Development of high-grade osteosarcoma in a patient with recurrent giant cell tumor of the ischium while receiving treatment with denosumab

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: An Update

Curettage is recommended for the treatment of Campanacci stages 1-2 giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, without preoperative denosumab treatment. In the distal femur, bone chips and plate fixation are utilized to reduce damage to the subchondral bone and prevent pathological fracture, respectively. For local recurrence, re-curettage may be utilized when feasible. En bloc resection is an option for very aggressive Campanacci stage 3 GCTB in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, combined with 1-3 doses of preoperative denosumab treatment. Denosumab monotherapy once every 3 months is currently the standard strategy for inoperable patients and those with metastatic GCTB. However, in case of tumor growth, a possible malignant transformation should be considered. Zoledronic acid appears to be as effective as denosumab; nevertheless, it is a more cost-effective option. Therefore, zoledronic acid may be an alternative treatment option, particularly in developing countries. Surgery is the mainstay treatment for malignant GCTB.

Denosumab in Giant Cell Rich Tumors of Bone: An Open-Label Multicenter Phase II Study

BACKGROUND

Since giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) and other giant cell rich tumors of bone (GCRTB) share the histological presence of osteoclastic giant cells and expression of RANK/RANKL, we hypothesized that GCRTB will respond similarly to denosumab as GCTB. The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of denosumab in patients with GCRTB that have recurred or require morbid surgery.

METHODS

In this open-label, multicenter, phase II trial, patients with GCRTB were included (June 2018-March 2020). Recruitment was stopped because of low accrual. Patients received denosumab (120 mg) subcutaneously (SC) on day 1 of every 4-week cycle with a loading dose of 120 mg SC on days 8 and 15.

RESULTS

Three patients were enrolled. One withdrew consent before start of study. The remaining patients had central giant cell granuloma of the jawbone (CGCG). Median treatment duration was 15 cycles (range 12-18). In both subjects, improvement in ossification of lesions was seen. Median follow-up was 28.5 months (range 20-37). One patient developed a recurrence for which surgery was performed.

CONCLUSION

Due to critical emerging real-world data of denosumab in GCRTBs, the study was prematurely stopped and not supportive of use of denosumab for this indication. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03605199).

Denosumab for giant cell tumors of bone from 2010 to 2022: a bibliometric analysis

Giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB) are considered moderately malignant bone tumors. Denosumab, as a neoadjuvant therapy, provides new possibilities for treating GCTB. However, even after multiple studies and long-term clinical trials, there are limitations in the treatment process. Research data and Medical Subject Headings terms related to denosumab and GCTB were collected from January 2010 to October 2022 using the Web of Science and MeSH ( https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov ) browsers. These data were imported into CiteSpace and VOSviewer softwares for bibliometric analysis. Overall, 445 publications on denosumab and GCTB were identified. Over the last 12 years, the growth rate of the total number of publications has remained relatively stable. The USA published the highest number of articles (83) and had the highest centrality (0.42). Amgen Inc. and Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) First Ortoped Rizzoli were identified as the most influential institutions. Many authors have made outstanding contributions to this field. Lancet Oncology had the highest journal impact factor (54.433). Local recurrence and drug dosage are current research hotspots, and future development trends will mainly focus on prognostic markers of GCTB and the development of new therapies. Further research is required to analyze denosumab's safety and efficacy and understand its local recurrence of GCTB, to identify the optimal dose. Future progress in this field will likely focus on exploring new diagnostic and recurrence markers to monitor disease progression and examine new therapeutic targets and treatment strategies.

Histopathological response to denosumab in giant cell tumours of bone - A review of 11 cases

Background

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of the bone is a locally aggressive primary bone tumor, that can rarely metastasize. Arising mostly in epiphysis of the long bones in young adults, the tumor is composed of mononuclear cells that are admixed with osteoclastic giant cells(OLGCs), which express RANK ligand and RANK respectively. Denosumab a monoclonal antibody against RANK ligand has been shown to reduce the tumor by causing bone lysis by inhibiting RANKL. Histological changes in 11 patients of GCT who were treated with denosumab are presented here.

Materials and Methods

Clinical records and slides of 11 patients of GCT who had been administered neoadjuvant denosumab were included in the study. Evaluation of pre and post therapy GCT specimens was performed by two pathologists (RK and VM). There were 4 males and 7 females. Their mean age was 30 years. All the patients received 120 mg denosumab subcutaneously every week with additional 120 mg on days 8 and 15 of therapy. The histological slides were reviewed and following points noted: 1) degree of ossification,2) fibrosis,3) loss of osteoclastic giant cells,4) proliferation of mononuclear cells,5) atypia,6) Permeation of osteoid by malignant cells.

Results

Out of 11 cases, 2 cases did not show any significant histological improvement. 7 cases showed reduction in giant cells, increased fibrosis, enhanced mononuclear cell proliferation and ossification consistent with a pathological response. Atypia and osteoid permeation were noted in 2 cases which showed transformation to osteosarcoma.

Conclusion

Denosumab treated giant cell tumor show dramatic histological changes. The post therapy lesions may bear no resemblance to pretherapy lesion. There may be complete resolution or may be confused with benign or malignant lesions Rarely they may show sarcomatous transformation. It is imperative that the pathologist is aware of these changes to prevent diagnostic pitfalls as it poses therapeutic and prognostic implications.

Resection and reconstruction with and without neoadjuvant denosumab in campanacci grade III giant cell tumors of proximal humerus: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Giant cell tumors (GCT) of the proximal humerus are rarely reported case that requires complex surgeries due to involvement of the shoulder joint. Therefore, we report the first retrospective comparative study where the postoperative functional outcomes, recurrence rate and complications in patients who underwent arthrodesis of shoulder after resection of grade III GCT with and without neoadjuvant denosumab are compared.

