Association between magnitude of femoral head collapse and quality of life in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head

Clinical evaluation of platelet-rich plasma therapy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).

METHODS

We comprehensively searched randomized controlled trials in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, WanFang, and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database from inception until October 25, 2024. The literature on the clinical efficacy of autologous PRP for ONFH was collated. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the literature was screened, quality evaluated and the data was extracted. Meta-analysis was carried out with the software Review Manager 5.4.1 software and Stata 17.0 software. In addition, potential publication bias was detected by the funnel plot test and Egger's test. The GRADE system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence for outcome indicators.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies involving 909 patients were included in this study. Compared with non-PRP, PRP exhibited significant improvements in the Harris hip score (HHS) at 3 months (MD = 3.58, 95% Cl: 1.59 to 5.58, P = 0.0004), 6 months (MD = 6.19, 95% Cl: 3.96 to 8.41, P < 0.00001), 12 months (MD = 4.73, 95% Cl: 3.24 to 6.22, P < 0.00001), ≥ 24 months (MD = 6.83, 95% Cl: 2.09 to 11.59, P = 0.0003), and the last follow-up (MD = 6.57, 95% Cl: 4.81 to 8.33, P < 0.00001). The PRP also showed improvement in HHS compared to baseline than the non-PRP at 3 months (MD = 3.60, 95% Cl: 1.26 to 5.94, P = 0.003), 6 months (MD = 6.17, 95% Cl: 3.74 to 8.61, P < 0.00001), 12 months (MD = 5.35, 95% Cl: 3.44 to 7.25, P < 0.00001), ≥ 24 months (MD = 8.19, 95% Cl: 3.76 to 12.62, P = 0.0003), and the last follow-up (MD = 6.94, 95% Cl: 5.09 to 8.78, P < 0.00001). The change in visual analog scale (VAS) score 3 months post intervention (MD = -0.33, 95% Cl: -0.52 to -0.13, P = 0.001), 6 months (MD = -0.69, 95% Cl: -0.90 to -0.48, P < 0.00001), 12 months (MD = -0.75, 95% Cl: -1.05 to -0.46, P < 0.00001), ≥ 24 months (MD = -1.05, 95% Cl: -1.20 to -0.89, P < 0.00001), and the last follow-up (MD = -0.75, 95% Cl: -0.97 to -0.54, P < 0.00001). The PRP also showed a decrease in VAS score compared to baseline than the non-PRP at 3 months (MD = -0.29, 95% Cl: -0.41 to -0.17, P = 0.003), 6 months (MD = -0.63, 95% Cl: -0.96 to -0.30, P = 0.0002), 12 months (MD = -0.78, 95% Cl: -1.22 to -0.33, P = 0.0006), ≥ 24 months (MD = -1.11, 95% Cl: -1.27 to -0.96, P < 0.00001), and the last follow-up (MD = -0.74, 95% Cl: -1.05 to -0.43, P < 0.00001). Additionally, it was found that the PRP group had the advantages in the following aspects: collapse rate of the femoral head (RR = 0.33, 95% Cl: 0.17 to 0.62, P = 0.0006), rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (RR = 0.37, 95% Cl: 0.18 to 0.74, P = 0.005), and overall complications (RR = 0.33, 95% Cl: 0.13 to 0.83, P = 0.02). The GRADE evidence evaluation showed overall complication as very low quality and other indicators as low quality.

CONCLUSION

There is limited evidence showing benefit of PRP therapy for treatment of ONFH patients, and most of this evidence is of low quality. Caution should therefore be exercised in interpreting these results. It is recommended that future research involve a greater number of high-quality studies to validate the aforementioned conclusions.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ #recordDetails, CRD42023463031.

Analysis of the natural collapse course of non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head based on the matrix model

BACKGROUND

There are many predictions about the progression of natural collapse course of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Here, we aimed to combine the three classical prediction methods to explore the progression of the natural collapse course.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 127 patients admitted to our hospital from October 2016 to October 2017, in whom the femoral head had not collapsed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the collapse risk factors, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used for femoral head survival analysis. The collapse rate of the femoral head was recorded within 5 years based on the matrix model. The specificity of the matrix model was analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

A total of 127 patients with a total of 202 hips were included in this study, and 98 hips collapsed during the follow-up period. Multivariate logistics regression analysis showed that the predictive ability of the matrix model was stronger than Association Research Circulation Osseous staging, Japanese Investigation Committee classification, and area (P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the median survival time of femoral head in patients was 3 years. The result of the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of the matrix model had better predictive value (AUC = 0.771, log-rank test: P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We creatively combined the three classical prediction methods for evaluating the progression of the natural collapse course based on the matrix model and found that the higher the score of the matrix model, the higher the femoral head collapse rate. Specifically, the matrix model has a potential value in predicting femoral head collapse and guiding treatment selection.

Investigating the subchondral trabecular bone microstructure in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head using multi-detector row computed tomography

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the microstructural changes of subchondral trabecular bone in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) using multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT).

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 76 hips in 50 patients diagnosed with ONFH between 2017 and 2021. Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 comprised hips without ONFH, ONFH without femoral head collapse (FHC), ONFH with mild collapse (<2 mm), and ONFH with severe collapse (>2 mm), respectively. All patients underwent MDCT, and the subchondral trabecular bone microstructure was assessed. Regions of interests were set at the lateral boundary of the femoral head necrotic lesion and centre of the acetabular weight-bearing portion.

RESULTS

In both the femoral head and the acetabular regions, there were significant differences in Groups 2 and 3 compared to Group 1, with increased volumetric bone mineral density and apparent bone volume fraction, and more plate-like with increased connectivity, indicating that osteosclerotic changes were occurring.

CONCLUSIONS

In both the femoral head and the acetabular regions, osteosclerotic changes of subchondral trabecular bone microstructure were present before FHC.

Hip function in patients undergoing conservative treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head

PURPOSE

Once collapsed, osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) generally obtains collapse cessation naturally and surgical intervention can be avoided in the long term. This study aimed to investigate the process of hip function and secondary osteoarthritis changes in ONFH patients undergoing conservative treatment.

METHODS

We included 54 patients with symptomatic ONFH at the first visit with a minimum follow-up of three years with conservative treatment. Patients were divided into two groups based on collapse cessation < 3 mm (stable group) or progression to > 3 mm (progression group). Additionally, we investigated age, sex, body mass index (BMI), etiology, contralateral side hip joint, the Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) type classification, Harris hip score (HHS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip-Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), and survival rate with secondary osteoarthritis as the endpoint.

RESULTS

The stable and progression groups had 31 and 23 patients, respectively. No significant differences in age, sex, BMI, and aetiology were observed between the two groups, except for the contralateral side hip joint and JIC type classification. The HHS and JHEQ were significantly improved at the final follow-up than at the first visit in the stable group. However, there were no significant differences in HHS and JHEQ at the final follow-up than at the first visit in the progression group. The five year survival rates with secondary osteoarthritis as the endpoint were significantly higher in the stable group (100%) than in the progression group (32.5%).

CONCLUSION

Hip joint function improved by continuing conservative treatment in ONFH patients with collapse cessation < 3 mm.