1
|
Duggirala N, Zhang S, Master A, Rao R, Kapoor NS, Bardia A, Lipsyc-Sharf M. Biology, care, and outcomes of gestational breast cancers: a review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2025; 211:547-559. [PMID: 40155574 PMCID: PMC12031940 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-025-07684-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2025] [Accepted: 03/12/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence of gestational breast cancers, breast cancers diagnosed during pregnancy, is increasing. There is a critical need to understand the pathophysiology, treatment recommendations, and remaining questions regarding care and therapeutics for this complex condition. METHODS Here, we review existing data regarding evaluation and management of gestational breast cancer, including safe imaging modalities, timing and choice of chemotherapy, evidence regarding targeted therapies during pregnancy. We highlight the importance of multidisciplinary care including oncologic, obstetric, and psychosocial care. RESULTS Gestational breast cancers are associated with unique biologic and clinicopathologic features that are impacted by physiologic changes of pregnancy such as upregulation of target genes associated with cell proliferation and immune regulation. Patients with gestational breast cancers more often present at advanced stages, are more likely to have aggressive tumor subtypes (i.e., triple negative or HER2 positive), and overall have worse prognoses than patients with non-gestational breast cancers. In this review, we synthesize recommendations for treatment strategies based on pregnancy trimester, optimal timing and choice of surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and psychosocial support. CONCLUSION Developing a framework for clinical care and treatment of patients with gestational breast cancers is integral to improving outcomes for patients with gestational breast cancers. Optimal treatment includes collaborative management with a multidisciplinary team dedicated to both maternal and fetal care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niharika Duggirala
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shiliang Zhang
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Aashini Master
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Rashmi Rao
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nimmi S Kapoor
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marla Lipsyc-Sharf
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bhardwaj PV, Abdou Y. Managing pregnancy-associated breast cancer: A practical approach. Semin Perinatol 2025; 49:152037. [PMID: 40089317 DOI: 10.1016/j.semperi.2025.152037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2025]
Abstract
Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer (PABC) is a rare but complex condition that presents both professional and ethical challenges. Diagnosis is often delayed due to breast changes associated with pregnancy and puerperium, which can mask malignant findings. Management requires a multidisciplinary approach that carefully balances maternal and fetal risks. Chemotherapy is generally reserved for the second and third trimesters to avoid teratogenicity, with anthracyclines being the most well-studied and safest agents in this setting. Surgical decisions are influenced by factors such as cancer stage, gestational age, and the timing of potential radiation therapy. Notably, radiation therapy, endocrine therapy, and most targeted therapies are contraindicated during pregnancy due to potential harm to the fetus. Comprehensive care should include robust social and mental health support for the mother and her family to help navigate the physical and emotional challenges during this period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prarthna V Bhardwaj
- Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Massachusetts Chan School of Medicine - Baystate, Springfield, MA, USA.
