Comparison of inflight first aid performed by cabin crew members and medical volunteers

Characteristics of In-Flight Medical Emergencies on a Commercial Airline in Mainland China: Retrospective Study

Background

In-flight medical emergencies (IMEs) can have severe outcomes, including the deaths of passengers and aircraft diversions. Information is lacking regarding the incidence rate and characteristics of IMEs in most countries, especially in mainland China.

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence, patterns, and associated risk factors of IMEs in mainland China and to provide medical suggestions for the evaluation and management of IMEs.

Methods

This population-based retrospective study examined electronic records for all IME reports between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, from a major airline company in mainland China. Outcome variables included the medical category of the IMEs, the outcomes of first aid, and whether or not the IMEs led to a flight diversion. We calculated the incidence rate and death rate of IMEs based on the number of passengers and flights, respectively. A logistic regression model was used to investigate the factors associated with aircraft diversions.

Results

A total of 199 IMEs and 24 deaths occurred among 447.2 million passengers, yielding an incidence rate of 0.44 (95% CI 0.39-0.51) events per million passengers and 66.56 (95% CI 50.55-86.04) events per million flights, and an all-cause mortality rate of 0.05 (95% CI 0.03-0.07) events per million passengers and 7.50 (95% CI 4.81-11.16) events per million flights. From 2018 to 2022, the highest incidence and mortality rates were observed in 2019 and 2020, respectively, while the lowest were in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Additionally, the highest incidence and mortality rates were observed between 6 PM to 6 AM and noon to 6 PM, respectively. There was a higher incidence rate of IMEs in the winter months. Moreover, the highest case-fatality rates were observed in 2019 (12/74, 16.2%), on flights traveling ≥4000 km (9/43, 20.9%), and on wide-body planes (10/52, 19.2%). Seizures (29/199, 14.6%), cardiac symptoms (25/199, 12.6%), and syncope or presyncope (19/199, 9.6%) were the most common medical problems and main reasons for aircraft diversion. The incidence of aircraft diversion was 42.50 (95% CI 37.02-48.12) events per million flights. Narrow-body planes (odds ratio [OR] 5.69, 95% CI 1.05-30.90), flights ≥4000 km (OR 16.40, 95% CI 1.78-151.29), and the months of December to February (OR 12.70, 95% CI 3.09-52.23), as well as the months of March to May (OR 23.21, 95% CI 3.75-143.43), were significantly associated with a higher risk of diversion.

Conclusions

The occurrence of and deaths associated with IMEs are rare in mainland China, but a temporal trend shows higher incidence rates at night and in winter. The leading IMEs are cardiac symptoms, seizures, and syncope. The establishment of a unified reporting system for IMEs and ground-to-air medical support are of great value for reducing IMEs and deaths in the global community.

How Common Are Allergic Reactions During Commercial Flights? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Global passenger demand for air travel has increased by over 7% annually since 2006, with a strong recovery following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Prior to COVID-19, individuals with food allergies reported significant concern and anxiety over the risk of reactions when travelling by air. However, published data of in-flight medical events (IMEs) due to allergic reactions are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To undertake a systematic review with meta-analysis to estimate the incidence of IMEs due to allergic reactions on commercial flights.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and TRANSPORT databases and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials for relevant studies reporting IMEs of allergic etiology, published since 1980. Data were extracted in duplicate for meta-analysis, and risk of bias assessed.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022384341.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. At meta-analysis, a pooled estimate of 2.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.6%-3.1%) of IMEs are coded as being due to allergic reactions. This may be higher in children (3.1%; 95% CI 1.5%-6.6%). The incidence of allergic IMEs at meta-analysis was 0.7 events per million passengers (95% CI 0.4-1.1). Reassuringly, the rate of allergic IMEs has been stable over the past 30 years, despite increasing passenger numbers and food allergy prevalence.

