Integration host factor of Escherichia coli regulates early- and repressor transcription of bacteriophage Mu by two different mechanisms

The integration host factor regulates multiple virulence pathways in bacterial pathogen Dickeya zeae MS2

Dickeya zeae is an aggressive bacterial phytopathogen that infects a wide range of host plants. It has been reported that integration host factor (IHF), a nucleoid-associated protein consisting of IHFα and IHFβ subunits, regulates gene expression by influencing nucleoid structure and DNA bending. To define the role of IHF in the pathogenesis of D. zeae MS2, we deleted either and both of the IHF subunit encoding genes ihfA and ihfB, which significantly reduced the production of cell wall-degrading enzymes (CWDEs), an unknown novel phytotoxin and the virulence factor-modulating (VFM) quorum-sensing (QS) signal, cell motility, biofilm formation, and thereafter the infection ability towards both potato slices and banana seedlings. To characterize the regulatory pathways of IHF protein associated with virulence, IHF binding sites (consensus sequence 5'-WATCAANNNNTTR-3') were predicted and 272 binding sites were found throughout the genome. The expression of 110 tested genes was affected by IHF. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) showed direct interaction of IhfA protein with the promoters of vfmE, speA, pipR, fis, slyA, prtD, hrpL, hecB, hcp, indA, hdaA, flhD, pilT, gcpJ, arcA, arcB, and lysR. This study clarified the contribution of IHF in the pathogenic process of D. zeae by controlling the production of VFM and putrescine QS signals, phytotoxin, and indigoidine, the luxR-solo system, Fis, SlyA, and FlhD transcriptional regulators, and secretion systems from type I to type VI. Characterization of the regulatory networks of IHF in D. zeae provides a target for prevention and control of plant soft rot disease.

Controlling DNA degradation from a distance: a new role for the Mu transposition enhancer

Phage Mu is unique among transposable elements in employing a transposition enhancer. The enhancer DNA segment is the site where the transposase MuA binds and makes bridging interactions with the two Mu ends, interwrapping the ends with the enhancer in a complex topology essential for assembling a catalytically active transpososome. The enhancer is also the site at which regulatory proteins control divergent transcription of genes that determine the phage lysis-lysogeny decision. Here we report a third function for the enhancer - that of regulating degradation of extraneous DNA attached to both ends of infecting Mu. This DNA is protected from nucleases by a phage protein until Mu integrates into the host chromosome, after which it is rapidly degraded. We find that leftward transcription at the enhancer, expected to disrupt its topology within the transpososome, blocks degradation of this DNA. Disruption of the enhancer would lead to the loss or dislocation of two non-catalytic MuA subunits positioned in the transpososome by the enhancer. We provide several lines of support for this inference, and conclude that these subunits are important for activating degradation of the flanking DNA. This work also reveals a role for enhancer topology in phage development.

Transposable prophage Mu is organized as a stable chromosomal domain of E. coli

The E. coli chromosome is compacted by segregation into 400–500 supercoiled domains by both active and passive mechanisms, for example, transcription and DNA-protein association. We find that prophage Mu is organized as a stable domain bounded by the proximal location of Mu termini L and R, which are 37 kbp apart on the Mu genome. Formation/maintenance of the Mu ‘domain’ configuration, reported by Cre-loxP recombination and 3C (chromosome conformation capture), is dependent on a strong gyrase site (SGS) at the center of Mu, the Mu L end and MuB protein, and the E. coli nucleoid proteins IHF, Fis and HU. The Mu domain was observed at two different chromosomal locations tested. By contrast, prophage λ does not form an independent domain. The establishment/maintenance of the Mu domain was promoted by low-level transcription from two phage promoters, one of which was domain dependent. We propose that the domain confers transposition readiness to Mu by fostering topological requirements of the reaction and the proximity of Mu ends. The potential benefits to the host cell from a subset of proteins expressed by the prophage may in turn help its long-term stability.

