Weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (LV) and bimonthly cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Removal rate of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in patients on hemodialysis: a report of two cases of colorectal cancer patients with end-stage renal failure

PURPOSE

Hyperammonemia is a serious adverse effect of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) administration. Hemodialysis can be used for its management, but detailed data on the concentrations and removal rate of 5FU and its metabolites during hemodialysis remain unclear. Here, we present two cases of hemodialysis patients with end-stage renal disease who received concurrent 5FU infusion.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from the hemodialysis circuit before and after the dialyzer during day 2 hemodialysis sessions, and from the internal shunt just before and after day 4 hemodialysis sessions. The serum levels of 5FU and its metabolites-α-fluoro-β-alanine (FBAL) and monofluoroacetate (FA)-were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Seven sets of blood samples were collected for case 1; the removal rates (mean ± standard deviation) of 5FU and FBAL by the dialyzer were 81.2 ± 23.2% and 96.1 ± 8.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Three sets of blood samples were collected for case 2; the removal rates of 5FU and FBAL were 81.7 ± 3.9% and 94.8 ± 2.7%, respectively (p = 0.03). Twenty-seven sets of blood samples were collected for case 1; reductions in blood FBAL and FA levels were 49.3 ± 8.8% (p < 0.001) and 64.2 ± 30.3% (p = 0.04), respectively. Bayesian estimation yielded similar results. Three sets of blood samples were collected for case 2; reductions in the blood FBAL and FA levels were 49.9 ± 6.9% and 50.6 ± 33.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this study, 5FU and its metabolite FBAL were directly removed from the blood by approximately 90% during hemodialysis, and the blood levels of FBAL and FA were reduced by approximately 50% with a single hemodialysis session.

Successful management of hyperammonemia with hemodialysis on day 2 during 5-fluorouracil treatment in a patient with gastric cancer: a case report with 5-fluorouracil metabolite analyses

Purpose

Hyperammonemia is an important adverse event associated with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) from 5FU metabolite accumulation. We present a case of an advanced gastric cancer patient with chronic renal failure, who was treated with 5FU/leucovorin (LV) infusion chemotherapy (2-h infusion of LV and 5FU bolus followed by 46-h 5FU continuous infusion on day 1; repeated every 2 weeks) and developed hyperammonemia, with the aim of exploring an appropriate hemodialysis (HD) schedule to resolve its symptoms.

Methods

The blood concentrations of 5FU and its metabolites, α-fluoro-β-alanine (FBAL), and monofluoroacetate (FA) of a patient who had hyperammonemia from seven courses of palliative 5FU/LV therapy for gastric cancer were measured by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry.

Results

On the third day of the first cycle, the patient presented with symptomatic hyperammonemia relieved by emergency HD. Thereafter, the 5FU dose was reduced; however, in cycles 2–4, the patient developed symptomatic hyperammonemia and underwent HD on day 3 for hyperammonemia management. In cycles 5–7, the timing of scheduled HD administration was changed from day 3 to day 2, preventing symptomatic hyperammonemia. The maximum ammonia and 5FU metabolite levels were significantly lower in cycles 5–7 than in cycles 2–4 (NH3 75 ± 38 vs 303 ± 119 μg/dL, FBAL 13.7 ± 2.5 vs 19.7 ± 2.0 μg/mL, FA 204.0 ± 91.6 vs 395.9 ± 12.6 ng/mL, mean ± standard deviation, all p < 0.05). After seven cycles, partial response was confirmed.

Conclusion

HD on day 2 instead of 3 may prevent hyperammonemia in 5FU/LV therapy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00280-020-04158-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Disturbance of consciousness due to hyperammonemia and lactic acidosis during mFOLFOX6 regimen: Case report

INTRODUCTION

FOLFOX therapy is the main chemotherapy regimen for colorectal cancer. Peripheral neuropathy, hematotoxicity, and digestive symptoms are known to be the most frequent adverse events. Hyperammonemia and lactic acidosis rarely occur simultaneously during treatment with FOLFOX therapy; the number of case reports is limited worldwide. We report a case of disturbance of consciousness, considered to be caused by hyperammonemia and lactic acidosis that occurred during treatment with mFOLFOX6 therapy that was administered as postoperative adjuvant treatment for rectal cancer.

PATIENT CONCERNS

This case was of a 71-year-old man who had been receiving oral treatment for chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus. Laparoscopic low anterior resection and artificial anal construction surgery were performed for stage III rectal cancer. As adjuvant postoperative therapy, mFOLFOX6 therapy was started but was followed by a disturbance of consciousness.

DIAGNOSES

Results of the blood tests revealed notable hyperammonemia (ammonia level, 1,163 μg/dl) and lactic acidosis (pH 7.207; lactate, 17.56 mmol/L); however, imaging diagnosis did not reveal intracranial lesions that could cause disturbance of consciousness.

INTERVENTIONS

For hyperammonemia, branched-chain amino acid agents and Ringers solution supplementation were administered. For acidosis, 7% sodium hydrogen carbonate was administered as treatment.

