National survey on total-body irradiation prior to reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation in Japan: The Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group

Advanced automated treatment planning for total body irradiation: Implementation and effects on standardization

PURPOSE

This work describes the automation of our volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) total body irradiation (TBI) treatment planning. It also aims to determine if plan standardization is impacted by automation.

METHODS

We introduced automated beam placement for TBI in March 2021. For manual beam placement pre-2021, Python-modified DICOM files were imported to pre-set cumulative meterset weights, with other parameters selected by dosimetrists. Our automated planning script automates these processes and sets gantry stop angles and isocentre placement. To determine the impact of automation on plan standardization, we performed a retrospective review of a matched cohort of 168 patients. Plan parameters were compared with an external standard, and passing rates compared between patient cohorts. The dosimetric impact was investigated by comparing a Body-5 mm homogeneity index (HI = D2%/D98%) and mean lung dose (MLD) between cohorts.

RESULTS

Results are listed for manual and automated groups respectively. Median (range) passing rates were 97.7% (96.1-100) and 99.2% (98.3-100). Automated plans had a significantly higher passing rate (p ≪ 0.05) and smaller variance (p = 0.001). Most failures were attributed to human error. Automated plans also had more consistent parameter identifiers. After considering dimensional outliers, median (range) Body-5 mm HI were 1.18 (1.14-1.23) and 1.18 (1.15-1.26), and mean ± standard deviation MLD were 103.8 ± 1.3% and 104.1 ± 0.9%. Variances were not significantly different between Body-5 mm HI (p = 0.092) but were for MLD (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of automated planning in TBI resulted in significantly improved plan standardization. The decrease in variance of the MLD for the automated planning group points towards a potential dosimetric benefit of automation.

Commissioning and performance evaluation of commercially available mobile imager for image guided total body irradiation

BACKGROUND

The setup of lung shield (LS) in total body irradiation (TBI) with the computed radiography (CR) system is a time-consuming task and has not been quantitatively evaluated. The TBI mobile imager (TBI-MI) can solve this problem through real-time monitoring. Therefore, this study aimed to perform commissioning and performance evaluation of TBI-MI to promote its use in clinical practice.

METHODS

The source-axis distance in TBI treatment, TBI-MI (CNERGY TBI, Cablon Medical B.V.), and the LS position were set to 400, 450, and 358 cm, respectively. The evaluation items were as follows: accuracy of image scaling and measured displacement error of LS, image quality (linearity, signal-to-noise ratio, and modulation transfer function) using an EPID QC phantom, optimal thresholding to detect intra-fractional motion in the alert function, and the scatter radiation dose from TBI-MI.

RESULTS

The accuracy of image scaling and the difference in measured displacement of the LS was <4 mm in any displacements and directions. The image quality of TBI imager was slightly inferior to the CR image but was visually acceptable in clinical practice. The signal-to-noise ratio was improved at high dose rate. The optimal thresholding value to detect a 10-mm body displacement was determined to be approximately 5.0%. The maximum fraction of scattering radiation to irradiated dose was 1.7% at patient surface.

CONCLUSION

MI-TBI can quantitatively evaluate LS displacement with acceptable image quality. Furthermore, real-time monitoring with alert function to detect intrafraction patient displacement can contribute to safe TBI treatment.

Commissioning of total body irradiation using plastic bead bags

The goal of total body irradiation (TBI) is to deliver a dose to the whole body with uniformity within ±10%. The purpose of this study was to establish the technique of TBI using plastic bead bags. A lifting TBI bed, Model ORP-TBI-MN, was used. The space between the patient's body and the acrylic walls of the bed was filled with polyacetal bead bags. Patients were irradiated by a 10 MV photon beam with a source to mid-plane distance of 400 cm. The monitor unit (MU) was calculated by dose-per-MU, tissue-phantom-ratio and a spoiler factor measured in solid water using an ionization chamber. The phantom-scatter correction factor, off-center ratio and the effective density of the beads were also measured. Diode detectors were used for in vivo dosimetry (IVD). The effective density of the beads was 0.90 ± 0.09. The point doses calculated in an I'mRT phantom with and without heterogeneity material showed good agreement, with measurements within 3%. An end-to-end test was performed using a RANDO phantom. The mean ± SD (range) of the differences between the calculated and IVD-measured mid-plane doses was 1.1 ± 4.8% (-5.9 to 5.0%). The differences between the IVD-measured doses and the doses calculated with Acuros XB of the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) were within 5%. For two patients treated with this method, the differences between the calculated and IVD-measured doses were within ±6% when excluding the chest region. We have established the technique of TBI using plastic bead bags. The TPS may be useful to roughly estimate patient dose.