Open and arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: a review of current concepts

Arthroscopic Management of Femoroacetabular Impingement: Current Concepts

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of hip pain and dysfunction, especially in young and active individuals, and it may require surgical management for associated labral tears and cartilage damage. The management of FAI has advanced radically over the last few years, and hip arthroscopy has gained a leading role. However, despite the increasing number of published research and technological advancements, a comprehensive systematic review summarising current evidence is still missing. Methods: All the clinical studies investigating the arthroscopic management of FAI were accessed. Only studies with a minimum of six months of follow-up were considered. The 2020 PRISMA guidelines were followed. In December 2024, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were accessed without time constraints. Results: The present systematic review included 258 clinical investigations (57,803 patients). The mean length of follow-up was 34.2 ± 22.7 months. The mean age was 34.7 ± 5.3, and the mean BMI was 25.1 ± 2.0 kg/m2. Conclusions: The present systematic review updates current evidence on patients who have undergone arthroscopic surgery for FAI, updating and discussing current progress in managing labral injuries and patient selection, emphasising outcomes and pitfalls. Progress in surgery and improvement in eligibility criteria, as well as current controversies and prospects, were also discussed.

Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement in Athletes Versus Non-Athletes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a frequently observed hip condition among young, active individuals-especially athletes-that can result in pain, restricted mobility, and a heightened risk of osteoarthritis. Hip arthroscopy has increasingly become the preferred surgical approach for managing FAI due to its ability to alleviate symptoms and improve function. However, potential differences in outcomes between athletes and non-athletes have not been thoroughly investigated. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared arthroscopic management for FAI in athletes versus non-athletes. The outcomes of interest were patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complications.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were systematically accessed until October 2024. The studies eligible were clinical investigations comparing athletes and non-athletes undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The outcomes assessed included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Hip Outcome Score for Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), and the Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS). Data on reoperation rates and progression to total hip arthroplasty were also extracted. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

Three comparative investigations, comprising 808 patients (165 athletes and 643 non-athletes), met the inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics were similar across both groups. The analyses demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the PROMs (VAS: p = 0.7; HOS-ADL: p = 0.5; HOS-SSS: p = 0.4), reoperation rates (p = 0.7), or the rate of progression to arthroplasty (p = 0.4) between athletes and non-athletes. Furthermore, meta-analyses of two studies reinforced the absence of significant differences in VAS and HOS-SSS outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Hip arthroscopy for FAI appears to yield equivalent improvements in pain and functional outcomes for both athletes and non-athletes, with comparable complication rates at an approximate two-year follow-up. Despite the limited number of studies and a moderate risk of bias, the findings support the effectiveness of arthroscopic intervention across varying physical activity levels.

Preoperative versus postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in femoroacetabular impingement patients undergoing hip arthroscopy surgery: analgesic effect, joint function, patients' satisfaction, and quality of life

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have analgesic effects on femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients undergoing hip arthroscopy surgery (HAS). However, the influence of medication time on the analgesic effect of NSAIDs is uncertain. This study aimed to compare the analgesic effect, joint function, quality of life (QoL), and patients' satisfaction between preoperative and postoperative NSAIDs in these patients.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational study, 165 FAI patients undergoing HAS with NSAIDs (celecoxib, meloxicam, and nimesulide) for analgesia were divided into preoperative (PRE-A) and postoperative analgesia (POST-A) groups according to their actual medication.

RESULTS

The visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores on the 1st (P < 0.001) and 3rd (D3) (P = 0.015) days after the operation were lower in the PRE-A group versus the POST-A group but not preoperatively (P = 0.262) or on the 7th day after the operation (D7) (P = 0.302). The proportion of patients receiving rescue analgesia decreased in the PRE-A group versus POST-A group (P = 0.041). However, the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), proportion of patients with an mHHS ≥ 70, and EuroQol-5-dimensional score at preoperative, 1st month (M1), and 3rd month (M3) after the operation were similar between the groups (all P > 0.050). The VAS score on D7 was greater in the PRE-A group compared to the POST-A group (P = 0.014), but the scores at M1 and M3 and the satisfaction and very satisfaction rates at D7, M1, and M3 did not differ between the groups (all P > 0.050). Subgroup analysis revealed that the type of NSAID did not affect most outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative NSAIDs elevate analgesic effect and patients' satisfaction, but not joint function or QoL compared to postoperative NSAIDs in FAI patients undergoing HAS.

Circumferential Labral Reconstruction With Knotless All-Suture Anchors Restores Hip Distractive Stability: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis

BACKGROUND

The essential component of managing femoroacetabular impingement involves restoration of the original labral function. Circumferential labral reconstruction (CLR) has shown positive results. However, biomechanical studies of CLR are limited and have not established the efficacy of the modern knotless all-suture anchor (ASA) pull-through technique.