METHODS

A retrospective review of eight cases of grade III GCT of proximal humerus receiving resection and fibular strut graft and arthrodesis between January 2014 and December 2019 is performed. They were stratified into two groups: one group of four patients received once-weekly denosumab 120 mg for 4-weeks before resection and reconstruction, while the other group of four patients did not receive denosumab before surgery. Primary outcomes included the functional outcomes assessed by revised Musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) score and shoulder pain and disability index (SPDI) at 6-weeks and 12-months postoperatively while secondary outcomes included complications and recurrences.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in terms of SPDI at 6 weeks and 12 months, MSTS at 12 months, complications, recurrence among denosumab and non-denosumab groups. At 6-weeks follow-up, a significantly better pain score in SPDI and MSTS was acquired in the denosumab group.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection and reconstruction with or without neoadjuvant denosumab for Grade III GCT of proximal humerus had similar functional outcomes and with no major differences in recurrence and complications. Hence, postoperative pain relief while long-term benefits were not discovered with the use of neoadjuvant denosumab.

Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumour of Bone: A Review of Literature and the Experience of a Referral Centre

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a benign, locally aggressive primary bone neoplasm that represents 5% of all bone tumours. The principal treatment approach is surgery. Although generally GCTB is considered only a locally aggressive disease, it can metastasise, and lung metastases occur in 1–9% of patients. To date, only the use of denosumab has been approved as medical treatment for GCTB. Even more rarely, GCTB undergoes sarcomatous transformation into a malignant tumour (4% of all GCTB), but history of this malignant transformation is unclear and unpredictable. Considering the rarity of the event, the data in the literature are few. In this review, we summarise published data of GCTB malignant transformation and we analyse three cases of malignant transformation of GCTB, evaluating histopathology, genetics, and radiological aspects. Despite the rarity of this event, we conclude that a strict follow up is recommended to detect early malignant transformation.

Clinicopathological and histological analysis of secondary malignant giant cell tumors of bone without radiotherapy

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an intermediate bone tumor that rarely undergoes malignant transformation. Secondary malignant GCTB (SMGCTB) is defined as a lesion in which high-grade sarcoma occurs at the site of previously treated GCTB. The present study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with GCTB treated at Okayama University Hospital between April 1986 and April 2020. The clinicopathological and histological features of patients with SMGCTB without prior radiotherapy were investigated. A total of three patients (4%) with SMGCTB were detected, and the tumor sites were the distal ulna, distal femur and sacrum. Two of the patients had been treated with curettage and bone graft, and one had been treated with denosumab. In all cases, the lesions were made up of two components, the conventional GCTB component and the malignant component. The Ki67 labeling index was higher in the malignant components of SMGCTB and metastatic lesions compared with that in primary and recurrent conventional GCTB, or the conventional GCTB component of SMGCTB. Moreover, p53 expression was higher in these same components in patients who underwent curettage and bone grafting; however, there was no difference in the patient that received denosumab treatment. In this patient, clinical cancer genomic profiling revealed loss of CDKN2A, CDKN2B and MTAP expression. All three patients developed distant metastasis. The patients with SMGCTB in the ulna and femur died 13 and 54 months after detection of malignant transformation, respectively. The patient with SMGCTB in the sacrum received carbon-ion radiotherapy to the sacrum and pazopanib; the treatment was effective and the patient was alive at the last follow-up 3 years later. In conclusion, p53 may be associated with malignant transformation in GCTB. Future studies should investigate the association of between denosumab treatment and malignant transformation, as well as molecular targeted therapy to improve the clinical outcomes of SMGCTB.

Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone and the Association with Denosumab Treatment: A Radiology and Pathology Perspective

Objective

Malignancy in giant cell tumor of bone (mGCTB) is categorized as primary (concomitantly with conventional GCTB) or secondary (after radiotherapy or other treatment). Denosumab therapy has been suggested to play a role in the etiology of secondary mGCTB. In this case series from a tertiary referral sarcoma center, we aimed to find distinctive features for malignant transformation in GCTB on different imaging modalities. Furthermore, we assessed the duration of denosumab treatment and lag time to the development of malignancy.

Methods

From a histopathology database search, 6 patients were pathologically confirmed as having initial conventional GCTB and subsequently with secondary mGCTB.

Results

At the time of mGCTB diagnosis, 2 cases were treated with denosumab only, 2 with denosumab and surgery, 1 with multiple curettages and radiotherapy, and 1 with surgery only. In the 4 denosumab treated patients, the mean lag time to malignant transformation was 7 months (range 2–11 months). Imaging findings suspicious of malignant transformation related to denosumab therapy are the absence of fibro-osseous matrix formation and absent neocortex formation on CT, and stable or even increased size of the soft tissue component.

Conclusion

In 4 patients treated with denosumab, secondary mGCTB occurred within the first year after initiation of treatment. Radiotherapy-associated mGCTB has a longer lag time than denosumab-associated mGCTB. Close clinical and imaging follow-up during the first months of denosumab therapy is key, as mGCTB tends to have rapid aggressive behavior, similar to other high-grade sarcomas. Nonresponders should be (re) evaluated for their primary diagnosis of conventional GCTB.

Secondary Malignancy in Giant Cell Tumor: A Single-Center Study

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) undergoes a sarcomatous transformation. Secondary malignancy in giant cell tumor (MGCT) is associated with radiotherapy and has a dismal prognosis. We reviewed medical records to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of MGCT patients. The enrollment criterion was high-grade spindle-cell sarcoma, which developed at the site of prior GCTB treatment. Twelve patients were analyzed: six females and six males. The median age was 42.5 years. Benign recurrence occurred in five GCTB patients not treated with radiotherapy. No pulmonary implants were observed. The median latency to the malignant transformation was 63 months. Nine patients were AJCC stage IIB, and three were stage IVA. The median follow-up period after malignant transformation was 62.5 months. Five patients developed local recurrence, and six had distant metastasis. Five-year overall recurrence and metastasis-free survival rates were 61.9%, 66.7%, and 58.3%, respectively. Initial metastasis was a predictive factor for overall survival. Benign local recurrence of GCTB was also a negative factor for metastasis-free survival of MGCT patients. Differences in overall survival according to benign recurrence also showed a tendency toward significance. In our series, secondary MGCT did not occur after radiotherapy. The prognosis was better than previous findings. Benign recurrence of GCTB could reflect the prognosis of MGCT.

