1
|
Pesapane F, Sorce A, Battaglia O, Mallardi C, Nicosia L, Mariano L, Rotili A, Dominelli V, Penco S, Priolo F, Carrafiello G, Cassano E. Contrast Agents in Breast MRI: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Biomedicines 2025; 13:829. [PMID: 40299402 PMCID: PMC12025004 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13040829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2025] [Revised: 03/18/2025] [Accepted: 03/23/2025] [Indexed: 04/30/2025] Open
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) has become an essential modality in breast cancer diagnosis and management. It is particularly used for locoregional staging, high-risk screening, monitoring treatment response, and assessing complications related to breast implants. The integration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) enhances the sensitivity and specificity of CE-MRI by providing detailed morphological and functional insights, particularly highlighting tumor neoangiogenesis. Despite its advantages, CE-MRI faces challenges such as high costs, limited accessibility, and concerns about gadolinium retention in tissues, prompting ongoing research into safer, high-relaxivity contrast agents like gadopiclenol. Advances in multiparametric imaging, including dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences and diffusion-weighted imaging, have refined diagnostic accuracy, enabling precise staging, and treatment planning. The introduction of abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) protocols offers a promising solution to barriers of cost and scan duration, maintaining diagnostic efficacy while improving patient accessibility and comfort. Future innovations in contrast agents, imaging protocols, and patient-centered approaches hold the potential to further enhance the utility of breast MRI, ensuring equitable and effective application in global healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Pesapane
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (O.B.); (C.M.); (L.N.); (A.R.); (V.D.); (S.P.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Adriana Sorce
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Ottavia Battaglia
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (O.B.); (C.M.); (L.N.); (A.R.); (V.D.); (S.P.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Carmen Mallardi
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (O.B.); (C.M.); (L.N.); (A.R.); (V.D.); (S.P.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (O.B.); (C.M.); (L.N.); (A.R.); (V.D.); (S.P.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Luciano Mariano
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (O.B.); (C.M.); (L.N.); (A.R.); (V.D.); (S.P.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Anna Rotili
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (O.B.); (C.M.); (L.N.); (A.R.); (V.D.); (S.P.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Valeria Dominelli
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (O.B.); (C.M.); (L.N.); (A.R.); (V.D.); (S.P.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Silvia Penco
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (O.B.); (C.M.); (L.N.); (A.R.); (V.D.); (S.P.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Francesca Priolo
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (O.B.); (C.M.); (L.N.); (A.R.); (V.D.); (S.P.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Gianpaolo Carrafiello
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Foundation IRCCS Cà Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Cassano
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (O.B.); (C.M.); (L.N.); (A.R.); (V.D.); (S.P.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Spear G, Lee K, DePersia A, Lienhoop T, Saha P. Updates in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:1451-1460. [PMID: 39466539 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01271-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/30/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Breast cancer does not wait until a woman reaches her 50's to strike. One in six cases occurs in women between the ages of 40 and 49 and breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women under 50 in the United States (10% of breast cancer deaths), emphasizing the urgency of early detection (American Society. 2024). Duffy et al. highlight the vital role of mammography screening in younger women, showing that starting screening at 40 reduces breast cancer mortality, with a consistent absolute reduction over time (Duffy et al. Health Technol Assess. 24(55):1-24, 2020). By starting yearly mammograms at 40, we could see a remarkable 40% reduction in breast cancer deaths (Monticciolo et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 18(9):1280-8, 2021). Screening at age 40 also adds little to the burden of overdiagnosis that already arises from screening at age 50 and older. Comparing this to biennial screening between ages 50-74, yearly screening at 40 saves approximately 13,770 more lives annually according to a report by the American Cancer Society published in JAMA in 2015 (Oeffinger et al. JAMA. 314(15):1599-614, 2015). But it's not just about saving lives; it's also about preserving quality of life. Between ages 40 and 49, 12-15% of years of life lost are attributed to breast cancer, highlighting the impact on women's lives. Early detection through screening can minimize these losses, ensuring more years spent with loved ones. It's clear: starting mammograms at age 40 saves lives. We must prioritize early detection and make screening accessible to all women, regardless of age. This proactive approach can reduce the burden of breast cancer and pave the way for a healthier future for women everywhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia Spear