HYPOTHESES

(1) CLR with knotless ASA fixation will restore native labral suction seal biomechanics; (2) tensioning the ASA to a high-tension state will increase the peak distractive force.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric hips were dissected free of all soft tissue except the native labrum and transverse acetabular ligament. On an electromechanical testing system, the hips were compressively loaded to 250 N to initiate a suction seal and distracted at a rate of 10 mm/s until rupture of the suction seal. Hips were tested in 4 states: intact labrum, full labral removal, knotless CLR with moderate anchor tension, and CLR with high anchor tension. Peak distractive force (in newtons) was compared using repeated measures analysis of variance (P < .05). Acetabular bevel angles (θ) were measured at labral clockface positions outside the transverse acetabular ligament using a 3-dimensional digitizer stylus after rim preparation. Linear regression plots compared θ and peak distractive force in the CLR state.

RESULTS

Peak force values were 138.5 ± 13.6 N (mean ± SE) for the intact labrum, 18.4 ± 2.79 N for labral excision, 95.4 ± 23.3 N for moderate-tension CLR, and 126.2 ± 27.3 N for high-tension CLR. Significant differences were observed only when full labral removal was compared with the other conditions: intact (P < .001), moderate-tension CLR (P = .016), and high-tension CLR (P = .002). Steeper acetabular bevel angles (smaller θ) were correlated with greater suction seal restoration (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

CLR restored distractive stability on average to 82.0% of the intact value after labral deficiency. Retensioning did not significantly increase peak distractive forces.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These findings provide biomechanical validation supporting CLR using knotless ASAs in an effort to minimize volumetric bone loss and provide other surgical advantages. The prepared rim's bevel angle may be an important variable to optimize for improved suction seal restoration.

Review of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a common condition of the hip that can cause significant damage to the joint, leading to degeneration and osteoarthritis. FAIS constitutes an abnormal and dynamic contact between the femoral head-neck junction and the acetabular rim, resulting from altered bone morphology at one or both sites. Repetitive trauma at the site of impingement generates progressive damage to the acetabular labrum, chondrolabral junction, and articular cartilage. Proper diagnosis based on patient symptoms, specific clinical signs, and imaging findings will guide treatment and ultimately allow preservation of the native hip joint. Common symptoms in patients with FAIS include pain, clicking, catching, buckling, stiffness, giving way, and a limited range of motion of the hip. Specific clinical maneuvers can aid diagnosis, such as flexion adduction internal rotation and flexion abduction external rotation tests. Imaging diagnosis includes orthogonal hip and pelvis X-ray views, as well as magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance arthrogram imaging. Initial treatment of FAIS can be conservative and include physical therapy, intra-articular injections, and activity modification. Currently, the preferred surgical management consists of hip arthroscopy, which aims to correct bony abnormalities, repair or reconstruct labral lesions and address other intra-articular and extra-articular derangements as needed.

Hip Circumferential Labral Reconstruction Provides Similar Distractive Stability to Labral Repair After Cam Over-Resection in a Biomechanical Model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the change in hip distractive stability after a cam over-resection, labral tear, repair, labrectomy, or circumferential 6- or 10-mm labral reconstruction in a biomechanical model.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen matched-pair human cadaveric hips were analyzed using a materials testing system to measure the force and distance required to disrupt the suction seal of the hip (1) with an intact capsule and labrum; (2) after a capsulectomy and labral repair; (3) after a capsulectomy, 5-mm cam over-resection and labral repair; (4) after a capsulectomy, 5-mm cam over-resection and labral tear; (5) after a capsulectomy, 5-mm cam over-resection and labrectomy; and (6) after a capsulectomy, 5-mm cam over-resection and a 6- or 10-mm circumferential labral reconstruction with iliotibial band (5 hips each). Each specimen was retested at 0° flexion, 45° flexion, and 45° flexion and at 15° internal rotation and analyzed using nonparametric statistical methods.

RESULTS

The Friedman test of differences was significant among structural conditions and hip positions (P = .001). In all positions, the resistive force that opposed the disruption of the suction seal in an intact hip was significantly greater compared with all other conditions. The resistive force for the capsulectomy, 5-mm cam over-resection and labrectomy condition was significantly less compared with almost all other conditions and hip positions. A qualitative suction seal was achieved in 20% of hip specimens with a 6-mm labral reconstruction, whereas a seal was in achieved 60% of specimens with a 10-mm labral reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

After a cam over-resection, a circumferential labral reconstruction improves the distractive stability of a labral deficient hip, comparable to a labral repair or tear in a biomechanical model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Circumferential labral reconstruction may be a viable treatment option for patients with ongoing symptoms after hip arthroscopy with evidence of a cam over-resection and a deficient labrum.

