S-1 and gemcitabine as an outpatient-based regimen in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer

Irreversible electroporation for liver metastasis from pancreatic cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis; 40%–50% of patients have liver metastases at the time of initial diagnosis and only 15%–20% undergo surgical resection. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a new, non-thermal local ablation method for solid tumors, which can induce cell membrane permeabilization, resulting in unrecoverable nanoscale perforation and apoptotic cell death without damaging the structural components of tissues.

CASE SUMMARY

We report the case of a 66-year-old female patient with liver metastasis from pancreatic cancer with a pathological diagnosis of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 was elevated to 420.3 U/mL. Computed tomography showed a pancreas mass of 2.7 cm × 2.5 cm and single liver metastasis of 1.4 cm × 1.1 cm in the S6 area. The patient underwent IRE and arterial infusion chemotherapy and received tegafur. The therapeutic effect of the combination treatment has been evaluated as complete response. To date, the patient has survived for > 12 mo and is receiving tegafur as maintenance therapy (at the time this case report was written).

CONCLUSION

IRE plus arterial infusion chemotherapy and tegafur may be synergistic, providing a reference for treating liver metastasis from pancreatic cancer.

Effect of S-1 on survival outcomes in 838 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A 7-year multicenter observational cohort study in Taiwan

Objective

Studies have rarely explored the efficacy of S‐1 in treating advanced pancreatic cancer outside Japan. This study compared the survival outcomes of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with S‐1 with the survival outcomes of those without S‐1 treatment before and after S‐1 reimbursement was introduced in Taiwan in June of 2014.

Method

We retrospectively analyzed 838 patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who underwent palliative chemotherapy from 2010 to 2016 at 4 institutes in Taiwan. For survival analysis, patients were categorized into two groups according to whether they received S‐1 treatment as palliative chemotherapy after diagnosis: (a) S‐1‐treated (n = 335) and (b) non‐S‐1‐treated (n = 503) groups.

Results

The median overall survival was longer in the S‐1‐treated group than in the non‐S‐1‐treated group (10.7 vs 6.0 mo, P < 0.001). Subgroup survival analyses showed that the S‐1‐treated group had more favorable outcomes than the non‐S‐1‐treated group in terms of stage III (19.6 vs 10.1 mo, P < 0.001) and stage IV (8.5 vs 5.3 mo, P < 0.001) disease. The disease control rates were 43.6% and 32.8% (P < 0.001) in patients treated with and without S‐1 in the first‐line setting, respectively. In multivariate analysis, exposure to S‐1 treatment was an independent prognosticator for survival.

Conclusion

Our results support the clinical use of S‐1 as the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, particularly in resource‐limited situations.

Phase I study assessing the feasibility of the triple combination chemotherapy of SOXIRI (S-1/oxaliplatin/irinotecan) in patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to determine the recommended dose (RD) of a biweekly S-1, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (SOXIRI) regimen in patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

This phase I study used a traditional "3+3" dose-escalation design, with four dose levels. A dose-escalation schedule consisted of two doses of S-1 (60 and 80 mg/m(2) twice daily) for 2 weeks in alternate-day administration, three doses of irinotecan (125, 150, and 180 mg/m(2)) on day 1, and a single dose of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) on day 1 of a 2-week cycle. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed in the first four cycles to determine the maximum tolerated dose. This clinical study was registered at UMIN000014339.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients received this regimen (median, eight cycles; range 4-12). At dose level 3 (S-1, 80 mg/m(2); irinotecan, 150 mg/m(2)), 2/6 patients experienced DLTs of grade 3 fatigue and grade 4 neutropenia. At dose level 4, all three patients experienced DLTs: grade 3 fatigue (n = 1) and grade 4 neutropenia (n = 2). The RD was 80, 85, and 150 mg/m(2) of S-1, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, respectively. We found the following: response rate, 47 %; disease control rate, 80%; median progression-free survival, 6.7 months; overall survival, 13.4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The SOXIRI regimen's RD is 80, 85, and 150 mg/m(2) of S-1, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, respectively.