Malignant giant cell tumour of bone: a review of clinical, pathological and imaging features

Giant cell tu mour accounts for up to 5% of all bone tumours and malignant giant cell tumour arises in < 10% of cases, representing sarcomatous transformation. Primary malignant giant cell tumour of bone occurs when sarcomatous tissue is observed within conventional giant cell tumour histologically on initial presentation. Secondary malignant giant cell tumour of bone occurs in a region of previously treated giant cell tumour, with most cases arising due to prior radiotherapy. Malignancy in giant cell tumour of bone does not have any unique clinical or imaging features compared to conventional aggressive disease. Historically, malignant giant cell tumour of bone has a poor prognosis which is worse in cases of secondary malignancy. This article aims to present the clinical, pathological and imaging features of MGCTB based on a review of the literature and illustrated by examples from our experience.

Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Single Center Study of 115 cases

•

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rarely metastasizing, locally aggressive tumor.

•

GCTB recurs frequently after intralesional curettage.

•

Denosumab is a potential neoadjuvant treatment option for borderline resectable lesions.

Background

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive bone tumor that represents about 4–5% of all primary bone tumors. It is characterized by aggressive growth, possible recurrence after surgical treatment and, in rare cases, metastasis. Surgical management is the primary treatment and may include intralesional curettage with adjuvants or, in rare cases, wide resection. In recent years the monoclonal antibody denosumab has been introduced as a potential (neo-)adjuvant systemic treatment option for patients with borderline resectable or unresectable lesions. Currently several studies reported that the use of denosumab prior to curettage possibly increase the risk of local recurrence.

Methods

In this retrospective study we reviewed 115 cases of GCT with a mean follow-up of 65.6 (24–404) months who underwent a surgical treatment with or without preoperative denosumab therapy in our institution. Potential risk factors for LR and complications were analyzed.

Results

The study includes 47 male (40.9%) and 68 female (59.1%) patients with a mean age of 33.9 (10–77) years and a mean follow-up of 65.6 (24–404) months. Denosumab was used in 33 (28.7%) cases, in 14 cases (12.2%) in a neoadjuvant setting and in 17 cases preoperatively before re-curettage (14.8%) after LR. In 105 cases (91.3%) an intralesional curettage was performed. The overall LR rate was 47.8% (55 cases). Patients who underwent intralesional curettage and bone cement augmentation without neoadjuvant denosumab treatment had LR in 42.2% (38/90) of the cases. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant denosumab treatment prior to curettage had LR in 28.6% (4/14). Re-recurrence was frequent in patients with neoadjuvant denosumab treatment who had LR after initial curettage (50%, 8/16). After wide resection and endoprosthetic replacement one case (20%) of local recurrence was detectable (1/5 cases).

Conclusions

GCTB recurs frequently after intralesional curettage and cement augmentation. While denosumab is a potential (neo-)adjuvant treatment option that might be used for lesions that are difficult to resect, surgeons should be aware that LR is still frequent.

Cell Biology of Giant Cell Tumour of Bone: Crosstalk between m/wt Nucleosome H3.3, Telomeres and Osteoclastogenesis

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a rare and intriguing primary bone neoplasm. Worrisome clinical features are its local destructive behaviour, its high tendency to recur after surgical therapy and its ability to create so-called benign lung metastases (lung 'plugs'). GCTB displays a complex and difficult-to-understand cell biological behaviour because of its heterogenous morphology. Recently, a driver mutation in histone H3.3 was found. This mutation is highly conserved in GCTB but can also be detected in glioblastoma. Denosumab was recently introduced as an extra option of medical treatment next to traditional surgical and in rare cases, radiotherapy. Despite these new insights, many 'old' questions about the key features of GCTB remain unanswered, such as the presence of telomeric associations (TAs), the reactivation of hTERT, and its slight genomic instability. This review summarises the recent relevant literature of histone H3.3 in relation to the GCTB-specific G34W mutation and pays specific attention to the G34W mutation in relation to the development of TAs, genomic instability, and the characteristic morphology of GCTB. As pieces of an etiogenetic puzzle, this review tries fitting all these molecular features and the unique H3.3 G34W mutation together in GCTB.

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumors of Bone

Simple Summary

According to the 2020 World Health Organization classification, a giant cell tumor of bone is an intermediate malignant bone tumor. Denosumab treatment before curettage should be avoided due to the increased risk of local recurrence. Administration of denosumab before en bloc resection of the giant cell tumors of the pelvis and spine facilitates en bloc resection. Nerve-sparing surgery after embolization is a possible treatment for giant cell tumors of the sacrum. Denosumab therapy with or without embolization is indicated for inoperable giant cell tumors of the pelvis, spine, and sacrum. A wait-and-see approach is recommended for lung metastases at first, then denosumab should be administered to the growing lesions. Radiotherapy is not recommended owing to the risk of malignant transformation. Local recurrence after 2 years or more should be indicative of malignant transformation. This review summarizes the treatment approaches for non-malignant and malignant giant cell tumors of bone.

Abstract

The 2020 World Health Organization classification defined giant cell tumors of bone (GCTBs) as intermediate malignant tumors. Since the mutated H3F3A was found to be a specific marker for GCTB, it has become very useful in diagnosing GCTB. Curettage is the most common treatment for GCTBs. Preoperative administration of denosumab makes curettage difficult and increases the risk of local recurrence. Curettage is recommended to achieve good functional outcomes, even for local recurrence. For pathological fractures, joints should be preserved as much as possible and curettage should be attempted. Preoperative administration of denosumab for pelvic and spinal GCTBs reduces extraosseous lesions, hardens the tumor, and facilitates en bloc resection. Nerve-sparing surgery after embolization is a possible treatment for sacral GCTBS. Denosumab therapy with or without embolization is indicated for inoperable pelvic, spinal, and sacral GCTBs. It is recommended to first observe lung metastases, then administer denosumab for growing lesions. Radiotherapy is associated with a risk of malignant transformation and should be limited to cases where surgery is impossible and denosumab, zoledronic acid, or embolization is not available. Local recurrence after 2 years or more should be indicative of malignant transformation. This review summarizes the treatment approaches for non-malignant and malignant GCTBs.