CONCLUSIONS

Allergic reactions coded as IMEs during commercial air travel are uncommon, occurring at an incidence approximately 10 to 100 times lower than that reported for accidental allergic reactions to food occurring in the community. Despite increasing passenger numbers and food allergy prevalence, the rate of allergic IMEs has not changed over the past 3 decades.

A Comparison of In-flight and Ground-Based Emergency Medical Events on the Clinical Demand for Outreach Medical Services at Taoyuan International Airport, Taiwan

Background: Limited information is available covering all medical events managed by the airport-based outreach medical service. This study explores the clinical demand for emergency medical outreach services at Taoyuan International Airport (TIA), Taiwan.

Methods: Electronic medical records collected from TIA medical outreach services from 2017 to 2018, included passengers' profiles, flight information, events location, chief complaints, diagnosis (using ICD-9 -CM codes), and management outcomes. Medical events distribution was stratified by location and ages, and were compared statistically.

Results: Among 1,501 eligible records, there were 81.8% ground-based emergency medical events (GBME), 16.9% in-flight medical events (IFME) managed after scheduled landing, and 1.3% IFME leading to unscheduled diversion or re-entry to TIA. The top three GBME diagnoses were associated with neurological (23.3%), gastrointestinal (21.2%), and trauma-related (19.3%) conditions. The top three IFME diagnosis that prompted unscheduled landings via flight diversion or re-entry were neurological (47.4%), psychological (15.8%), and cardiovascular (10.5%). The chief complaints that prompted unscheduled landings were mostly related to neurological (42.1%), cardiovascular (26.3%), and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) (10.5%) symptoms. A higher frequency of IFME events due to dermatologic causes in patients aged ≤ 18 years compared with adults and older adults (19 vs. 1.5% and 0, respectively); and a higher frequency of IFME due to cardiovascular causes in adults ≥ 65 years compared with patients aged ≤ 65 (15.1 vs. 9%). Among all IFME patients, six out-of-hospital deaths occurred among passengers from scheduled landings and two deaths occurred among 18 IFME passengers who were transferred to local hospitals from flight diversion or re-entry. A statistically significant difference in outcomes and short-term follow-up status was found between patients with IFME and those with GBME (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Ground-based emergency medical events exceeded in-flight medical events at TIA. The most frequent events were related to neurological, gastrointestinal symptoms, or trauma. Results of this study may provide useful information for training medical outreach staff and preparing medical supplies to meet the clinical demand for airport medical outreach services.

Infection Prevention Performance among In-Flight Cabin Crew in South Korea

COVID-19 was declared a worldwide pandemic in 2020; thus, preventing in-flight infection transmission is important for stopping global spread via air travel. Infection prevention (IP) performance among aircraft cabin crew is crucial for preventing in-flight transmission. We aimed to identify the level of IP performance and factors affecting IP performance among aircraft cabin crew during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea. An online survey was conducted with 177 cabin crew members between August and September 2020. The survey assessed IP performance, and IP awareness, using a five-point Likert scale, and also evaluated simulation-based personal protective equipment (PPE) training experience, and organizational culture. The average IP performance score was 4.56 ± 0.44. Although the performance level for mask-wearing was high (4.73 ± 0.35), hand hygiene (HH) performance (4.47 ± 0.56) was low. Multivariate analysis showed that IP performance was significantly associated with IP awareness (p < 0.05) and simulation-based PPE training experience (p < 0.05). Since HH performance was relatively low, cabin crew and airlines should make efforts to improve HH performance. Furthermore, a high level of IP awareness and PPE training experience can improve IP performance among cabin crew members. Therefore, simulation-based PPE training and strategies to improve IP awareness are essential for preventing in-flight infection transmission.

