1
|
Palme J, Li A, Springer M. The galactokinase enzyme of yeast senses metabolic flux to stabilize galactose pathway regulation. Nat Metab 2025; 7:137-147. [PMID: 39762390 PMCID: PMC11774755 DOI: 10.1038/s42255-024-01181-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2025]
Abstract
Nutrient sensors allow cells to adapt their metabolisms to match nutrient availability by regulating metabolic pathway expression. Many such sensors are cytosolic receptors that measure intracellular nutrient concentrations. One might expect that inducing the metabolic pathway that degrades a nutrient would reduce intracellular nutrient levels, destabilizing induction. However, in the galactose-responsive (GAL) pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we find that induction is stabilized by flux sensing. Previously proposed mechanisms for flux sensing postulate the existence of metabolites whose concentrations correlate with flux. The GAL pathway flux sensor uses a different principle: the galactokinase Gal1p both performs the first step in GAL metabolism and reports on flux by signalling to the GAL repressor, Gal80p. Both Gal1p catalysis and Gal1p signalling depend on the concentration of the Gal1p-GAL complex and are therefore directly correlated. Given the simplicity of this mechanism, flux sensing is probably a general feature throughout metabolic regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julius Palme
- Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ang Li
- Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael Springer
- Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fita-Torró J, Swamy KBS, Pascual-Ahuir A, Proft M. Divergence of alternative sugar preferences through modulation of the expression and activity of the Gal3 sensor in yeast. Mol Ecol 2023. [PMID: 37052375 DOI: 10.1111/mec.16954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
Optimized nutrient utilization is crucial for the progression of microorganisms in competing communities. Here we investigate how different budding yeast species and ecological isolates have established divergent preferences for two alternative sugar substrates: Glucose, which is fermented preferentially by yeast, and galactose, which is alternatively used upon induction of the relevant GAL metabolic genes. We quantified the dose-dependent induction of the GAL1 gene encoding the central galactokinase enzyme and found that a very large diversification exists between different yeast ecotypes and species. The sensitivity of GAL1 induction correlates with the growth performance of the respective yeasts with the alternative sugar. We further define some of the mechanisms, which have established different glucose/galactose consumption strategies in representative yeast strains by modulating the activity of the Gal3 inducer. (1) Optimal galactose consumers, such as Saccharomyces uvarum, contain a hyperactive GAL3 promoter, sustaining highly sensitive GAL1 expression, which is not further improved upon repetitive galactose encounters. (2) Desensitized galactose consumers, such as S. cerevisiae Y12, contain a less sensitive Gal3 sensor, causing a shift of the galactose response towards higher sugar concentrations even in galactose experienced cells. (3) Galactose insensitive sugar consumers, such as S. cerevisiae DBVPG6044, contain an interrupted GAL3 gene, causing extremely reluctant galactose consumption, which is, however, improved upon repeated galactose availability. In summary, different yeast strains and natural isolates have evolved galactose utilization strategies, which cover the whole range of possible sensitivities by modulating the expression and/or activity of the inducible galactose sensor Gal3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josep Fita-Torró
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Pathology and Therapy, Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia IBV-CSIC, Valencia, Spain
| | - Krishna B S Swamy
- Division of Biological and Life Sciences, School of Arts and Sciences, Ahmedabad University, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Amparo Pascual-Ahuir
- Department of Biotechnology, Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Markus Proft
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Pathology and Therapy, Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia IBV-CSIC, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jayaraman V, Toledo‐Patiño S, Noda‐García L, Laurino P. Mechanisms of protein evolution. Protein Sci 2022; 31:e4362. [PMID: 35762715 PMCID: PMC9214755 DOI: 10.1002/pro.4362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
