The difference between delayed extubation and tracheostomy in post-operative sleep apnea after glossectomy or laryngectomy

Preoperative sleep-disordered breathing and craniofacial abnormalities are risk factors for postoperative sleep-disordered breathing in patients undergoing skin-flap oropharyngeal reconstruction surgery for oral cavity cancer: a prospective case-control study

PURPOSE

After oropharyngeal reconstruction surgery, excessive flap volume within the oral cavity may increase the risk of pharyngeal obstruction during sleep. This prospective observational study aimed to test a hypothesis that the skin-flap oropharyngeal reconstructive surgery increases nocturnal apnea-hypopnea index (nAHI, primary variable) after surgery.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing oropharyngeal reconstruction surgery participated in this study. The hypothesis was tested by comparing the results of portable type 4 sleep study and craniofacial assessments with lateral head and neck computed tomography scout image before and after surgery. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for nAHI increase after the surgery.

RESULTS

In 15 patients, a postoperative sleep study was performed at 41 (27, 59) (median (IQR)) days after the surgery. nAHI did not increase after the surgery (mean (95% CI), 13.0 (7.2 to 18.7) to 18.4 (10.2 to 26.6) events.hour-1, p = 0.277), while apnea index significantly increased after the surgery (p = 0.026). Use of the pedicle flap for the oropharyngeal reconstruction (p = 0.051), small mandible (p = 0.008), longer lower face (0.005), and larger tongue size (p = 0.008) were independent predictors for worsening of nAHI after surgery. Hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with the pedicle flap (n = 8) than in those with the free flap (n = 7) (p = 0.014), and the period of hospital stay was directly associated with increase of nAHI after surgery (r = 0.788, p < 0.001, n = 15).

CONCLUSIONS

Oropharyngeal reconstruction surgery worsens sleep-disordered breathing in some patients with craniofacial and surgical risk factors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000036260, March 22, 2019), https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/s/detail/um?trial_id=UMIN000036260.

Maxillomandibular Advancement and Tracheostomy for Morbidly Obese Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Objective

The objective of this study is to systematically review polysomnography data and sleepiness in morbidly obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥40 kg/m2) patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treated with either a maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) or a tracheostomy and to evaluate the outcomes.

Data Sources

MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library.

Review Methods

A search was performed from inception through April 8, 2014, in each database.

Results

Six maxillomandibular advancement studies (34 patients, age 42.42 ± 9.13 years, mean BMI 44.88 ± 4.28 kg/m2) and 6 tracheostomy studies (14 patients, age 52.21 ± 10.40 years, mean BMI 47.93 ± 7.55 kg/m2) reported individual patient data. The pre- and post-MMA means ± SDs for apnea-hypopnea indices were 86.18 ± 33.25/h and 9.16 ± 7.89/h ( P < .00001), and lowest oxygen saturations were 66.58% ± 16.41% and 87.03% ± 5.90% ( P < .00001), respectively. Sleepiness following MMA decreased in all 5 patients for whom it was reported. The pre- and posttracheostomy mean ± SD values for apnea indices were 64.43 ± 41.35/h and 1.73 ± 2.68/h ( P = .0086), oxygen desaturation indices were 69.20 ± 26.10/h and 41.38 ± 36.28/h ( P = .22), and lowest oxygen saturations were 55.17% ± 16.46% and 79.83% ± 4.36% ( P = .011), respectively. Two studies reported outcomes for Epworth Sleepiness Scale for 5 patients, with mean ± SD values of 18.80 ± 4.02 before tracheostomy and 2.80 ± 2.77 after tracheostomy ( P = .0034).

Conclusion

Data for MMA and tracheostomy as treatment for morbidly obese, adult OSA patients are significantly limited. We caution surgeons about drawing definitive conclusions from these limited studies; higher level studies are needed.

Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea following head and neck cancer treatment: A cross-sectional study

The obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS) is a sleep-related breathing disorder characterised by repetitive pharyngeal collapse. OSAHS is associated with a reduced quality of life. A high OSAHS prevalence has been reported in patients treated for head and neck cancer (HNC). The aim of the present study was to identify the prevalence of OSAHS within a Dutch population of patients treated for HNC. Consecutive HNC patients with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years after treatment of an oral or oropharynx carcinoma were eligible for inclusion. Two questionnaires were used to assess the presence of OSAHS-related complaints. Subsequently, polysomnography was used in patients with OSAHS-related complaints to confirm the diagnosis of OSAHS. Four out of 33 included patients were diagnosed with OSAHS, yielding a prevalence of 12%. Since recognition and treatment of OSAHS might play an important role in improving quality of life of HNC patients, we suggest screening all patients with an oral or oropharynx carcinoma for the presence of OSAHS-related complaints prior to and following HNC treatment.