1
|
Zhou XZ, Lyu NH, Zhu HY, Cai QC, Kong XY, Xie P, Zhou LY, Ding SZ, Li ZS, Du YQ. Large-scale, national, family-based epidemiological study on Helicobacter pylori infection in China: the time to change practice for related disease prevention. Gut 2023; 72:855-869. [PMID: 36690433 PMCID: PMC10086479 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Current practice on Helicobacter pylori infection mostly focuses on individual-based care in the community, but family-based H. pylori management has recently been suggested as a better strategy for infection control. However, the family-based H. pylori infection status, risk factors and transmission pattern remain to be elucidated. METHODS From September 2021 to December 2021, 10 735 families (31 098 individuals) were enrolled from 29 of 31 provinces in mainland China to examine family-based H. pylori infection, related factors and transmission pattern. All family members were required to answer questionnaires and test for H. pylori infection. RESULTS Among all participants, the average individual-based H. pylori infection rate was 40.66%, with 43.45% for adults and 20.55% for children and adolescents. Family-based infection rates ranged from 50.27% to 85.06% among the 29 provinces, with an average rate of 71.21%. In 28.87% (3099/10 735) of enrolled families, there were no infections; the remaining 71.13% (7636/10 735) of families had 1-7 infected members, and in 19.70% (1504/7636), all members were infected. Among 7961 enrolled couples, 33.21% had no infection, but in 22.99%, both were infected. Childhood infection was significantly associated with parental infection. Independent risk factors for household infection were infected family members (eg, five infected members: OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.86 to 4.00), living in highly infected areas (eg, northwest China: OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.57 to 2.13), and large families in a household (eg, family of three: OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.76 to 2.21). However, family members with higher education and income levels (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.91), using serving spoons or chopsticks, more generations in a household (eg, three generations: OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.92), and who were younger (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.70) had lower infection rates (p<0.05). CONCLUSION Familial H. pylori infection rate is high in general household in China. Exposure to infected family members is likely the major source of its spread. These results provide supporting evidence for the strategic changes from H. pylori individual-based treatment to family-based management, and the notion has important clinical and public health implications for infection control and related disease prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xian-Zhu Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Nong-Hua Lyu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Hui-Yun Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Quan-Cai Cai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiang-Yu Kong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Pei Xie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Li-Ya Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Song-Ze Ding
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, and People's Hospital of Henan University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Zhao-Shen Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi-Qi Du
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guan JL, Hu YL, An P, He Q, Long H, Zhou L, Chen ZF, Xiong JG, Wu SS, Ding XW, Luo HS, Li PY. Comparison of high-dose dual therapy with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori-infected treatment-naive patients: An open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Pharmacotherapy 2022; 42:224-232. [PMID: 35075679 DOI: 10.1002/phar.2662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication has a relatively high rate of side effects and high cost, thus the option of a high-dose dual therapy with a high eradication rate and fewer adverse events is a consideration. However, studies of dual therapy are still scarce and are mostly single-center studies with limited generalizability. Large-scale, multicenter studies are required. Our study investigated and compared the effectiveness, adverse events, patient compliance, and costs of high-dose dual therapy with those of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in H. pylori-infected treatment-naive patients in a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. METHOD Treatment-naive patients infected with H. pylori were randomly assigned to receive high-dose dual therapy (esomeprazole 20 mg 4 times daily and amoxicillin 1000 mg 3 times daily, for 14 days) or bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (esomeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg, all twice daily for 14 days). The effectiveness, adverse events, patient compliance, and costs of both groups were compared. RESULTS A total of 700 patients were enrolled. The high-dose dual therapy group (N = 350) achieved eradication rates of 89.4% (intention-to-treat), 90.4% (modified intention-to-treat), and 90.6% (per-protocol), which were similar to rates in the bismuth-containing quadruple therapy group (N = 350), 84.6%, 88.0%, and 88.2%, respectively (p > 0.05). The high-dose dual therapy group had a lower rate of adverse events (12.9% vs. 28.1%, p < 0.001) and lower costs (¥590.2 vs. ¥723.22) compared with the quadruple therapy group, respectively. The compliance of both groups was satisfactory (97.7% high-dose dual vs. 96.8% quadruple, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION High-dose dual therapy for H. pylori eradication had similar efficacy and compliance, fewer adverse events, and lower costs than bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for treatment-naive patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Lun Guan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yun-Lian Hu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China
| | - Ping An
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wuhan University People's Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Qiong He
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wuhan Red Cross Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Hui Long
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tianyou Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lin Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Suizhou Central Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhi-Fen Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Jian-Guang Xiong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Xianning Central Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Shi-Sheng Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital of Huangshi, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiang-Wu Ding