- Department of Radiology, Endeavor Health, 2650 Ridge Avenue, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA
| | - Kyla Lee
- Department of Medicine, Hematology Oncology, Endeavor Health, 2650 Ridge Avenue, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA
| | - Allison DePersia
- Center for Personalized Medicine, Endeavor Health, 2650 Ridge Avenue, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA
| | - Thomas Lienhoop
- Department of Radiology, Endeavor Health, 2650 Ridge Avenue, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA
| | - Poornima Saha
- Department of Medicine, Hematology Oncology, Endeavor Health, 2650 Ridge Avenue, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kočo L, Balkenende L, Appelman L, Moman MR, Sponsel A, Schimanski M, Prokop M, Mann RM. Optimized, Person-Centered Workflow Design for a High-Throughput Breast MRI Screening Facility-A Simulation Study. Invest Radiol 2024; 59:538-544. [PMID: 38193779 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000001059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This project aims to model an optimal scanning environment for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening based on real-life data to identify to what extent the logistics of breast MRI can be optimized. MATERIALS AND METHODS A novel concept for a breast MRI screening facility was developed considering layout of the building, workflow steps, used resources, and MRI protocols. The envisioned screening facility is person centered and aims for an efficient workflow-oriented design. Real-life data, collected from existing breast MRI screening workflows, during 62 scans in 3 different hospitals, were imported into a 3D simulation software for designing and testing new concepts. The model provided several realistic, virtual, logistical pathways for MRI screening and their outcome measures: throughput, waiting times, and other relevant variables. RESULTS The total average appointment time in the baseline scenario was 25:54 minutes, with 19:06 minutes of MRI room occupation. Simulated improvements consisted of optimizing processes and resources, facility layout, and scanning protocol. In the simulation, time spent in the MRI room was reduced by introducing an optimized facility layout, dockable tables, and adoption of an abbreviated MRI scanning protocol. The total average appointment time was reduced to 19:36 minutes, and in this scenario, the MRI room was occupied for 06:21 minutes. In the most promising scenario, screening of about 68 people per day (10 hours) on a single MRI scanner could be feasible, compared with 36 people per day in the baseline scenario. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that by optimizing workflow MRI for breast screening total appointment duration and MRI occupation can be reduced. A throughput of up to 6 people per hour may be achieved, compared with 3 people per hour in the current setup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lejla Kočo
- From the Department of Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (L.K., L.A., M.P., R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (Antoni van Leeuwenhoek), Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.B., R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Alexander Monro Hospital, Bilthoven, the Netherlands (L.A., M.R.M.); and Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany (A.S., M.S.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bahl M. A Step-by-Step Guide to Writing a Scientific Review Article. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2023; 5:480-485. [PMID: 38416900 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
Scientific review articles are comprehensive, focused reviews of the scientific literature written by subject matter experts. The task of writing a scientific review article can seem overwhelming; however, it can be managed by using an organized approach and devoting sufficient time to the process. The process involves selecting a topic about which the authors are knowledgeable and enthusiastic, conducting a literature search and critical analysis of the literature, and writing the article, which is composed of an abstract, introduction, body, and conclusion, with accompanying tables and figures. This article, which focuses on the narrative or traditional literature review, is intended to serve as a guide with practical steps for new writers. Tips for success are also discussed, including selecting a focused topic, maintaining objectivity and balance while writing, avoiding tedious data presentation in a laundry list format, moving from descriptions of the literature to critical analysis, avoiding simplistic conclusions, and budgeting time for the overall process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manisha Bahl