Late Local Recurrence of Bone Giant Cell Tumors Associated with an Increased Risk for Malignant Transformation

Simple Summary

In giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), an intermediate malignant bone tumor, approximately 4% of cases can undergo malignant transformation. We analyzed risk factors for malignant transformation of GCTB treated without radiotherapy and retrospectively reviewed medical files of 461 patients with GCTB of the extremities who had undergone surgery alone, with no radiotherapy or denosumab therapy. Malignant transformation occurred in 15 of 461 patients (3.3%) at a median follow-up period of 192 months. The median follow-up duration was 89.4 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that local recurrence was an independent prognostic factor for unfavorable malignant transformation. The interval between the last surgery to local recurrence and malignant transformation was longer than that to local recurrence of benign GCTB, with a median of 15.2 (IQR, 5.2–25.4) years versus 1.3 (IQR, 0.8–2.6) months, respectively (p < 0.001). Late local recurrence of GCTB is associated with a higher risk of malignant transformation.

Abstract

In giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), an intermediate malignant bone tumor, approximately 4% of all cases undergo malignant transformation. Accordingly, we analyzed risk factors for malignant transformation of GCTB treated without radiotherapy. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 530 patients with GCTB of the extremities, admitted and treated at two institutions between January 1980 and December 2019. Overall, 4 patients with primary malignant GCTB, 4 patients with missing data, 3 patients with a history of radiotherapy, 22 patients with a follow-up of less than 6 months, and 36 patients who received denosumab were excluded. Accordingly, 461 patients were included for further analysis. Malignant transformation was observed in 15 of 461 patients (3.3%) at a median follow-up period of 192 months. The median follow-up duration was 89.4 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that local recurrence was an independent prognostic factor for unfavorable malignant transformation (Hazard ratio [HR], 11.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.33–55.13; p = 0.003 for once versus none and HR, 11.24; 95% CI, 1.76–71.96; and p = 0.011 for twice or more versus none). The interval between the last surgery to local recurrence and malignant transformation was longer than that to local recurrence of benign GCTB, with a median of 15.2 years (interquartile range [IQR], 5.2–25.4) versus 1.3 months (IQR, 0.8–2.6), respectively (p < 0.001). Late local recurrence of GCTB is associated with a higher risk of malignant transformation.

Tumors of the Hand and the Wrist

Most tumors of the hand and the wrist are benign; however, malignant conditions can mimic benign tumors and must be worked up accordingly. Advanced imaging should be followed by biopsy before definitive treatment of tumors of unknown diagnosis. The most common soft-tissue masses in the hand and the wrist are ganglion cysts, whereas the most common bone tumors are enchondromas.

Multiple Pulmonary Metastases of Recurrent Giant Cell Tumor of Bone with Expression of VEGFR-2 Successfully Controlled by Denosumab and Apatinib: A Case Report and Literature Review

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare, benign, but locally aggressive bone tumor. It has a high tendency for local recurrence, which may increase the incidence of lung metastasis. Currently, an optimal treatment strategy has not been established because of the rarity of pulmonary metastatic GCTB. Denosumab is the preferred regimen for unresectable metastatic lesions; however, there are no alternative treatment options when patients are resistant to denosumab. Apatinib is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively competes for the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) ATP binding site, and several studies have analyzed the effectiveness of apatinib in advanced or metastatic tumors. However, there is no report of apatinib as an anti-angiogenesis therapy for pulmonary metastatic GCTB to date. Here, we present a case of a 26-year-old female who was diagnosed with recurrent and pulmonary metastatic GCTB. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining indicated that the tumor cells were positive for VEGFR-2. Denosumab was administered to control the metastases; nevertheless, disease progression was confirmed after four months of treatment. Given the IHC results and rapid disease progression, apatinib was added to the treatment strategy. After 42 months of treatment, the patient showed noticeable symptomatic improvement and considerable tumor shrinkage.

Denosumab for Effective Tumor Size Reduction in Patients With Giant Cell Tumors of the Bone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody that has been used successfully in the treatment of giant cell tumors of bone. These tumors are rare and, in principle, benign, but they are highly aggressive, locally advanced, osteolytic bone tumors that can metastasize to the lungs. Denosumab is an effective treatment when these tumors cannot be surgically removed or when surgical resection is likely to lead to severe morbidity (eg, loss of limbs or joints). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate patients with giant cell tumors of bone who experienced tumor progression during treatment with denosumab and to compare them with patients who experienced reduction of their giant cell tumors of bone during treatment with denosumab.

METHODS

Embase, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE/PubMed databases were searched for trials submitted by January 7, 2020, that reported the efficacy and safety of denosumab in patients with giant cell tumors of bone.

RESULTS

Sixty studies were reviewed, involving a total of 1074 patients who had giant cell tumors of bone and were treated with denosumab. Of the 60 studies, 58% of the patients were from case series studies, 39% from open-label phase II studies, and 3% from case reports. The response rate for denosumab as a treatment for giant cell tumors of bone was 97.5%, with statistical significance (P < .0001). Pain in the limbs was statistically the most common adverse event for denosumab treatment in case series studies (P < .0001). No treatment-related deaths occurred in the reviewed studies.

CONCLUSION

Cumulative evidence supports the addition of surgery to optimal medical therapy with denosumab to reduce tumor size, clinical symptoms, and mortality among patients with giant cell tumors of bone.

Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone 7 years After Initial Surgery: A Case Report and Literature Review

CASE

A 64-year-old man with a history of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in the fibula 7 years earlier developed a recurrence with histologic features of osteosarcoma. Both the primary GCTB and the secondary osteosarcoma were found to have the H3F3A gene mutation. Despite immediate above-the-knee amputation, the patient died of respiratory failure because of lung metastases 3 months later.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of proven H3F3A mutation in both the primary GCTB and the secondary osteosarcoma in the same case. Clinicians should consider secondary malignancy in patients presenting with a lesion at the site of a previously treated GCTB after a long interval.

