The dosimetric impact of respiratory breast movement and daily setup error on tangential whole breast irradiation using conventional wedge, field-in-field and irregular surface compensator techniques

Effect of jaw width in jaw tracking mode on the radiotherapy dose of partial arc VMAT in patients undergoing left breast-conserving surgery

To analyze the effect of jaw width in jaw tracking mode on the dose of radiotherapy partial arc VMAT (P-VMAT) for patients undergoing left breast-conserving surgery and to explore the best jaw width as the initial inverse optimization parameter. Twenty patients who underwent left breast-conserving surgery were randomly selected. Six groups of P-VMAT plans were designed (named Plan0, Plan0.3, Plan0.6, Plan0.9, Plan-0.3, and Plan-0.6). The width of the jaw of each plan was changed in 0.3 cm steps along the X direction (from - 0.6 to 0.9 cm) according to the beginning of the half beam (Plan0). The PTV coverage, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), monitor units (MU) and organs at risk (OARs) dose were evaluated by repeated measurement data analysis of variance between plan0 and the other plans. Additionally, the correlations between CI, HI, MU and OARs to change in jaw width were analyzed using Spearman's bivariate correlation analysis. The PTV dose distributions of Plan-0.3 and Plan-0.6, which have smaller jaw widths than those of Plan0, did not meet the clinical requirements. CI, HI and MU were correlated with jaw width (r = 0.554, -0.501, -0.641, p < 0.05, respectively). The V5, V10, V20, V40, Dmean and Dmax of the heart were correlated with jaw width (r = 0.288, 0.284, 0.191, -0.27, 0.186, -0.245, p < 0.05, respectively). The V2.5, V5, V10, V20, V40 and Dmean of the left lung (Lung-L) were correlated with jaw width (0.298, 0.421, 0.516, 0.391, -0.241, 0.356, p < 0.05, respectively). Among all the plans to ensure PTV target coverage, Plan0 had the lowest clinical indicators for the heart and Lung-L (p < 0.05, respectively). The internal boundary of the jaw set as 0 cm (Plan0) represents the optimal jaw width for the initial optimization of the plan design. This method is the simplest and most effective for radiotherapy treatment planning for breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer as well as allows ideal dose distribution.

Breast radiation therapy fluence painting with multi-agent deep reinforcement learning

BACKGROUND

The electronic compensation (ECOMP) technique for breast radiation therapy provides excellent dose conformity and homogeneity. However, the manual fluence painting process presents a challenge for efficient clinical operation.

PURPOSE

To facilitate the clinical treatment planning automation of breast radiation therapy, we utilized reinforcement learning (RL) to develop an auto-planning tool that iteratively edits the fluence maps under the guidance of clinically relevant objectives.

METHODS

With institutional review board (IRB) approval, 70 patients treated with 6MV tangential photon beams with ECOMP technique were retrospectively collected and included in this study (20/50 for training/testing). Each pixel in the fluence map was assigned a reinforcement learning agent to perform independent action. Beam-eye-view projected dose profiles were generated to form state information as the input of the RL network. By predicting the Q value, pixel-wise actions were selected to modify specific pixel value in the fluence maps to improve overall plan quality. After dose calculation, reward signal calculated from the variation of target coverage and dose homogeneity was fed back to the RL framework and used to update network parameters. The RL generated plans were evaluated with dose distribution and dosimetric endpoints (i.e., Breast PTV V90%, Breast PTV V95%, Breast PTV V105%, Lung V20 Gy, Heart V5 Gy, Dmax) and compared with clinical plans.

RESULTS

The RL agent took around 90 s to generate a ECOMP treatment plan. The RL plans exhibited plan quality comparable to clinical plans in terms of isodose distribution and dosimetric endpoints. The mean Breast PTV V95%, Breast PTV V105% of RL plans are77.759 % ( ± 8.904 % ) $77.759{\mathrm{\ \% }}( { \pm 8.904{\mathrm{\ \% }}} )$ and8.522 cc ( ± 11.469 cc ) $8.522{\mathrm{\ cc\ }}( { \pm 11.469{\mathrm{\ cc}}} )$ , compared to78.568 % ( ± 9.094 % ) $78.568{\mathrm{\ \% }}( { \pm 9.094{\mathrm{\ \% }}} )$ and34.298 cc ( ± 36.297 cc ) $34.298\ {\mathrm{cc}}\ ( { \pm 36.297{\mathrm{\ cc}}} )$ cc of clinical plans.