Gemcitabine Compared With Gemcitabine and S-1 Combination Therapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Several reports suggest that gemcitabine (GEM) plus S-1 combination (GS) is associated to prolong the survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC). We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the safety and efficacy of GS versus GEM.Summary data from randomized trials and retrospective studies were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses based on the chemotherapy cycles were performed to explore the efficacy and toxicity for therapy. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by removing specific studies to assess the effects of study quality.Between January 2004 and August 2012, 4 RCTs and 2 retrospective studies including a total of 1025 cases were identified. The overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.96; P = 0.01) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.77; P < 0.001) for the GS arm were significantly longer than the GEM arm. The differences in objective response rate (ORR) (RR: 1.24; 95% CI, 1.17-1.33; P < 0.001) and disease control rate (DCR) were also better in the GS arm (RR: 1.37; 95% CI, 1.19-1.59; P < 0.001). Grades 3 to 4 toxicities in both the groups were similar except neutropenia and diarrhea, which were more frequent in the GS arm (P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the cycle for chemotherapy every 4 weeks has equivalent efficacy and less toxicity than regimens every 3 weeks in the GS arm.The current meta-analysis suggested that GEM significantly prolonged OS and PFS when added to S-1 combination in patients with unresectable PC. GS therapy also offers better ORR and DCR than GEM monotherapy and no unexpected toxicity was evident.

Biweekly gemcitabine plus S-1 for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: a preliminary feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer should not only prolong survival but maintain quality of life, considering its limited life expectancy. To achieve these goals, biweekly gemcitabine plus S-1 was assessed in the clinical practice setting.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with either locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who received biweekly gemcitabine plus S-1 as a first-line anti-cancer treatment were included in this study. Treatment delivery, toxicity, response, and survival were reviewed to assess the feasibility and efficacy.

RESULTS

The completion rate of treatment delivery was 95.1%, with relative dose intensity of 97.1% for gemcitabine and 97.3% for S-1. Overall, grade 3 or worse adverse events were rare, with hematologic toxicities occurring in 5.8%. The objective response rate was 30.8%, and more than a 50% reduction of CA19-9 was observed in 77.1%. Surgical conversion was completed with a margin-negative resection in four patients whose tumor had shrunk for at least 6 months. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 10.4 and 18.2 months, respectively. Reduction of CA19-9 was associated with longer survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Biweekly gemcitabine plus S-1 may be a good alternative to current standard chemotherapies for unresectable pancreatic cancer with less toxicity and less treatment burden without losing efficacy.

S-1 in the treatment of pancreatic cancer

S-1 is an oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug, which is designed to improve the antitumor activity of 5-FU by inhibiting dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the key enzyme of 5-FU catabolism. Recently, two important studies on the clinical use of S-1 for pancreatic cancer have been reported from Japan. In the first study (GEST study), S-1 demonstrated non-inferiority to gemcitabine (GEM) in overall survival (OS) for metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic cancer, but combination chemotherapy with GEM and S-1 did not show superiority to GEM in OS. In the second study (JASPAC-01 study), S-1 showed superiority to adjuvant chemotherapy with GEM in OS in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. In addition to GEM, S-1 is now regarded as the key drug in the management of pancreatic cancer in Japan. To date, many studies have investigated the effectiveness of S-1 in various settings, such as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic cancer, second-line chemotherapy after GEM failure, and chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced disease. In this review, we focus on recent clinical trials of S-1-based chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