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Muradali D, Fletcher GG, Cordeiro E, Fienberg S, George R, Kulkarni S, Seely JM, Shaheen R, Eisen A. Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Clinical Practice Guideline. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:6255-6270. [PMID: 37504323 PMCID: PMC10378361 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after the diagnosis of breast cancer by mammography and/or ultrasound is inconsistent. METHODS After conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing preoperative breast MRI versus no MRI, we reconvened to prepare a clinical practice guideline on this topic. RESULTS Based on the evidence that MRI improved recurrence, decreased the rates of reoperations (re-excisions or conversion mastectomy), and increased detection of synchronous contralateral breast cancer, we recommend that preoperative breast MRI should be considered on a case-by-case basis in patients diagnosed with breast cancer for whom additional information about disease extent could influence treatment. Based on stronger evidence, preoperative breast MRI is recommended in patients diagnosed with invasive lobular carcinoma for whom additional information about disease extent could influence treatment. For both recommendations, the decision to proceed with MRI would be conditional on shared decision-making between care providers and the patient, taking into account the benefits and risks of MRI as well as patient preferences. Based on the opinion of the Working Group, preoperative breast MRI is also recommended in the following more specific situations: (a) to aid in surgical planning of breast conserving surgery in patients with suspected or known multicentric or multifocal disease; (b) to identify additional lesions in patients with dense breasts; (c) to determine the presence of pectoralis major muscle/chest wall invasion in patients with posteriorly located tumours or when invasion of the pectoralis major muscle or chest wall is suspected; (d) to aid in surgical planning for skin/nipple-sparing mastectomies, autologous reconstruction, oncoplastic surgery, and breast conserving surgery with suspected nipple/areolar involvement; and (e) in patients with familial/hereditary breast cancer but who have not had recent breast MRI as part of screening or diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek Muradali
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Glenn G Fletcher
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Erin Cordeiro
- Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | | | - Ralph George
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Supriya Kulkarni
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Jean M Seely
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Rola Shaheen
- Department of Radiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
- Diagnostic Imaging, Peterborough Regional Health Centre, Peterborough, ON K9J 7C6, Canada
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Trepakova AI, Skovpin IV, Chukanov NV, Salnikov OG, Chekmenev EY, Pravdivtsev AN, Hövener JB, Koptyug IV. Subsecond Three-Dimensional Nitrogen-15 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Facilitated by Parahydrogen-Based Hyperpolarization. J Phys Chem Lett 2022; 13:10253-10260. [PMID: 36301252 PMCID: PMC9983028 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides unique information about the internal structure and function of living organisms in a non-invasive way. The use of conventional proton MRI for the observation of real-time metabolism is hampered by the dominant signals of water and fat, which are abundant in living organisms. Heteronuclear MRI in conjunction with the hyperpolarization methods does not encounter this issue. In this work, we polarized 15N nuclei of [15N1]fampridine (a drug used for the treatment of multiple sclerosis) to the level of 4% in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments and 0.7% in MRI studies using spin-lock-induced crossing combined with signal amplification by reversible exchange. Consequently, three-dimensional 15N MRI of the hyperpolarized 15N-labeled drug was acquired in 0.1 s with a signal-to-noise ratio of 70. In addition, the NMR signal enhancements for 15N-enriched fampridine and fampridine with a natural abundance of 15N nuclei were compared and an explanation for their difference was proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra I. Trepakova
- International Tomography Center, SB RAS, 3A Institutskaya St., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
- Novosibirsk State University, 2 Pirogova St., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
- Institute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS, 10 Acad. Lavrentiev Ave., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
| | - Ivan V. Skovpin
- International Tomography Center, SB RAS, 3A Institutskaya St., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
| | - Nikita V. Chukanov
- International Tomography Center, SB RAS, 3A Institutskaya St., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
- Novosibirsk State University, 2 Pirogova St., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
| | - Oleg G. Salnikov
- International Tomography Center, SB RAS, 3A Institutskaya St., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
| | - Eduard Y. Chekmenev
- Department of Chemistry, Integrative Biosciences (Ibio), Karmanos Cancer Institute (KCI), Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, 48202, USA