CONCLUSION

The developed RL framework efficiently generates breast ECOMP plans with clinical acceptable plan quality.

Impact of Respiratory Motion on the Skin Dose for Breast Cancer in Tomotherapy: A Study in the In-house Moving Phantom

Purpose: The dose expansion methods as the skin flash and virtual bolus were used to solve intrafraction movement for breast planning due to breathing motion. We investigated the skin dose in each planning method by using optically stimulated luminescence on an in-house moving phantom for breast cancer treatment in tomotherapy. The impact of respiratory motion on skin dose between static and dynamic phantom's conditions was evaluated. Methods: A phantom was developed with movement controlled by the respirator for generating the respiratory waveforms to simulate respiratory motion. Five optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters were placed on the phantom surface to investigate the skin dose for the TomoDirect and TomoHelical under static and dynamic conditions. Eight treatment plans were generated with and without skin flash or virtual bolus by varying the thickness. The difference in skin dose between the two phantom conditions for each plan was explored. Results: All plans demonstrated a skin dose of more than 87% of the prescription dose under static conditions. However, the skin dose was reduced to 84.1% (TomoDirect) and 78.9% (TomoHelical) for dynamic conditions. The treatment plans without skin flash or virtual bolus showed significant skin dose differences under static and dynamic conditions by 4.83% (TomoDirect) and 9.43% (TomoHelical), whereas the skin flash with two leaves (TomoDirect 2L) or virtual bolus of at least 1.0 cm thickness (VB1.0) application compensated the skin dose in case of intrafraction movements by presenting a skin dose difference of less than 2% between the static and dynamic conditions. Conclusion: The skin dose was reduced under dynamic conditions due to breathing motion. The skin flash method with TomoDirect 2L or virtual bolus application with 1.0 cm thickness was useful for maintaining skin dose following the prescription by compensating for intrafraction movement due to respiratory motion for breast cancer in tomotherapy.

Factors impacting on patient setup analysis and error management during breast cancer radiotherapy

Radiotherapy is required to deliver an accurate dose to the tumor while protecting surrounding normal tissues. Breast cancer radiotherapy involves a number of factors that can influence patient setup and error management, including the immobilization device used, the verification system and the patient's treatment position. The aim of this review is to compile and discuss the setup errors that occur due to the above-mentioned factors. In view of this, a systematic search of the scientific literature in the Medline/PubMed databases was performed over the 1990-2021 time period, with 93 articles found to be relevant for the study. To be accessible to all, this study not only aims to identify factors impacting on patient setup analysis, but also seeks to evaluate the role of each verification device, board immobilization and position in influencing these errors.

Semiautomatic Treatment Planning for the Field-in-field Technique in Whole Brain Irradiation

Objectives

In radiation therapy, the field-in-field (FIF) technique is used to prevent the administration of unnecessarily high doses to reduce toxicity. Recently, the FIF technique has been used for whole brain irradiation (WBI). Using the FIF technique, the volume that receives a higher than prescribed dose (hotspot) can be largely reduced; however, the treatment planning requires time. Therefore, to reduce the burden on the treatment planners, we propose a semiautomatic treatment planning method for the FIF technique.

Methods

In the semiautomatic FIF technique, hotspot regions in a treatment plan without the FIF technique are identified three-dimensionally, and beams with blocks that cover the hotspot regions using a multileaf collimator (sub-beams) are automatically created. The sub-beams are added to the original plan, and weights are assigned based on the maximum dose of the original plan to decrease the doses in the hotspot regions. This method was applied to 22 patients previously treated with WBI, wherein treatment plans were originally created without the FIF technique.

Results

In the semiautomatic FIF plans, the hotspots almost disappeared. The dose to 95% of the volume and the volume receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose in the planning target volume decreased by only 0.3% ± 0.2% and 0.0% ± 0.1%, respectively, on average compared with those in the original plan. The average semiautomatic FIF processing time was 28 ± 4 s.

