National survey on total-body irradiation prior to reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation in Japan: The Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group

A multi-institutional survey on technical variations in total body irradiation in Japan

This study aimed to survey technical variations in total body irradiation (TBI) across Japan. A web-based questionnaire investigating technical aspects (irradiation method, in vivo dosimetry, organ shielding, and boluses) of TBI was distributed via the authors' acquaintances in each region of Japan using snowball sampling, and 73 institutions responded. The data were collected from January to April 2024. Three institutions used two distinct irradiation methods, yielding 76 reported techniques. The reported irradiation techniques included long source-to-surface distance (SSD) techniques, which involve using a large field and extended distance; helical intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using specialized equipment (e.g., TomoTherapy), moving couch techniques, and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using a standard C-arm linac, with responses totaling 60 (79%), 10 (13%), 4 (5%), and 2 (3%), respectively. All institutions performing IMRT-based (helical IMRT and VMAT) TBI used computed tomography simulation with the patient in the supine position and utilized a 6 MV photon beam. Conversely, the long SSD technique exhibited significant variation; while 47 institutions treated patients exclusively in the supine position, others reported using the prone and lateral positions. Furthermore, the photon beam energies varied, with 10 MV (41 responses), 6 MV (20 responses), and 4 MV (1 response) reported. Notably, 17 institutions using long SSD techniques did not perform in vivo dosimetry and 32 did not use boluses. The differences in the methods used to shield the organs were also reported. These variations highlight the need for standardization of in vivo dosimetry, dose homogeneity strategies, and organ-shielding in TBI.

Large-field irradiation techniques in Germany: A DGMP Working Group survey on the current clinical implementation of total body irradiation, total skin irradiation and craniospinal irradiation

In 2023, a Germany-wide survey on the current clinical practice of three different large field irradiation techniques (LFIT), namely total body irradiation (TBI), total skin irradiation (TSI) and craniospinal irradiation (CSI), was conducted covering different aspects of the irradiation process, e.g., the irradiation unit and technique, dosimetrical aspects and treatment planning as well as quality assurance. The responses provided a deep insight into the applied approaches showing a high heterogeneity between participating centers for all three large field irradiation techniques. The highest heterogeneity was found for TBI. Here, differences between centers were found in almost every aspect of the irradiation process, e.g., the irradiation technique, the prescription dose, the spared organs at risk and the applied treatment planning method. For TBI, the only agreement was found in the fractionation scheme (2 Gy/fraction, 2 fractions/day) and the dose reduction to the lung. TSI was the rarest of the three LFITs. For TSI, the only agreement was found in the use of 6 MeV when irradiating with electrons. The reported approaches of CSI were closest to standard radiotherapy, using no CSI-specific irradiation techniques or treatment planning methods. For CSI, the only agreement was found in the prescribed dose to the brain (50 - 60 Gy). When asking for future requirements, participating centers considered the lack of standardization as the most important future challenge and suggested to perform (retrospective) patient studies. The results of such studies can then serve as a basis for new and improved guidelines.

Advanced automated treatment planning for total body irradiation: Implementation and effects on standardization

PURPOSE

This work describes the automation of our volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) total body irradiation (TBI) treatment planning. It also aims to determine if plan standardization is impacted by automation.

METHODS

We introduced automated beam placement for TBI in March 2021. For manual beam placement pre-2021, Python-modified DICOM files were imported to pre-set cumulative meterset weights, with other parameters selected by dosimetrists. Our automated planning script automates these processes and sets gantry stop angles and isocentre placement. To determine the impact of automation on plan standardization, we performed a retrospective review of a matched cohort of 168 patients. Plan parameters were compared with an external standard, and passing rates compared between patient cohorts. The dosimetric impact was investigated by comparing a Body-5 mm homogeneity index (HI = D2%/D98%) and mean lung dose (MLD) between cohorts.

RESULTS

Results are listed for manual and automated groups respectively. Median (range) passing rates were 97.7% (96.1-100) and 99.2% (98.3-100). Automated plans had a significantly higher passing rate (p ≪ 0.05) and smaller variance (p = 0.001). Most failures were attributed to human error. Automated plans also had more consistent parameter identifiers. After considering dimensional outliers, median (range) Body-5 mm HI were 1.18 (1.14-1.23) and 1.18 (1.15-1.26), and mean ± standard deviation MLD were 103.8 ± 1.3% and 104.1 ± 0.9%. Variances were not significantly different between Body-5 mm HI (p = 0.092) but were for MLD (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of automated planning in TBI resulted in significantly improved plan standardization. The decrease in variance of the MLD for the automated planning group points towards a potential dosimetric benefit of automation.

Commissioning and performance evaluation of commercially available mobile imager for image guided total body irradiation

BACKGROUND

The setup of lung shield (LS) in total body irradiation (TBI) with the computed radiography (CR) system is a time-consuming task and has not been quantitatively evaluated. The TBI mobile imager (TBI-MI) can solve this problem through real-time monitoring. Therefore, this study aimed to perform commissioning and performance evaluation of TBI-MI to promote its use in clinical practice.

METHODS

The source-axis distance in TBI treatment, TBI-MI (CNERGY TBI, Cablon Medical B.V.), and the LS position were set to 400, 450, and 358 cm, respectively. The evaluation items were as follows: accuracy of image scaling and measured displacement error of LS, image quality (linearity, signal-to-noise ratio, and modulation transfer function) using an EPID QC phantom, optimal thresholding to detect intra-fractional motion in the alert function, and the scatter radiation dose from TBI-MI.

RESULTS

The accuracy of image scaling and the difference in measured displacement of the LS was <4 mm in any displacements and directions. The image quality of TBI imager was slightly inferior to the CR image but was visually acceptable in clinical practice. The signal-to-noise ratio was improved at high dose rate. The optimal thresholding value to detect a 10-mm body displacement was determined to be approximately 5.0%. The maximum fraction of scattering radiation to irradiated dose was 1.7% at patient surface.

CONCLUSION

MI-TBI can quantitatively evaluate LS displacement with acceptable image quality. Furthermore, real-time monitoring with alert function to detect intrafraction patient displacement can contribute to safe TBI treatment.

Commissioning of total body irradiation using plastic bead bags

The goal of total body irradiation (TBI) is to deliver a dose to the whole body with uniformity within ±10%. The purpose of this study was to establish the technique of TBI using plastic bead bags. A lifting TBI bed, Model ORP-TBI-MN, was used. The space between the patient's body and the acrylic walls of the bed was filled with polyacetal bead bags. Patients were irradiated by a 10 MV photon beam with a source to mid-plane distance of 400 cm. The monitor unit (MU) was calculated by dose-per-MU, tissue-phantom-ratio and a spoiler factor measured in solid water using an ionization chamber. The phantom-scatter correction factor, off-center ratio and the effective density of the beads were also measured. Diode detectors were used for in vivo dosimetry (IVD). The effective density of the beads was 0.90 ± 0.09. The point doses calculated in an I'mRT phantom with and without heterogeneity material showed good agreement, with measurements within 3%. An end-to-end test was performed using a RANDO phantom. The mean ± SD (range) of the differences between the calculated and IVD-measured mid-plane doses was 1.1 ± 4.8% (-5.9 to 5.0%). The differences between the IVD-measured doses and the doses calculated with Acuros XB of the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) were within 5%. For two patients treated with this method, the differences between the calculated and IVD-measured doses were within ±6% when excluding the chest region. We have established the technique of TBI using plastic bead bags. The TPS may be useful to roughly estimate patient dose.