HIV preventive vaccine research: selected ethical issues

What should South African HIV vaccine trials do about social harms?

Phase I and II HIV vaccine trials are currently underway in South Africa. Sites are being prepared for Phase III vaccine trials. Participants in these trials risk exposure to 'social harms' that may impact on participant enrolment and retention and threaten their welfare. Potential social harms should be prevented, minimised and/or addressed. This paper examines the literature on potential social harms in HIV vaccine trials. It outlines the type and severity and frequency of potential social harms and ways these have been monitored in settings in the developed world and Thailand. We argue that many of these social harms are likely to manifest in South African trials, however, it is also likely social harms may manifest differently in our setting, such as domestic violence. Therefore careful formative research is required to identify what constitutes a social harm in our setting. Measures should be carefully tailored to record such events and methods established to prevent or address these.

Socio-behaviour challenges to phase III HIV vaccine trials in Sub-Saharan Africa

BACKGROUND

A number of countries in sub-Saharan Africa are preparing for HIV vaccine efficacy trials. Social and behavioural factors related to HIV transmission require examination in each setting where these trials are considered. As part of this, several countries have also recently begun preparatory research investigating relevant social and behavioural issues. There is a need for a review of the literature to help focus such research efforts in Sub-Saharan Africa.

OBJECTIVES

To examine key social and behavioural issues that may impact on the conduct of HIV vaccine efficacy trials in sub-Saharan Africa.

DESIGN

Literature review

METHODS

Major databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, EBSCOhost, and AIDSline) were searched for literature that discussed social and behavioural issues related to HIV vaccine trials. Three areas are highlighted as being particularly significant for HIV vaccine research: (1) willingness to participate in future HIV vaccine efficacy trials, (2) retention of participants in studies, and (3) sexual risk reporting during trials. For each of these topics, major findings from both developed and developing countries are described and avenues for further research are discussed.

RESULTS

There are few data from Sub-Saharan Africa regarding willingness to participate in HIV vaccine trials. Data on participant retention rates varies widely, and maintaining large cohorts of individuals within Phase III trials presents an important challenge. In addition, the possible impact of trial participation on sexual disinhibition, and response bias on sexual risk-reporting remain as issues for HIV vaccine trials in African contexts.

CONCLUSION

Social and behavioural research forms an important part of preparations for HIV vaccine efficacy trials, and there is a clear need for more research of this type in Sub-Saharan Africa. Innovative approaches are required to address issues such as willingness to participate in vaccine research, participant retention during efficacy trials, and the accurate reporting by participants of sexual risk behaviours.

Some important issues in the planning of phase III HIV vaccine efficacy trials

Given that interesting HIV vaccine candidates, including live preparations and DNA plasmids, exist and that the first phase III vaccine (AIDSVAX) testing is due to begin this summer, 1998, in the U.S., adequately addressing trial preparedness is a pressing issue. Despite double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial design, there may be difficulties with interpretation and use of the usual measures of vaccinal efficacy and calculation of sample size. Difficulties arise from vaccine characteristics (e.g. mode of action, time-lag, waning) and population heterogeneities (e.g. differences in susceptibility, sexual behaviour, mixing preferences) causing frailty effects that can exacerbate bias and time-dependent effects already known to exist in simple cases. Since vaccine properties, particularly mode of action, are unlikely to be known before the onset of clinical trials, choosing an efficacy measure and the associated analyses and sample size calculations will be problematic. Interim analyses designed to decide whether a study will be prolonged may be tenuous if based on a time-dependent measure and will influence sample size determination. Despite shortcomings, general recommendations can be made to minimise pernicious effects. The objectives of this paper are principally to review the current state of knowledge of the different stages in the preparation of large phase III HIV vaccine efficacy trials, the methodological difficulties related to their design, and the analysis of data collected from them. Mathematical models and trial simulations are used to demonstrate that further research is necessary to study the behaviour of vaccine efficacy measures under heterogeneous conditions of population, vaccine action, and trial design and identify a time-independent efficacy measure. Alternative methods to validate sample size calculations have to be developed in older to reduce the chances of unnecessary economic and human cost in phase III HIV vaccine trials.