Intraoperative Monitoring of Heparin: Comparison of Activated Coagulation Time and Whole Blood Heparin Measurements by Different Point-of-Care Devices with Heparin Concentration by Laboratory-Performed Plasma Anti-Xa Assay

Evaluation of the use of a heparin dose-response test in dogs to determine the optimal heparin dose during intravascular procedures and assessment of the in vitro heparin response in healthy dogs

BACKGROUND

No guidelines for administering and monitoring anticoagulants intraprocedurally are currently available in dogs, despite the prevalence of procedures necessitating systemic anticoagulation with heparin.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate an activated clotting time (ACT)-based heparin dose-response (HDR) test to predict the individual required heparin dose in dogs during intravascular procedures, and to investigate both the in vitro heparin - ACT and in vitro heparin - factor anti-Xa activity (anti-Xa) relationships in dogs.

METHODS

Blood was collected from eight healthy beagles undergoing a cardiac procedure and utilised to establish baseline ACT and for in vitro evaluation. Subsequently, 100 IU/kg heparin was administered intravenously (IV) and ACT was remeasured (HDR test). The required heparin dose for an ACT target response ≥300 s was calculated for each individual and ACT was remeasured after administration of this dose. For in vitro testing, a serial heparin blood dilution (0-0.5-1-2-4 international unit (IU)/mL) was prepared and ACT and anti-Xa were determined using whole blood and frozen plasma, respectively.

RESULTS

The HDR test overestimated the required heparin dose in 3/7 dogs. In vitro, ACT and anti-Xa increased significantly with increasing blood heparin concentration. Heparin - ACT was nonlinear in 4/8 dogs at heparin concentrations >2 IU/mL, whereas heparin - anti-Xa remained linear throughout the tested range.

CONCLUSIONS

The HDR test poorly estimated the required heparin dose in dogs. This is most likely attributed to a nonlinear heparin - ACT relationship, as observed in vitro. Anti-Xa is a promising alternative for ACT; however, unavailability as a point-of-care test and lack of in vivo target values restrict its current use.

Long-term alliance for pathology equipment and technology acquisition: a paradigm shift for improved quality and efficiency

OBJECTIVE

Personnel costs are the largest single budget item in the clinical laboratory, other major expenses being equipment, analyzers, blood and blood components, and cost of day-to-day consumables. This report describes our experience with developing a long-term relationship with a single major vendor as a paradigm shift from the traditional multiple vendors, multiple contracts, and recurrent extended negotiations. Our objective was to develop a long-term approach for replacement of effete equipment and upgrades to operations in a pathology and laboratory medicine department in collaboration with vendors providing equipment and services.

METHODS

Major vendors were invited to visit the department to analyze the workload and workflow and suggest integrated solutions to meet the goals of the department. Multiple iterations of the proposals were evaluated, and a recommendation made to the medical center leadership. The vendor, the medical center, and the department jointly developed a 15-year partnership plan to improve the operations of pathology services. The agreement encompasses a range of management and performance criteria for both sides. The salient items discussed were laboratory staffing, turnaround time, workload change, test insourcing, reference laboratory costs, and scholarly productivity and teaching.

RESULTS

The agreement reduced laboratory staffing by 21%, eliminated stat tests by reducing the turnaround time for routine tests to less than 45 minutes for 90% of tests, with an increase of 9.1% in the number of tests, Cost avoidance in salary and reference laboratory costs was $3,424,136/year against an expected target of $2 million in total savings, despite not including cost avoidance from promoting appropriate use of laboratory testing for inpatients and increase in revenue from increase in ambulatory testing. Vizient score in laboratory utilization improved from the 94th to 76th percentile. Scholarly output increased by more than 100%.

CONCLUSION

This model of a long-term alliance with a chosen vendor led to improvements in quality and efficiency.

