Plasma Transfusion Demystified: A Review of the Key Factors Influencing the Response to Plasma Transfusion

What's in Your Transfusion? A Bedside Guide to Blood Products and Their Preparation

An understanding of the contents of blood products and how they are modified before transfusion will help any physician. This article will review five basic blood products and the five most common product modifications.

A Concise Synopsis of Current Literature and Guidelines on the Practice of Plasma Transfusion

Evidence-based indications for plasma transfusion are limited, and much of the clinical practice relies on expert opinion. This article highlights key studies, meta-analyses, and guidelines for plasma transfusion in adults. The goal is to limit non-evidence-based plasma transfusion that is outside of clinical guideline, because as with all transfusions, the administration of plasma is not without risk. Any intended potential benefit must be appraised against the real risks associated with transfusion. Moving forward, the practice of plasma transfusion would benefit greatly from randomized controlled trials to update and expand the existing guidelines.

Sepsis-Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Concepts

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition and a global disease burden. Today, the heterogeneous syndrome is defined as severe organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, with renewed emphasis on immune pathophysiology. Despite all efforts of experimental and clinical research during the last three decades, the ability to positively influence course and outcome of the syndrome remains limited. Evidence-based therapy still consists of basic causal and supportive measures, while adjuvant interventions such as blood purification or targeted immunotherapy largely remain without proof of effectiveness so far. With this review, we aim to provide an overview of sepsis immune pathophysiology, to update the choice of therapeutic approaches targeting different immunological mechanisms in the course of sepsis and septic shock, and to call for a paradigm shift from the pathogen to the host response as a potentially more promising angle.

Plasma Transfusion Practice in Adult Surgical Patients: Systematic Review of the Literature

Background

Plasma transfusions are most commonly used therapeutically for bleeding or prophylactically in non-bleeding patients prior to invasive procedures or surgery. Although plasma transfusions generally seem to decline, plasma usage for indications that lack evidence of efficacy prevail.

Summary

There is wide international, interinstitutional, and interindividual variance regarding the compliance with guidelines based on published references, supported by appropriate testing. There is furthermore a profound lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of plasma transfusion with that of other therapeutic interventions for most indications, including massive bleeding. The expected benefit of a plasma transfusion needs to be balanced carefully against the associated risk of adverse events. In light of the heterogeneous nature of bleeding conditions and their rapid evolvement over time, fibrinogen and factor concentrate therapy, directed at specific phases of coagulation identified by alternative laboratory assays, may offer advantages over conventional blood product ratio-driven resuscitation. However, their outcome benefit has not been demonstrated in well-powered prospective trials. This systematic review will detail the current evidence base for plasma transfusion in adult surgical patients.

Potential impact of a delayed ADAMTS13 result in the treatment of thrombotic microangiopathy: an economic analysis

BACKGROUND

A pre-plasma exchange ADAMTS13 measurement differentiates thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) from other forms of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Given that many hospitals do not perform the ADAMTS13 assay in-house and that the turnaround time (TAT) differs among reference laboratories, we performed an analysis investigating the potential impact of a delay in obtaining the results on the healthcare system.

METHODS

An economic model was developed to estimate the impact of a delay in obtaining the pretreatment ADAMTS13 results on patients admitted with TMA with cost (US dollars) as the primary outcome. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) as a composite outcome was calculated from both cost and life days [LDs], an effectiveness surrogate marker. Model parameters were gathered from the medical literature, except for the institutional cost of the ADAMTS13 test.

RESULTS

In patients with TMA, during the 6-day study period, the incremental cost to the healthcare system ranged from approximately $4155 to $5123 for every 1-day delay in obtaining the pre-exchange ADAMTS13 results with virtually no change in the effectiveness marker. The ICER composite outcome established the cost-effectiveness of having a fast TAT for pre-exchange ADAMTS13 results. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses also confirmed the robustness of the model.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with clinical presentations of TMAs, having a rapid TAT for pre-exchange ADAMTS13 measurement appeared to be cost-effective. If testing cannot be performed in-house, then our findings support the necessity of contracting with a reference laboratory that can reliably provide the result, preferably within 1 day of admission.