Profiling of three H3F3A-mutated and denosumab-treated giant cell tumors of bone points to diverging pathways during progression and malignant transformation

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive lesion of intermediate malignancy. Malignant transformation of GCTB is a rare event. In 2013, the humanized monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor-κb-Ligand (RANKL) denosumab was approved for treatment of advanced GCTB. Since then, several reports have questioned the role of denosumab during occasional malignant transformation of GCTB. We report on three patients with H3F3A-mutated GCTBs, treated with denosumab. The tissue samples were analysed by histomorphology, immunohistochemistry, and in two instances by next generation panel sequencing of samples before and after treatment. One patient had a mutation of ARID2 in the recurrence of the GCTB under treatment with denosumab. One patient developed a pleomorphic sarcoma and one an osteoblastic osteosarcoma during treatment. Sequencing revealed a persisting H3F3A mutation in the osteosarcoma while the pleomorphic sarcoma lost the H3F3A mutation; however, a FGFR1 mutation, both in the recurrence and in the pleomorphic sarcoma persisted. In addition, the pleomorphic sarcoma showed an AKT2 and a NRAS mutation. These data are inconclusive concerning the role denosumab plays in the event of malignant progression/transformation of GCTB and point to diverging pathways of tumor progression of GCTB associated with this treatment.

The safety profile of denosumab in oncology beyond the safety of denosumab as an anti-osteoporotic agent: still more to learn

INTRODUCTION

Initially endorsed as an antiosteoporotic agent, denosumab ‒ human monoclonal antibody inhibiting the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL)‒ has currently shown an anticancer potential, rationalizing its exploitation in oncology. A prerequisite for leveraging denosumab in oncology is a favorable safety profile.

AREAS COVERED

The present review provides an overview of the adverse events of denosumab in oncology, with a focus on hypocalcemia, medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw, atypical femoral fracture(s), post-denosumab vertebral fractures, increased risk of infections, and excess of second primary cancer. Representative studies addressing the safety and efficacy of denosumab compared to bisphosphonates in oncology are summarized. Critical gaps in the literature concerning the safety of denosumab in oncology are highlighted as opposed to plenty of available safety data on denosumab as an antiosteoporotic agent.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the generally acceptable safety profile of denosumab in oncology, many issues remain unresolved. Further research is mandatory to counteract current challenges, namely: (i) validation of risk factors for adverse events; (ii) elucidation of the pathophysiology of the adverse events in search of actionable molecular pathways; (iii) illumination of the association of denosumab with increased risk of infections and/or second primary cancer; (iv) establishment of optimal diagnostic, and therapeutic protocols.

Denosumab in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Current Status and Pitfalls

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody against RANK ligand for treatment of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). Clinical trials and case series have demonstrated that denosumab is relevant to beneficial tumor response and surgical down-staging in patients of GCTB. However, these trials or case series have limitations with a short follow-up. Recent increasing studies revealed that denosumab probably increased the local recurrence risk in patients treated with curettage. This may be caused by the thicken bone margin of tumor that trapped tumor cells from curettage. The direct bone formation by tumor cells in the margin after denosumab treatment also contributed to the local recurrence. in vitro studies showed denosumab resulted in a cytostatic instead of a true cytotoxic response on neoplastic stromal cells. More importantly, denosumab-treated GCTB exhibited morphologic overlap with malignancy, and a growing number of patients of malignant transformation of GCTB during denosumab treatment have been reported. The optimal duration, long term safety, maintenance dose, and optimum indications remain to be elucidated. With these concerns in mind, this review warns that the denosumab therapy of GCTB should be applied with caution.

Denosumab for Bone Giant Cell Tumor of the Distal Radius

There are conflicting reports regarding the outcome and effect of denosumab for distal radius giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). The authors performed this study to evaluate the behavior of distal radius GCTB in relation to the type of treatment and the administration of denosumab. The files of 72 patients with distal radius GCTB treated from 1984 to 2018 were reviewed. Fourteen patients were administered denosumab. Surgical treatment consisted of curettage (25 patients) or resection (47 patients) and allograft or vascularized fibular head graft reconstruction. Median follow-up was 63.1 months (interquartile range [IQR], 35.5-107.1 months). The authors evaluated local recurrences, metastasis, function, and complications. The local recurrence rate was 30.6% at a median of 14.0 months (IQR, 10-19 months), with no difference between curettage and resection. The local recurrence rate was significantly higher in the patients who received denosumab. The metastasis rate was 9.7% at a median of 41.0 months (IQR, 15-114 months), with no difference regarding denosumab administration. Function was significantly better in patients after curettage. The complication rate was 25%; vascularized fibular graft reconstruction was associated with fewer complications. This study found that denosumab increases the risk of local recurrence after curettage, function is better after curettage, and vascularized fibular graft is the optimal reconstruction after resection of distal radius GCTB. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5):284-291.].

Can Denosumab be used in combination with Doxorubicin in Osteosarcoma?

Osteosarcoma is an aggressive bone tumor of the pediatric age. It is therefore important to improve conventional therapies (chemotherapy and surgery). Anticancer drugs often cause osteoporosis due to a misbalance of RANK/RANK-L/OPG pathway.

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody with high affinity and specificity to RANK-L, the ligand released by osteoblasts that enhances osteoclasts differentiation and bone resorption. It is used in osteoporosis and in other conditions characterized by bone mass loss. Doxorubicin is a chemotherapic drug used in several kinds of tumors, and also patients treated with it often develop osteoporosis.

We investigated the effects of Denosumab alone and in combination with Doxorubicin, in two human osteosarcoma cell lines (MG63 and U-2 OS). We evaluated the effect of these treatments on apoptosis, cell cycle progression, invasion capacity and bone metabolism.

We observed for the first time an anti-invasive effect of Denosumab in OS cells and confirmed its anti-osteoporotic activity also in Osteosarcoma. On the other hand, we demonstrate that Denosumab not only does not affect apoptosis and cell cycle progression, but when used in combination with Doxorubicin, it causes an unexpected reduction of its activity. These results indicate that the presence of Denosumab might inhibit the efficacy of the chemotherapic drug.

