Axillary node metastasis from T1N0M0 breast cancer: possible avoidance of dissection in a subgroup

BMP-2 upregulates the AKT/mTOR pathway in breast cancer with microcalcification and indicates a poor prognosis

BACKGROUND

As a reliable biomarker of breast cancer, breast microcalcification has been reported to be correlated with poor prognosis. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) plays an important role in microcalcification of breast cancer. Studies in other tissues have shown an association between BMP-2 and AKT/mTOR pathway, while their relationship in breast cancer still remains largely undetermined. To clarify the relationship of these three factors, we collected patients of invasive breast cancer with/without microcalcification and immunohistochemical examination was performed.

METHOD/PATIENTS

A total of 272 patients with primary invasive breast cancer were selected from the First Hospital of China Medical University from January 2010 to January 2012. Immunohistochemical examination of the BMP-2, p-AKT and p-mTOR was performed on 4-µm tissue microarray (TMA) sections. Then, we analyzed the relationship of BMP-2, p-AKT, and p-mTOR and their correlation with disease-free survival (DFS) in breast cancer with/without microcalcification.

RESULTS

We found that breast cancer patients with microcalcification were correlated with HER-2 positive expression and poor prognosis. Immunohistochemical examination showed that the expressions of BMP-2 and p-mTOR were increased in breast cancer with microcalcification and the expressions of BMP-2, p-AKT, and p-mTOR were correlated with each other. Moreover, the high expressions of BMP-2, p-AKT, and p-mTOR were significantly correlated with poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the abovementioned findings, we hypothesized that the high expression of BMP-2 not only played a vital role in the formation of microcalcification, but also activated the AKT/mTOR pathway. Collectively, breast cancer patients with microcalcification were more likely to be resistant to targeted or endocrine therapy and be correlated with poor prognosis.

Malignant calcification is an important unfavorable prognostic factor in primary invasive breast cancer

AIMS

To explore the clinical characteristics and prognostic value of malignant calcification in operable breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 721 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma were divided into two groups based on whether malignant calcifications were observed on mammograms. The association of calcification with pathological features and survival were evaluated. The relative importance of each of the potential prognostic variables was tested using a Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Compared with tumors without calcification, those with calcification had a larger tumor size, more lymph node involvement, lower estrogen and progesterone receptor expression and higher human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 expression. The 8-year relapse-free survival was lower for patients with calcifications than for those without (77.5 vs 89.2%, P < 0.01). The 8-year overall survival for patients with calcifications was 82.2% compared with 91.9% for those without (P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, node status, existence of calcification and tumor size were demonstrated to have a prognostic value for relapse-free survival. The node status, existence of calcifications and estrogen receptor status were also prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Mammographic calcification is a poor prognostic factor for patients with invasive ductal carcinoma. Its prognostic value is second only to axillary node status and greater than the other factors evaluated. Thus, breast cancers with calcifications should be regarded as high risk when determining adjuvant treatment.

Factors predicting the axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: is axillary node clearance indicated in every breast cancer patient?: factors predicting the axillary lymphnode metastases in breast cancer

The study was carried out to find out predictors of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer and to evaluate its significance in selecting the group of patients in whom axillary dissection could be avoided. Ninety-five breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy and axillary dissection were included in the study. Factors like patient's age, tumor size, histopathological type, histological grade and estrogen and progesterone receptor status were correlated with the axillary metastases. Out of 95 cases axillary metastasis was found in 47 (49.47%) cases. There was no correlation between patient's age and tumor size with axillary metastasis (p > 0.05). Based on histopathological typing tumors like ductal carcinoma in situ, tubular carcinoma and mucinous carcinoma showed less tendency for axillary metastasis (p < 0.046). Association was found between histological grade and estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positivity with presence of axillary metastasis (p < 0.001 and 0.002 respectively). The findings in this study indicate that breast cancer patients having favorable histological type, grade I tumors and estrogen and progesterone receptor negative tumor are good candidates to avoid axillary dissection.

