Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography vs MRI for evaluation of local invasion by cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study is to compare contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to MRI for evaluating local invasion of cervical cancer.

METHODS:

A total of 108 patients with cervical cancer were included in this study. All the enrolled patients were Stage IIA2-IVB according to the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy. Tumour size in different dimensions was compared between MRI and CEUS. The correlation coefficients (r) between MRI and CEUS for diagnosing local invasion, parametrial extension, and invasion to vagina, uterine corpus and adjacent organs were assessed.

RESULTS:

Measurements by MRI and CEUS were strongly correlated in the three dimensions: left-right r = 0.84, craniocaudal r = 0.86 and anteroposterior r = 0.88. Vaginal and parametrial invasion were detected by both MRI and CEUS with moderate concordance, and invasion of uterine corpus, bladder and rectum with good concordance.

CONCLUSION:

CEUS is comparable to MRI for measuring tumour size, with good concordance for evaluating invasion of cervical cancer.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

CEUS is a less expensive non-invasive modality for assessment of tumour size and invasion of cervical cancer.

Changing trend in the patterns of pretreatment diagnostic assessment for patients with cervical cancer in Japan

OBJECTIVE

Cancer staging systems should be responsive to the development of diagnostic tools. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) cervical cancer guidelines were modified in 2009 regarding the pretreatment assessment. We report the recent Japanese patterns of pretreatment workup for cervical cancer.

METHODS

The Japanese Patterns of Care Study (PCS) working group analyzed the pretreatment diagnostic assessment data of 609 patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy in the two survey periods (1999-2001, 324; 2003-2005, 285) in Japan. Sixty-one of 640 institutions were selected for this survey using a stratified two-staged cluster sampling method.

RESULTS

The use of optional examinations in the latest FIGO guidelines such as intravenous urography, cystoscopy, and proctoscopy was gradually decreasing. Surgical staging was rarely performed in either survey period. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were widely used, and MRI has become increasingly prevalent even between the two survey periods. Primary lesion size and pelvic lymph node status was evaluated by CT/MRI for most patients in both surveys.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of CT/MRI that is encouraged in the latest FIGO staging guidelines already replaced intravenous urography, cystoscopy, and proctoscopy in Japan. Japanese patients received the potential benefit of CT/MRI because prognostic factors such as primary lesion size and pelvic lymph node status were evaluated by these modalities. The use of cystoscopy and proctoscopy should be continuously monitored in the future PCS survey because only CT/MRI could lead to the stage migration for patients on suspicion of bladder/rectum involvement on CT/MRI.

Prognostic significance of MRI-detected bladder muscle and/or serosal invasion in patients with cervical cancer treated with radiotherapy

In cervical cancer, the prognostic significance of bladder wall invasion on MRI without pathological evidence of mucosal invasion is not known. From 454 consecutive patients with cervical cancer who were treated with radiation, we reviewed images and analysed the outcome of 92 patients with the Federation of International Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIB-IVA. We analysed the patients in three groups, normal, wall (muscle and/or serosal) invasion and mucosal invasion, according to the findings on the MRI. Kaplan-Meier life table analysis and the log-rank test were used to assess the survival rates and differences according to prognostic factors. MRI detected abnormalities in the bladder wall in 42 patients (45.6%): wall invasion in 24 and mucosal invasion in 18. 5 of 18 patients, suspected on MRI to have mucosal invasion, showed no pathological evidence of mucosal invasion. Median follow-up period was 34 months. 3-year cause-specific survival (CSS) in the normal group compared with the wall invasion group was 76.2% vs 71.4% (p = 0.48). 3-year CSS for the wall invasion group compared with the mucosal invasion group was 71.4% vs 54.3% (p = 0.04). Mucosal invasion on MRI (p = 0.03) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.01) was significant for CSS. The prognosis for patients with cervical cancer with evidence of muscle and/or serosal invasion of the bladder on MRI may not differ from that for patients without abnormality on MRI. In patients with the MRI finding of bladder mucosal invasion, further studies should be conducted regarding the role of cystoscopy to determine the need for pathological confirmation.