OUTCOMES

The disturbance of consciousness improved within 12 hours of initiating the treatment, and the patient was discharged with no sequelae on 7th day after hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

In patients with chronic kidney disease, FOLFOX regimen may confer risks of hyperammonemia and lactic acidosis.

Acute hyperammonemic encephalopathy after fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy: A case series and review of the literature

Acute hyperammonemic encephalopathy induced by fluoropyrimidines (FPs) is a rare complication. Its pathophysiology remains unclear, especially given the currently used regimens, including intermediate-doses of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or oral FP agents. We aimed to characterize the clinical manifestations in cancer patients who developed hyperammonemic encephalopathy after receiving FP-based chemotherapy.We retrospectively reviewed 1786 patients with gastrointestinal or primary-unknown cancer who received FP-based regimens between 2007 and 2012. Eleven patients (0.6%) developed acute hyperammonemic encephalopathy. The incidence according to the administered anticancer drugs were as follows: 5-FU (8 of 1176, 0.7%), S-1 (1 of 679, 0.1%), capecitabine (2 of 225, 0.9%), and tegafur-uracil (UFT) (0 of 39, 0%). Ten patients (90.9%) had at least 1 aggravating factor, including infection, dehydration, constipation, renal dysfunction, and muscle loss. All the 10 patients met the definition of sarcopenia. Median time to the onset of hyperammonemic encephalopathy in the cycle was 3 days (range: 2-21). Three patients (27.3%) developed encephalopathy during the first cycle of the regimen and the remaining 8 patients during the second or more cycles. Seven patients (63.6%) had received at least 1 other FP-containing regimen before without episodes of encephalopathy.All patients recovered soon after immediate discontinuation of chemotherapy and supportive therapies, such as hydration, infusion of branched-chain amino acids, and oral lactulose intake, with a median time to recovery of 2 days (range: <1-7). Four patients (36.4%) received FP-based regimens after improvement of symptoms; 3 patients were successfully managed with dose reduction, and 1 patient, who had developed encephalopathy due to S-1 monotherapy, received modified FOLFOX-6 therapy without encephalopathy later.FP-associated acute hyperammonemic encephalopathy is extremely rare, but a possible event at any time and even during the administration of oral FP agents. Particular attention is warranted when giving FP-based therapy for patients with aggravating factors, such as sarcopenia. This complication can be properly managed with early detection.

Surgery for gastric cancer in a patient with non-cirrhotic hyperammonemia: a case report

We report a case of gastric cancer in a patient with non-cirrhotic hyperammonemia secondary to a spontaneous portacaval shunt. The patient, a 69-year-old male, had more than 40 years of abdominal discomfort. On gastroscopy, 2.0 × 1.5-cm irregular uplift ulcers were seen on the lesser curvature of the stomach, and tissue biopsy revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. His hyperammonemia was found on celiac angiography to be due to the formation of a spontaneous portacaval shunt. Imaging revealed no evidence of cirrhosis or portal hypertension. The patient ultimately underwent a distal gastrectomy and gastroduodenal anastomosis; the spontaneous portacaval shunt was left untreated. Postoperatively, there were no short-term complications such as anastomotic leakage, stricture, or bleeding, and the patient’s blood ammonia level decreased to within the normal range. Radical gastrectomy without splenectomy or closure of the abnormal shunt was feasible for the treatment of gastric cancer in a patient with non-cirrhotic hyperammonemia.

A multicenter phase II study of biweekly capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer

Purpose

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of biweekly capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

Methods

Patients received oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–10 plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² as a 2-h intravenous infusion on day 1, every 2 weeks (XELOX). The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity.

Results

From March 2007 to October 2010, 46 patients were enrolled in this phase II study. The median age was 64 years (range 32–85). A total of 391 (median 7.5, range 1–29) cycles were delivered. Among the 41 patients evaluable for tumor response, 9 showed partial response and 25 had stable disease. The overall response rates of the evaluable and intent-to-treat (ITT) populations were 22 % (95 % CI 10–42 %) and 20 % (95 % CI 9–34 %), respectively. In the ITT analysis, the progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.6 months (95 % CI 4.1–6.3 months) and 8.0 months (95 % CI 6.3–10.1 months), respectively. The most common hematological toxicities were thrombocytopenia (35 %) and leucopenia (34 %), whereas the most common non-hematological toxicities were neuropathy (35 %), fatigue (33 %), diarrhea (27 %), vomiting (26 %), and hand-foot syndrome (25 %). Major grade 3–4 toxicities were anemia (11 %), diarrhea (9 %), and hand-foot syndrome (7 %). No patient died of treatment-related toxicities.