Conclusions

The proposed method reduced the hotspot regions with a slight change in the target coverage.

Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for early stage right side breast cancer between three techniques: IMRT, hybrid IMRT and hybrid VMAT

Purpose

This study aimed at evaluating the clinical impact of full intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), hybrid IMRT (H-IMRT) and hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT) for early-stage breast cancer with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), in terms of plan quality and second cancer risk (SCR).

Methods

Three different plans were designed in full IMRT, hybrid IMRT, and hybrid VMAT for each of twenty patients with early-stage breast cancer. Target quality, organs at risk (OARs) sparing, and SCR were compared among the three plans for each case.

Results

In compared with H-IMRT, IMRT plans showed deterioration in terms of D_2% of SIB, V₁₀ of ipsilateral lung, and excess absolute risk (EAR) to contralateral lung (C-Lung) and esophagus. D_2% and the homogeneity index (HI) of SIB, V5 of ipsilateral lung (I-Lung), the D_mean of the esophagus, the EAR to C-Lung and the esophagus with hybrid VMAT dramatically increased by 0.63%, 10%, 17.99%, 149.27%, 230.41%, and 135.29%, respectively (p = 0.024; 0.025; 0.046; 0.011; 0.000; 0.014). D_mean of the heart, the EAR to contralateral breast (C-Breast) and C-Lung by full IMRT was significantly decreased in comparison to the H-VMAT (4.67%, p = 0.033, 26.76%, p = 0.018; 48.05%, p = 0.036).

Conclusion

The results confirmed that H-IMRT could achieve better target quality and OARs sparing than IMRT and H-VMAT for SIB radiotherapy of early-stage right breast cancer. H-IMRT was the best treatment option, while H-VMAT performed the worst among the three plans in terms of SCR to peripheral OARs.

Patient setup accuracy in DIBH radiotherapy of breast cancer with lymph node inclusion using surface tracking and image guidance

Studying setup accuracy in breast cancer patients with axillary lymph node inclusion in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) after patient setup with surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Breast cancer patients (N = 51) were treated (50 Gy in 25 fractions) with axillary lymph nodes within the planning target volume (PTV). Patient setup was initiated with tattoos and lasers, and further adjusted with SGRT. The DIBH guidance was based on SGRT. Orthogonal and/or tangential imaging was analyzed for residual position errors of bony landmarks, the breath-hold level (BHL), the skin outline, and the heart; and setup margins were calculated for the PTV. The calculated PTV margins were 4.3 to 6.3 and 2.8 to 4.6 mm before and after orthogonal imaging, respectively. The residual errors of the heart were 3.6 ± 2.2 mm and 2.5 ± 2.4 mm before and 3.0 ± 2.5 and 2.9 ± 2.3 mm after orthogonal imaging in the combined anterior-posterior/lateral and the cranio-caudal directions, respectively, in tangential images. The humeral head did not benefit from daily IGRT, but SGRT guided it to the correct location. We presented a slightly complicated but highly accurate workflow for DIBH treatments. The residual position errors after both SGRT and IGRT were excellent compared to previous literature. With well-planned SGRT, IGRT brings only slight improvements to systematic accuracy. However, with the calculated PTV margins and the number of outliers, imaging cannot be omitted despite SGRT, unless the PTV margins are re-evaluated.

[Impact of Respiratory Motion on Point Doses for Three Whole-breast Irradiation Techniques after Breast-conserving Surgery]

PURPOSE

For whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery, computed tomography simulation (CTS) and irradiation are generally performed during free breathing. In treatment planning, there are three techniques: field-in-field (FIF), physical wedge (PW), and enhanced dynamic wedge (EDW). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of respiratory motion on doses for these three irradiation techniques.

METHODS

All doses were measured using an ionization chamber in a cylindrical phantom on a respiratory motion platform. Doses for each technique were measured with and without phantom motion. The dose without phantom motion was defined as the reference. The reference was compared to the dose with the phantom motion. The positions of the isocenter with respect to the ranges of phantom motion were set as exhale and intermediate. The phantom motion amplitude was set to 5 mm or 10 mm. The respiratory phase to initiate irradiation was varied as inhale, intermediate-inhale, exhale and intermediate-exhale.