Contemporary Transfusion Science and Challenges

Health care professionals must understand the impact of blood product transfusions and transfusion therapy procedures to ensure high-quality patient care, positive outcomes, and wise use of resources in blood management programs. Understanding transfusions of blood and blood products is also important because of the number of treatments performed, which affects individual patients and health care system resources. This article reviews research findings to acquaint health care professionals with the most successful protocols for blood, blood product, and coagulation factor transfusions. Damage control resuscitation in bleeding trauma patients, protocols for patients without trauma who are undergoing surgical procedures that place them at risk for excessive bleeding, and protocols for patients with sepsis are addressed. Emerging research continues to help guide mass transfusion treatments (restrictive vs liberal, balanced, and goal-directed treatment). Although available study results provide some guidance, questions remain. Additional research by health care professionals is needed.

An economic analysis of different treatments for bleeding in patients with acquired haemophilia

BACKGROUND

Acquired haemophilia A (AHA), with potentially high risk of morbidity and mortality, occurs as a result of inhibitors against factor VIII. Bleeding due to AHA can be treated with activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC), recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) or recently, recombinant porcine-sequence factor VIII (rpFVIII). We extended our previous cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) comparing rpFVIII against the available traditional options.

METHODS

For high-titred, haemorrhaging AHA patients treated with either aPCC, rFVIIa or rpFVIII, over the course of 6-days, a Markov simulation was conducted to evaluate the outcomes when these patients transitioned into any of the four following health states: (1) continuous bleeding, (2) thrombosis, (3) stop bleeding and (4) death, with states (2), (3) and (4) modelled as absorbing states. All model parameters were obtained from the medical literature, except the costs of aPCC, rFVIIa and the factor VIII assay, which came from our institutional data.

RESULTS

Excluding the cost of the initial treatment on day 0, the total subsequent treatment cost of rFVIIa was substantially more than the costs of aPCC and rpFVIII ($13 925 vs. $1778 vs. $6957, respectively). The average quality-adjusted life days (QALDs) gained from rpFVIII was lowest (4·89 vs. 4·9 for rFVIIa and 4·91 for aPCC). Overall, aPCC dominated the other two treatments. The model was determined to be robust across the tested ranges for all input variables.

CONCLUSION

Based on this economic model, for AHA patients with high titres who were bleeding, aPCC was the most cost-effective treatment option and may be considered for use if there is no clinical contraindication.

Plasma for direct therapeutic use, for today and tomorrow: A short critical overview

Plasma for direct therapeutic use is a fast-evolving blood component in terms of its production and presentation. More than a dozen forms are available worldwide, which is often overlooked since most countries apply policies making only one or very few forms available for treating patients in need. It is most often reserved for the same three clinical indications, i.e. overall clotting-factor deficiency, reversal of vitamin K antagonists in the context of active bleeding or prior to urgent surgery, and therapeutic plasma exchange. The level of evidence is often less robust than generally acknowledged for such major indications while novel indications are tending to emerge in medical and trauma settings. This short review explores classical views and new prospects opened up by novel presentations and statuses for therapeutic plasma.

ADAMTS13 test and/or PLASMIC clinical score in management of acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a cost-effective analysis

BACKGROUND

The ADAMTS13 test distinguishes thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) from other thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs). The PLASMIC score helps determine the pretest probability of ADAMTS13 deficiency. Due to inherent limitations of both tests, and potential adverse effects and cost of unnecessary treatments, we performed a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) investigating the benefits of incorporating an in-hospital ADAMTS13 test and/or PLASMIC score into our clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A CEA model was created to compare four scenarios for patients with TMAs, utilizing either an in-house or a send-out ADAMTS13 assay with or without prior risk stratification using PLASMIC scoring. Model variables, including probabilities and costs, were gathered from the medical literature, except for the ADAMTS13 send-out and in-house tests, which were obtained from our institutional data.

RESULTS

If only the cost is considered, in-house ADAMTS13 test for patients with intermediate- to high-risk PLASMIC score is the least expensive option ($4,732/patient). If effectiveness is assessed as measured by the number of averted deaths, send-out ADAMTS13 test is the most effective. Considering the cost/effectiveness ratio, the in-house ADAMTS13 test in patients with intermediate- to high-risk PLASMIC score is the best option, followed by the in-house ADAMTS13 test without the PLASMIC score.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with clinical presentations of TMAs, having an in-hospital ADAMTS13 test to promptly establish the diagnosis of TTP appears to be cost-effective. Utilizing the PLASMIC score further increases the cost-effectiveness of the in-house ADAMTS13 test. Our findings indicate the benefit of having a rapid and reliable in-house ADAMTS13 test, especially in the tertiary medical center.