Detection of methadone, LAAM, and their metabolites by methadone immunoassays

Opioid Treatment for Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome: Current Challenges and Future Approaches

Chronic intrauterine exposure to psychoactive drugs often results in neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). When nonpharmacologic measures are insufficient in controlling NOWS, morphine, methadone, and buprenorphine are first-line medications commonly used to treat infants with NOWS because of in utero exposure to opioids. Research suggests that buprenorphine may be the leading drug therapy used to treat NOWS when compared with morphine and methadone. Currently, there are no consensus or standardized treatment guidelines for medications prescribed for NOWS. Opioids used to treat NOWS exhibit large interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) response in neonates. Organ systems undergo rapid maturation after birth that may alter drug disposition and exposure for any given dose during development. Data regarding the PK and PD of opioids in neonates are sparse. Pharmacometric methods such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic and population pharmacokinetic modeling can be used to explore factors predictive of some of the variability associated with the PK/PD of opioids in newborns. This review discusses the utility of pharmacometric techniques for enhancing precision dosing in infants requiring opioid treatment for NOWS. Applying these approaches may contribute to optimizing the outcome by reducing cumulative drug exposure, mitigating adverse drug effects, and reducing the burden of NOWS in neonates.

Quantification of methadone and its metabolites: EDDP and EMDP determined in autopsy cases using LC-MS/MS

The paper presents a method for the determination of methadone, EDDP, and EMDP in postmortem biological materials using liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate (pH9) and UHPLC-MS/MS technique. Methadone-d₉ and EDDP-d₃ were used as the internal standards. The method validation results for blood and urine were as follows: linearity: 0.5-1000 ng/ml; R²  > 0.9993 for methadone, EDDP and R²  > 0.9944 for EMDP. Intra- and inter-day precision: 0.1%-7.5% and 0.3%-8.6%, respectively; intra- and inter-day accuracy: -11.8% to 13.9% and -9.3 to 14.8%, respectively; recovery: 91.5%-123.0%; matrix effect: 83.5%-123.9%. This study also describes 18 postmortem cases, where methadone concentrations ranged 2.3-1180 ng/ml in blood (n = 17), from 11.0 to >10,000 ng/ml in urine (n = 13) and 135.2-409.0 in vitreous humor (VH, n = 3). EDDP concentrations ranged from not detectable to 180 ng/mL in blood, from 42.4 to >10,000 ng/ml in urine and 18.3-36.5 in VH. EMDP concentrations were found in four cases in blood from below LLOQ to 1.8 ng/ml and in seven cases in urine, ranged 2.1-243.0 ng/ml. EMDP was not detected in VH samples. The EDDP/methadone ratios and blood/urine ratios for methadone and EDDP in EMDP-positive and negative cases were performed. The paper presents mass spectra of other methadone metabolites, than EDDP and EMDP (ring hydroxylated methadone, ring hydroxylated EDDP, ring hydroxylated EMDP, methadol, and DDP). Simultaneous determination of methadone and its metabolites in order to unequivocally interpret the results of toxicological tests seems to be useful in cases related to prescription/illicit use of methadone.

Revealing the Kinetic Advantage of a Competitive Small-Molecule Immunoassay by Direct Detection

Small-molecule detection in an immunoassay format generally employs competition or labeling. A novel direct-detection label-free primary immunoassay utilizing second harmonic generation (SHG) has been developed and the utility of the method has been demonstrated for several small-molecule narcotics. Specifically, the binding of morphine, methadone, and cocaine to antimorphine, antimethadone, and anticocaine antibodies was measured by SHG, allowing binding affinities and rates of dissociation to be obtained. The SHG primary immunoassay has provided the first kinetic measurements of small-molecule hapten interactions with a receptor antibody. The kinetics reveal for the first time that competitive immunoassays achieve their selectivity by taking advantage of the kinetics of association and dissociation of the labeled and unlabeled target and nontarget small-molecule to the capture antibody. In particular, the induced fit of the target small-molecule to their antibody pairs prolongs their residence time, while the nontarget small-molecule dissociate rapidly in comparison.

Advanced urine toxicology testing

Urine toxicology screening testing is an important standard of care in the addiction and pain treatment setting, offering a reproducible, unbiased, and accurate laboratory test to monitor patients and provide objective support for clinical observations. It has been shown that physicians do not have proficiency in the ordering or interpretation of these tests. This article is an attempt to respond to that need. Current antibody-based enzymatic immunoassays (EIAs) used for urine toxicology screening are useful to detect classes of drugs (ex., opiate) but cannot determine which specific drug (ex., morphine) is present. Gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy can determine exactly which drugs are present, allowing prescribed (or illicit) opiates and benzodiazepines to be identified. This article will discuss principles and details of opiate and benzodiazepine EIA and gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy urine toxicology testing. The approach to detecting patients attributing positive opiate EIAs to prescription opiates who are using heroin or other opioids will be reviewed. Cases of controlled prescription drugs that do not produce the expected positive urine tests (ex., oxycodone producing negative opiate screening tests) will be discussed. How to differentiate codeine from heroin and the role of poppy seeds in toxicology will be examined. The case of an anti-depressant drug that produces false-positive benzodiazepine results and antibiotics that cause positive opiate urine toxicology results will be reviewed. Common benzodiazepines (ex., clonazepam and lorazepam) that do not reliably produce positive benzodiazepine EIAs will be discussed. The approach to detection and management of all these types of toxicology cases will be reviewed, and it is hoped that the analyses presented will impart an adequate information base to medical providers and staff members of drug treatment and pain centers, enabling them to order and interpret these tests in the clinic more effectively as an integrated part of whole patient care.