How do proteins evolve? How do changes in sequence mediate changes in protein structure, and in turn in function? This question has multiple angles, ranging from biochemistry and biophysics to evolutionary biology. This review provides a brief integrated view of some key mechanistic aspects of protein evolution. First, we explain how protein evolution is primarily driven by randomly acquired genetic mutations and selection for function, and how these mutations can even give rise to completely new folds. Then, we also comment on how phenotypic protein variability, including promiscuity, transcriptional and translational errors, may also accelerate this process, possibly via "plasticity-first" mechanisms. Finally, we highlight open questions in the field of protein evolution, with respect to the emergence of more sophisticated protein systems such as protein complexes, pathways, and the emergence of pre-LUCA enzymes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Jayaraman
- Department of Molecular Cell BiologyWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael
| | - Saacnicteh Toledo‐Patiño
- Protein Engineering and Evolution UnitOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate UniversityOkinawaJapan
| | - Lianet Noda‐García
- Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and EnvironmentHebrew University of JerusalemRehovotIsrael
| | - Paola Laurino
- Protein Engineering and Evolution UnitOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate UniversityOkinawaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Past, Present, and Future Perspectives on Whey as a Promising Feedstock for Bioethanol Production by Yeast. J Fungi (Basel) 2022; 8:jof8040395. [PMID: 35448626 PMCID: PMC9031875 DOI: 10.3390/jof8040395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Concerns about fossil fuel depletion and the environmental effects of greenhouse gas emissions have led to widespread fermentation-based production of bioethanol from corn starch or sugarcane. However, competition for arable land with food production has led to the extensive investigation of lignocellulosic sources and waste products of the food industry as alternative sources of fermentable sugars. In particular, whey, a lactose-rich, inexpensive byproduct of dairy production, is available in stable, high quantities worldwide. This review summarizes strategies and specific factors essential for efficient lactose/whey fermentation to ethanol. In particular, we cover the most commonly used strains and approaches for developing high-performance strains that tolerate fermentation conditions. The relevant genes and regulatory systems controlling lactose utilization and sources of new genes are also discussed in detail. Moreover, this review covers the optimal conditions, various feedstocks that can be coupled with whey substrates, and enzyme supplements for increasing efficiency and yield. In addition to the historical advances in bioethanol production from whey, this review explores the future of yeast-based fermentation of lactose or whey products for beverage or fuel ethanol as a fertile research area for advanced, environmentally friendly uses of industrial waste products.
Collapse
|
5
|
Capturing and Understanding the Dynamics and Heterogeneity of Gene Expression in the Living Cell. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21218278. [PMID: 33167354 PMCID: PMC7663833 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21218278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The regulation of gene expression is a fundamental process enabling cells to respond to internal and external stimuli or to execute developmental programs. Changes in gene expression are highly dynamic and depend on many intrinsic and extrinsic factors. In this review, we highlight the dynamic nature of transient gene expression changes to better understand cell physiology and development in general. We will start by comparing recent in vivo procedures to capture gene expression in real time. Intrinsic factors modulating gene expression dynamics will then be discussed, focusing on chromatin modifications. Furthermore, we will dissect how cell physiology or age impacts on dynamic gene regulation and especially discuss molecular insights into acquired transcriptional memory. Finally, this review will give an update on the mechanisms of heterogeneous gene expression among genetically identical individual cells. We will mainly focus on state-of-the-art developments in the yeast model but also cover higher eukaryotic systems.