RESULTS

When the motion amplitude was 10 mm, the dose differences for the FIF, PW, and EDW techniques were 4.2%, 0.5%, and 0.8%, respectively, at the maximum. However, the dose difference for the FIF technique was -0.5% when the isocenter position was set to the intermediate phase of phantom motion.

CONCLUSION

We found that the dose difference per fraction was reduced when the respiratory phase during CTS image acquisition was set to the intermediate phase. Meanwhile, the dose differences per fraction for the PW and EDW techniques were less affected by the respiratory motion.

Clinical Experience With Machine Learning-Based Automated Treatment Planning for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

The machine learning-based automated treatment planning (MLAP) tool has been developed and evaluated for breast radiation therapy planning at our institution. We implemented MLAP for patient treatment and assessed our clinical experience for its performance.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 102 patients of breast or chest wall treatment plans were prospectively evaluated with institutional review board approval. A human planner executed MLAP to create an auto-plan via automation of fluence maps generation. If judged necessary, a planner further fine-tuned the fluence maps to reach a final plan. Planners recorded the time required for auto-planning and manual modification. Target (ie, breast or chest wall and nodes) coverage and dose homogeneity were compared between the auto-plan and final plan.

RESULTS

Cases without nodes (n = 71) showed negligible (<1%) differences for target coverage and dose homogeneity between the auto-plan and final plan. Cases with nodes (n = 31) also showed negligible difference for target coverage. However, mean ± standard deviation of volume receiving 105% of the prescribed dose and maximum dose were reduced from 43.0% ± 26.3% to 39.4% ± 23.7% and 119.7% ± 9.5% to 114.4% ± 8.8% from auto-plan to final plan, respectively, all with P ≤ .01 for cases with nodes (n = 31). Mean ± standard deviation time spent for auto-plans and additional fluence modification for final plans were 12.1 ± 9.3 and 13.1 ± 12.9 minutes, respectively, for cases without nodes, and 16.4 ± 9.7 and 26.4 ± 16.4 minutes, respectively, for cases with nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

The MLAP tool has been successfully implemented for routine clinical practice and has significantly improved planning efficiency. Clinical experience indicates that auto-plans are sufficient for target coverage, but improvement is warranted to reduce high dose volume for cases with nodal irradiation. This study demonstrates the clinical implementation of auto-planning for patient treatment and the significant importance of integrating human experience and feedback to improve MLAP for better clinical translation.

Evaluation of beam-on time and number of breath-holds using a flattening-filter-free beam with the deep inspiration breath-hold method in left-sided breast cancer

We performed a dosimetric study to evaluate the benefits of using a flattening-filter-free (FFF) beam with the deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) method for left-breast cancer. We used data from 30 previous patients with treatment plans that included DIBH for left-breast cancer with a flattened beam. FFF beam plans were calculated from previous treatment plan images and compared to the original plans in terms of monitor units (MU), number of segments, beam-on time, and breath-holds. Beam-on time was calculated by adding the traveling time of 1.5 second between segments to the time calculated from the MU and dose rate. Breath-holds were calculated based on the beam-on time, assuming 15 s per hold. The FFF beam had increased MU in all cases (mean ± SD: flattened beam, 122.4 ± 9.8 MU; FFF beam, 160.2 ± 17.5 MU). Furthermore, the number of segments increased with the FFF beam in all cases (median [range]: flattened beam, 2 [1 to 3]; FFF beam, 5 [3 to 7]). However, in most cases, the beam-on time was reduced using the FFF beam (mean ± SD: flattened beam, 27.8 ± 7.4 seconds; FFF beam, 13.2 ± 1.7 seconds), although when a 6 MV flattened beam was used there was not a large increase. There were fewer breath-holds in most cases with the FFF beam. Cases using a 4 MV flattened beam also had fewer breath-holds; however, the number of breath-holds was consistent or increased in cases that used a 6 MV flattened beam (median [range]: flattened beam, 3 [1 to 3]; FFF beam, 1 [1 to 2]).