A majority of sequenced bacterial genomes harbor prophage sequences. Some prophages are viable, while others have decayed from accumulating mutations and genome rearrangements. Prophages, including defective ones, can contribute important biological properties such as antibiotic resistance, toxins, and serum resistance that increase the survival and ecological range of their hosts. We show in this study that the 37 kbp transposable prophage Mu exists in a unique configuration we call the ‘Mu domain’, where its two ends are paired, segregating the Mu sequences from those of the host chromosome. This is the largest stable chromosomal domain in E. coli mapped to date. The Mu domain configuration promotes low-level transcription from an early prophage promoter, which controls the expression of several genes, not all essential for phage growth. Some non-essential genes include DNA repair functions. We suggest that the Mu domain provides long-term survival benefits to both the prophage and the host: to the prophage in bestowing transposition-ready topological properties unique to the Mu reaction, and to the host in contributing extraneous DNA housekeeping functions.

Starvation-induced Mucts62-mediated coding sequence fusion: a role for ClpXP, Lon, RpoS and Crp

The formation of araB-lacZ coding sequence fusions in Escherichia coli is a particular type of chromosomal rearrangement induced by Mucts62, a thermoinducible mutant of mutator phage Mu. Fusion formation is controlled by the host physiology. It only occurs after aerobic carbon starvation and requires the phage-encoded transposase pA, suggesting that these growth conditions trigger induction of the Mucts62 prophage. Here, we show that thermal induction of the prophage accelerated araB-lacZ fusion formation, confirming that derepression is a rate-limiting step in the fusion process. Nonetheless, starvation conditions remained essential to complete fusions, suggesting additional levels of physiological regulation. Using a transcriptional fusion indicator system in which the Mu early lytic promoter is fused to the reporter E. coli lacZ gene, we confirmed that the Mucts62 prophage was derepressed in stationary phase (S derepression) at low temperature. S derepression did not apply to prophages that expressed the Mu wild-type repressor. It depended upon the host ClpXP and Lon ATP-dependent proteases and the RpoS stationary phase-specific sigma factor, but not upon Crp. None of these four functions was required for thermal induction. Crp was required for fusion formation, but only when the Mucts62 prophage encoded the transposition/replication activating protein pB. Finally, we found that thermally induced cultures did not return to the repressed state when shifted back to low temperature and, hence, remained activated for accelerated fusion formation upon starvation. The maintenance of the derepressed state required the ClpXP and Lon host proteases and the prophage Ner-regulatory protein. These observations illustrate how the cts62 mutation in Mu repressor provides the prophage with a new way to respond to growth phase-specific regulatory signals and endows the host cell with a new potential for adaptation through the controlled use of the phage transposition machinery.

Activation of gene expression by a novel DNA structural transmission mechanism that requires supercoiling-induced DNA duplex destabilization in an upstream activating sequence

We have previously demonstrated that integration host factor (IHF)-mediated activation of transcription from the ilvPG promoter of Escherichia coli requires a supercoiled DNA template and occurs in the absence of specific interactions between IHF and RNA polymerase. In this report, we describe a novel, supercoiling-dependent, DNA structural transmission mechanism for this activation. We provide theoretical evidence for a supercoiling-induced DNA duplex destabilized (SIDD) structure in the A + T-rich, ilvPG regulatory region between base pair positions +1 and -160. We show that the region of this SIDD sequence immediately upstream of an IHF binding site centered at base pair position -92 is, in fact, destabilized by superhelical stress and that this duplex destabilization is inhibited by IHF binding. Thus, in the presence of IHF, the negative superhelical twist normally absorbed by this DNA structure in the promoter distal half of the SIDD sequence is transferred to the downstream portion of the SIDD sequence containing the ilvPG promoter site. This IHF-mediated translocation of superhelical energy facilitates duplex destabilization in the -10 region of the downstream ilvPG promoter and activates transcription by increasing the rate of open complex formation.