S-1 plus CIK as second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of S-1 (Tegafur, Gimeracil, and Oteracil Potassium Capsules) plus CIK (Cytokine-induced killer cells) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who had previously received gemcitabine-based therapy. In this prospective study, fifty-eight patients were randomly divided into two groups. One group (CT group) was given S-1 alone, and the other group (immuno-CT group) was given S-1 plus CIK. S-1 was administered orally twice a day at 80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle till disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. CIK was given for one cycle of 28 days. The disease control rate for S-1 and CIK was 40.0 and 53.6%, respectively (p = 0.621). The serum CA19-9 level decreased for more than 25% was significantly different (33.3 and 60.7 % in CT group and immuno-CT group, respectively, p = 0.037). The median time to progression was 2.5 (95% CI 2.3-2.8) and 2.9 (95% CI 2.6-3.2) months (p = 0.037) for CT group and immuno-CT group, respectively. The median overall survival was 6.1 (95% CI 5.7-6.5) and 6.6 (95% CI 6.1-7.1) months (p = 0.09) for CT group and immuno-CT group, respectively. The difference in hematological toxicity, including leukocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia, was insignificant between the two groups. In contrast, the differences in non-hematological toxicity, fatigue, and non-infective fever were significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.05). The S-1 plus CIK regimen was well tolerated in a second-line setting in patients with gemcitabine-refractory and advanced pancreatic cancer.

Advances in medical treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer

Chemotherapy is currently an important means of treating advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine is a chemotherapeutic agent for the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Some progress has been made to improve survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer with gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy regimens. FOLFIRINOX is the first non-gemcitabine regimen whose efficacy has been demonstrated to be superior to gemcitabine in selected patients. In addition, the development of a variety of targeted drugs (including cytotoxic drugs and biological drugs) has brought a new prospect to the treatment of pancreatic cancer. In this article, we will review recent advances in chemotherapy and targeted therapy of pancreatic cancer.

A multicentre randomised phase II trial of gemcitabine alone vs gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: GEMSAP study

Background:

This randomised phase II trial compared gemcitabine alone vs gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Methods:

Patients were randomly assigned to 4-week treatment with gemcitabine alone (1000, mg m⁻² gemcitabine by 30-min infusion on days 1, 8, and 15) or gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy (1000, mg m⁻² gemcitabine by 30-min infusion on days 1 and 15 and 40 mg m⁻² S-1 orally twice daily on days 1–15). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results:

Between July 2006 and February 2009, 106 patients were enrolled. The PFS in gemcitabine and S-1 combination arm was significantly longer than in gemcitabine arm (5.4 vs 3.6 months), with a hazard ratio of 0.64 (P=0.036). Overall survival (OS) for gemcitabine and S-1 combination was longer than that for gemcitabine monotherapy (13.5 vs 8.8 months), with a hazard ratio of 0.72 (P=0.104). Overall, grade 3 or 4 adverse events were similar in both arms.

Conclusion:

Gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy demonstrated longer PFS in advanced pancreatic cancer. Improved OS duration of 4.7 months was found for gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy, though this was not statistically significant.

Multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy (GS Therapy) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this multicenter Phase II study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients with histologically or cytologically proven metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were eligible for this study. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) over 30 min on days 1 and 8, and oral S-1 at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) twice daily from days 1 to 14, repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients were included and the efficacy and toxicity were analyzed in 54 patients who received at least one dose of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy. Although no complete response was seen, a partial response was achieved in 24 patients, resulting in an overall response rate of 44.4% (95% confidence interval: 30.9-58.6%). The median progression-free survival was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval: 4.1-6.9 months) and the median overall survival was 10.1 months (95% confidence interval: 8.5-10.8 months) with a 1-year survival rate of 33.0%. The major Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (80%), leucopenia (59%), thrombocytopenia (22%), anorexia (17%) and rash (7%). Hematological toxicity was mostly transient and there was only one episode of febrile neutropenia ≥Grade 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy produced a high response rate with good survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. A randomized Phase III study to confirm the efficacy of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy is ongoing.