The global incidence of in-flight medical emergencies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of approximately 1.5 billion airline passengers

BACKGROUND

Medical emergencies during short- or long-haul commercial airline flights have become more commonplace due to the aviation industry's contemporary growth, the popularization of commercial flights, and an increased aging of air travelers with significant comorbidities. However, the precise incidence of onboard medical events on commercial airlines and the most common medical conditions is unclear.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we explored the incidence of in-flight medical emergencies among airline passengers and estimated the incidence rate by physiological body system, or organ class/syndrome for emergencies that may be associated with different body systems. We limited our search to cohort studies published between 1945 to October 31, 2020 in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and official reports from the Federal Aviation Administration/International Air Transport Association, regardless of the language of publication. Only studies that evaluated the overall frequency of onboard medical events on commercial air carriers (in which they also presented the total number of annual revenue passengers) and the frequency of events by physiological body systems or organ class/syndrome were included. We excluded case reports and case series, systematic or narrative reviews, and studies addressing specific health-related conditions. Two independent investigators performed first- and second-phase study screening, abstracted data, and appraised risk of bias. We rated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Using a quality effect model, we meta-analyzed data associated with the incidence of in-flight medical emergencies, all-cause fatality, incidence of medical events by medical condition category, frequency of en-route diversion, presence of medical personnel on board, and the use of an automatic external defibrillator. We also extracted data regarding the cost of flight diversion.

RESULTS

Of 18 individual studies with approximately 1.5 billion passengers, 11 reported the overall incidence of in-flight medical emergencies. Low certainty of evidence suggested that the global incidence of in-flight medical emergencies was 18.2 events per million passengers (95% CI 0.5 to 53.4 per million; I² = 100%, P < 0.001, very low certainty), and an all-cause mortality rate was 0.21 per million passengers (95% CI 0 to 0.76 per million; I² = 99%, P < 0.001, low certainty). The four most common categories of medical conditions or syndromes during flight were syncope, gastrointestinal events, respiratory and neurological diagnostic groups. The diversion rate was 11.1 per 100,000 flights (95% CI 5.9 to17.6 per 100,000 flights; I² = 97%, P < 0.001), with an average cost ranging from $15,000 to $893,000 per unplanned emergency landing across studies which examined this outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In-flight medical events on commercial travels are extremely low with a corresponding very low in-flight mortality rate. Associated costs derived from en-route diversion might significantly influence airlines' budgetary equilibrium. Novel and modern standardized reporting systems or platforms should be internationally provided and enforced by health and aviation authorities to obtain higher quality patient-passengers datasets. Onboard volunteer medical providers must be aware of everyday life-threatening events during commercial flights and should consider the establishment of a connection between the aircraft and ground-based medical advisory services while assisting in-flight medical events.

In-Flight Medical Events and Cabin Crew First Aid Response

INTRODUCTION: In-flight medical events (IMEs), although rare, are challenging due to the limited onboard resources and the time needed to reach an airport. Cabin crewmembers (CCMs) are trained to provide first aid, but their effectiveness has not been appropriately studied.METHODS: IMEs occurring in the biggest airline of Greece were prospectively recorded during a 5-yr period (20142018) and categorized according to a symptom-based taxonomy.RESULTS: During the study period 990 IMEs were recorded corresponding to 16 IMEs for each million passengers or 1.8 IMEs for every thousand flights. The most frequent events were loss of consciousness (38.4%) followed by injuries (8.6%), gastrointestinal problems (8.3%), respiratory symptoms (7.3%), anxiety (5.7%), and burns (5.9%). Diversion was decided in 3% of the cases while death on board was rare (0.3% of events). CCMs responded in 33.5% of IMEs without assistance by a volunteer health professional, achieving a 97% success rate.DISCUSSION: IMEs are rare events and the majority can be treated with simple first aid measures. CCMs acting according to a simplified algorithm were very efficient in providing first aid. A standardized symptom-based IME form will assist in creating a reliable registry for further studies.Paxinos O, Savourdos P, Alexelis V, Anastasopoulos A, Karantoni E, Grigoropoulos P, Konstantinou X. In-flight medical events and cabin crew first aid response. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2021; 92(1):3238.