Deletion analysis of the fis promoter region in Escherichia coli: antagonistic effects of integration host factor and Fis

Fis is a small DNA-binding and -bending protein in Escherichia coli that is involved in several different biological processes, including stimulation of specialized DNA recombination events and regulation of gene expression. fis protein and mRNA levels rapidly increase during early logarithmic growth phase in response to a nutritional upshift but become virtually undetectable during late logarithmic and stationary phases. We present evidence that the growth phase-dependent fis expression pattern is not determined by changes in mRNA stability, arguing in favor of regulation at the level of transcription. DNA deletion analysis of the fis promoter (fis P) region indicated that DNA sequences from -166 to -81, -36 to -26, and +107 to +366 relative to the transcription start site are required for maximum expression. A DNA sequence resembling the integration host factor (IHF) binding site centered approximately at -114 showed DNase I cleavage protection by IHF. In ihf cells, maximum cellular levels of fis mRNA were decreased more than 3-fold and transcription from fis P on a plasmid was decreased about 3.8-fold compared to those in cells expressing wild-type IHF. In addition, a mutation in the ihf binding site resulted in a 76 and 61% reduction in transcription from fis P on a plasmid in the presence or absence of Fis, respectively. Insertions of 5 or 10 bp between this ihf site and fis P suggest that IHF functions in a position-dependent manner. We conclude that IHF plays a role in stimulating transcription from fis P by interacting with a site centered approximately at -114 relative to the start of transcription. We also showed that although the fis P region contains six Fis binding sites, Fis site II (centered at -42) played a predominant role in autoregulation, Fis sites I and III (centered at +26 and -83, respectively) seemingly played smaller roles, and no role in negative autoregulation could be attributed to Fis sites IV, V, and VI (located upstream of site III). The fis P region from -36 to +7, which is not directly regulated by either IHF or Fis, retained the characteristic fis regulation pattern in response to a nutritional upshift.

The integration host factor-DNA complex upstream of the early promoter of bacteriophage Mu is functionally symmetric

Inversion of the ihf site in the promoter region of the early promoter of bacteriophage Mu did not influence the integration host factor (IHF)-mediated functions. IHF bound to this inverted site could counteract H-NS-mediated repression, directly activate transcription, and support lytic growth of bacteriophage Mu. This implies that the IHF heterodimer and its asymmetrical binding site form a functionally symmetrical complex.

In vivo mutational analysis of bacteriophage Mu operators

In bacteria lysogenic for bacteriophage Mu, the phage repressor binds to a tripartite operator region, O1,O2,O3, to repress the lytic promoter pE, located in O2, and negatively autoregulate its own synthesis at the pCM promoter located in O3. We isolated and characterized operator mutations which lead to derepression of pE. Their location in the first and third repressor-consensus-binding sequences in O2 confirms the importance of these sites for repressor/operator interactions.

Function of the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase in basal expression and integration host factor-mediated activation of the early promoter of bacteriophage Mu

Integration host factor (IHF) can activate transcription from the early promoter (Pe) of bacteriophage Mu both directly and indirectly. Indirect activation occurs through alleviation of H-NS-mediated repression of the Pe promoter (P. Van Ulsen, M. Hillebrand, L. Zulianello, P. Van de Putte, and N. Goosen, Mol. Microbiol. 21:567-578, 1996). The direct activation involves the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit (alphaCTD) of RNA polymerase. We investigated which residues in the alphaCTD are important for IHF-mediated activation of the Pe promoter. Initial in vivo screening, using a set of substitution mutants derived from an alanine scan (T. Gaal, W. Ross, E. E. Blatter, T. Tang, X. Jia, V. V. Krishnan, N. Assa-Munt, R. Ebright, and R. L. Gourse, Genes Dev. 10:16-26, 1996; H. Tang, K. Severinov, A. Goldfarb, D. Fenyo, B. Chait, and R. H. Ebright, Genes Dev. 8:3058-3067, 1994), indicated that the residues, which are required for transcription activation by the UP element of the rrnB P1 promoter (T. Gaal, W. Ross, E. E. Blatter, T. Tang, X. Jia, V. V. Krishnan, N. Assa-Munt, R. Ebright, and R. L. Gourse, Genes Dev. 10:16-26, 1996), are also important for Pe expression in the presence of IHF. Two of the RNA polymerase mutants, alphaR265A and alphaG296A, that affected Pe expression most in vivo were subsequently tested in in vitro transcription experiments. Mutant RNA polymerase with alphaR265A showed no IHF-mediated activation and a severely reduced basal level of transcription from the Pe promoter. Mutant RNA polymerase with alphaG296A resulted in a slightly reduced transcription from the Pe promoter in the absence of IHF but could still be activated by IHF. These results indicate that interaction of the alphaCTD with DNA is involved not only in the IHF-mediated activation of Pe transcription but also in maintaining the basal level of transcription from this promoter. Mutational analysis of the upstream region of the Pe promoter identified a sequence, positioned from -39 to -51 with respect to the transcription start site, that is important for basal Pe expression, presumably through binding of the alphaCTD. The role of the alphaCTD in IHF-mediated stimulation of transcription from the Pe promoter is discussed.