Conclusions

Although the biweekly XELOX regimen failed its primary response rate endpoint, it showed modest efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Hyperammonemic encephalopathy in a patient with primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma

A 53-year-old male patient was admitted to our hospital with abdominal pain in the right upper quadrant. There was no change in laboratory investigations other than a slight increase in serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT). Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen showed multiple hepatic nodular lesions in the liver. Tru-cut biopsy of the lesions was reported as well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. The patient received sandostatin treatment. After a few days, the patient was hospitalized in the intensive care unit with disturbance of consciousness and clinical features suggestive of encephalopathy. Serum ammonia level was found highly elevated. After the treatment with L-ornithine-L-aspartate, a remarkable improvement in the level of patient's sensorium occurred as well as a reduction in serum ammonia level within a few days. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was performed one week later. The patient's condition began to worsen along with increase in serum ammonia level and he died because of hyperammonemic encephalopathy. There are case reports of hyperammonemia with some malignancies such as multiple myeloma, plasma cell leukemia, and leiomyosarcoma, or in some patients who have received chemotherapy. This case may suggest an association between hyperammonemia and neuroendocrine tumors.

The aggravating factors of hyperammonemia related to 5-fluorouracil infusion—A report of two cases

Hyperammonemia or hyperammonemic leukoencephalopathy sometimes occurs as an adverse event after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The actual mechanism responsible for hyperammonemia by 5-FU administration is not known. Patient 1, a 48-year-old woman with cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) presented with transient hyperammonemic leukoencephalopathy after undergoing combined chemotherapy (750mg/body/day of 5-FU for 5 days+100mg/body/day of cisplatin). Patient 2, a 58-year-old man with oropharyngeal and lower esophageal SCCs presented with hyperammonemia without leukoencephalopathy while undergoing combined chemotherapy (1200mg/body/day of 5-FU for 5 days+120mg/body/day of cisplatin). The neural symptoms of both patients improved after the termination of 5-FU administration and the early administration of fluid replacement. Ammonia can accumulate in the body when catabolism is insufficient because of an impairment in the urea cycle. The excess production of ammonium from 5-FU catabolites in addition to aggravating factors, e.g., renal dysfunction, constipation and body weight loss, may explain the transient hyperammonemia seen in the present two cases. The incidence of hyperammonemia by 5-FU administration will be one of the adverse events to need care in future and may be decreased by being aware of the presence of renal dysfunction, taking measures to prevent constipation, and nutritional management.

An open, multi-centre, phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel, UFT, and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

The aim of the study was to evaluate the response rate and safety of weekly paclitaxel (Taxol((R))) combination chemotherapy with UFT (tegafur, an oral 5-fluorouracil prodrug, and uracil at a 1 : 4 molar ratio) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic gastric cancer were studied. Paclitaxel 1-h infusion at a dose of 100 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8 and oral UFT 300 mg m(-2) day(-1) plus LV 90 mg day(-1) were given starting from day 1 for 14 days, followed by a 7-day period without treatment. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. From February 2003 to October 2004, 55 patients were enrolled. The median age was 62 years (range: 32-82). Among the 48 patients evaluated for tumour response, two achieved a complete response and 22 a partial response, with an overall response rate of 50% (95% confidence interval: 35-65%). All 55 patients were evaluated for survival and toxicities. Median time to progression and overall survival were 4.4 and 9.8 months, respectively. Major grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia in 25 patients (45%) and diarrhoea in eight patients (15%). Although treatment was discontinued owing to treatment-related toxicities in nine patients (16%), there was no treatment-related mortality. Weekly paclitaxel plus oral UFT/LV is effective, convenient, and well tolerated in treating patients with advanced gastric cancer.

A phase II trial of haptaplatin/5-FU and leucovorin for advanced stomach cancer

PURPOSE

Heptaplatin (SKI-2053 R) is a new platinum analogue, with a better toxicity profile than cisplatin, and has antitumor activity even in cisplatin resistant cell lines. 5-fluoruracil (5-FU) has shown synergy with platinum compounds. This phase II trial was designed to determine the efficacy and toxicities of heptaplatin/ 5-FU (5-fluorouracil) for treating stomach cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with advanced, measurable gastric adenocarcinomas were enrolled in this trial. The treatment consisted of heptaplatin, 400 mg/m(2)/day (1 hour IV infusion), on day 1 and 5-FU, 800 mg/m(2)/day (12 hours IV infusion), on days 1 to 5. The cycles were repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Of the 26 evaluable patients, 9 had partial responses and 1a complete response (overall response rate, 38%; 95% confidence interval, 19 approximately 57%). The median response duration was 23 weeks (range: 4 approximately 60 weeks). The median time to progression was 26 weeks (range: 3 approximately 68 weeks). The grades III-IV toxicities were mostly hematological toxicities: leucopenia was observed in 11 patients (35%) and thrombocytopenia 4 (13%). No definite neuropathy was observed. Grade I-II nephropathy was also noted: grade I high BUN/creatinine levels occurred in 5 patients (16%), grade II proteinuria 2 (6%), grade I proteinuria 5 (16%). Neutropenic fever developed in 5 patients (16%) and 1 died of pneumonia in a neutropenic state.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the regimen of Heptaplatin/5-FU should be effective and have a favorable toxicity profile for the patients suffering with advanced stomach cancer.