacement of NNRTIs by INSTIs. PDR to NRTIs was low but notable, which warrants continuous surveillance of pre-existing resistance to the dolutegravir co-administered NRTI in Eastern Africa.

Viral Load Status Before Switching to Dolutegravir-Containing Antiretroviral Therapy and Associations With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa

BACKGROUND

Dolutegravir is being rolled out globally as part of preferred antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens, including among treatment-experienced patients. The role of viral load (VL) testing before switching patients already on ART to a dolutegravir-containing regimen is less clear in real-world settings.

METHODS

We included patients from the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS consortium who switched from a nevirapine- or efavirenz-containing regimen to one with dolutegravir. We used multivariable cause-specific hazards regression to estimate the association of the most recent VL test in the 12 months before switching with subsequent outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 36 393 patients at 37 sites in 5 countries (Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda) who switched to dolutegravir from July 2017 through February 2020, with a median follow-up of approximately 11 months. Compared with those who switched with a VL <200 copies/mL, patients without a recent VL test or with a preswitch VL ≥1000 copies/mL had significantly increased hazards of an incident VL ≥1000 copies/mL (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.99-4.19 and aHR, 6.60; 95% CI, 4.36-9.99, respectively) and pulmonary tuberculosis or a World Health Organization clinical stage 4 event (aHR, 4.78; 95% CI, 2.77-8.24 and aHR, 13.97; 95% CI, 6.62-29.50, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A VL test before switching to dolutegravir may help identify patients who need additional clinical monitoring and/or adherence support. Further surveillance of patients who switched to dolutegravir with an unknown or unsuppressed VL is needed.