Ocular Toxicity Related to Cetuximab Monotherapy in an Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patient

Uncommon Blepharitis

Blepharitis is a common chronic inflammatory condition affecting the eyelid margins; the pathophysiology of blepharitis is complex and not fully understood. The disease is anatomically divided into anterior (inflammation of eyelashes) and posterior (meibomian gland dysfunction) types. Diagnosis relies on clinical examination, revealing characteristic features like scurf, vascular changes, and meibomian gland dysfunction. The main goals of blepharitis treatment are symptom relief, recurrence prevention, and complication risk minimization. Treatment options include lid hygiene, topical and systemic antibiotics, topical corticosteroids, and omega-3 supplements. However, it is important to highlight reported cases of blepharitis as side effects of systemic therapies, particularly in the context of chemotherapy, bortezomib, cetuximab, TNFα inhibitors, and dupilumab. It is crucial to monitor patients undergoing such treatments regularly and attentively in order to promptly set up adequate supportive therapy. Of even more importance is future research on the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the occurrence of these ocular side effects in order to find a nosological cure for the issue.

Case report: Immune-mediated meibomian gland dysfunction following pembrolizumab therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma

Ocular immune-related adverse events are a relatively rare complication of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Common ocular toxicities range from dry eyes to inflammatory uveitis and ocular myasthenia gravis. Here, we present the case of a 55-year-old woman with recurrent urothelial carcinoma of the ureter after initially being managed with neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy and surgical resection. She was treated with pembrolizumab which was complicated by immune-mediated pneumonitis after the eighth cycle, which was managed with a prolonged steroid course. The patient also developed red eyes along with recurrent styes. Eye examination revealed decreased tear breakup time, expression of thick and turbid meibum, and meibomian gland atrophy on infrared meibography. The patient was diagnosed with suspected immune-mediated meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) as a result of pembrolizumab, a previously unreported complication of immunotherapy. The goal of MGD therapy is to stabilize the tear film and minimize evaporation with lipid-based lubricants and other conservative treatments.

Current Development of Monoclonal Antibodies in Cancer Therapy

Exploiting the unique specificity of monoclonal antibodies has revolutionized the treatment and diagnosis of haematological and solid organ malignancies; bringing benefit to millions of patients over the past decades. Recent achievements include conjugating antibodies with toxic payloads resulting in superior efficacy and/or reduced toxicity, development of molecular imaging techniques targeting specific antigens for use as predictive and prognostic biomarkers, the development of novel bi- and tri-specific antibodies to enhance therapeutic benefit and abrogate resistance and the success of immunotherapy agents. In this chapter, we review an overview of antibody structure and function relevant to cancer therapy and provide an overview of pivotal clinical trials which have led to regulatory approval of monoclonal antibodies in cancer treatment. We further discuss resistance mechanisms and the unique side effects of each class of antibody and provide an overview of emerging therapeutic agents.

The ophthalmological complications of targeted agents in cancer therapy: what do we need to know as ophthalmologists?

Recently, there has been an increase in the use of targeted therapies for cancer treatments. Nevertheless, the ocular side-effects of the commonly used targeted agents are generally under-reported and not well studied in the literature. We conducted multiple searches in databases, including Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and conference proceedings, using the following strings: 'name of targeted therapeutic agent (both generic and commercial names)' AND 'eye OR ocular OR vision OR ophthalmological'. Various targeted agents have been found to be associated with ocular side-effects due to their specific targeting of activities in the eye. Imatinib commonly causes periorbital oedema, epiphora and occasionally conjunctival haemorrhage. Cetuximab causes corneal lesions, meibomian gland dysfunction, periorbital and lid dermatitis, blepharitis and conjunctivitis. Erlotinib is related to various ocular toxicities, mainly on the ocular surface, and perifosine has been reported to be associated with severe keratitis. Bevacizumab could potentially disrupt intrinsic ocular circulation and lead to the development of thromboembolic events; there are rare reported cases of optic neuritis or optic neuropathy. Other targeted agents, such as trastuzumab, sunitinib and crizotinib, also have specific ocular toxicities. In conclusion, ocular effects of targeted agents are not uncommon in cancer patients receiving targeted therapy. Ophthalmologists should have high indexes of suspicion to diagnose and treat these complications promptly.

