Definitive chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: outcomes for borderline-resectable disease

A 3-Year Survival Update from a Phase 2 Study of Paclitaxel Plus Cisplatin and 5-Fuorouracil Induction Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Borderline-Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The NEOCRTEC-1601 Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

This study updated 3-year analyses to further characterize the impact of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF) chemotherapy followed by surgery.

METHODS

This study was a single-center phase 2 clinical trial. Patients with a diagnosis of borderline resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (BR-ESCC) because of the primary tumor or bulky lymph node that potentially invaded adjacent organs were eligible. The treatment started with TPF chemotherapy followed by surgery if the cancer was resectable, or by concurrent chemoradiation if it was unresectable. This updated report presents the 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates.

RESULTS

Surgery was performed for 27 patients (57.4%), and R0 resection was confirmed in 25 patients (53.2%). Pathologic complete response was confirmed in four patients (8.5%). The median follow-up time for the surviving patients was 44.8 months (range, 3.4-74.6 months). The median OS for all the patients was 41.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.6-65.3 months), with a median PFS of 38.7 months (95% CI, 23.5-53.9 months). The 3-year survival rate for all the patients was 54.4%. The 3-year survival rate for the R0 patients was 65.4%.

CONCLUSION

Long-term follow-up evaluation confirmed that TPF followed by surgery is feasible and promising in terms of survival for BR-ESCC patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifer: NCT02976909.

Patients with Spondylodiscitis following Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer in a Portuguese Cancer Hospital: A Case Report

Introduction

Head and neck cancer is an umbrella term for tumor manifestations across the head and neck regions, including the oral cavity, pharynx (including the naso, oro, and hypopharynx), larynx, and sinuses. Treatment options for head and neck cancer include surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, with specific treatment plans depending upon individual tumor location and staging, together with overall patient health status. Furthermore, definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has emerged as a highly effective therapeutic option for locoregional advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer. However, such therapy has also been linked to the development of spondylodiscitis. Spondylodiscitis consists of an infection starting at the vertebral endplates and spreading into the intervertebral discs, typically manifesting in adults.

Case Presentation and Conclusion

This case report describes our clinical team's experience in managing three separate cases of spondylodiscitis following CRT for head and neck tumors that presented at our clinic for diagnosis and treatment in order to identify predisposing factors that underlie the link between CRT and spondylodiscitis.

Therapeutic strategy aiming at R0 resection for borderline-resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil

OBJECTIVE

Treatment for borderline resectable (cT3br) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is currently undefined. This study aimed to analyze the outcome of treatment strategies including induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) against T3br esophageal SCC.

METHODS

A total of 32 patients with cT3br esophageal SCC enrolled in this study were treated with two cycles of DCF induction therapy.

RESULTS

The overall response rate to DCF induction therapy was 62.5%, while the disease control rate was 93.8% (complete response (CR), three; partial response (PR), 17; stable disease (SD), 10; progressive disease (PD), 2). After DCF induction chemotherapy, 27 patients underwent conversion surgery (CS) and five patients underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Out of 27 patients who underwent CS, 17 underwent transthoracic esophagectomy and 10 underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Anastomotic leakage occurred in five patients (18.5%) and pneumonia in four (14.8%). Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis and arrhythmia were observed in two patients (7.4%). The R0 resection rate was 81.5%. Among the five patients who underwent definitive CRT, only one patient (20.0%) achieved CR. Two patients (40.0%) had PR and two (40.0%) had PD. Salvage esophagectomy was performed in one patient after definitive CRT. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 75.0, 50.6, and 46.4%, respectively, whereas the 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 54.9, 38.8, and 38.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DCF induction therapy and subsequent CS or definitive CRT are promising treatment strategies for cT3br esophageal SCC.

Paclitaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy for locally advanced borderline-resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II clinical trial

PURPOSE

This phase II trial aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) induction chemotherapy followed by surgery for locally advanced borderline-resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (BR-ESCC).

METHODS

Patients with primary tumor or bulky lymph nodes that might invade nearby organs were eligible. Treatment started with 2-3 cycles of TPF induction chemotherapy, followed by surgery if the tumor was assessed resectable, or by radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy if unresectable. The primary endpoint was pathologically proven complete resection (R0) rate.

RESULTS

From July 2014 to February 2019, a total of 47 patients were enrolled. After TPF chemotherapy, 27 patients (57.4%) received surgery and 11 patients (23.4%) received radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy. R0 resection was confirmed in 25 patients (53.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 38.9-67.5%). Pathologic complete response was confirmed in four patients (8.5%). The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients were 33.3 months and 20.3 months, respectively. The median OS was significantly more favorable in surgery group than in chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy alone group [33.3 months vs 14.1 months, hazard ratio 0.32 (95% CI 0.12-0.88), p = 0.027]. During induction chemotherapy, the most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (29.8%), leucopenia (21.3%) and stomatitis (4.3%). No serious postoperative complications were observed in patients undergoing surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment strategy of induction chemotherapy followed by surgery is promising for patients with locally advanced BR-ESCC. To further improve the R0 resection rate, more effective induction chemotherapy regimens need to be explored.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02976909.

Investigation of Predictors to Achieve Acceptable Lung Dose in T-Shaped Upper and Middle Esophageal Cancer With IMRT and VMAT

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether there are predictors and cutoff points that can predict the acceptable lung dose using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in radiotherapy for upper ang middle esophageal cancer.

Material and Methods

Eighty-two patients with T-shaped upper-middle esophageal cancer (UMEC) were enrolled in this retrospective study. Jaw-tracking IMRT plan (JT-IMRT), full-arc VMAT plan (F-VMAT), and pactial-arc VMAT plan (P-VMAT) were generated for each patient. Dosimetric parameters such as MLD and V20 of total lung were compared among the three plannings. Ten factors such as PCTV_inferior length and PCTV_inferior length/total lung length were calculated to find the predictors and cutoff points of the predictors. All patients were divided into two groups according to the cutoff points, and the dosimetric differences between the two groups of the three plans were compared. ANOVA, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and Mann–Whitney U-test were performed for comparisons between datasets. A p <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Result

The quality of the targets of the three plannings was comparable. The total lung dose in P-VMAT was significantly lower than that in JT IMRT and F-VMAT. Monitor unit (MU) of F-VMAT and P-VMAT was significantly lower than that of JT IMRT. ROC analysis showed that among JT IMRT, F-VMAT, and P-VMAT, PCTV_i-L, and PCTV_i-L/TL_L had diagnostic power to predict the suitability of RT plans according to lung dose constraints of our department. For JT IMRT, the cutoff points of PCTV_i-L and PCTV_i-L/TL_L were 16.6 and 0.59. For F-VMAT, the cutoff points of PCTV_i-L and PCTV_i-L/TL_L were 16.75 and 0.62. For P-VMAT, the cutoff points of PCTV_i-L and PCTV_i-L/TL_L were 15.15 and 0.59. After Mann–Whitney U-test analysis, it was found that among the three plannings, the group with lower PCTV_i-L and PCTV_i-L/TL_L could significantly reduce the dose of total lung and heart (p <0.05).

Conclusion

PCTV_{i-L <}16.6 and PCTV_i-L/TL_L <0.59 for JT IMRT, PCTV_{i-L <}16.75 and PCTV_i-L/TL_L <0.62 for F-VMAT and PCTV_{i-L <}15.15, and PCTV_i-L/TL_L <0.59 for P-VMAT can predict whether patients with T-shaped UMEC can meet the lung dose limits of our department.