In conclusion, while our results certainly support and confirm the efficacy of Denosumab in Osteoporosis, we discourage the use of Denosumab in addition to conventional chemotherapy in Osteosarcoma, even though, certainly further investigations are necessary to better clarify the clinical role of this monoclonal antibody in cancer.

Role of (Neo)adjuvant Denosumab for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

OPINION STATEMENT

Denosumab is a RANK ligand inhibitor approved for the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone. While the role of denosumab in the setting of advanced and unresectable disease is well established, its role in surgically resectable disease is currently under discussion. Several prospective and retrospective series on neoadjuvant therapy in potentially resectable tumor with high morbidity surgery reported a relapse rate of 10-20% after resection and 30-40% after curettage. At the same time, less morbid surgery has obvious clinical advantages for the patient, and several studies have shown the efficacy of denosumab in downgrading of the surgical procedure. Currently, the role of neoadjuvant denosumab in operable GCTB is limited to selected cases in which a diffuse reactive bone formation and peripheral ossification can make an easier surgical procedure, for example, in tumors with a large soft tissue component. A planned resection may become less morbid when preoperative denosumab is administered. Whenever a segmental resection is thought to be indicated at diagnosis, denosumab may be considered in the neoadjuvant setting. A preoperative course of 6 months is considered safe and effective. Two case scenarios are presented and critically discussed. Because of the high recurrence rates after denosumab treatment followed by curettage, we discourage the use of denosumab when curettage is considered feasible. In this setting, a short course of preoperative denosumab (2-6 months) may be considered for highly selected cases, for example in pathological fractures. The role of adjuvant denosumab needs further investigation. Long-term disease control has been reported in case of non-surgical lesions, even after treatment interruption, but there is no consensus on ideal treatment duration and dosage for these scenarios. In all cases, multidisciplinary discussion with oncology, pathologist, radiologist, and surgeons is mandatory. Patient's comorbidities, dental conditions, and preferences, including family planning, should always be taken into account.

Denosumab-treated Giant Cell Tumors of Bone: A Clinicopathologic Analysis of 35 Cases From the French Group of Bone Pathology

Denosumab, an antibody directed against receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), has recently been introduced in the treatment strategy of giant cell tumor of bone. In this study, we assessed the tumor changes induced by denosumab in a national multicentric series of 35 cases (French Bone Pathology Group network-ResOs). Tissue specimens collected before and after denosumab treatment were investigated for RANKL, H3.3 G34W, p63, and Ki-67 expression, and for H3F3A mutation. These parameters were put in correspondance with clinical and radiologic presentation to identify prognostic factors, and more specifically, predictive markers of an optimal histologic response to denosumab, identified as a ≥50% loss in giant cells with fibrosis and ossification. The main changes in posttreatment specimens showed an induction of ossification (P=2.10), an increased fibrosis (P=3.10), and a major decrease in giant cells (P=6.10). No significant change in mononuclear tumor cell density and in patterns of expression of RANKL (P=0.061) and H3.3 G34W was observed (P=0.061). An optimal histologic response to denosumab treatment was associated with an enhanced progression-free survival (P=0.010 in univariate analyses; P=0.040 in multivariate analyses). The initial number of giant cells was predictive of the histologic response to treatment (P=0.016). In summary, denosumab treatment induced radical changes in the tumor. The histologic response, despite the absence of objective regression of the mononuclear cells, was associated with an enhanced progression-free survival. Greater numbers of giant cells represented the only predictive indication of an optimal histologic response to denosumab treatment.

Denosumab in giant cell tumour of bone in the pelvis and sacrum: Long-term therapy or bone resection?

INTRODUCTION

Surgery of GCTB in sacrum and pelvis is challenging, with high rates of complications and local recurrence. Denosumab can consolidate the peripheral rim of the tumour, thus reducing the rate of morbidities of surgery. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the use of denosumab in pelvic/sacrum giant cell tumours of bone (GCTB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 26 patients with aggressive GCTB in sacrum or pelvis treated with denosumab at two referral centres. Clinical response and local recurrence were recorded and the radiologic responses were evaluated with the MDA criteria.

RESULTS

69% of the pelvic GCTB treated with denosumab presented partial or good radiologic responses (type 2A or 2B) after 49 weeks of treatment. Denosumab was administered as adjuvant therapy prior and after surgery in 11 patients (group A), and as the only treatment in 15 patients (group B). In group A, 62% of local recurrence was observed in patients treated with intralesional curettage. No recurrences were identified after en bloc resection. In group B, 9 patients were on continuous bimonthly long term denosumab administration with type 2A and 2B responses. Six patients stopped denosumab and 66% remained stable after 10 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term denosumab therapy can be considered with curative intent for pelvic and sacrum GCTB. If surgical intervention is required wide resection may be advisable to reduce the risk of recurrence.

Challenges of denosumab in giant cell tumor of bone, and other giant cell-rich tumors of bone

Purpose of review

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an uncommon benign primary bone tumor, consisting of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B (RANK) expressing reactive osteoclast-like giant cells and neoplastic spindle-shaped cells. Denosumab was approved by FDA in 2013 and by EMA in 2014 to treat adults and skeletally mature adolescents with unresectable GCTB or when resection is likely to result in severe morbidity. However, there is much discussion regarding the optimal applied treatment strategy.

Recent findings

Neoadjuvant treatment of GCTB with denosumab can effectively downstage tumors to facilitate less morbid surgery or completely avoid the need for resection, but there is concern about local recurrence postsurgery. Definitive treatment of unresectable GTCB improves symptoms and halts tumor progression. The optimal treatment duration is unclear and long-term treatment is associated with adverse events like osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and atypical femoral fractures. Denosumab maintenance dose interval is currently being investigated.

Summary

For the related but heterogenous group of giant cell rich tumors of bone, like aneurysmal bone cysts (ABC) and central giant cell granuloma (CGCG), denosumab is a new treatment modality under investigation. Given the effectiveness in GCTB, this could be a promising treatment option for selected patients with advanced disease.

Retrospective cohort study of 68 sacral giant cell tumours treated with nerve-sparing surgery and evaluation on therapeutic benefits of denosumab therapy

AIMS

To investigate the benefits of denosumab in combination with nerve-sparing surgery for treatment of sacral giant cell tumours (GCTs).

