Clinical and Analytical Verification of an Automated Fecal Calprotectin Immunoassay with Extraction Device

Preanalytical and analytical factors affecting elastase quantitation in stool

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) is a condition caused by a deficiency of exocrine pancreatic enzymes, resulting in malabsorption of nutrients. Clinical manifestations of EPI may include steatorrhea, weight loss, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. Although direct testing is the most sensitive and specific for EPI, these tests are invasive, time consuming, expensive, and not well standardized. Fecal elastase (FE-1) has been shown to be an indirect marker of the exocrine secretory capacity of the pancreas and has become the most commonly employed indirect test for diagnosis of EPI. Measurement of fecal elastase consists of two main phases, a preanalytical phase and analytical phase. The preanalytical phase involves stool collection, storage and handling. The second phase is the analytical phase, which includes the actual assay processes and products used to produce a result. For FE-1 this includes sample extraction and measurement on an immunoassay. Each step in the process can influence the result and contribute to heterogeneity in FE-1 measurement, potentially impacting clinical diagnosis and management. Thus, this paper provides an overview of the preanalytical and analytical factors that can affect measurement and interpretation of FE-1 results.

Clinical performance of a particle enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (PETIA) for detecting fecal calprotectin

Particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (PETIA) is a new measurement procedure for detecting fecal calprotectin (FC). We aimed to investigate the accuracy and clinical performance of PETIA for FC. We assessed the accuracy of PETIA for FC measurements through concordance analysis, Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analysis, using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as the reference. To evaluate the clinical performance of PETIA, the FC levels of individuals with significant and non-significant bowel diseases were compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the appropriate cut-off value of FC detected by PETIA for discriminating subjects with significant and non-significant colorectal lesions. Of the 413 cases analyzed, 340 (82.3%) were concordant between PETIA and ELISA. No significant discordance was observed. There was a good agreement (y = -7.710+0.957x) between PETIA and ELISA for detecting FC. The FC level detected by PETIA in patients with significant bowel diseases (159.1 [31.3, 821.0] µg/g) was significantly higher than that of subjects with non-significant bowel diseases (10.3 [4.2, 38.5] µg/g) (p < 0.001). The AUC of FC for identifying significant bowel diseases detected by PETIA was 0.82 (p < 0.001). With a cut-off value of 77.6µg/g, the specificity and positive predictive value were 92.2% and 97.1%, respectively. The PETIA for FC measurement showed good clinical performance for detecting bowel diseases.

Screening for gastrointestinal and pancreatic diseases

Diagnosis of chronic gastrointestinal and pancreatic diseases is challenging because patients generally present with nonspecific symptoms, such as abdominal pain and chronic diarrhea, some of which can last for many years. Although stool assays are more sensitive than serum assays, the former has unique limitations that healthcare providers should be aware of. One algorithm to screen for chronic gastrointestinal and pancreatic issues is to perform stool testing to assess inflammatory, watery (osmotic) and malabsorptive conditions. This chapter will discuss several stool-based screening tests, the major disorders they screen for and clinical performance. Sections on assay and sample limitations are also included. Stool testing can provide valuable diagnostic, prognostic and treatment response information if both the laboratory and clinician understand the benefits and limitations of these assays.