Influence of DNA geometry on transcriptional activation in Escherichia coli

Transcription from many Escherichia coli promoters can be activated by the cAMP-CRP complex bound at different locations upstream of the promoter. At some locations the mechanism of activation involves direct protein-protein contacts between CRP and the RNA polymerase. We positioned the CRP binding site at various distances from the transcription start site of the malT promoter and measured the in vivo activities of these promoter variants. From the activation profiles we deduce that the protein-protein interactions involved in transcriptional activation are rather rigid. A heterologous protein (IHF) that bends the DNA to a similar degree as does CRP activates transcription when bound at sites equivalent to activating positions for CRP. DNA geometry makes a major contribution to the process of transcriptional activation and DNA upstream of the activator binding site participates in this process. Removal of this DNA decreases the capacity of the malT promoter to be activated by CRP in vitro. We conclude that both DNA topology and direct protein-protein contacts contribute to transcriptional activation and that the relative importance of these two modes of activation depends on the nature of the activator and on the location of the activator binding site.

Effects of integration host factor and DNA supercoiling on transcription from the ilvPG promoter of Escherichia coli

Integration host factor (IHF) activates transcription from the ilvPG promoter by severely distorting the DNA helix in an upstream region of a supercoiled DNA template in a way that alters the structure of the DNA in the downstream promoter region and facilitates open complex formation. In this report, the in vivo and in vitro influence of DNA supercoiling on transcription from this promoter is examined. In the absence of IHF, promoter activity increases with increased DNA supercoiling. In the presence of IHF, the same increases in superhelical DNA densities result in larger increases in promoter activity until a maximal activation of 5-fold is obtained. However, the relative transcriptional activities of the promoter in the presence and absence of IHF at any given DNA superhelical density remains the same. Thus, IHF and increased DNA supercoiling activate transcription by different mechanisms. Also, IHF binds with equal affinities to its target site on linear and supercoiled DNA templates. Therefore, IHF binding does not activate transcription simply by increasing the local negative supercoiling of the DNA helix in the downstream promoter region or by differential binding to relaxed and supercoiled DNA templates.

Integration host factor alleviates the H-NS-mediated repression of the early promoter of bacteriophage Mu

Integration host factor (IHF), which is a histone-like protein, has been shown to positively regulate transcription in two different ways. It can either help the formation of a complex between a transcription factor and RNA polymerase or it can itself activate RNA polymerase without the involvement of other transcription factors. In this study, we present a third mechanism for IHF-stimulated gene expression, by counteracting the repression by another histone-like protein, H-NS. The early (Pe) promoter of bacteriophage Mu is specifically inhibited by H-NS, both in vivo and in vitro. For this inhibition, H-NS binds to a large DNA region overlapping the Pe promoter. Binding of IHF to a binding site just upstream of Pe alleviates the H-NS-mediated repression of transcription. This same ihf site is also involved in the direct activation of Pe by IHF. In contrast to the direct activation by IHF, however, the alleviating effect of IHF appears not to be dependent on the relevant position of the ihf site on the DNA helix, and it also does not require the presence of the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase. Footprint analysis shows that binding of IHF to the ihf site destabilizes the interaction of H-NS with the DNA, not only in the IHF-binding region but also in the DNA regions flanking the ihf site. These results suggest that IHF disrupts a higher-order nucleoprotein complex that is formed by H-NS and the DNA.