| | - Yara Abdou
- Assistant Professor, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roesch E, Maggiotto A, Valente SA. Multidisciplinary Management of Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2025; 21:313-321. [PMID: 39383485 DOI: 10.1200/op-24-00453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Revised: 09/10/2024] [Accepted: 09/23/2024] [Indexed: 10/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer during pregnancy is uncommon; however, it is one of the most common malignancies affecting pregnant women. Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is a complex entity characterized by unique risk factors, presentation, and pathology. Furthermore, although management generally aims to mirror that for nonpregnant patients, there are distinct aspects of oncologic care delivery specific to PABC. The focus is on optimizing maternal outcomes while maximizing maternal and fetal safety. A multidisciplinary approach is key, and the timing of various treatment modalities is critical. Postdelivery care and counseling are also imperative to address issues such as contraception, breastfeeding, and future fertility. In the present review, we discuss the current knowledge base and the diagnostic and treatment landscape for PABC, including recent literature and practice pattern updates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Roesch
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Amanda Maggiotto
- Cancer Programming, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Stephanie A Valente
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Integrated Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Johnson HM, Song J, Warneke CL, Martinez AL, Litton JK, Oke OC. Outcomes of patients treated with chemotherapy for breast cancer during pregnancy compared with nonpregnant breast cancer patients treated with systemic therapy. Cancer 2025; 131:e35619. [PMID: 39470464 PMCID: PMC11784491 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 10/05/2024] [Accepted: 10/08/2024] [Indexed: 10/30/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prior studies of patients treated for breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) report mixed outcomes and are limited by substandard treatment, small cohorts, and short follow-up. This study compared survival outcomes of PrBC patients treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy with nonpregnant patients matched by age, year of diagnosis, stage, and subtype. METHODS PrBC patients treated from 1989 to 2022 on prospective institutional protocols were eligible. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS Among 143 PrBC and 285 nonpregnant patients, median follow-up was 11.4 years. Survival differences were statistically significant, with median DFS and OS not attained for PrBC patients versus 5.6 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6-15.4; p = .0001) and 19.3 years (95% CI, 14.1-not estimated; p = .0262) for nonpregnant patients, respectively. Median PFS was 24.1 years (95% CI, 15.8-not estimated) for PrBC patients versus 8.4 years (95% CI, 6.4-10.9) for the nonpregnant cohort (p = .0008). Study cohort was associated with DFS, PFS, and OS in multivariable analyses, with the nonpregnant cohort having increased risks of disease recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91; 95% CI, 1.33-2.76; p = .0005) and disease progression or death (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.19-2.39; p = .0035), and shorter OS (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.01-2.29; p = .0442). CONCLUSION These data suggest that PrBC patients treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy have at least comparable, if not superior, outcomes than nonpregnant patients with similar age, cancer stage, and subtype. Analyses excluding patients with postpartum breast cancer were unable to be performed and are a priority for future confirmatory studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen M Johnson
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Juhee Song
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carla L Warneke
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ashley L Martinez
- Department of Nursing, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer K Litton
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Oluchi C Oke
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of General Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Van Assche IA, Van Calsteren K, Huis in ’t Veld EA, van Gerwen M, Heylen L, LeJeune CL, Cardonick E, Halaska MJ, Fruscio R, Fumagalli M, van Dijk-Lokkart EM, Lemiere J, van Grotel M, Lagae L, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Amant F. Child outcomes after prenatal exposure to platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy: an unplanned interim analysis of the international network on cancer, infertility, and pregnancy study. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 78:102922. [PMID: 39588212 PMCID: PMC11585789 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Revised: 10/10/2024] [Accepted: 10/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Platina and taxanes are frequently used chemotherapeutic agents to treat cancer, also when diagnosed during pregnancy. This report presents an interim analysis of the largest series of children prenatally exposed to platinum and/or taxane agents and aims to determine their physical health and neurocognitive outcomes. Methods As part of a multicentre, prospective cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00330447), children born between 2000 and 2022 were assessed between 2005 and 2024 at ages 1.5-18 years (interim analysis; median length of follow-up, 3.2 years (IQR 3.0-6.4)) by a comprehensive neurocognitive test battery, parent-reported questionnaires, and a physical assessment. Mixed-effects regression and Type III Analysis of Variance models were used to investigate associations between these outcomes and platinum/taxane cumulative dose and agent type, with best-fit models corrected for age and covariates (gestational age at birth, chemotherapy timing, other chemotherapy, sex, parental education level, maternal death). Findings In total, 144 children were included (13% exposed to platinum, 62% to taxanes, 25% to both). Of these, 101 were assessed at age 1.5 years, 96 at age 3, 63 at age 6, 32 at age 9, 18 at age 12, 7 at age 15, and 2 at age 18 years. Neurocognitive outcomes were within normal ranges