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), 14 Leninskiy Prospekt, Moscow, 119991, Russia
| | - Andrey N. Pravdivtsev
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology Section Biomedical Imaging, MOIN CC, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Universität Kiel, 14 Am Botanischen Garten, Kiel, 24118, Germany
| | - Jan-Bernd Hövener
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology Section Biomedical Imaging, MOIN CC, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Universität Kiel, 14 Am Botanischen Garten, Kiel, 24118, Germany
| | - Igor V. Koptyug
- International Tomography Center, SB RAS, 3A Institutskaya St., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vilar VS, Gomes AI, Federicci ÉEF, Ribeiro RLDM, Rudner MA, Racy ACS. FAST breast magnetic resonance imaging: a new approach for breast cancer screening? EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO 2022; 20:eAO0073. [PMID: 35857951 PMCID: PMC9278930 DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2022ao0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop an abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging protocol (FAST) and to compare it with the complete protocol (FULL) to determine its diagnostic accuracy for detecting malignant or suspicious lesions (BI-RADS 4, 5 and 6) and the time required for image interpretation using BI-RADS categorization. METHODS Retrospective study with 100 consecutive women who underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging between January and February 2014. All patients were submitted to a complete breast magnetic resonance imaging protocol, which was then compared with an abbreviated protocol (pre-contrast sequence, second post-contrast sequence and subtraction of pre- from post-contrast images). RESULTS Of 100 patients, 4 were classified as BI-RADS 5 or 6 and 16 as BI-RADS 4. In these 20 patients, there was full agreement among readers regarding the final BI-RADS categorization in both (FAST and FULL) protocols. CONCLUSION The FAST protocol reduces interpretation time without compromising the accuracy of the method for detection of malignant or suspicious lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Sales Vilar
- Hospital Israelita Albert EinsteinSão PauloSPBrazilHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | - Andressa Inácio Gomes
- Hospital Israelita Albert EinsteinSão PauloSPBrazilHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | | | | | - Mônica Akahoshi Rudner
- Hospital Israelita Albert EinsteinSão PauloSPBrazilHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | - Ana Cláudia Silveira Racy
- Hospital Israelita Albert EinsteinSão PauloSPBrazilHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bahl M. Screening MRI in Women at Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk: An Update of the Recent Literature. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2022; 4:231-240. [PMID: 35783682 PMCID: PMC9233194 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbac021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Guidelines issued by the American Cancer Society (ACS) in 2007 recommend neither for nor against screening MRI in women at intermediate breast cancer risk (15%-20%), including those with dense breast tissue, a history of lobular neoplasia or atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), or a prior breast cancer, because of scarce supporting evidence about the utility of MRI in these specific patient populations. However, since the issuance of the ACS guidelines in 2007, multiple investigations have found that women at intermediate risk may be suitable candidates for screening MRI, given the high detection rates of early-stage cancers and acceptable false-positive rates. For women with dense breast tissue, the Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening trial reported that the incremental cancer detection rate (CDR) by MRI exceeded 16 cancers per 1000 examinations but decreased in the second round of screening; this decrease in CDR, however, occurred alongside a marked decrease in the false-positive rate. For women with lobular neoplasia or ADH, single-institution retrospective analyses have shown CDRs mostly ranging from 11 to 16 cancers per 1000 MRI examinations, with women with lobular carcinoma in situ benefitting more than women with atypical lobular hyperplasia or ADH. For patients with a prior breast cancer, the cancer yield by MRI varies widely but mostly ranges from 8 to 20 cancers per 1000 examinations, with certain subpopulations more likely to benefit, such as those with dense breasts. This article reviews and summarizes more recent studies on MRI screening of intermediate-risk women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manisha Bahl
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moraes MO, Forte GC, Guimarães ADSG, Grando MBFDP, Junior SA, Kepler C, Hochhegger B. Breast MRI: Simplifying protocol and BI-RADS categories. Clin Breast Cancer 2022; 22:e615-e622. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
10
|