The regulation of transcription initiation by integration host factor

Integration host factor (IHF) of Escherichia coli is an asymmetric histone-like protein that binds and bends the DNA at specific sequences. IHF functions as an accessory factor in a wide variety of processes including replication, site-specific recombination and transcription. In many of these processes IHF was shown to act as an architectural element which helps the formation of nucleo-protein complexes by bending of the DNA at specific sites. This MicroReview shows how such a structural role of IHF can influence the initiation of transcription. In addition, it summarizes the evidence indicating that IHF can stimulate transcription via a direct interaction with RNA polymerase and explores the possibility that the asymmetry of the IHF protein might reflect such an interaction.

Promoters responsive to DNA bending: a common theme in prokaryotic gene expression

The early notion of DNA as a passive target for regulatory proteins has given way to the realization that higher-order DNA structures and DNA-protein complexes are at the basis of many molecular processes, including control of promoter activity. Protein binding may direct the bending of an otherwise linear DNA, exacerbate the angle of an intrinsic bend, or assist the directional flexibility of certain sequences within prokaryotic promoters. The important, sometimes essential role of intrinsic or protein-induced DNA bending in transcriptional regulation has become evident in virtually every system examined. As discussed throughout this article, not every function of DNA bends is understood, but their presence has been detected in a wide variety of bacterial promoters subjected to positive or negative control. Nonlinear DNA structures facilitate and even determine proximal and distal DNA-protein and protein-protein contacts involved in the various steps leading to transcription initiation.

Inhibition of bacteriophage Mu transposition by Mu repressor and Fis

In this paper we show that the Escherichia coli protein Fis has a regulatory function in Mu transposition in the presence of Mu repressor. Fis can lower the transposition frequency of a mini-Mu 3-80-fold, but only if the Mu repressor is expressed simultaneously. In this novel type of regulation of transposition by the concerted action of Fis and repressor, the IAS, the internal activating sequence, is also involved as deletion of this site lead to the loss of the Fis effect. As the IAS contains strong repressor binding sites these are probably the target for the repressor in the observed negative regulation by Fis and repressor. However, the role of Fis and repressor is not only to inactivate the IAS, since a 4 bp insertion in the IAS, which changes the spacing of the repressor-binding site, abolishes the enhancing function of the IAS but leaves the repressor-Fis effect intact. A likely target for Fis in this regulation is a strong Fis-binding site, which is located adjacent to the L2 transposase-binding site. However, when this Fis-binding sequence was substituted by a random sequence and Fis no longer showed specific binding to this site, the Fis effect was still observed. Although it is still possible that Fis can function by binding to this non-specific site in a particular complex, it seems more likely that Fis is directly or indirectly involved in determining the level of the repressor.

Integration host factor (IHF) modulates the expression of the pyrimidine-specific promoter of the carAB operons of Escherichia coli K12 and Salmonella typhimurium LT2

We report the identification of Integration Host Factor (IHF) as a new element involved in modulation of P1, the upstream pyrimidine-specific promoter of the Escherichia coli K12 and Salmonella typhimurium carAB operons. Band-shift assays, performed with S-30 extracts of the wild type and a himA, hip double mutant or with purified IHF demonstrate that, in vitro, this factor binds to a region 300 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site of P1 in both organisms. This was confirmed by deletion analysis of the target site. DNase I, hydroxyl radical and dimethylsulphate footprinting experiments allowed us to allocate the IHF binding site to a 38 bp, highly A+T-rich stretch, centred around nucleotide -305 upstream of the transcription initiation site. Protein-DNA contacts are apparently spread over a large number of bases and are mainly located in the minor groove of the helix. Measurements of carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase (CPSase) and beta-galactosidase specific activities from car-lacZ fusion constructs of wild type or IHF target site mutants introduced into several genetic backgrounds affected in the himA gene or in the pyrimidine-mediated control of P1 (carP6 or pyrH+/-), or in both, indicate that, in vivo, IHF influences P1 activity as well as its control by pyrimidines. IHF stimulates P1 promoter activity in minimal medium, but increases the repressibility of this promoter by pyrimidines. These antagonistic effects result in a two- to threefold reduction in the repressibility of promoter P1 by pyrimidines in the absence of IHF binding. IHF thus appears to be required for maximal expression as well as for establishment of full repression. IHF could exert this function by modulating the binding of a pyrimidine-specific regulatory molecule.

