Sulfonium salts as derivatizing agents. 3. Quantitation of the cocaine metabolite benzoylecgonine in urine using gas chromatography with ion-pair extraction/on-column alkylation

Determination of Drugs in Clinical Trials: Current Status and Outlook

All pharmaceutical drugs, vaccines, cosmetic products, and many medical breakthroughs must first be approved through clinical research and trials before advancing to standard practice or entering the marketplace. Clinical trials are sets of tests that are required to determine the safety and efficacy of pharmaceutical compounds, drugs, and treatments. There is one pre-phase and four main clinical phase requirements that every drug must pass to obtain final approval. Analytical techniques play a unique role in clinical trials for measuring the concentrations of pharmaceutical compounds in biological matrices and monitoring the conditions of patients (or volunteers) during various clinical phases. This review focuses on recent analytical methods that are employed to determine the concentrations of drugs and medications in biological matrices, including whole blood, plasma, urine, and breast milk. Four primary analytical techniques (extraction, spectroscopy, chromatography, and electrochemical) are discussed, and their advantages and limitations are assessed. Subsequent to a survey of evidence and results, it is clear that microelectromechanical system (MEMS) based electrochemical sensor and biosensor technologies exhibit several notable advantages over other analytical methods, and their future prospects are discussed.

Determination of cocaine and benzoylecgonine by direct injection of human urine into a column-switching liquid chromatography system with diode-array detection

A method for the determination of cocaine (COC) and benzoylecgonine (BZE) in human urine using a column-switching liquid chromatography system is reported. A homemade precolumn (20 mm x 4.6 mm i.d.) dry-packed with Alltech ODS-C18 (35-750 microm) was employed as an extraction precolumn in order to extract and concentrate the COC and BZE from the human urine sample. The analytes were continuously transferred to the analytical column (Spherisorb-C8, 250 mm x 4.6 mm i.d.; dp = 5 microm) by means of the switching arrangement in the backflush mode. Detection was carried out at 235 nm in a UV-diode array detector. The validation of the method revealed analytes quantitative recoveries (96-102%) at three concentrations in the range from 0.25 to 4.00 and from 0.5 to 12.0 microg/mL for COC and BZE, respectively. These values demonstrate the excellent extraction efficiency of the precolumn. The detection limits for COC and BZE at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3 were 0.08 and 0.15 microg/mL when a sample volume of 50 microL was injected. The overlap of sample preparation, analysis and recondition of the precolumn increases the sample throughput to four samples per hour. The proposed method has been applied to the determination of COC and BZE in human urine samples from 73 suspecting drug addicts. Urine concentrations of 1.0-118.10 microg of BZE/mL and 0.1-41.0 microg of COC/mL were found.

Urine toxicology samples in cocaine treatment trials: how many need to be tested?

How frequently should urine samples be collected and analyzed to accurately measure drug use in clinical trials of cocaine abuse treatments? Previous research suggests that analyzing one of three weekly urine toxicology samples in an opiate-related trial may be sufficient. To empirically address this question in the field of cocaine research, we examined the weekly variation in the cocaine metabolite benzoylecgonine (BE) concentration between pairs of weekly urine samples from a clinical trial of a treatment for cocaine dependence. Twice weekly urine samples from 71 subjects collected over eleven weeks were assayed for quantitative BE levels. Agreement between pairs of samples was estimated for both quantitative and qualitative measures of BE. Results indicated substantial intra-week variation with correlations never exceeding .50 and approximately 20% disagreement among samples using cutoff values in place of quantitative levels. Both samples, however, supported similar conclusions about group-level behavior.