Secondary cancer risk after whole-breast radiation therapy: field-in-field versus intensity modulated radiation therapy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we used the concept of organ-equivalent dose (OED) to evaluate the excess absolute risk (EAR) for secondary cancer in various organs after radiation treatment for breast cancer.

METHODS

Using CT data set of 12 patients, we generated three different whole-breast radiation treatment plans using 50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with a field-in-field (FinF) technique, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The OEDs were calculated from differential dose-volume histograms on the basis of the "linear-exponential," "plateau," and "full mechanistic" dose-response models. Secondary cancer risks of the contralateral breast (CB), contralateral lung (CL), and ipsilateral lung (IL) were estimated and compared.

RESULTS

The lowest EARs for the CB, CL, and IL were achieved with FinF, which reduced the EARs by 77%, 88%, and 56% relative to those with IMRT, and by 77%, 84%, and 58% relative to those with VMAT, respectively. The secondary cancer risk for FinF was significantly lower than those of IMRT and VMAT. OED-based secondary cancer risks for CB and IL were similar when IMRT and VMAT were used, but the risk for CL was statistically lower when VMAT was used.

CONCLUSION

The overall estimation of EAR indicated that the radiation-induced cancer risk of breast radiation therapy was lower with FinF than with IMRT and VMAT. Therefore, when secondary cancer risk is a major concern, FinF is considered to be the preferred treatment option in irradiation of whole-breast.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Secondary malignancy estimation after breast radiotherapy is becoming an important subject for comparative treatment planning.When secondary cancer risk a major concern, FinF technique is considered the preferred treatment option in whole breast patients.

Dosimetric Comparison of Irregular Surface Compensator and Field-in-Field for Whole Breast Radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the dosimetric benefits of the irregular surface compensator (ISC) technique for whole breast radiotherapy compared with the field-in-field (FIF) technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiotherapy was planned using both techniques in 50 breast cancer patients (25 left sided and 25 right sided). The Eclipse treatment planning system (Varian Medical Systems) was used for dose calculations. For the FIF technique, subfields were added to the main fields to reduce hot and cold regions; for the ISC technique, the fluence editor application was used to extend the optimal fluence. Planning target volume dose, dose homogeneity index (DHI), maximum dose, ipsilateral lung, and heart doses for the left breast irradiation and monitor unit (MU) counts required for treatment were compared between the two techniques.

RESULTS

Compared with the FIF technique, the ISC technique significantly decreased DHI values and volumes receiving >105% of the prescription dose, and increased volumes receiving >95% of the dose and MU count (P < 0.01 for all comparisons). For the heart and ipsilateral lung, the FIF technique significantly reduced volumes receiving >5 Gy compared with the ISC technique (P < 0.01); however, volumes receiving >10, 20, and 30 Gy and the values of a mean dose did not differ significantly between the techniques (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The ISC technique is preferred over the FIF technique.

Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study

Introduction

The aim of this work was to assess the dosimetric impact of the interfraction variations during breast radiotherapy.

Materials and methods

Daily portal imaging measurements were prospectively performed in 10 patients treated with adjuvant whole breast irradiation (50 Gy/25 fractions). Margins between the clinical target volume and the planning target volume (PTV) were 5 mm in the three dimensions. Parameters of interest were the central lung distance (CLD) and the inferior central margin (ICM). Daily movements were applied to the baseline treatment planning (TP1) to design a further TP (TP2). The PTV coverage and organ at risk exposure were measured on both TP1 and TP2, before being compared.

Results

A total of 241 portal images were analyzed. The random and systematic errors were 2.6 and 3.7 mm for the CLD, 4.3 and 6.9 mm for the ICM, respectively. No significant consequence on the PTV treatments was observed (mean variations: +0.1%, p = 0.56 and −1.8%, p = 0.08 for the breast and the tumor bed, respectively). The ipsilateral lung and heart exposure was not significantly modified.

Conclusion

In our series, the daily interfraction variations had no significant effect on the PTV coverage or healthy tissue exposure during breast radiotherapy.

