1
|
Horton DR. Psyllids in Natural Habitats as Alternative Resources for Key Natural Enemies of the Pear Psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea). INSECTS 2024; 15:37. [PMID: 38249044 PMCID: PMC10816694 DOI: 10.3390/insects15010037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
The pear psyllids (Cacopsylla spp.; Psylloidea) comprise ~24 species of sap-feeding insects distributed in Europe, temperate Asia, and (as introductions) in the Americas. These pear-specialized insects are among the most damaging and difficult to control pests in orchards. Biological control increasingly is being used to replace or partially replace insecticidal management of pear psyllids. Many key natural enemies of pear psyllids regularly occur in non-orchard habitats on native plants. The presence of beneficial species both in orchard and non-orchard habitats (here referred to as "spillover") has prompted suggestions that native plants and their associated psyllids should be conserved as alternative resources for natural enemies of pear psyllids. The expectation is that the natural enemies will move from those habitats into psyllid-infested orchards. This review shows that psyllids in native habitats are important resources for several key predators and parasitoids of pear psyllids. These resources are critical enough that some beneficials exhibit an almost nomadic existence as they move between plant species, tracking the seasonal appearance and disappearance of psyllid species. In contrast, other natural enemies show minimal or no spillover between orchard and non-orchard habitats, which likely is evidence that they exhibit limited movement at best between orchard and non-orchard habitats. To show conclusively that spillover also indicates that a beneficial species disperses between native habitats and orchards requires difficult research on insect movement. This review concludes with a brief discussion of these difficulties and possible solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Horton
- Temperate Tree Fruit and Vegetable Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Wapato, WA 98951, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hanel A, Orpet RJ, Hilton R, Nottingham L, Northfield TD, Schmidt-Jeffris R. Turning a Pest into a Natural Enemy: Removing Earwigs from Stone Fruit and Releasing Them in Pome Fruit Enhances Pest Control. INSECTS 2023; 14:906. [PMID: 38132580 PMCID: PMC10743910 DOI: 10.3390/insects14120906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
The European earwig Forficula auricularia (L.) (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) is an omnivorous insect that is considered a minor pest of stone fruit and a key predator of pests in pome fruit orchards. In many pome fruit orchards, earwigs are absent or in low abundance due to broad-spectrum spray programs and the slow recolonization rate of earwigs. Orchards in transition to organic or "selective" conventional programs often struggle to achieve effective levels of biological control, and thus, may benefit from inoculating earwigs to expedite their re-establishment. In a two-year study, we evaluated the potential for mass trapping earwigs from stone fruit using rolled cardboard traps to reduce fruit damage and provide earwigs for augmentation in pome fruit. We also tested whether a single mass release or five releases (on alternating weeks) of the same total number of earwigs in apples and pears reduced pests relative to plots where no releases occurred. Mass trapping did not decrease earwig abundance or substantially reduce fruit damage in stone fruit orchards. However, trapping was an efficient method for providing earwigs for augmentation. Earwig abundances were only increased in orchards where earwigs were previously low or absent; however, multiple orchards with varying prior levels of earwigs exhibited reductions in key pests (woolly apple aphid and pear psylla). For some other pests evaluated, plots with mass releases of earwigs had a slight trend in overall lower pest density when compared with control plots. A strategy for moving earwigs out of stone fruit orchards and into pome fruit orchards could be an effective method for augmenting orchard predator populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Hanel
- Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA; (R.J.O.); (L.N.); (T.D.N.)
| | - Robert J. Orpet
- Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA; (R.J.O.); (L.N.); (T.D.N.)
- Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA 98801, USA
| | - Richard Hilton
- Southern Oregon Research and Extension Center, Oregon State University, Central Point, OR 97502, USA;
| | - Louis Nottingham
- Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA; (R.J.O.); (L.N.); (T.D.N.)
- Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Mount Vernon, WA 98273, USA
| | - Tobin D. Northfield
- Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA; (R.J.O.); (L.N.); (T.D.N.)
- Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA 98801, USA
| | - Rebecca Schmidt-Jeffris
- Temperate Tree Fruit and Vegetable Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Wapato, WA 98951, USA;
| |
Collapse
|