Reference interval, longitudinal variability and reliability of activated clotting time in healthy dogs using a point-of-care analyser

BACKGROUND

Activated clotting times (ACTs) are used to screen for coagulopathies and monitor heparin therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine a reference interval (RI) for ACT in dogs using a point-of-care analyser, to quantify intra-subject within- and between-day variability, to quantify analyser reliability and inter-analyser agreement and to study the influence of a delay in measurement.

METHODS

Forty-two healthy dogs were included. Measurements were performed on fresh venous blood using the i-STAT 1 analyser. The RI was determined using the Robust method. Intra-subject within-day variability and between-day variability were quantified between baseline and 2 h (n = 8) or 48 h (n = 10) later. Analyser reliability and inter-analyser agreement were studied by duplicate measurements (n = 8) on identical analysers. The influence of measurement delay was studied before and after a delay of one analytical run (n = 6).

RESULTS

Mean, lower and upper reference limits for ACT were 92.9 ± 9.1, 74.4 and 111.2 s, respectively. Coefficients of variation of intra-subject within- and between-day variability were 8.1% and 10.4%, respectively, resulting in a significant between-day measurement difference. Analyser reliability assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient and coefficient of variation were 0.87% and 3.3%, respectively. Significantly lower ACT values were observed after a measurement delay compared to direct analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides an RI for ACT in healthy dogs using the i-STAT 1 and suggests low intra-subject within- and between-day variability. Analyser reliability and inter-analyser agreement were good; however, analysis delay and between-day differences could significantly influence ACT results.

Titrated versus conventional anticoagulation management for thrombin generation in cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Optimal heparin titration during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may reduce coagulation system activation and preserve hemostatic function post-CPB. Our objective was to assess if the Heparin Management System (HMS) Plus improves heparin titration, thereby leading to higher thrombin generation post-CPB compared with activated clotting time (ACT)-guided management.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled trial of 100 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB at a single center. A total of 50 patients were randomized to conventional ACT-guided management, and 50 to the HMS Plus system. The primary outcome was change in thrombin generation post-CPB compared with baseline, as assessed by calibrated automated thrombography. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative blood loss, chest drain output up to 72 hr, and transfusions. In an exploratory analysis, we compared the quintile of patients with the highest average heparin concentration on CPB (≥ 4.0 mg⋅kg-1) with the rest of the cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were included in an intent-to-treat analysis. We observed no difference in post-CPB thrombin generation or secondary outcomes. However, patients in the HMS Plus group had higher average heparin concentrations while on CPB than patients in the conventional management group did (mean difference, -0.21; 95% confidence interval, -0.42 to -0.01). The quintile of patients with the highest average heparin concentration (4.0 mg⋅kg-1) had higher thrombin generation post-CPB than the rest of the cohort did.

CONCLUSIONS

The HMS Plus system did not show significant benefits in thrombin generation, bleeding outcomes, or transfusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. Higher average heparin concentrations on CPB were associated with higher post-CPB thrombin generation.

STUDY REGISTRATION

www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (NCT03347201); first submitted 12 October 2017.

Anticoagulation Monitoring for Perioperative Physicians

From preoperative medications to intraoperative needs to postoperative thromboprophylaxis, anticoagulants are encountered throughout the perioperative period. This review focuses on coagulation testing clinicians utilize to monitor the effects of these medications.

Engaging Pathology Residents in Clinical Chemistry: The Essential Ingredient Is a Committed Teacher

BACKGROUND

Pathology residents are thought to show a lack of interest in clinical chemistry, therefore potentially graduating from training programs unprepared to function as laboratory directors and clinical consultants.

METHODS

A structured program of tutorials based primarily on Henry's textbook, supplemented by recent review articles; a question bank of about 600 questions to emphasize key concepts; requirement for performing and presenting quality improvement projects; participation in on-site CAP inspections; review of reference laboratory test requests; and involving residents in scholarly activity have resulted in sustained, transferable, and significant improvements in engagement, knowledge, competence, and examination scores.