Commercial Air Travel for Passengers With Cardiovascular Disease: Stressors of Flight and Aeromedical Impact

The exponential growth of commercial flights has resulted in a sharp rise of air travellers over the last 2 decades, including passengers with a wide range of cardiovascular conditions. Notwithstanding the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic that had set back the aviation industry for the next 1 to 2 years, air travel is expected to rebound fully by 2023-2024. Guidelines and evidence-based recommendations for safe air travel in this group vary, and physicians often encounter situations where opinions and assessments on fitness for flights are sought. This article aims to provide an overview of the stressors of commercial passenger flights with an impact on cardiovascular health for the general cardiologist and family practitioner, when assessing the suitability of such patients for flying fitness.

Characterization of In-Flight Medical Events Involving Children on Commercial Airline Flights

STUDY OBJECTIVE

More than 4 billion passengers travel on commercial airline flights yearly. Although in-flight medical events involving adult passengers have been well characterized, data describing those affecting children are lacking. This study seeks to characterize pediatric in-flight medical events and their immediate outcomes, using a worldwide sample.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of all in-flight medical events from January 1, 2015, to October 31, 2016, involving children younger than 19 years treated in consultation with a ground-based medical support center providing medical support to 77 commercial airlines worldwide. We characterized these in-flight medical events and determined factors associated with the need for additional care at destination or aircraft diversion.

RESULTS

From a total of 75,587 in-flight medical events, we identified 11,719 (15.5%) involving children. Most in-flight medical events occurred on long-haul flights (76.1%), and 14% involved lap infants. In-flight care was generally provided by crew members only (88.6%), and physician (8.7%) or nurse (2.1%) passenger volunteers. Most in-flight medical events were resolved in flight (82.9%), whereas 16.5% required additional care on landing, and 0.5% led to aircraft diversion. The most common diagnostic categories were nausea or vomiting (33.9%), fever or chills (22.2%), and acute allergic reaction (5.5%). Events involving lap infants, syncope, seizures, burns, dyspnea, blunt trauma, lacerations, or congenital heart disease; those requiring the assistance of a volunteer medical provider; or those requiring the use of oxygen were positively correlated with the need for additional care after disembarkment.

CONCLUSION

Most pediatric in-flight medical events are resolved in flight, and very few lead to aircraft diversion, yet 1 in 6 cases requires additional care.

In-Flight Medical Emergencies: A Review

IMPORTANCE

In-flight medical emergencies (IMEs) are common and occur in a complex environment with limited medical resources. Health care personnel are often asked to assist affected passengers and the flight team, and many have limited experience in this environment.

OBSERVATIONS

In-flight medical emergencies are estimated to occur in approximately 1 per 604 flights, or 24 to 130 IMEs per 1 million passengers. These events happen in a unique environment, with airplane cabin pressurization equivalent to an altitude of 5000 to 8000 ft during flight, exposing patients to a low partial pressure of oxygen and low humidity. Minimum requirements for emergency medical kit equipment in the United States include an automated external defibrillator; equipment to obtain a basic assessment, hemorrhage control, and initiation of an intravenous line; and medications to treat basic conditions. Other countries have different minimum medical kit standards, and individual airlines have expanded the contents of their medical kit. The most common IMEs involve syncope or near-syncope (32.7%) and gastrointestinal (14.8%), respiratory (10.1%), and cardiovascular (7.0%) symptoms. Diversion of the aircraft from landing at the scheduled destination to a different airport because of a medical emergency occurs in an estimated 4.4% (95% CI, 4.3%-4.6%) of IMEs. Protections for medical volunteers who respond to IMEs in the United States include a Good Samaritan provision of the Aviation Medical Assistance Act and components of the Montreal Convention, although the duty to respond and legal protections vary across countries. Medical volunteers should identify their background and skills, perform an assessment, and report findings to ground-based medical support personnel through the flight crew. Ground-based recommendations ultimately guide interventions on board.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In-flight medical emergencies most commonly involve near-syncope and gastrointestinal, respiratory, and cardiovascular symptoms. Health care professionals can assist during these emergencies as part of a collaborative team involving the flight crew and ground-based physicians.