Maffei ME. Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:1339. [PMID: 35163262 PMCID: PMC8835851 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Humans are exposed to a complex mix of man-made electric and magnetic fields (MFs) at many different frequencies, at home and at work. Epidemiological studies indicate that there is a positive relationship between residential/domestic and occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and some types of cancer, although some other studies indicate no relationship. In this review, after an introduction on the MF definition and a description of natural/anthropogenic sources, the epidemiology of residential/domestic and occupational exposure to MFs and cancer is reviewed, with reference to leukemia, brain, and breast cancer. The in vivo and in vitro effects of MFs on cancer are reviewed considering both human and animal cells, with particular reference to the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS). MF application on cancer diagnostic and therapy (theranostic) are also reviewed by describing the use of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications for the detection of several cancers. Finally, the use of magnetic nanoparticles is described in terms of treatment of cancer by nanomedical applications for the precise delivery of anticancer drugs, nanosurgery by magnetomechanic methods, and selective killing of cancer cells by magnetic hyperthermia. The supplementary tables provide quantitative data and methodologies in epidemiological and cell biology studies. Although scientists do not generally agree that there is a cause-effect relationship between exposure to MF and cancer, MFs might not be the direct cause of cancer but may contribute to produce ROS and generate oxidative stress, which could trigger or enhance the expression of oncogenes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo E Maffei
- Department Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Via Quarello 15/a, 10135 Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Reig B. Radiomics and deep learning methods in expanding the use of screening breast MRI. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:5863-5865. [PMID: 34014381 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08056-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
KEY POINTS • The use of screening breast MRI is expanding beyond high-risk women to include intermediate- and average-risk women.• The study by Pötsch et al uses a radiomics-based method to decrease the number of benign biopsies while maintaining high sensitivity.• Future studies will likely increasingly focus on deep learning methods and abbreviated MRI data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriu Reig
- The Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, 160 E 34th St, 3rd floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Berg WA, Rafferty EA, Friedewald SM, Hruska CB, Rahbar H. Screening Algorithms in Dense Breasts: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 216:275-294. [PMID: 32903054 PMCID: PMC8101043 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.24436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality; however, when used to examine women with dense breasts, its performance and resulting benefits are reduced. Increased breast density is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), ultrasound (US), molecular breast imaging (MBI), MRI, and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) each have shown improved cancer detection in dense breasts when compared with 2D digital mammography (DM). DBT is the preferred mammographic technique for producing a simultaneous reduction in recalls (i.e., additional imaging). US further increases cancer detection after DM or DBT and reduces interval cancers (cancers detected in the interval between recommended screening examinations), but it also produces substantial additional false-positive findings. MBI improves cancer detection with an effective radiation dose that is approximately fourfold that of DM or DBT but is still within accepted limits. MRI provides the greatest increase in cancer detection and reduces interval cancers and late-stage disease; abbreviated techniques will reduce cost and improve availability. CEM appears to offer performance similar to that of MRI, but further validation is needed. Dense breast notification will soon be a national standard; therefore, understanding the performance of mammography and supplemental modalities is necessary to optimize screening for women with dense breasts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendie A Berg
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| | | | - Sarah M Friedewald
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Carrie B Hruska
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
| | - Habib Rahbar
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Harvey JA. Screening: Looking into the Crystal Ball. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2020; 2:177-178. [PMID: 38424983 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaa019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Harvey
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Imaging Sciences, Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Morris EA. The Promise of Abbreviated Breast MRI: Solution for Women Who Are Currently Underscreened? JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2020; 2:215-216. [PMID: 38424987 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaa021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Morris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|