RESULTS

The primary parameter for measuring change in resident competence and engagement were improvements in resident in-service examination (RISE) scores, publications in peer-reviewed journals, and receipt of awards. The revised program produced significant improvement in RISE scores in clinical chemistry, over and above the improvements in the general residency program. The residents were authors on 12 publications in peer-reviewed PubMed listed journals in the 5-year period since revision in the clinical chemistry curriculum compared to no publications in clinical chemistry in the 5-year period before the new curriculum. Over the past 2 years, 6 of the 11 publications by graduating residents were in clinical chemistry, and 6 of 7 awards for research were garnered by residents engaged in clinical chemistry investigations. All of the residents passed their clinical pathology boards on first attempt since the change compared to 2 failures in the prior 5-year period.

CONCLUSIONS

The structured program described here is important as a template that could be adopted by any pathology training program. The question bank developed by this program is a valuable and transferable aid. However, success of such a program is dependent on the commitment of a knowledgeable, dedicated, and passionate teacher.

Evaluation of Point-of-Care ACT Coagulometers and Anti-Xa Activity During Cardiopulmonary Bypass

OBJECTIVE

The activated clotting time (ACT) is used worldwide to confirm safe heparin anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. For the present study, the performances of 2 commonly used ACT devices were compared with each other and with anti-Xa levels throughout the surgical procedure in order to understand whether they can be used interchangeably.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 33 elective adult cardiac surgical patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Blood samples were taken at standard times throughout the surgery (after induction, after heparin bolus, 4 samples at 30-minute intervals during cardiopulmonary bypass, after protamine), and ACTs and anti-Xa levels were analyzed. Data were compared using receiver operating characteristics and LOESS regression.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The correlation between anti-Xa levels and the Hemochron ACT (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA) was acceptable (r = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.757-0.868; p < 0.0001), as was the correlation between anti-Xa levels and the i-STAT (Abbott Point of Care, Abbott Park, IL) (r = 0.81, 95% CI 0.738-0.858; p < 0.0001). The correlation between the 2 ACT methods was poorer (r = 0.77, 95% CI 0.707-0.828; p < 0.0001) than their correlation to anti-Xa levels. When compared with anti-Xa levels, the sensitivity and specificity were mediocre for both devices, although the i-STAT performed better than the Hemochron ACT. The Hemochron ACT read higher values than the i-STAT ACT throughout the course of the surgery.

CONCLUSION

The correlation between the Hemochron ACT and i-STAT ACT is moderate, and they have different sensitivity and specificity when compared with anti-Xa levels. This suggests that ACT devices should not be used interchangeably, but cut-off values for safe anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass should be determined for each type of device, particularly when switching supplier.

Hemostatic Testing in Critically Ill Infants and Children

Children with critical illness frequently manifest imbalances in hemostasis with risk of consequent bleeding or pathologic thrombosis. Traditionally, plasma-based tests measuring clot formation by time to fibrin clot generation have been the "gold standard" in hemostasis testing. However, these tests are not sensitive to abnormalities in fibrinolysis or in conditions of enhanced clot formation that may lead to thrombosis. Additionally, they do not measure the critical roles played by platelets and endothelial cells. An added factor in the evaluation of these plasma-based tests is that in infants and young children plasma levels of many procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins are lower than in older children and adults resulting in prolonged clot generation times in spite of maintaining a normal hemostatic "balance." Consequently, newer assays directly measuring thrombin generation in plasma and others assessing the stages hemostasis including clot initiation, propagation, and fibrinolysis in whole blood by viscoelastic methods are now available and may allow for a global measurement of the hemostatic system. In this manuscript, we will review the processes by which clots are formed and by which hemostasis is regulated, and the rationale and limitations for the more commonly utilized tests. We will also discuss selected newer tests available for the assessment of hemostasis, their "pros" and "cons," and how they compare to the traditional tests of coagulation in the assessment and management of critically ill children.