Feasibility and potential of intraoperative ultrasound in arthroscopy of femoroacetabular impingement

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using ultrasound for monitoring osteochondroplasty intraoperatively, determine the factors that interfere with ultrasound imaging and assess its influence on surgeon performance. Intraoperative ultrasonography was performed during osteochondroplasty in 39 cases of arthroscopy. The femoral head-neck junction (FHNJ) was evaluated using ultrasonography. Another 39 cases, which underwent conventional arthroscopy, were included in the control group. The C-arm was used in this group at the end of osteochondroplasty to confirm that no residual cam lesion remained. Pre- and postoperative Dunn radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans were analyzed to determine the feasibility of ultrasound. Residual cam deformity was noted in eight cases under ultrasound. The FHNJ was not detected owing to ultrasound interference by air in three cases. No difference in the α angle measured in Dunn radiographs and the residual cam deformity rate of CT at the 1:00, 2:00 or 3:00 position was found between both groups. However, the α angle at the 3:00 position was greater in the ultrasound group than in the control group (44.4 ± 4.3° versus 41.3 ± 5.1°, P < 0.05), suggesting that more bone was preserved at 3:00 in the ultrasound group. No difference was found in the mean operation time. None of the patients experienced complications, such as wounds or intra-articular infections. Ultrasound is a safe method for assessing FHNJ during arthroscopy. It did not change the risk of residual cam deformity but positively affected the surgeon's performance by reducing unnecessary bone removal.

Long-Term Outcomes of Arthroscopic Labral Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Adolescents: A Nested Propensity-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Hip arthroscopy has demonstrated effectiveness as a treatment for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in adult patients, with promising long-term outcomes. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding the adolescent population. The purposes of our study were to report on survivorship and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at a minimum 10-year follow-up in adolescent patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI and labral tears and to compare the survivorship and outcomes of this population with those of a nested, propensity-matched adult control group.

METHODS

Data regarding adolescent patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy between February 2008 and January 2012 were reviewed. Patients with a minimum 10-year follow-up for the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were eligible. The exclusion criteria were previous ipsilateral hip conditions or surgical procedures, a Tönnis grade of >1, or dysplasia. In the subanalysis, adolescent patients were matched to young adult patients with use of a 1:1 ratio on the basis of sex, body mass index, Tönnis grade, lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), labral treatment, capsular treatment, and additional procedures performed during the surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients (61 female and 13 male; 74 hips) with a mean (and standard deviation) age of 16.7 ± 1.4 years and a minimum follow-up of 10 years were included. The latest follow-up occurred at a mean of 125.4 ± 5.3 months (range, 120.0 to 144.1 months). Significant improvement in all PROs from baseline and 100% survivorship were demonstrated at the 10-year follow-up. In the subanalysis, 58 adolescent hips were propensity-matched to 58 young adult hips. The adolescent group had higher postoperative scores for the HOS-SSS (p = 0.021), NAHS (p = 0.021), and iHOT-12 (p = 0.042) than the young adult group. Patient satisfaction at the latest follow-up was also significantly higher in the adolescent group (p = 0.00061). The rate of survivorship free from conversion to THA was similar between the adolescent and control groups (100% versus 96.6%; p = 0.200).

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents undergoing hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAI and labral tears demonstrated excellent outcomes and a high rate of survivorship. These outcomes were superior to those seen in a matched adult group. The results of this study indicate that hip arthroscopy in adolescents is a safe procedure that leads to improvement in outcomes at long-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Hip Arthroscopy Followed by 6-Month Rehabilitation Leads to Improved Periarticular Muscle Strength, Except for Abductors and External Rotators

Purpose

To evaluate the variations in hip muscles strength following arthroscopy and 6-month rehabilitation in patients treated for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was carried out on a series of patients who were arthroscopically treated for FAI at La Tour Hospital between 2020 and 2022. Bilateral isometric strengths of 8 hip-related muscles (abductors, adductors, hamstrings, quadriceps, extensors, flexors, internal and external rotators) were assessed using a handheld dynamometer before surgery and postoperatively after 6 months of rehabilitation in terms of relative strength changes between time points.

Results

A total of 29 patients (aged 26.9 ± 7.1 years, 86% of women) were included. Except for the abductors, which remained of comparable strength than before surgery, a statistically significant (P < .05) increase in hip muscle strength on the operated side could be noted at 6 postoperative months for hamstrings (9% ± 17%, P = .041), quadriceps (11% ± 27%, P = .045), extensors (17% ± 32%, P = .006), flexors (17% ± 29%, P = .003), adductors (18% ± 23%, P < .001), and internal rotators (32% ± 36%, P < .001). The proportion of patients who reached a strength level above their preoperative status ranged from 62% (quadriceps) to 86% (adductors and flexors), depending on the muscle studied. The external rotators were the only muscles that remained significantly weakened at 6 months on both operated (-13% ± 26%, P = .002) and nonoperated (-17% ± 25%, P < .001) sides, with a decrease beyond 15% in almost half of the patients (45% and 48%, respectively).

Conclusions

Arthroscopic treatment followed by 6-month rehabilitation granted to most FAI patients a higher strength level for several hip muscles, except for abductors and external rotators, which remained comparable and weakened, respectively.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.