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wuhan Puai Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - He-Sheng Luo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wuhan University People's Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Pei-Yuan Li
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, Wenchang People's Hospital, Hainan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cause of cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. The number of gastric cancer-related deaths is only projected to increase, attributable primarily to the expanding aging population. Prevention is a mainstay of gastric cancer control programs, particularly in the absence of accurate, noninvasive modalities for screening and early detection, and the absence of an infrastructure for this purpose in the majority of countries worldwide. Herein, we discuss the evidence for several chemopreventive agents, along with putative mechanisms. There remains a clear, unmet need for primary chemoprevention trials for gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shailja C. Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1030C MRB IV, 2215 Garland Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232-0252, USA;,Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Health System, Nashville Campus, Nashville, TN, USA,Corresponding author:
| | - Richard M. Peek
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1030C MRB IV, 2215 Garland Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232-0252, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cheung KS, Chung KL, Leung WK. Chemopreventive Effect of Metformin on Gastric Cancer Development. Gut Liver 2021; 16:147-156. [PMID: 34158423 PMCID: PMC8924804 DOI: 10.5009/gnl210132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Although Helicobacterpylori infection is the most important causative factor for gastric cancer (GC), H. pylori eradication alone does not completely eliminate the GC risk. In addition to H. pylori eradication, other risk factors for GC should be identified and targeted. Diabetes mellitus (DM) confers a 20% increased risk of GC, which could be mediated via several biological mechanisms including the stimulation of cell proliferation via hyperinsulinemia and increased insulin-growth factor production, the promotion of angiogenesis, and DNA damage. With a current global prevalence of 9.3% and a predicted rise to 10.2% by 2030, DM could contribute substantially to the burden of GC cases worldwide. Emerging evidence showed that metformin possesses chemopreventive effects via both direct (e.g., adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase activation and subsequent inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway) and indirect (e.g., modulation of the interaction between tumor cells and their microenvironment and gut microbiota) pathways. A recent meta-analysis of observational studies showed that metformin use was associated with 24% lower GC risk. However, many available observational studies related to metformin effects suffered from biases including the failure to adjust for the H. pylori infection status and serial glycemic control and time-related biases. Future prospective studies addressing these pitfalls are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ka Shing Cheung
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.,Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Kit Lam Chung
- Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Wai K Leung
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jung HK, Kang SJ, Lee YC, Yang HJ, Park SY, Shin CM, Kim SE, Lim HC, Kim JH, Nam SY, Shin WG, Park JM, Choi IJ, Kim JG, Choi M. Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Korea 2020. Gut Liver 2021; 15:168-195. [PMID: 33468712 PMCID: PMC7960974 DOI: 10.5009/gnl20288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori infection is one of the most common infectious diseases worldwide. Although the prevalence of H. pylori is gradually decreasing, approximately half of the world's population still becomes infected with this disease. H. pylori is responsible for substantial gastrointestinal morbidity worldwide, with a high disease burden. It is the most common cause of gastric and duodenal ulcers and gastric cancer. Since the revision of the H. pylori clinical practice guidelines in 2013 in Korea, the eradication rate of H. pylori has gradually decreased with the use of a clarithromycin-based triple therapy for 7 days. According to a nationwide randomized controlled study conducted by the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research released in 2018, the intention-to-treat eradication rate was only 63.9%, which was mostly due to increased antimicrobial resistance, especially from clarithromycin. The clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of H. pylori were updated according to evidence-based medicine from a meta-analysis conducted on a target group receiving the latest level of eradication therapy. The draft recommendations developed based on the meta-analysis were finalized after an expert consensus on three recommendations regarding the indication for treatment and eight recommendations for the treatment itself. These guidelines were designed to provide clinical evidence for the treatment (including primary care treatment) of H. pylori infection to patients, nurses, medical school students, policymakers, and clinicians. These may differ from current medical insurance standards and will be revised if more evidence emerges in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye-Kyung Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Joo Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Chan Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo-Joon Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seon-Young Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Cheol Min Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Sung Eun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Hyun Chul Lim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - Jie-Hyun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Su Youn Nam
- Center for Gastric Cancer, Kyungpook National University Hospital Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Woon Geon Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Myung Park
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Il Ju Choi
- Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jae Gyu Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Miyoung Choi