Collapse
|
6
|
Reinhardt-Tews A, Krutyhołowa R, Günzel C, Roehl C, Glatt S, Breunig KD. A double role of the Gal80 N terminus in activation of transcription by Gal4p. Life Sci Alliance 2020; 3:3/12/e202000665. [PMID: 33037058 PMCID: PMC7556753 DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202000665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Activation of gene expression by Gal4p in K. lactis requires an element in the N terminus of KlGal80p that mediates nuclear co-import of KlGal1p and galactokinase inhibition to support the co-inducer function of KlGal1p. The yeast galactose switch operated by the Gal4p–Gal80p–Gal3p regulatory module is a textbook model of transcription regulation in eukaryotes. The Gal80 protein inhibits Gal4p-mediated transcription activation by binding to the transcription activation domain. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, inhibition is relieved by formation of an alternative Gal80–Gal3 complex. In yeasts lacking a Gal3p ortholog, such as Kluyveromyces lactis, the Gal1 protein (KlGal1p) combines regulatory and enzymatic activity. The data presented here reveal a yet unknown role of the KlGal80 N terminus in the mechanism of Gal4p activation. The N terminus contains an NLS, which is responsible for nuclear accumulation of KlGal80p and KlGal1p and for KlGal80p-mediated galactokinase inhibition. Herein, we present a model where the N terminus of KlGal80p reaches the catalytic center of KlGal1p causing enzyme inhibition in the nucleus and stabilization of the KlGal1–KlGal80p complex. We corroborate this model by genetic analyses and structural modelling and provide a rationale for the divergent evolution of the mechanism activating Gal4p.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rościsław Krutyhołowa
- Malopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.,Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Christian Günzel
- Institut für Biologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Constance Roehl
- Institut für Biologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Sebastian Glatt
- Malopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Karin D Breunig
- Institut für Biologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
New AM, Lehner B. Harmonious genetic combinations rewire regulatory networks and flip gene essentiality. Nat Commun 2019; 10:3657. [PMID: 31413260 PMCID: PMC6694120 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11523-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
We lack an understanding of how the full range of genetic variants that occur in individuals can interact. To address this shortcoming, here we combine diverse mutations between genes in a model regulatory network, the galactose (GAL) switch of budding yeast. The effects of thousands of pairs of mutations fall into a limited number of phenotypic classes. While these effects are mostly predictable using simple rules that capture the ‘stereotypical’ genetic interactions of the network, some double mutants have unexpected outcomes including constituting alternative functional switches. Each of these ‘harmonious’ genetic combinations exhibits altered dependency on other regulatory genes. These cases illustrate how both pairwise and higher epistasis determines gene essentiality and how combinations of mutations rewire regulatory networks. Together, our results provide an overview of how broad spectra of mutations interact, how these interactions can be predicted, and how diverse genetic solutions can achieve ‘wild-type’ phenotypic behavior. Studying how genetic variants in different genes interact and their combinatorial output is experimentally and analytically challenging. Here, the authors quantify the effects of more than 5000 mutation pairs in the yeast GAL regulatory system, finding that many combinations can be predicted with statistical models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron M New
- Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ben Lehner
- Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. .,Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain. .,Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), 08010, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Perez-Samper G, Cerulus B, Jariani A, Vermeersch L, Barrajón Simancas N, Bisschops MMM, van den Brink J, Solis-Escalante D, Gallone B, De Maeyer D, van Bael E, Wenseleers T, Michiels J, Marchal K, Daran-Lapujade P, Verstrepen KJ. The Crabtree Effect Shapes the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Lag Phase during the Switch between Different Carbon Sources. mBio 2018; 9:e01331-18. [PMID: 30377274 PMCID: PMC6212832 DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01331-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
When faced with environmental changes, microbes often enter a temporary growth arrest during which they reprogram the expression of specific genes to adapt to the new conditions. A prime example of such a lag phase occurs when microbes need to switch from glucose to other, less-preferred carbon sources. Despite its industrial relevance, the genetic network that determines the duration of the lag phase has not been studied in much detail. Here, we performed a genome-wide Bar-Seq screen to identify genetic determinants of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae glucose-to-galactose lag phase. The results show that genes involved in respiration, and specifically those encoding complexes III and IV of the electron transport chain, are needed for efficient growth resumption after the lag phase. Anaerobic growth experiments confirmed the importance of respiratory energy conversion in determining the lag phase duration. Moreover, overexpression of the central regulator of respiration, HAP4, leads to significantly shorter lag phases. Together, these results suggest that the glucose-induced repression of respiration, known as the Crabtree effect, is a major determinant of microbial fitness