Longitudinal Associations Between Pain and Psychosocial Adjustment in Youth With Spina Bifida

Bidirectional, longitudinal associations between chronic pain and family functioning in youth with spina bifida

INTRODUCTION

Chronic pain does not reside within an individual. Pain is affected by and affects larger systems (e.g., families). We examined longitudinal, bidirectional associations between chronic pain and family functioning in spina bifida (SB). We hypothesized a bidirectional association between pain and family functioning (cohesion and conflict); youth chronic pain status would be associated with maladaptive family functioning and maladaptive family functioning would be associated with youth chronic pain status.

METHOD

Participants were from an ongoing longitudinal study of adolescents with SB (N = 140, 53.6% female, ages 8-15 at Time 1). Data were collected every 2 years, with this study using data from Times 1 and 2 (T1, T2; T1: 2006-2009, T2: 2008-2011). Parents reported on youth demographics and family functioning. Youth reported on family functioning and pain; pain was dichotomized into a categorical variable (chronic pain vs. no chronic pain). Family functioning (cohesion and conflict) was also assessed using observational data.

RESULTS

Youth chronic pain status was associated with decreased family conflict (child report) and increased cohesion (parent report) over time. Increased family conflict (parent report) was associated with a greater likelihood of reporting chronic pain 2 years later. Findings were nonsignificant between observed family conflict or cohesion and chronic pain in either direction.

DISCUSSION

With the presence of an additional stressor (chronic pain) families increase cohesion and reduce conflict. Increased conflict may increase a child's vulnerability of developing chronic pain. It is critical that interventions for both pain and family functioning in SB are guided by a strengths-based model. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Prevalence and risk factors for scoliosis in adults with closed and open spina bifida: A large, cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Scoliosis develops in a proportion of children with myelomeningocele; however, little is known about scoliosis in adulthood and in other forms of spina bifida (SB).

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to describe the prevalence of scoliosis and identify risk factors for its development in a large cohort of adults with open and closed SB.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of data from 580 adults with SB attending their first consultation at a French multidisciplinary referral centre for SB. Sex, anatomical location and type of SB (open or closed), neurological level, back pain and ambulatory status (new Functional Ambulation Classification [new FAC]) were compared in adults with and without scoliosis. These characteristics were used to determine scoliosis risk factors.

RESULTS

In total, 331 adults fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 221 had open and 110 had closed SB. Of these, 176 (53%) had scoliosis: 57% open and 45% closed SB. As compared with individuals without scoliosis, those with scoliosis more frequently had open SB (p=0.03), more cranially located SB (p<0.0001), more severe neurological deficits (p≤0.02) and poorer walking ability (mean new FAC score 3.5 [SD 3.3] vs 6.1 [2.6], [p<0.0001]). In total, 69% had chronic back pain, with no difference in frequency between those with and without scoliosis. The odds of scoliosis was associated with asymmetrical motor level and a new FAC score <4 (odds ratio 0.46, p<0.006, and 0.75, p<0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

About half of adults with open and closed SB had scoliosis. Back pain was frequent in those both with and without scoliosis. Individuals with low walking ability and an asymmetrical motor level should be monitored early and continuously to limit the consequences of scoliosis during their lifetime. A major issue is to determine how scoliosis evolves and to determine appropriate monitoring and treatment strategies for individuals at risk.