across all ages, compared with test-specific normative data. Eight children (6%) reported ototoxicity, seven (5%) reported chronic medical conditions, three (2%) had congenital malformations, and two (1%) were diagnosed with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Thirty-three children (23%) needed extra neurocognitive support, of which 64% were born preterm. Children prenatally exposed to paclitaxel scored lower on visuospatial (β = 0.64 ± 0.21, p = 0.0052) and verbal memory (β = 0.68 ± 0.27, p = 0.015) than those exposed to docetaxel. Interpretation In this interim analysis, we found normal neurocognitive outcomes and no increase in congenital malformations nor medical conditions after prenatal exposure to platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy. However, owed to the limited number of older children, further investigation regarding their potential neurotoxicity and its long term effects is necessary in follow-up studies with larger samples. Funding Kom Op Tegen Kanker, KWF Kankerbestrijding, Stichting Tegen Kanker, Cooperatio program, Research Foundation Flanders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indra A. Van Assche
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Unit of Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kristel Van Calsteren
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Unit of Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Unit of Foetomaternal Medicine, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evangeline A. Huis in ’t Veld
- Center for Gynecological Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Mathilde van Gerwen
- Center for Gynecological Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laura Heylen
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Unit of Clinical Psychology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charlotte L. LeJeune
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Unit of Foetomaternal Medicine, UZ Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Unit of Gynaecological Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elyce Cardonick
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Michael J. Halaska
- Department of Obstetric Gynecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - Monica Fumagalli
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, NICU, Milano, Italy
| | - Elisabeth M. van Dijk-Lokkart
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Child Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jurgen Lemiere
- Department of Oncology, Unit of Pediatric Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Pediatrics, Unit of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Lieven Lagae
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Unit of Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Pediatrics, Unit of Pediatric Neurology, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht-Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Division of Child Health, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Center for Gynecological Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Oncology, Unit of Gynaecological Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium
- Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
O'Sullivan CC, Ruddy KJ. Improving our treatment of breast cancer during pregnancy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:183-185. [PMID: 38156705 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
|
7
|
Favero D, Lapuchesky LS, Poggio F, Nardin S, Perachino M, Arecco L, Scavone G, Ottonello S, Latocca MM, Borea R, Puglisi S, Cosso M, Fozza A, Spinaci S, Lambertini M. Choosing the appropriate pharmacotherapy for breast cancer during pregnancy: what needs to be considered? Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:1975-1984. [PMID: 38179613 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2293167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy during pregnancy. Breast cancer during pregnancy is a challenging clinical condition requiring proper and timely multidisciplinary management. AREAS COVERED This review focuses on the management of breast cancer during pregnancy with a focus about the current state-of-the-art on the feasibility and safety of pharmacotherapy approaches in this setting. EXPERT OPINION Multidisciplinary care is key for a proper diagnostic-therapeutic management of breast cancer during pregnancy. Engaging patients and their caregivers in the decision-making process is essential and psychological support should be provided. The treatment of patients with breast cancer during pregnancy should follow the same recommendations as those for breast cancer in young women outside pregnancy but taking into account the gestational age at the time of treatment.Anthracycline-, cyclophosphamide-, and taxane-based regimens can be safely administered during the second and third trimesters with standard protocols, preferring weekly regimens whenever possible. Endocrine therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and targeted agents are contraindicated throughout pregnancy, also due to the very limited data available to guide their administration in this setting. During treatment, careful fetal growth monitoring is mandatory, and even after delivery proper health monitoring for the children exposed in utero to chemotherapy should be continued.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diletta Favero
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Laura Sabina Lapuchesky
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Alexander Fleming, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Francesca Poggio
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Simone Nardin
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marta Perachino
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luca Arecco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Graziana Scavone
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Silvia Ottonello
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maria Maddalena Latocca
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Roberto Borea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Silvia Puglisi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cosso
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alessandra Fozza
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Stefano Spinaci
- Division of Breast Surgery, Ospedale Villa Scassi, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|