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy for patients with refractory pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy on refractory pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer refractory to gemcitabine and S-1 were treated with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² over 30 min and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² over 120 min on days 1 and 15. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks and tumor response was assessed every two cycles by RECIST version 1.0.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with pathologically confirmed pancreatic cancer were enrolled. The treatment was administered as a second-line chemotherapy in eighteen patients (82%) and as a third-line chemotherapy in four patients (18%). Tumor response did not occur in any of the cases. Thirteen patients demonstrated stable diseases, and the disease control rate was 59%. Median overall survival and time to progression were 6.8 months (95% CI, 2.8-11.5) and 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.5-3.8), respectively. Median overall survival from the first-line chemotherapy was 22.7 months (95% CI, 14.8-24.4). The major grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (14%), anorexia (23%), and peripheral neuropathy (14%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy was tolerable but had limited activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer in a refractory setting.

Impact of S-1 on the survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of S-1 on the prognosis of advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

In total, 112 patients with pancreatic cancer who received chemotherapy between April 2001 and April 2007 were divided into 2 groups: PreS-1 (53 patients who started chemotherapy before January 2005) and PostS-1 (59 patients who started chemotherapy after February 2005, the time of S-1 introduction). Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared, and prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. S-1 was administered as a second-line monotherapy in 5.7% of the PreS-1 group and combined with gemcitabine as a first-line therapy in 27.1% or as second-line monotherapy in 23.7% in the PostS-1 group. Both progression-free survival and overall survival improved after introduction of S-1 (median progression-free survival, 4.4 and 5.3 months; P = 0.043; median overall survival, 9.5 and 13.1 months; P = 0.048 in PreS-1 and PostS-1 groups, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that the PostS-1 group (hazards ratio, 0.52; P = 0.003), performance status, and carcinoembryonic antigen were significant prognostic factors for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of S-1 may improve the prognosis of Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Multicenter, phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;65:1101-1107. [PMID: 19707761 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-009-1115-5]

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

Patients with a measurable lesion and no previous history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy were enrolled. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously at a dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) over 30 min on day 1 and 15, repeated every 4 weeks. S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-14. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria.

RESULTS

As much as 35 patients were enrolled between December 2006 and July 2008; 14 patients (40%) with gallbladder cancer and 14 (40%) with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were included and 7 patients (20%) had received previous surgical resection. The overall response rate was 34.3% and the overall disease control rate was 82.9%. The median overall survival time was 11.6 months (95% CI, 7.3-15.6 months), and the median time to progression was 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.0-7.7 months). The grade 3/4 toxicities were leucopenia (23%), neutropenia (34%), anemia (20%), thrombocytopenia (6%) and anorexia (3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy has promising efficacy and good tolerability in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

A multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;65:527-536. [PMID: 19578850 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-009-1059-9]

PURPOSE

To confirm the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy when used as a first-line therapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic or recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma, which was histologically or cytologically proven, with at least one measurable lesion were eligible for the study. Gemcitabine at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 was intravenously given over 30 min on days 1 and 8, while S-1 at a dose of 40 mg/m2 was orally given twice daily from day 1 to 14, and the cycle was repeated every 3 weeks. The objective response rate, which was assessed according to RECIST criteria, was the primary end point.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients were enrolled between June 2006 and June 2007. The median number of treatment courses was 5.5 (range 1-22). Thirty-four patients were evaluable for response. Although no complete response was seen, partial responses were achieved in 11 patients, resulting in an overall response rate of 32% [95% confidence interval (CI) 17-48%]. The median response duration was 6.0 months (95% CI 4.6-8.3 months), the median time-to-progression was 5.4 months (95% CI 2.9-8.0 months), and the median overall survival was 8.4 months (95% CI 5.7-11.1 months). The major grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (39.5%), leukopenia (15.8%), thrombocytopenia (2.6%), and anemia (7.9%). The major grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included anorexia (10.5%), stomatitis (2.6%), rash (7.9%), fatigue (7.9%) and hyperbilirubinemia (5.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy was effective and tolerable in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.