Factors correlating with lymph node metastases in patients with T1 ductal invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Identification of reliable predictors of axillary lymph node metastases (ALNM) may be useful in selecting appropriate management for patients with T1-size breast cancer. This study was undertaken to determine the association between ALNM and several variables, including age, tumor size, grade, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, p53 and c-erbB2 protein expression, and Ki-67 proliferative index. METHODS: In a retrospective study, 74 patients with pT1b and pT1c ductal invasive breast carcinoma and with known nodal status were analyzed. The size of the infiltrating tumor was microscopically evaluated. The histological grading was performed using the modified criteria of Bloom and Richardson, as described by Elston and Ellis. The immunophenotype of the tumor was determined as: the expression of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors, p53, c-erbB2 and Ki-67. The patients were grouped by age as follows: <50, 50-70, and >70 years old. RESULTS: Twenty six patients (35%) were node positive. Tumor size was related directly to nodal positivity. Nodal positivity was significantly related to negative PR status, p53 protein overexpression and high Ki-67 index (p<0.05). No significant association was found between nodal positivity and patient age, tumor grade, ER status, and c-erbB2 expression. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that PR status, Ki-67 proliferation index, and p53 protein expression might provide additional information to the lymph node status in T1 ductal breast carcinomas.

Will we need lymph node dissection at all in the future?

Traditionally in the treatment of primary breast cancer, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) plays an important role. However, a substantial and increasing percentage of patients appear to have no nodal involvement and have been subjected to ALND unnecessarily. The first reason to perform an ALND is axillary nodal staging. After reviewing the literature, it can be concluded that in clinically node-negative patients an adequately conducted lymphatic mapping by sentinel node procedure is equal to ALND for this purpose. The second reason to perform an ALND is to establish the extent of nodal involvement, which might have an impact on adjuvant treatment recommendations. However, there is no evidence available that patients with extensive nodal involvement (= 4 positive nodes) benefit more from adjuvant systemic treatment (either standard or high dose) in terms of reduction of odds of recurrence and mortality compared to patients with limited nodal involvement and optimally administered so-called standard adjuvant treatment. The third reason to perform an ALND is to ensure axillary tumor control. Reviewing the different treatment options, it can be concluded that in clinically node-negative patients axillary control after axillary radiotherapy appears to be similar to axillary control after ALND. In clinically overt axillary involvement, ALND (with or without adjuvant radiotherapy) may result in an improved regional control. In the near future, ALND will not be the standard of care but will be reserved for those patients with proven axillary lymph node involvement. In microscopic disease, radiotherapy may be an alternative with equal control and less morbidity.

A prospective validated model for predicting axillary node metastases based on 2,000 sentinel node procedures: the role of tumour location [corrected]

AIMS

The purpose was to identify the independent predictive factors of axillary lymph-node metastases (ALNM) in infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IFDC) and to create a prospective, validated statistical model to predict the likelihood of ALNM in patients in the present era of sentinel lymph-node (SLN) biopsy and enhanced histopathology.

METHODS

Univariate and multivariate analyses of 13 clinicopathological variables (including tumour location) were performed to determine predictors of ALNM in 1659 eligible SLN biopsy procedures. A logistic regression model was developed and then prospectively validated on a second population of 187 subsequent consecutive procedures.

RESULTS

Age, pathological tumour size, palpability, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), histological grade, nuclear grade, ductal histological subtype, tumour location (quadrant) and multifocality were associated with ALNM in univariate analyses (P < 0.001). Of these, only palpability and histological grade were not statistically associated with ALNM in the multivariate analysis (P> 0.05). The frequency of ALNM in upper-inner-quadrant (UIQ) tumours was 20.6%, compared with 33.2% for all other quadrants (P<0.0005). There was no statistical difference between UIQ and other-quadrant tumours in any clinicopathological variables analysed. The logistic regression model, developed based on the population of 1659, had the same accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value when applied prospectively to the second population.

CONCLUSION

Tumour size, LVI, age, nuclear grade, histological subtype, multifocality and location in the breast were independent predictive factors for ALNM in IFDC. ALNM is less frequent in UIQ tumours than in other-quadrant tumours. Our prospectively validated predictive model could be valuable in pre-operative patient discussions, although staging of the axilla in the individual patient remains necessary.