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with GCT who presented between January 2011 and July 2017. Intralesional curettage was performed and patients treated from 2015 to 2017 also received denosumab therapy. The patients were divided into three groups: Cohort 1: control group (n = 36); cohort 2: adjuvant denosumab group (n = 9); and cohort 3: neo- and adjuvant-denosumab group (n = 17).

RESULTS

There were 68 patients within the study period. Six patients were lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up was 47.7 months (SD 23.2). Preoperative denosumab was found to reduce intraoperative haemorrhage and was associated with shorter operating time for tumour volume > 200 cm³. A total of 17 patients (27.4%) developed local recurrence. The locoregional control rate was 77.8% (7/9) and 87.5% (14/16) respectively for cohorts 2 and 3, in comparison to 66.7% (24/36) of the control group. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was significantly higher for adjuvant denosumab group versus those without adjuvant denosumab during the first two years: 100% vs 83.8% at one year and 95.0% vs 70.3% at two years. No significant difference was found for the three-year RFS rate.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative denosumab therapy was found to reduce intraoperative haemorrhage and was associated with shorter operating times. Adjuvant denosumab was useful to prevent early recurrence during the first two years after surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):177-185.

The functional outcomes and complications of different reconstruction methods for Giant cell tumor of the distal radius: comparison of Osteoarticular allograft and three-dimensional-printed prosthesis

Background

En bloc excision has been increasingly used for the management of giant cell tumors (GCTs) in the distal radius. An osteoarticular allograft has been used extensively for decades, and custom-made prosthesis reconstruction has been more recently applied. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of the two procedures.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 30 patients with Campanacci III or recurrent GCTs of the distal radius for follow-up at a mean of 33.2 months. In total, 15 underwent osteoarticular allograft reconstruction (allograft group) and 15 received cementless three-dimensional (3D)-printed prosthesis reconstruction (prosthesis group) between March 18, 2013, and May 20, 2018. All patients underwent by clinical and radiological examinations, including pre- and postoperative active range of motion (ROM) of the wrist, VAS score, grip strength, degenerative change of wrist, Mayo wrist score and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score. Complications were evaluated using the Henderson classification.

Results

Both groups showed significantly increased ROM, grip strength, Mayo score and MSTS score postoperatively. Furthermore, the extension, flexion, MSTS, and Mayo score were significantly higher in the prosthesis group. There was no significant difference in grip strength and VAS between the groups. In allograft group, one patient had a late infection one had resorption of allograft without allograft bone fracture. and four had wrist subluxation. All patients had degenerative changes (mean 9 months). In the prosthesis group, three patients developed wrist subluxation, three had separation of the distal radioulnar joint, and none of the patients developed wrist degeneration.

Conclusions

Our study compared the objective functional outcomes and complications of two reconstructive methods for Campanacci III or recurrent GCT in the distal radius. 3D-printed prosthesis replacement can partially preserve wrist function better than allograft reconstruction in the short-term. During the design of 3D-printed prosthesis, preoperative morphological assessment of the affected proximal row carpal is helpful to control postoperative dislocation. After allograft reconstruction, wrist degeneration, which has been demonstrated in all patients, severely influence their wrist function. Therefore, compared to allograft reconstruction, 3D-printed prosthesis reconstruction has irreplaceable advantages at early-stage application, especially in wrist function, however, further studied with a larger number of cases and longer follow-up.

Radiological findings of denosumab treatment for giant cell tumours of bone

Giant cell tumours of bone (GCTB) are benign giant cell-rich tumours typically occurring in the epi-metaphysis of skeletally mature patients. Despite their benign classification, GCTB may be locally aggressive with local recurrence as a challenging issue. Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits osteolysis via the RANK-RANK ligand pathway. There is currently no consensus on optimal treatment duration or imaging modality for monitoring patients on denosumab therapy. This review illustrates the radiological findings of GCTB on denosumab treatment seen on plain radiographs, CT, MRI, PET-CT and DEXA, with reference to the current literature. Recognizing imaging features indicative of a positive response to denosumab is important for therapeutic decision-making. Imaging findings with respect to duration of denosumab treatment, tumour upregulation during treatment, tumour recurrence and malignant transformation are discussed. The development of a sclerotic neocortex and varying degrees of matrix osteosclerosis are seen on plain radiographs. Reconstitution of subarticular bone and articular surface irregularity are optimally evaluated on CT which can also quantify tumour density. MRI demonstrates heterogeneous low signal matrix and is useful to assess decrease in size of cystic and/or soft tissue components of GCTB. A fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive MR sequence is important to detect tumour reactivation. Reduction in ¹⁸F-FDG-PET avidity represents an early sensitive sign of response to denosumab treatment. Regardless of imaging modality, close follow-up in a specialist centre and careful evaluation of nonresponders is necessary as local recurrence after cessation of denosumab treatment and malignant transformation of GCTB have been described.

Absence of H3F3A mutation in a subset of malignant giant cell tumor of bone

Giant cell tumor of bone typically involves the epiphysis of the long bones of skeletally mature patients. It is genetically characterized by highly recurrent and specific mutations of the H3F3A gene, which encodes histone H3.3. The most common mutation H3F3A G34W can readily be detected by a recently developed mutation-specific antibody. Giant cell tumor of bone rarely transforms to a sarcoma (malignant giant cell tumor of bone), which has not been genetically characterized in detail. We studied seven clinicopathologically defined malignant giant cell tumors, as well as two H3F3A-mutant bone sarcomas without giant cell tumor histology using a combination of clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular methods (Sanger sequencing + pyrosequencing or next generation sequencing). The cases included five men and four women, with a median age at initial diagnosis of 27 years. The two H3F3A G34W-positive sarcomas without giant cell tumor histology involved the subarticular epiphyseal sites, suggesting relatedness with giant cell tumor of bone. In two of the seven clinicopathologically defined malignant giant cell tumor cases, the sarcoma tissue showed the H3F3A G34W mutation. However, in the remaining five cases, in contrast to their associated H3F3A G34W-mutant giant cell tumor, the sarcoma lacked the H3F3A G34W mutation, either entirely or sub-clonally in the samples tested. This discordant mutation status was confirmed in all instances by immunohistochemistry and sequencing. A FISH analysis suggested that the absence of the H3F3A G34W mutation may be related to deletion of the H3F3A gene. Therefore, we have demonstrated that H3F3A G34W mutation, a critical driver in giant cell tumor, is absent in a subset of malignant giant cell tumor of bone. This novel recurrent phenomenon has potential biological and diagnostic implications, and further study is required to better characterize this progression pathway and understand its mechanism.