Spectrum of ocular toxicities from epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and their intermediate-term follow-up: a five-year review

PURPOSE

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and kinases are commonly used in the treatment regimen of various solid tumors including non-small cell lung, colorectal, head and neck, breast, and pancreatic cancers. The aim of this study is to describe common ocular adverse effects associated with EGFR inhibitor treatment, outline successful management options, and provide data on intermediate-term follow-up of these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients presenting to the ophthalmology clinic with an adverse ocular effect while on an EGFR inhibitor. Duration of EGFR inhibitor treatment, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment information were collected. Statistical analyses were done to ascertain differences in adverse effects based on duration and type of EGFR inhibitor treatment using the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

The two most common EGFR inhibitors in this group of patients were erlotinib and cetuximab. The most common adverse ocular effects for patients on EGFR inhibitors were dysfunctional tear syndrome (DTS), followed by blepharitis and eyelash changes (trichomegaly and trichiasis). Two patients had epithelial defects (corneal abrasions). There was no significant difference in adverse effects based on specific EGFR inhibitor medication or duration of treatment. Almost all patients were successfully managed with treatment regimens that we have outlined in this paper. Intermediate-term follow-up (range 6-17 months) showed a persistence of DTS and eyelash changes.

CONCLUSION

We present what is, to our knowledge, the largest reported cohort of patients with ocular toxicities from EGFR inhibitors--the spectrum of eye toxicities, their management, and the intermediate-term follow-up of patients with eye toxicities. Awareness of this information is important for oncologists and oncology nurses to facilitate proper counseling and management/referral of patients developing eye toxicity while on EGFR inhibitors.

Ocular Toxicity of Targeted Therapies

Molecularly targeted agents are commonly used in oncology practice, and many new targeted agents are currently being tested in clinical trials. Although these agents are thought to be more specific and less toxic then traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy, they are associated with a variety of toxicities, including ocular toxicity. Many of the molecules targeted by anticancer agents are also expressed in ocular tissues. We reviewed the literature for described ocular toxicities associated with both approved and investigational molecularly targeted agents. Ocular toxicity has been described with numerous approved targeted agents and also seems to be associated with several classes of agents currently being tested in early-phase clinical trials. We discuss the proposed pathogenesis, monitoring guidelines, and management recommendations. It is important for oncologists to be aware of the potential for ocular toxicity, with prompt recognition of symptoms that require referral to an ophthalmologist. Ongoing collaboration between oncologists and ocular disease specialists is critical as the use of molecularly targeted agents continues to expand and novel targeted drug combinations are developed.

Chemotherapy-induced iatrogenic injury of skin: new drugs and new concepts

Chemotherapy and its cutaneous side effects are an increasingly common source of iatrogenic injury to the skin, hair, and nails. Cutaneous changes are among the most common side effects from treatment with particular targeted chemotherapeutic agents, especially those that target the epidermal growth factor receptor and small molecule multikinase inhibitors. Less common, but growing in recognition, are the development of secondary cutaneous neoplasms and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus as a result of chemotherapy. There is considerable overlap of the multiple entities described as a side effect from conventional chemotherapeutic agents; therefore, the term "toxic erythema of chemotherapy" can be used as an easily understood name.

Adverse events associated with anti-EGFR therapies for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a member of the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases, plays an important role in the control of cell growth and differentiation. Disruption of its signaling leads to neoplastic cell proliferation, migration, stromal invasion, resistance to apoptosis, and angiogenesis.

EGFR is overexpressed in a variety of solid tumors, including colorectal cancer (CRC), and its overexpression is associated with poorer prognosis. One class of agents that is currently used to target EGFR in the treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC) is the monoclonal antibodies. While the monoclonal antibody EGFR inhibitors lack many of the severe side effects commonly observed with cytotoxic chemotherapy, they are associated with a set of unique dermatological toxicities. This paper reviews the safety profile of the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab in the treatment of mCRC.

Chemotherapeutic agents and the skin: An update

Chemotherapeutic agents give rise to numerous well described adverse effects that may affect the skin, hair, mucous membranes, or nails. The mucocutaneous effects of longstanding agents have been extensively studied and reviewed. Over the last 2 decades, a number of new molecular entities for the treatment of cancer have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This article reviews the cutaneous toxicity patterns of these agents. It also reviews one drug that has not received FDA approval but is in use outside the United States and is important dermatologically. Particular emphasis is placed on the novel signal transduction inhibitors as well as on newer literature pertaining to previously described reactions.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

At the completion of this learning activity, participants should able to list the newer chemotherapeutic agents that possess significant mucocutaneous side effects and describe the range of reactions that are seen with each drug. In addition, they should be able to formulate appropriate management strategies for these reactions.