in fluctuating carbon environments.IMPORTANCE The lag phase is arguably one of the prime characteristics of microbial growth. Longer lag phases result in lower competitive fitness in variable environments, and the duration of the lag phase is also important in many industrial processes where long lag phases lead to sluggish, less efficient fermentations. Despite the immense importance of the lag phase, surprisingly little is known about the exact molecular processes that determine its duration. Our study uses the molecular toolbox of S. cerevisiae combined with detailed growth experiments to reveal how the transition from fermentative to respirative metabolism is a key bottleneck for cells to overcome the lag phase. Together, our findings not only yield insight into the key molecular processes and genes that influence lag duration but also open routes to increase the efficiency of industrial fermentations and offer an experimental framework to study other types of lag behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Perez-Samper
- VIB - KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
- CMPG Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, Department M2S, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bram Cerulus
- VIB - KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
- CMPG Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, Department M2S, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Abbas Jariani
- VIB - KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
- CMPG Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, Department M2S, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lieselotte Vermeersch
- VIB - KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
- CMPG Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, Department M2S, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Markus M M Bisschops
- Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Joost van den Brink
- Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Brigida Gallone
- VIB - KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
- CMPG Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, Department M2S, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dries De Maeyer
- Centre of Microbial and Plant Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elise van Bael
- VIB - KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
- CMPG Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, Department M2S, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Wenseleers
- Laboratory of Socioecology and Social Evolution, Department of Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Michiels
- VIB - KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
- Centre of Microbial and Plant Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kathleen Marchal
- Centre of Microbial and Plant Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Kevin J Verstrepen
- VIB - KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
- CMPG Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, Department M2S, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sood V, Brickner JH. Genetic and Epigenetic Strategies Potentiate Gal4 Activation to Enhance Fitness in Recently Diverged Yeast Species. Curr Biol 2017; 27:3591-3602.e3. [PMID: 29153325 PMCID: PMC5846685 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Revised: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 10/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Certain genes show more rapid reactivation for several generations following repression, a conserved phenomenon called epigenetic transcriptional memory. Following previous growth in galactose, GAL gene transcriptional memory confers a strong fitness benefit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae adapting to growth in galactose for up to 8 generations. A genetic screen for mutants defective for GAL gene memory revealed new insights into the molecular mechanism, adaptive consequences, and evolutionary history of memory. A point mutation in the Gal1 co-activator that disrupts the interaction with the Gal80 inhibitor specifically and completely disrupted memory. This mutation confirms that cytoplasmically inherited Gal1 produced during previous growth in galactose directly interferes with Gal80 repression to promote faster induction of GAL genes. This mitotically heritable mode of regulation is recently evolved; in a diverged Saccharomyces species, GAL genes show constitutively faster activation due to genetically encoded basal expression of Gal1. Thus, recently diverged species utilize either epigenetic or genetic strategies to regulate the same molecular mechanism. The screen also revealed that the central domain of the Gal4 transcription factor both regulates the stochasticity of GAL gene expression and potentiates stronger GAL gene activation in the presence of Gal1. The central domain is critical for GAL gene transcriptional memory; Gal4 lacking the central domain fails to potentiate GAL gene expression and is unresponsive to previous Gal1 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varun Sood
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
| | - Jason H Brickner
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gencoglu M, Schmidt A, Becskei A. Measurement of In Vivo Protein Binding Affinities in a Signaling Network with Mass Spectrometry. ACS Synth Biol 2017; 6:1305-1314. [PMID: 28333434 DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Protein interaction networks play a key role in signal processing. Despite the progress in identifying the interactions, the quantification of their strengths lags behind. Here we present an approach to quantify the in vivo binding of proteins to their binding partners in signaling-transcriptional networks, by the pairwise genetic isolation of each interaction and by varying the concentration of the interacting components over time. The absolute quantification of the protein concentrations was performed with targeted mass spectrometry. The strengths of the interactions, as defined by the apparent dissociation constants, ranged from subnanomolar to micromolar values in the yeast galactose signaling network. The weak homodimerization of the Gal4 activator amplifies the signal elicited by glucose. Furthermore, combining the binding constants in a feedback loop correctly predicted cellular memory, a characteristic network behavior. Thus, this genetic-proteomic binding assay can be used to faithfully quantify how strongly proteins interact with proteins, DNA and metabolites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mumun Gencoglu
