Economic evaluation of antimicrobial use practices in animal agriculture: a case of poultry farming

Effects of antibiotics on chicken gut microbiota: community alterations and pathogen identification

The extensive use of antibiotics in animal husbandry, either for therapeutic purposes or as growth promoters, has raised significant concerns about their effects on poultry. However, when antibiotics are used as therapeutic agents, their impact on the gut microbiota of poultry remains unknown. This study aimed to address this gap by simulating therapeutic application of six frequently used antibiotics (lincomycin hydrochloride, gentamicin sulfate, florfenicol injection, benzylpenicillin potassium, ceftiofur sodium, and enrofloxacin infection) and investigated their effects on the composition and structure of poultry gut microbiota. Single-molecule real-time 16S rRNA sequencing was performed to analyze fecal samples collected from chickens treated with each antibiotic to assess the impact of antibiotic exposure on gut community diversity and dominant microbial species. Although the results demonstrated that antibiotic exposure reduced gut microbiota diversity and disrupted community stability, the impacts of different antibiotics differed considerably, specifically in the number of ASVs. Notably, the dominant bacterial phyla-Pseudomonadota and Bacillota-was largely consistent across different antibiotic exposures, except 11 days after gentamicin sulfate exposure. Moreover, six third-category pathogens were identified in fecal samples, namely, Shigella boydii, Escherichia coli, Shigella flexneri, Salmonella enterica, Corynebacterium bovis, Proteus mirabilis. Of these, three strains of Corynebacterium bovis were identified as potential novel pathogenic bacteria. These findings demonstrate the critical importance of rational antibiotics use in animal husbandry. This study provides a scientific basis for improving current antibiotics use in the treatment and prevention of poultry diseases, advancing the standardization and precision of antibiotic usage.

Antibiotic residues in poultry products and bacterial resistance: A review in developing countries

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global concern, particularly in poultry farming, where antibiotics are widely used for both disease prevention and growth promotion. This review examines the misuse of antibiotics in poultry production, especially in developing countries, and its contribution to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The findings highlight that factors such as increasing demand for poultry protein, the availability of inexpensive antibiotics, and weak regulatory oversight have led to widespread misuse, accelerating the spread of resistance genes. Although evidence links poultry farming to AMR, significant data gaps remain, especially regarding resistance transmission from poultry to humans. The review underscores the urgent need for stronger regulatory frameworks, phased-out use of antimicrobial growth promoters, and enhanced awareness campaigns to address this issue. Improving the capacity of regulatory bodies and developing more robust national data monitoring systems are essential steps to mitigate the threat of AMR in poultry farming and to protect both animal and human health.

Evaluation of Surveillance Strategies of Antimicrobial Consumption in Animals

The aim of this paper is to explore and assess various strategies for monitoring antimicrobial consumption (AMC) in animals, within the context of the One Health approach. Recent studies have shed light on the limited surveillance and data collection for AMC in animals. Using the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention Policy Analytical Framework, we assess global, national, and farm-level surveillance strategies on public health impact and feasibility using evidence from primary, secondary, and grey literature. From this, we identify key policy mechanisms that support the adoption of surveillance while providing specific recommendations. We find that a global strategy, though valuable for benchmarking and policy guidance, faces participation and data visibility challenges. National-level surveillance offers direct inputs into national action plans but struggles with data uniformity and comparability. Farm-level surveillance, while resource-intensive, provides the most granular data for informing specific interventions. We advocate for a multi-faceted approach to AMC surveillance, emphasizing that legal mandates and financial incentives are crucial for encouraging surveillance participation, along with international cooperation for enhancing participation and data quality. Drawing parallels with public reporting challenges in other sectors can provide valuable lessons on how to address data collection, analysis, and reporting barriers.

Challenges in the profitability of small-scale broiler farming by avoiding injudicious use of drugs and additives

The aim of the current study was to determine the present scenario of injudicious use of drugs and additives in small-scale broiler operations and whether broilers can be produced successfully and profitably without the injudicious use of drugs and additives. First, a survey was undertaken in relation to farmers' basic information and general management methods in commercial broilers, with special attention given to the usage of medications and additives in drinking water. Second, based on the survey data, an experimental trial was carried out to compare the growth performance and economic profitability of rearing broilers with and without the use of said drugs and additives. A total of 540 broiler DOCs were allotted into three treatments: T1 = self-formulated feed (SFF) with judicious use of drugs and additives; T2 = commercial feed with judicious use of drugs and additives (JUDA) and T3 = commercial feed with injudicious use of drugs and additives (InJUDA), with six replications (30 birds/replication) in each. The results showed that the farmers used a variety of drugs and additives in 35 days of broiler rearing; however, the farmers usually did not consult with veterinary practitioners, instead relying on and being instructed by local dealers and medicine company representatives. Although the medications and additives account for almost 6-8% of total production costs, the experimental trial clearly demonstrated that the broilers kept with either JUDA or InJUDA showed statistically (p < 0.05) similar BW (2181.93 g & 2222.53 g/bird), BWG (2110.0 g & 2129.91 g/bird), and FCR (1.62 & 1.57, respectively), whereas broilers in the SFF group showed significantly lower growth performances (BW = 1799.31 g/bird, BWG = 1746.19 g/bird, and FCR = 1.93, respectively). The net profit per kg bird in the JUDA group was substantially (p < 0.05) greater (BDT- 27.34/-), followed by the SFF group (BDT- 25.56/) and the InJUDA group (BDT- 24.49/-). Taken together, these findings suggest that profitable broiler farming is possible without the injudicious use of drugs and additives.

An agent-based model for collaborative learning to combat antimicrobial resistance: proof of concept based on broiler production in Senegal

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a substantial global One Health problem. This paper reports on initial, proof-of-concept development of an agent-based model (ABM) as part of wider modelling efforts to support collaborations between groups interested in policy development for animal health and food systems. The model simulates AMR in poultry production in Senegal. It simultaneously addresses current policy issues, builds on existing modelling in the domain and describes AMR in the broiler chicken production cycle as seen by producers and veterinarians. This enables implementation and assessment of producer antimicrobial use and infection prevention and control strategies in terms of immediate economic incentives, potentially helping to advance conversations by addressing national policy priorities. Our model is presented as a flexible tool with promise for extension as part of AMR policy development in Senegal and West Africa, using participatory approaches. This work indicates that ABM can potentially play a useful role in fostering counter-AMR initiatives driven by food system actor behaviour in lower- and middle-income countries more generally.