Mesothelioma subtypes of the tunica vaginalis: a rare case report and review of histological criteria

Identification and Management of Testicular Mesothelioma Identified Intraoperatively: A Case Series

Testicular mesothelioma lacks the characteristic presentation of testicular malignancy and often has normal biomarkers at the time of diagnosis causing this malignancy to be overlooked and diagnosed intraoperatively during elective scrotal surgery. We present two cases of testicular mesothelioma that were diagnosed incidentally during hydrocelectomy. These cases emphasize the importance of considering testicular mesothelioma during hydrocele and scrotal mass workup and demonstrate the need for standardized guidelines for the management of testicular mesothelioma.

Mesothelioma of Uncertain Malignant Potential (MUMP) of the Tunica Vaginalis: Proposal for Reclassification as "Complex Mesothelial Tumor of the Tunica Vaginalis"

A well-differentiated papillary mesothelial tumor (WDPMT) and malignant mesothelioma are 2 well-recognized entities arising from the testis tunica vaginalis. Another mesothelial lesion exclusively seen at this site is mesothelioma of uncertain malignant potential (MUMP)-a lesion reminiscent of WDPMT yet demonstrating variable proportions of more complex architectural patterns that could be confused with invasion. MUMP was first described in 2010 with a total of 11 cases reported to date. Herein, we describe 19 additional patients who underwent hydrocelectomy, excision, and/or orchiectomy. Novel morphologic patterns found in addition to the 2010 series include spindle cells, keloidal-type collagen, and multicystic architecture lined by bland mesothelial cells. Clinical follow-up in 9 patients for more than 1 year (1.5 to 22.5 y, median 4.5 y) revealed no evidence of disease recurrence or metastases. Despite greater architectural complexity, MUMP has (1) bland cytology; (2) merging in with WDPMT areas; (3) low mitotic rate and Ki-67 nuclear labeling index; (4) retention of MTAP and BAP1 expression; and (5) benign clinical follow-up. If these cases were malignant mesotheliomas, one would have expected at least some of the patients to demonstrate disease recurrence/progression without adjuvant therapy within the available follow-up time, particularly with limited resection in most patients. Thus, we propose that "mesothelioma of uncertain malignant potential" be renamed as "complex mesothelial tumor of the tunica vaginalis." Using the term "complex" draws a contrast with the simple cuboidal lining and simple papillary architecture seen in WDPMT. Also, labeling the lesion as "tumor" removes the stigmata of "uncertain malignant potential" and "mesothelioma" that are alarming to patients and clinicians, and potentially could unduly lead to more extensive surgery in an attempt at "complete" resection. At the same time, not definitively labeling the lesion as benign allows recommendations for follow-up.

Well-differentiated Papillary Mesothelial Tumour of the Tunica Vaginalis Testis - A Rare Lesion, but one Pathologists Should Know About Two Patient Reports and a Review of the Literature

Besides malignant mesothelioma, benign mesothelial neoplasms do exist in the tunica vaginalis testis. However, histological criteria remain controversial, thus leading to diagnostic uncertainty and difficulty in their classification according to their biological behavior. In recent years, molecular markers have emerged that aid in the differentiation of benign and malignant mesothelial proliferations throughout the body. Here, we present two middle-aged men with well-differentiated papillary mesothelial tumors and a review of the literature. By now, more than a year after surgery, one patient showed no recurrence of disease after partial or complete orchiectomy without further treatment, for the second no information is available. In conclusion, well-differentiated papillary mesothelial tumors represent rare lesions in the tunica vaginalis testis, but one pathologists should know about to prevent unnecessary treatment and suffering of patients.

Localized malignant mesothelioma, an unusual and poorly characterized neoplasm of serosal origin: best current evidence from the literature and the International Mesothelioma Panel

Localized malignant mesotheliomas (LMM) is an uncommon and poorly recognized neoplasm. Its pathologic diagnosis is often surprising in patients with serosal/subserosal based localized tumors that are clinically suspicious for metastatic lesions or primary sarcomas. Once a tumor is diagnosed as "mesothelioma", LMM is often mistaken for diffuse malignant mesothelioma (DMM). Best currently available evidence about LMM was collected from the literature and cases diagnosed by members of the International Mesothelioma Panel (IMP). One hundred and one (101) LMM have been reported in the English literature. Patients had localized tumors with identical histopathologic features to DMM. Patients ranged in age from 6 to 82 years; 75% were men. Most (82%) of the tumors were intrathoracic. Others presented as intrahepatic, mesenteric, gastric, pancreatic, umbilical, splenic, and abdominal wall lesions. Tumors varied in size from 0.6 to 15 cm. Most patients underwent surgical resection and/or chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Median survival in a subset of patients was 29 months. Seventy two additional LMM from IMP institutions ranged in age from 28 to 95 years; 58.3% were men. Sixty tumors (83.3%) were intrathoracic, others presented in intraabdominal sites. Tumors varied in size from 1.2 to 19 cm. Median survival for 51 cases was 134 months. Best evidence was used to formulate guidelines for the diagnosis of LMM. It is important to distinguish LMM from DMM as their treatment and prognosis is different. A multidisciplinary approach is needed for the diagnosis of LMM as it shows identical histopathology and immunophenotype to DMM.