The Vitality of Mortality: Being-Toward-Death and Long-Term Cancer Survivorship

Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of CVD: time to think about cardiovascular health rather than rehabilitation

During the past century, there have been major developments in the medical and surgical treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD). These advancements have resulted in more people surviving initial events and having reduced length of stay in hospital; consequently, there is an increasing number of people in need of ongoing and lifelong cardiovascular risk management. The physical and emotional effects of living with CVD are ongoing with broad challenges ranging from the individual to system level. However, post-discharge care of people with coronary disease continues to follow a 50-year-old cardiac rehabilitation model which focuses on the sub-acute phase and is of a finite in duration. The aim of this paper is to consider the concept of supporting survivors to live well with CVD rather than 'rehabilitating' them and propose factors for consideration in reframing secondary prevention towards optimizing cardiovascular health. We discuss deeply-held potential considerations and challenges associated with the concept of supporting survivors achieve optimal cardiovascular health and live well with CVD rather than 'rehabilitating' them. We propose the concept of 5 x P's for reframing traditional cardiac rehabilitation towards the concept of cardiovascular health for survivors beyond 'rehabilitation'. These include the need for personalization, processes, patient-centered care, parlance, and partnership. Taken together, consideration of challenges at the systems and population level will ultimately improve engagement with secondary prevention as well as outcomes for all people who need it.

Illness perception profile among cancer patients and its influencing factors: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore latent profiles of illness perception among cancer patients and its influencing factors.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional study adopting convenience sampling to select cancer patients from two hospitals in China. A total of 286 patients completed Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, Post-traumatic Growth Inventory, Fear of Disease Progression Questionnaire and Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale. Latent profile analysis and multiple linear regression were performed to explore the subgroups and factors influencing classification.

RESULTS

Three subgroups were identified, which were labelled as "Moderate Illness Perception Group" (16.8%; C1), "High Illness Perception with Heightened Concerns Group" (68.5%; C2) and "High Resilience and Low Symptomatic Impact Group" (14.7%; C3). Specifically, "Normal", "Mild symptom" and "Bed time during the day <50%" of "Functional Status" were more associated with C3. "Worker", "Farmer" and "Self-employed" were more associated with C1 and C2. Patients who had more "knowledge of the disease" were more associated with C2 and C3, who had less "post-traumatic growth" were more associated with C1, and who had less "fear of disease progression" and more "psychosocial adjustment" were more associated with C3 (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant variability of illness perception among three subgroups of cancer patients, which emphasized the complexity of psychological condition. The insights derived from these distinct profiles enables tailored interventions and patient-centered communication strategies. However, integrating objective measures or biomarkers is needed to complement self-reported data.

Philosophy of Cancer Theranostics

Imagine a theranostic nuclear physician oncologist engaged in a Socratic philosophic dialogue. Questions that may be posed include the status of our current knowledge base of radiomolecular tumor biology, the meaning of precision in personalized dosimetry, the nature of responsibility for direct patient care, and the moral and ethical dimensions of individual quality of life (QOL) when survival is prolonged. This review invites reflective enquiry into one's personal practice of theranostics in cancer care, with the objective of optimizing clinical outcomes, not only in terms of prolonged survival but also individual QOL, in respect of its meaning for each patient, both physically and emotionally.

Cancer survivorship: existential suffering

Purpose

This study aimed to explore and describe existential experiences after cancer treatment.

Method

An exploratory phenomenological hermeneutical design was used following in-depth interviews with 21 people.

Results

The study revealed experiences of multifaceted suffering in the form of limitations in everyday life, inner struggles, and bearing the burden alone.

Conclusions

Existential suffering after cancer treatment was revealed as like being in a process of transition, in an intermediate state, as moving between suffering and enduring, and alternating between alienworld and homeworld. A new and broader professional perspective is needed to establish rehabilitation services based on multifaceted experiences of suffering. This means a shift in focus from biomedical symptoms towards understanding of existential meaning for the person.

Life-Saving Cancer Care

What, precisely, are we seeking to achieve in offering 'life-saving' treatment to patients with cancer? Research funding agencies and pharmaceutical industry media releases, and government cancer screening programs all promise that their cancer programs save lives. But everybody dies. The nature of life and death from cancer is explored philosophically in this essay, with particular reference to the quality of life, and its meaning, during the period of prolongation of survival by 'life-saving' cancer care.