- Biozentrum, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50/70, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Schmidt
- Biozentrum, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50/70, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Attila Becskei
- Biozentrum, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50/70, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Noda-Garcia L, Romero Romero ML, Longo LM, Kolodkin-Gal I, Tawfik DS. Bacilli glutamate dehydrogenases diverged via coevolution of transcription and enzyme regulation. EMBO Rep 2017; 18:1139-1149. [PMID: 28468957 DOI: 10.15252/embr.201743990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2017] [Revised: 03/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The linkage between regulatory elements of transcription, such as promoters, and their protein products is central to gene function. Promoter-protein coevolution is therefore expected, but rarely observed, and the manner by which these two regulatory levels are linked remains largely unknown. We study glutamate dehydrogenase-a hub of carbon and nitrogen metabolism. In Bacillus subtilis, two paralogues exist: GudB is constitutively transcribed whereas RocG is tightly regulated. In their active, oligomeric states, both enzymes show similar enzymatic rates. However, swaps of enzymes and promoters cause severe fitness losses, thus indicating promoter-enzyme coevolution. Characterization of the proteins shows that, compared to RocG, GudB's enzymatic activity is highly dependent on glutamate and pH Promoter-enzyme swaps therefore result in excessive glutamate degradation when expressing a constitutive enzyme under a constitutive promoter, or insufficient activity when both the enzyme and its promoter are tightly regulated. Coevolution of transcriptional and enzymatic regulation therefore underlies paralogue-specific spatio-temporal control, especially under diverse growth conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianet Noda-Garcia
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | | | - Liam M Longo
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Ilana Kolodkin-Gal
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Dan S Tawfik
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kuang MC, Hutchins PD, Russell JD, Coon JJ, Hittinger CT. Ongoing resolution of duplicate gene functions shapes the diversification of a metabolic network. eLife 2016; 5:e19027. [PMID: 27690225 PMCID: PMC5089864 DOI: 10.7554/elife.19027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2016] [Accepted: 09/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The evolutionary mechanisms leading to duplicate gene retention are well understood, but the long-term impacts of paralog differentiation on the regulation of metabolism remain underappreciated. Here we experimentally dissect the functions of two pairs of ancient paralogs of the GALactose sugar utilization network in two yeast species. We show that the Saccharomyces uvarum network is more active, even as over-induction is prevented by a second co-repressor that the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacks. Surprisingly, removal of this repression system leads to a strong growth arrest, likely due to overly rapid galactose catabolism and metabolic overload. Alternative sugars, such as fructose, circumvent metabolic control systems and exacerbate this phenotype. We further show that S. cerevisiae experiences homologous metabolic constraints that are subtler due to how the paralogs have diversified. These results show how the functional differentiation of paralogs continues to shape regulatory network architectures and metabolic strategies long after initial preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meihua Christina Kuang
- Laboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
- Graduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
- Wisconsin Energy Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
- JF Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Madison, United States
- Genome Center of Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
| | - Paul D Hutchins
- Genome Center of Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
- Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
- DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
| | - Jason D Russell
- Genome Center of Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
- DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
- Metabolism Research Group, Morgridge Institute for Research, Madison, United States
| | - Joshua J Coon
- Genome Center of Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
- Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
- DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
- Metabolism Research Group, Morgridge Institute for Research, Madison, United States
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
| | - Chris Todd Hittinger
- Laboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
- Graduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
- Wisconsin Energy Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
- JF Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Madison, United States
- Genome Center of Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
- DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
| |
Collapse
|