Ocular toxicities of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and their management

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors have become an important therapy for patients with malignant solid tumors, such as non-small cell lung, breast, ovarian, colorectal, renal, esophageal, sarcoma, mesothelioma, prostate, head and neck, and pancreatic cancers. Although these agents are generally well tolerated, some adverse effects will likely occur. The most common adverse effect associated with use of EGFR inhibitors is an acne-like rash. Less reported in the literature are adverse ocular reactions, which occur in approximately one third of patients and can cause significant discomfort. The ocular toxicities that may occur with use of EGFR inhibitors can be broadly categorized as changes in the eyelids (eg, squamous blepharitis, trichomegaly, meibomitis), changes in the tear film (eg, dysfunctional tear syndrome), and miscellaneous changes (eg, iridocyclitis, corneal epithelial defect). Early recognition and management of these adverse ocular reactions are necessary to improve patient comfort, to facilitate compliance, and to avoid interruption of therapy. This article describes the adverse ocular effects reported to occur with use of EGFR inhibitors and presents specific strategies to manage these effects. Mild eyelid and tear film changes usually can be managed by the oncology and nursing staff. More severe ocular reactions require involvement of an ophthalmologist.

Ocular toxicity related to cetuximab monotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer

Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody that specifically blocks the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway. Cetuximab is now a standard drug to treat refractory advanced colorectal cancer. The most common side effect is a rash, seen in most patients. Ocular toxicity is uncommon. We report 2 cases of ocular toxicity characterized by blepharitis and conjunctivitis related to cetuximab administration. Strategies for management are discussed.

Adverse effects of the humanized antibodies used as cancer therapeutics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Humanized monoclonal antibodies represent a recent and very significant addition to the anticancer armamentarium. With improved therapeutic strategies due to these agents, however, there are also various, sometimes unexpected, side effects.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most of the monoclonal antibodies used in oncology share a risk of infusion-related manifestations, including the possibility of anaphylaxis; these reactions usually appear early on during the first administration. Hematological toxicity is also frequent, especially if the antibodies are associated with chemotherapy; the resulting neutropenia--and with some agents lymphopenia--is associated with an increased risk of infection. Cardiac failure and pulmonary complications have been reported with some of these agents, especially in patients with prior cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities.

SUMMARY

Although consideration of these side effects is important in terms of prevention and therapy, overall they are relatively uncommon, making therapy with monoclonal antibodies quite safe in comparison with other therapeutic modalities used in cancer patients.

Synergism of epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted immunotherapy with photodynamic treatment of ovarian cancer in vivo

BACKGROUND

Epithelial ovarian cancer often develops resistance to standard treatments, which is a major reason for the high mortality associated with the disease. We examined the efficacy of a treatment regimen that combines immunotherapy to block the activity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), overexpression of which is associated with the development of resistant ovarian cancer, and photodynamic therapy (PDT), a mechanistically distinct photochemistry-based modality that is effective against chemo- and radioresistant ovarian tumors.

METHODS

We tested a combination regimen consisting of C225, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the receptor tyrosine kinase activity of EGFR, and benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid A (BPD)-based PDT in a mouse model of human ovarian cancer. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in acute treatment response and survival studies that used 9-19 mice per group. Analysis of variance and Wilcoxon statistics were used to analyze the data. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Mice treated with PDT + C225 had the lowest mean tumor burden compared with that in the no-treatment control mice (mean percent tumor burden = 9.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.3% to 17.3%, P < .001). Mean percent tumor burden for mice treated with C225 only or PDT only was 66.6% (95% CI = 58.7% to 74.4%, P < .001) and 38.2% (95% CI = 29.3% to 47.0%, P < .001), respectively. When compared with PDT only or C225 only, PDT + C225 produced synergistic reductions in mean tumor burden (P < .001, analysis of variance) and improvements in survival (P = .0269, Wilcoxon test). Median survival was approximately threefold greater for mice in the PDT + C225 group than for mice in the no-treatment control group (80 days versus 28 days), and more mice in the PDT + C225 group were alive at 180 days (3/9; 33% [95% CI = 7% to 70%]) than mice in the C225-only (0/12; 0% [95% CI = 0% to 22%]) or PDT-only (1/10; 10% [95% CI = 0.2% to 44%]) groups.

CONCLUSION

A mechanistically nonoverlapping combination modality consisting of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibition with C225 and BPD-PDT is well tolerated, effective, and synergistic in mice.