An evaluation of tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) in the two bronchoalveolar lavage fractions of lung cancer patients

Evaluation of diagnostic value of four tumor markers in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of peripheral lung cancer

AIM

The diagnostic role of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen, Cyfra 21-1 and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) for lung cancer is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of these four tumor markers in BALF for peripheral lung cancer.

METHODS

We measured and compared the levels of CEA, SCC, Cyfra21-1 and NSE in BALF in 42 patients with peripheral lung cancer and 22 patients with benign lung disease. In the patients with peripheral lung cancer, the BAL was separately performed in the bronchus of the tumor-bearing lung and in the corresponding bronchus of the opposite healthy lung.

RESULTS

The levels of CEA, SCC, Cyfra21-1 and NSE were significantly elevated in BALF from the tumor-bearing lung compared with the opposite healthy lung in the lung cancer patients (P < 0.001) or the benign lung disease patients (P < 0.005). The diagnostic sensitivities of Cyfra21-1 (86 and 76%), with a specificity of 91%, were the highest among the four tumor markers for the tumor-bearing lung versus the opposite healthy lung and benign lung disease. The combination of Cyfra21-1 and CEA increased the sensitivity to 93 and 86 percent, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The assay of these tumor markers in BALF may be used as a diagnostic tool to complement a cytological examination in the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer.

Cytokeratin fragments in the serum: their utility for the management of oral cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common malignancy and is a major cause of cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide. Oral cancer is the most predominant malignancy in the Indian subcontinent due to the widespread habits of chewing tobacco and related products. Patients with oral tumours have a high risk of early locoregional relapse. Early detection of disease progression remains a challenging task mainly due to the lack of adequate early prognostic markers. CEA, SCC Ag, CA-125, serum cytokeratin (CK) fragments, Cyfra 21-1 (CK 19), TPS (CK 18), TPA (CK 8, 18, and 19) etc. are being used as serum markers for the prediction of prognosis of various malignancies. This review presents the available literature on serum CK markers in different malignancies evaluates their utility in the management of oral cancer, and identifies the lacunae which need to be addressed to develop sensitive and specific assays for early detection of recurrence, prognosis, and treatment monitoring.

How to Express Tumor Markers in Bronchoalveolar Lavage

Introduction

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a fundamental technique in the diagnosis of different respiratory diseases including lung cancer. Tumor marker values can be determined in the BAL fluid, but controversy still exists about how to express the results.

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine the best method of expressing tumor markers in BAL, either referring to total proteins or volume of fluid recovered.

Patients and Methods

A prospective, randomized, non-blind study was carried out. Seventy-six patients (72 men and 4 women) diagnosed with lung cancer and 17 subjects without respiratory disease were included. BAL was performed in all patients and the fluid retrieved was divided into two fractions: a bronchiolar fraction (F0) and an alveolar fraction (F1). Five tumor markers: cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA 21–1), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) as well as total protein were measured in both fractions. The concentrations were expressed in relation to the volume of BAL fluid recovered (ng or mU/mL) and in milligrams of total protein of lavage fluid (ng or mU/mg TP). The SPSS 11.01 software was used for statistical analysis. Mann-Whitney U test and ROC curves were developed when significant differences were found.

Results

We found significant differences in the CYFRA 21-1 values in the two BAL fractions and in both ways of expressing its concentration; in SCC in F1 expressed in ng/mg TP; in TPA in F0 expressed in mU/mg TP; in TPS in both fractions expressed in mU/mg TP, and in NSE in both fractions in ng/mg TP. The markers that best differentiated tumors from controls (ROC curves) were CYFRA 21-1 in F0 and NSE in both fractions in ng/mg TP.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that the concentrations of tumor markers in BAL expressed in relation to total protein were more effective than if expressed in mL of BAL fluid collected.