Stimulation of the phage lambda pL promoter by integration host factor requires the carboxy terminus of the alpha-subunit of RNA polymerase

Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF) binds with high affinity to two tandem IHF consensus sequences located upstream from the pL promoter of bacteriophage lambda. IHF was shown to stimulate transcription initiation from the pL promoter by increasing close complex formation (KB). We show here, by the use of reconstituted mutant RNA polymerases, that the C-terminal portion of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase plays an essential role in the stimulation of transcription by IHF. Our results are in agreement with the hypothesis that IHF, like the cAMP-CRP activator, increases the affinity of RNA polymerase to the promoter by protein-protein interaction.

Escherichia coli integration host factor stabilizes bacteriophage Mu repressor interactions with operator DNA in vitro

Using gel retardation and DNase I protection techniques, we have demonstrated that the Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF) stabilizes the interaction between Mu repressor and its cognate operator-binding sites in vitro. These results are discussed in terms of a model in which IHF may commit the phage to the lytic or lysogenic pathway depending on the occupancy of the operator sites by the repressor.

Stabilization of bacteriophage Mu repressor-operator complexes by the Escherichia coli integration host factor protein

All of the previously described effects of integration host factor (IHF) on bacteriophage Mu development have supported the view that IHF favours transposition-replication over the alternative state of lysogenic phage growth. In this report we show that, consistent with a model in which Mu repressor binding to its operators requires a particular topology of the operator DNA, IHF stimulates repressor binding to the O1 and O2 operators and enhances Mu repression. IHF would thus be one of the keys, besides supercoiling and the H-NS protein, that lock the operator region into the appropriate topological conformation for high-affinity binding not only of the phage transposase but also of the phage repressor.

Supercoiling, integration host factor, and a dual promoter system, participate in the control of the bacteriophage lambda pL promoter

The high level of efficiency of the bacteriophage lambda pL promoter is dependent upon the topological state of the promoter DNA and the binding of a DNA-bending protein, IHF, to a site centered -86 base-pairs upstream from the pL transcription start site. Abortive initiation assays indicate that DNA supercoiling stimulates open complex formation, whereas IHF enhances promoter recognition. IHF stimulates promoter recognition to the same extent on linear and supercoiled templates. We found that the pL region contains a second promoter, pL2, that initiates transcription 42 base-pairs upstream from pL. Although competitive with pL and inhibited by IHF, mutations in pL2 do not affect the regulation of pL. Stimulation by IHF is helix-face-dependent. IHF inhibits pL when the IHF binding site is displaced a helical half-turn upstream. The pL sequences protected against DNase I digestion by bound IHF and RNA polymerase do not overlap. However, DNase I-hypersensitive sites appear in the region between the two bound proteins. In addition, IHF enhances RNA polymerase binding to pL. These data suggest that stimulation of pL by IHF involves the interaction of IHF and RNA polymerase to form a loop or otherwise distort the DNA between their binding sites.

Analysis of the IHF binding site in the regulatory region of bacteriophage Mu

In bacteriophage Mu the converging early and repressor transcriptions are both stimulated by binding of IHF to the same region, which is located just upstream of the early promoter (Pe) and 100 base pairs downstream of the repressor promoter (Pc). Within this region two sequences are present (ihfa and ihfb) that match the consensus sequence for IHF binding. These sequences are partially overlapping and in inverted orientation. In this paper we describe the effect of mutations in the non-overlapping part of ihfa and ihfb on the binding of IHF. We show that IHF has a very strong preference to bind to ihfb even when a mutated ihfa has a better match with the consensus. A stretch of A residues located nine base pairs from the ihfb sequence appears to play an important role in the stability of the DNA-IHF complex, but not in the discrimination between the two putative binding sites. In addition we describe the effect of the mutations on the stimulation of early and repressor transcription. We show that for activation of the Pc promoter a stable complex between IHF and the DNA is required, whereas for normal Pe stimulation a much weaker DNA-IHF interaction is sufficient.

