Response to Zhang and Yang

Validation of absolutely quantitated Ki67 and cyclinD1 protein levels for prognosis of Luminal-like breast cancer patients

Aims

To translate a clinical research finding into daily clinical practice requires well‐controlled clinical trials. We have demonstrated the usage of absolute quantitation of Ki67 and cyclinD1 protein levels to improve prognosis of Luminal‐like patients based on overall survival (OS) analysis of a cohort of 155 breast cancer specimens (cohort 1). However, this finding is considered the D level of evidence (LOE) to require subsequent validation before it may be used in daily clinical practice. To set the stage for future clinical trials, our findings were validated through OS analysis of an independent cohort (cohort 2) of 173 Luminal‐like patients.

Methods

Both Ki67 and cyclinD1 levels were measured absolutely and quantitatively using the Quantitative Dot Blot (QDB) method in cohort 2. The proposed cutoffs for both biomarkers from cohort 1 were re‐evaluated in cohort 2 and in the merged cohort of 1 and 2, respectively, through univariate, multivariate and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis.

Results

The proposed cutoffs of 2.31 nmol/g for Ki67 and 0.44 μmol/g for cyclinD1 were validated as effective cutoffs in cohort 2 and the merged cohort through OS analysis. The combined use of both biomarkers allowed us to identify patients with both biomarker levels below the cutoffs (59.3%) with10‐year survival probability (SP) of 89%, in comparison to those above the cutoffs (8.3%) with 8 year SP of 28% through OS analysis in the merged cohort.

Conclusions

This study validated our findings that absolute quantitation of Ki67 and cyclinD1 allows effective subtyping of luminal‐like patients. It sets the stage for prospective or prospective‐retrospective clinical studies.

Small non-coding RNA profiling in breast cancer: plasma U6 snRNA, miR-451a and miR-548b-5p as novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in women. Most cases are invasive ductal carcinomas of no special type (NST breast carcinomas).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this prospective, multicentric biomarker discovery study, we analyzed the expression of small non-coding RNAs (mainly microRNAs) in plasma by qPCR and evaluated their association with NST breast cancer. Large-scale expression profiling and subsequent validations have been performed in patient and control groups and compared with clinicopathological data. Small nuclear U6 snRNA, miR-548b-5p and miR-451a have been identified as candidate biomarkers. U6 snRNA was remarkably overexpressed in all the validations, miR-548b-5p levels were generally elevated and miR-451a expression was mostly downregulated in breast cancer groups. Combined U6 snRNA/miR-548b-5p signature demonstrated the best diagnostic performance based on the ROC curve analysis with AUC of 0.813, sensitivity 73.1% and specificity 82.6%. There was a trend towards increased expression of both miR-548b-5p and U6 snRNA in more advanced stages. Further, increased miR-548b-5p levels have been partially associated with higher grades, multifocality, Ki-67 positivity, and luminal B rather than luminal A samples. On the other hand, an association has been observed between high miR-451a expression and progesterone receptor positivity, lower grade, unifocal samples, Ki-67-negativity, luminal A rather than luminal B samples as well as improved progression-free survival and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that U6 snRNA and miR-548b-5p may have pro-oncogenic functions, while miR-451a may act as tumor suppressor in breast cancer.

Improving Prognosis of Surrogate Assay for Breast Cancer Patients by Absolute Quantitation of Ki67 Protein Levels Using Quantitative Dot Blot (QDB) Method

Background

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based surrogate assay is the prevailing method in daily clinical practice to determine the necessity of chemotherapy for Luminal-like breast cancer patients worldwide. It relies on Ki67 scores to separate Luminal A-like from Luminal B-like breast cancer subtypes. Yet, IHC-based Ki67 assessment is known to be plagued with subjectivity and inconsistency to undermine the performance of the surrogate assay. A novel method needs to be explored to improve the clinical utility of Ki67 in daily clinical practice.

Materials and Methods

The Ki67 protein levels in a cohort of 253 specimens were assessed with IHC and quantitative dot blot (QDB) methods, respectively, and used to assign these specimens into Luminal A-like and Luminal B-like subtypes accordingly. Their performances were compared with the Kaplan–Meier, univariate, and multivariate survival analyses of the overall survival (OS) of Luminal-like patients.

Results

The surrogate assay based on absolutely quantitated Ki67 levels (cutoff at 2.31 nmol/g) subtyped the Luminal-like patients more effectively than that based on Ki67 scores (cutoff at 14%) (Log rank test, p = 0.00052 vs. p = 0.031). It is also correlated better with OS in multivariate survival analysis [hazard ratio (HR) at 6.89 (95% CI: 2.66–17.84, p = 0.0001) vs. 2.14 (95% CI: 0.89–5.11, p = 0.087)].

Conclusions

Our study showed that the performance of the surrogate assay may be improved significantly by measuring Ki67 levels absolutely, quantitatively, and objectively using the QDB method.