Setup Error and Effectiveness of Weekly Image-Guided Radiation Therapy of TomoDirect for Early Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

This study investigated setup error and effectiveness of weekly image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) of TomoDirect for early breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and fifty-one breasts of 147 consecutive patients who underwent breast conserving surgery followed by whole breast irradiation using TomoDirect in 2012 and 2013 were evaluated. All patients received weekly IGRT. The weekly setup errors from simulation to each treatment in reference to chest wall and surgical clips were measured. Random, systemic, and 3-dimensional setup errors were assessed. Extensive setup error was defined as 5 mm above the margin in any directions.

RESULTS

All mean errors were within 3 mm of all directions. The mean angle of gantry shifts was 0.6°. The mean value of absolute 3-dimensional setup error was 4.67 mm. In multivariate analysis, breast size (odds ratio, 2.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 7.90) was a significant factor for extensive error. The largest significant deviation of setup error was observed in the first week of radiotherapy (p < 0.001) and the deviations gradually decreased with time. The deviation of setup error was 5.68 mm in the first week and within 5 mm after the second week.

CONCLUSION

In this study, there was a significant association between breast size and significant setup error in breast cancer patients who received TomoDirect. The largest deviation occurred in the first week of treatment. Therefore, patients with large breasts should be closely observed on every fraction and fastidious attention is required in the first fraction of IGRT.

Determination of the optimal method for the field-in-field technique in breast tangential radiotherapy

Several studies have reported the usefulness of the field-in-field (FIF) technique in breast radiotherapy. However, the methods for the FIF technique used in these studies vary. These methods were classified into three categories. We simulated a radiotherapy plan with each method and analyzed the outcomes. In the first method, a pair of subfields was added to each main field: the single pair of subfields method (SSM). In the second method, three pairs of subfields were added to each main field: the multiple pairs of subfields method (MSM). In the third method, subfields were alternately added: the alternate subfields method (ASM). A total of 51 patients were enrolled in this study. The maximum dose to the planning target volume (PTV) (Dmax) and the volumes of the PTV receiving 100% of the prescription dose (V100%) were calculated. The thickness of the breast between the chest wall and skin surface was measured, and patients were divided into two groups according to the median. In the overall series, the average V100% with ASM (60.3%) was significantly higher than with SSM (52.6%) and MSM (48.7%). In the thin breast group as well, the average V100% with ASM (57.3%) and SSM (54.2%) was significantly higher than that with MSM (43.3%). In the thick breast group, the average V100% with ASM (63.4%) was significantly higher than that with SSM (51.0%) and MSM (54.4%). ASM resulted in better dose distribution, regardless of the breast size. Moreover, planning for ASM required a relatively short time. ASM was considered the most preferred method.

Radiotherapy-induced secondary cancer risk for breast cancer: 3D conformal therapy versus IMRT versus VMAT

This study evaluated the secondary cancer risk to various organs due to radiation treatment for breast cancer. Organ doses to an anthropomorphic phantom were measured using a photoluminescent dosimeter (PLD) for breast cancer treatment with 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Cancer risk based on the measured dose was calculated using the BEIR (Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation) VII models. The secondary dose per treatment dose (50.4 Gy) to various organs ranged from 0.02 to 0.36 Gy for 3D-CRT, but from 0.07 to 8.48 Gy for IMRT and VMAT, indicating that the latter methods are associated with higher secondary radiation doses than 3D-CRT. The result of the homogeneity index in the breast target shows that the dose homogeneity of 3D-CRT was worse than those of IMRT and VMAT. The organ specific lifetime attributable risks (LARs) to the thyroid, contralateral breast and ipsilateral lung per 100 000 population were 0.02, 19.71, and 0.76 respectively for 3D-CRT, much lower than the 0.11, 463.56, and 10.59 respectively for IMRT and the 0.12, 290.32, and 12.28 respectively for VMAT. The overall estimation of LAR indicated that the radiation-induced cancer risk due to breast radiation therapy was lower with 3D-CRT than with IMRT or VMAT.

Improving intra-fractional target position accuracy using a 3D surface surrogate for left breast irradiation using the respiratory-gated deep-inspiration breath-hold technique

Purpose

To evaluate the use of 3D optical surface imaging as a surrogate for respiratory gated deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) for left breast irradiation.