- Division of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fischbach W, Malfertheiner P. Helicobacter Pylori Infection. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2018; 115:429-436. [PMID: 29999489 PMCID: PMC6056709 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Revised: 10/11/2017] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infection with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a major pathogenic factor for gastroduodenal ulcer disease and gastric carcinoma, as well as for other types of gastric and extragastric disease. As a result of changing epidemiologic conditions (e.g., immigration), changing resistance patterns with therapeutic implications, and new knowledge relating to the indications for pathogen eradication, the medical management of H. pylori is a dynamic process in need of periodic reassessment. METHODS This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and the Cochrane Database, with particular attention to three international consensus reports and the updated German S2k guideline. RESULTS H. pylori is now dealt with as an infection, whether or not the infected individual has symptoms or suffers from and H.-pylori-induced illness. H.-pylori-associated dyspepsia and functional dyspepsia are distinct entities that can only be diagnosed when competing elements in the differential diagnosis have been ruled out. H. pylori can be detected with noninvasive methods (13C-urea breathing test, stool antigen detection) and with invasive methods (histology, culture, rapid urease test). An important consideration for treatment is that primary clarithromycin resistance is common in many groups of patients; in Germany, its prevalence is now 10.9%. Primary treatment can be with either standard triple therapy (clarithromycin and amoxicillin or metronidazole) or bismuth-containing quadruple therapy. Treatment for 10 to 14 days is more likely to eradicate the pathogen than treatment for 7 days. When H. pylori infection is initially diagnosed in a patient over age 50, gastritis risk stratification should be performed by means of endoscopic biopsy and histologic examination. CONCLUSION The new, clinically relevant developments that are presented and commented upon in this review now enable evidence-based management of H. pylori infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Fischbach
- Department II, Gastroenterology and Oncology, Klinikum Aschaffenburg – Alzenau GmbH, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg
| | - Peter Malfertheiner
- Clinic for Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Infectious Diseases, University Clinic Magdeburg
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shimoyama T, Chinda D, Sawada Y, Komai K, Chiba H, Saito Y, Sasaki Y, Matsuzaka M, Fukuda S. Randomized Trial Comparing Esomeprazole and Rabeprazole in First-line Eradication Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection based on the Serum Levels of Pepsinogens. Intern Med 2017; 56:1621-1627. [PMID: 28674348 PMCID: PMC5519461 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.56.7823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective CYP2C19 metabolic activity influences the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies comprising PPIs. Rabeprazole (RPZ) and esomeprazole (EPZ) are PPIs not extensively metabolized by CYP2C19. The aim of this study was to elucidate whether or not first-line triple therapies using RPZ or EPZ are equally effective in Japanese patients with different CYP2C19 genotypes. Methods Two-hundred patients infected with H. pylori were randomized to receive one of the following regimens: amoxicillin (750 mg), clarithromycin (200 mg), and either esomeprazole (20 mg) (EAC group) or rabeprazole (10 mg) (RAC group), twice a day for one week. The CYP2C19 polymorphisms were determined by polymerase chain reaction and the serum level of pepsinogens was measured. Results The eradication rates of the EAC and RAC regimens were 79.8% (95% confidential interval: 71.7-89.0%) and 74.7% (66.0-83.4%), respectively, in a per protocol (PP) analysis (p=0.488). The eradication rates of the EAC and RAC regimens were not significantly different between patients with the homo EM genotype (p=0.999) or hetero IM or PM genotypes (p=0.286). A lower PG I/II ratio was associated with lower eradication rates (p=0.025). Conclusion Although the eradication rate was less than 80%, the EAC and RAC regimens were equally effective in each CYP2C19 genotype group. The PG I/II ratio was associated with the results of EAC and RAC therapy in this series of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadashi Shimoyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Daisuke Chinda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | | | - Kazuo Komai
- Komai Clinic of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Japan
| | - Hironobu Chiba
- Sasaki Clinic of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Japan
| | - Yoshiharu Saito
- Chiba Clinic of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Japan
| | - Yoshio Sasaki
- Shinjo Clinic of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Japan
| | - Masashi Matsuzaka
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Community Health, Hirosaki University Hospital, Japan
| | - Shinsaku Fukuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Talebi Bezmin Abadi A. Vaccine against Helicobacter pylori: Inevitable approach. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:3150-3157. [PMID: 27003991 PMCID: PMC4789989 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i11.3150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2015] [Revised: 01/05/2016] [Accepted: 01/30/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Over three decades have passed since the discovery of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), and yet many questions about its treatment remain unanswered. For example, there is no certainty regarding continued use of current antibiotic therapy against H. pylori. The bad news is that even combined regimens are also unable to eradicate bacterial colonization. The worst problem with H. pylori chemotherapy is that even if we identify the most successful regimen, it cannot eliminate the risk of re-infection. This problem is further complicated by the fact that clinicians have no information as to whether probiotics are useful or not. Moreover, to date, we have no large scale produced vaccine effective against H. pylori. Due to the relatively rapid and abundant dissemination of guidelines globally reported concerning management of gastric cancer prevention and therapeutic regimens, clinicians may choose a vaccine as better effective weapon against H. pylori. Therefore, a radical shift in adopted strategies is needed to guide ultimate decisions regarding H. pylori management. In light of failures in vaccine projects, we should identify better vaccine design targeting conserved/essential genes. The unique character and persistence of H. pylori pose obstacles to making an effective vaccine. Preferably, in developing countries, the best reasonable and logical approach is to recommend prophylactic H. pylori vaccine among children as an obligatory national program to limit primary colonization. Trying to produce a therapeutic vaccine would be postponed until later. In reality, we should not forget to prescribe narrow spectrum antibiotics. In the current review, I draw a route to define the best adopted strategy against this rogue bacterium.
Collapse
|