Primary Bone Tumor of the Spine-An Evolving Field: What a General Spine Surgeon Should Know

STUDY DESIGN

A narrative review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the general principles of treatment and investigation for primary bone tumors of the spine. Furthermore, it explores the emerging alternatives.

METHODS

A review was performed using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases.

RESULTS

Primary bone tumors of the spine are rare entities that general spine surgeons may encounter only a few times in their career. The treatment algorithm of these complex tumors is filled with nuances and is evolving constantly. For these reasons, patients should be referred to experienced tertiary or quaternary centers who can offer a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach. For most malignant spinal bone tumors, surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment. Respecting oncologic principles has been associated with improved survival and decreased local recurrence in multiple settings. However, even in experienced centers, these surgeries carry a significant risk of adverse events and possible long-term neurologic impairment. The associated morbidity of these procedures and the challenges of local recurrence have encouraged professionals caring for these patients to explore alternatives or adjuncts to surgical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the past few years, several advances have occurred in medical oncology, radiation oncology and interventional radiology, changing the treatment paradigm for some tumors. Other advances still need to be refined before being applied in a clinical setting.

Comprehensive molecular imaging of malignant transformation of giant cell tumour of bone reveals diverse disease biology

Malignant transformation of giant cell tumour of the bone is extremely rare. In addition, bone transformation in giant cell tumour may occur in different phases. With conventional X-rays, CT scans or MRIs, it may be challenging to distinguish among different phases of bone transformation, normal bone, soft tissue disease and bone disease (benign vs malignant lesions) and changes in multiple organs such as lung, liver and lymph nodes unless every lesion is biopsied, which is not practical. Molecular imaging with different isotopes (Tc-99m phosphonate, 2-deoxy-2-(¹⁸F)fluoro-d-glucose and sodium fluoride-18) may help to better characterise the disease. We hypothesised that molecular imaging could offer qualitative and quantitative characterisation of all stages of bone formation, destruction, reactivity or neoplasia in a patient with giant cell tumour of the bone, and we present the first case of molecular imaging where bone formation was seen in multiple soft tissues, such as lungs, muscles, lymph nodes and liver.

Characterization of Three Novel H3F3A-mutated Giant Cell Tumor Cell Lines and Targeting of Their Wee1 Pathway

The giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive primary bone tumor that is composed of mononuclear stroma cells, scattered macrophages, and multinucleated osteoclast-like giant cells which cause pathologic osteolysis. The stroma cells represent the neoplastic population of the tumor and are characterized by the H3F3A mutation G34W. This point mutation is regarded as the driver mutation of GCTB. We have established three new stable H3F3A mutated GCTB cell lines: U-GCT1, U-GCT2, and U-GCT3M. MK-1775 is a Wee1-kinase inhibitor which has been used for blocking of sarcoma growth. In the cell lines we detected Wee1, Cdk1, Cyclin B1, H3K36me3, and Rrm2 as members of the Wee1 pathway. We analyzed the effect of MK-1775 and gemcitabine, alone and in combination, on the growth of the cell lines. The cell lines showed a significant reduction in cell proliferation when treated with MK-1775 or gemcitabine. The combination of both agents led to a further significant reduction in cell proliferation compared to the single agents. Immunohistochemical analysis of 13 GCTB samples revealed that Wee1 and downstream-relevant members are present in GCTB tissue samples. Overall, our work offers valuable new tools for GCTB studies and presents a description of novel biomarkers and molecular targeting strategies.

Malignant Sarcomatous Transformation of Benign Giant Cell Tumor of Bone after Treatment with Denosumab Therapy: A Literature Review of Reported Cases

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a biologically benign and locally aggressive tumor that most often affects the epiphyseal and metaphyseal sites of long bones in the young adult population. Overexpression of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) by cancerous mesenchymal stromal cells stimulates a signal transduction cascade that recruits and activates multinucleated osteoclast-like giant cells, resulting in pathologic bone resorption. Denosumab, an RANKL inhibitor that blocks the RANKL-mediated osteoclast activation, has been recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of aggressive GCTB. Although uncommon, several studies reported drug-related malignant morphological transformation of benign GCTB following treatment with denosumab therapy. The aim of the article was to review the clinicopathological characteristics of all the reported cases of malignant sarcomatous transformation of GCTB after treatment with denosumab therapy in patients without any history of prior exposure to radiotherapy.

Safety and efficacy of denosumab in the treatment of pulmonary metastatic giant cell tumor of bone

Background

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is an intermittent and locally aggressive tumor with increasing pulmonary metastatic potential. In this study, we evaluated the interim clinical outcome of denosumab in patients with pulmonary metastatic GCT.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed seven patients with pulmonary metastatic GCT who received denosumab treatment after local tumor surgery during January 2014 and July 2016. Denosumab treatment for all patients lasted for at least 12 months. Serial chest computerized tomography scan was used to monitor the drug response and RECIST 1.1 standard was used to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy.

Results

All patients experienced chest pain relief in the first month of treatment. Three patients showed partial response. Four patients got stable disease after denosumab treatment. Adverse events included one patient with hypocalcemia and two patients with fever. No treatment-related deaths were reported. No patient with metastatic disease progression was found during an average of 28.6 months follow-up period.

Conclusion

We presented a promising interim clinical outcome using denosumab to treat patients with pulmonary metastatic GCT. Denosumab might be considered as the first-line treatment for patients with inoperable metastatic pulmonary GCT. However, Phase II clinical study with larger number of patients and longer follow-up period is needed to detect the further efficacy and safety of this drug for lung metastatic GCT.