Integration host factor is required for the activation of developmentally regulated genes in Caulobacter

Several temporally controlled flagellar genes in Caulobacter crescentus require a sigma 54 promoter and upstream sites for transcription activation. We demonstrate here that in some of these genes, an AT-rich region containing an integration host factor (IHF) consensus binding site lies between the activator and the promoter, and that this region binds IHF in vitro. Analysis of mutations in the IHF-binding region of the hook operon demonstrated that an intact IHF-binding site is necessary for transcription in vivo. An adjacent and divergent promoter also has an IHF consensus sequence that binds IHF. The IHF and enhancer sites are 3' to the transcription start site in this promoter. We postulate that IHF mediates the formation of a higher order structure between the divergent promoter regions in a manner analogous to the nucleosome-like structure generated for lambda-Escherichia coli DNA recombination and that this higher order structure modulates transcription.

Integration host factor stimulates the phage lambda pL promoter

Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF) is a small dimeric protein that binds to a specific DNA consensus sequence and produces DNA bending. Transcription from the bacteriophage lambda pL promoter is stimulated three- to fourfold by IHF both in vivo and in vitro. IHF binds with high-affinity to two tandem sites located just upstream from the pL promoter and enhances the formation of RNA polymerase-promoter closed complexes. The rate of isomerization to open complex is not influenced by IHF. IHF may stimulate recognition of pL by one or more of several mechanisms: (1) by bending DNA; (2) by making protein-protein contacts with RNA polymerase; or (3) by occluding a competing promoter upstream from pL.

Regulation of phage Mu repressor transcription by IHF depends on the level of the early transcription

Integration Host Factor (IHF) of E. coli can stimulate both early and repressor transcription of bacteriophage Mu. We introduced several mutations in the early promoter (Pe) and studied the effect of these mutations on the stimulation of early and repressor transcription by IHF. All mutant promoters are still positive regulated by IHF, but the level of stimulation is dependent on the strength of the promoter. The strength of the early promoter has an even greater impact on the regulation of the repressor promoter by IHF: stimulation is observed in the presence of a relatively weak Pe, whereas with a strong Pe the repressor promoter Pc is inhibited by IHF. This inhibition is most probably due to an interference of the early transcription with the opposing repressor transcription. The implication of this type of regulation for the Mu life cycle is discussed.

Differential activity of a transposable element in Escherichia coli colonies

In Escherichia coli colonies, patterns of differential gene expression can be visualized by the use of Mu d(lac) fusion elements. Here we report that patterned beta-galactosidase expression in colonies of strain MS1534 resulted from a novel mechanism, spatially localized replication of the Mu dII1681 element causing lacZ transposition to active expression sites. Mu dII1681 replication did not occur constitutively with a fixed probability but was dependent on the growth history of the bacterial population. The bacteria in which Mu dII1681 replication and lacZ transposition had occurred could no longer form colonies. These results lead to several interesting conclusions about cellular differentiation during colony development and the influence of bacterial growth history on gene expression and genetic change.

Repression of the lambda pcin promoter by integrative host factor

The cin-1 mutation creates a new promoter (pcin) in the tR1 region of bacteriophage lambda. The pcin promoter transcribes the cI repressor gene constitutively. lambda cin-1 does not propagate on Escherichia coli mutants lacking the integrative host factor (IHF). lambda cI- cin-1 grows normally in IHF- mutants, indicating that repressor overproduction from pcin blocks lytic growth. The presence of an IHF binding site which overlaps the pcin promoter led us to the hypothesis that IHF functions as a repressor of pcin transcription. We find that the pcin promoter is fivefold more active in a host lacking IHF than in wild-type cells. In vitro studies show that IHF directly inhibits transcription initiation at pcin. Abortive initiation and gel retardation assays demonstrate that IHF interferes with the binding of RNA polymerase to the pcin promoter. RNA polymerase bound in an open promoter complex is resistant to IHF. We propose that IHF binding to the pcin promoter region blocks the binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter, either by covering specific nucleotides or by distorting DNA structure.