Material and Methods

Patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with lumpectomy or mastectomy were selected as candidates for DIBH treatment for their external beam radiation therapy. Treatment plans were created on both free breathing (FB) and DIBH computed tomography (CT) simulation scans to determine dosimetric benefits from DIBH. The Real-time Position Management (RPM) system was used to acquire patient's breathing trace during DIBH CT acquisition and treatment delivery. The reference 3D surface models from FB and DIBH CT scans were generated and transferred to the “AlignRT” system for patient positioning and real-time treatment monitoring. MV Cine images were acquired during treatment for each beam as quality assurance for intra-fractional position verification. The chest wall excursions measured on these images were used to define the actual target position during treatment, and to investigate the accuracy and reproducibility of RPM and AlignRT.

Results

Reduction in heart dose can be achieved using DIBH for left breast/chest wall radiation. RPM was shown to have inferior correlation with the actual target position, as determined by the MV Cine imaging. Therefore, RPM alone may not be an adequate surrogate in defining the breath-hold level. Alternatively, the AlignRT surface imaging demonstrated a superior correlation with the actual target positioning during DIBH. Both the vertical and magnitude real-time deltas (RTDs) reported by AlignRT can be used as the gating parameter, with a recommended threshold of ±3 mm and 5 mm, respectively.

Conclusion

The RPM system alone may not be sufficient for the required level of accuracy in left-sided breast/CW DIBH treatments. The 3D surface imaging can be used to ensure patient setup and monitor inter- and intra- fractional motions. Furthermore, the target position accuracy during DIBH treatment can be improved by AlignRT as a superior surrogate, in addition to the RPM system.

Impact of respiratory motion on breast tangential radiotherapy using the field-in-field technique compared to irradiation using physical wedges

Background

This study aimed to evaluate whether the field-in-field (FIF) technique was more vulnerable to the impact of respiratory motion than irradiation using physical wedges (PWs).

Patients and methods

Ten patients with early stage breast cancer were enrolled. Computed tomography (CT) was performed during free breathing (FB). After the FB-CT data set acquisition, 2 additional CT scans were obtained during a held breath after light inhalation (IN) and light exhalation (EX). Based on the FB-CT images, 2 different treatment plans were created for the entire breast for each patient and copied to the IN-CT and EX-CT images. The amount of change in the volume of the target receiving 107%, 95%, and 90% of the prescription dose (V107%, V95%, and V90%, respectively), on the IN-plan and EX-plan compared with the FB-plan were evaluated.

Results

The V107%, V95%, and V90% were significantly larger for the IN-plan than for the FB-plan in both the FIF technique and PW technique. While the amount of change in the V107% was significantly smaller in the FIF than in the PW plan, the amount of change in the V95% and V90% was significantly larger in the FIF plan. Thus, the increase in the V107% was smaller while the increases in the V95% and V90% were larger in the FIF than in the PW plan.

Conclusions

During respiratory motion, the dose parameters stay within acceptable range irrespective of irradiation technique used although the amount of change in dose parameters was smaller with FIF technique.

Improvement of dose distribution with irregular surface compensator in whole breast radiotherapy

Aim of this study was to compare the dosimetric aspects of whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) between an irregular surface compensator (ISC) and a conventional tangential field technique using physical wedges. Treatment plans were produced for 20 patients. The Eclipse treatment planning system (Varian Medical Systems) was used for the dose calculation: For the physical wedge technique, the wedge angle was selected to provide the best dose homogeneity; for the ISC technique, the fluence editor application was used to extend the optimal fluence. These two treatment plans were compared in terms of doses in the planning target volume, the dose homogeneity index, the maximum dose, ipsilateral lung and heart doses for left breast irradiation, and the monitor unit counts required for treatment. Compared with the physical wedge technique, the ISC technique significantly reduced the dose homogeneity index, the maximum dose, the volumes received at 105% of the prescription dose, as well as reducing both the ipsilateral lung and heart doses (P < 0.01 for all comparisons). However, the monitor unit counts were not significantly different between the techniques (P > 0.05). Thus, the ISC technique for WBRT enables significantly better dose distribution in the planning target volume.