The internal region of CtIP negatively regulates DNA end resection

Mechanism of BRCA1-BARD1 function in DNA end resection and DNA protection

DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination is initiated by DNA end resection, a process involving the controlled degradation of the 5'-terminated strands at DSB sites1,2. The breast cancer suppressor BRCA1-BARD1 not only promotes resection and homologous recombination, but it also protects DNA upon replication stress1,3-9. BRCA1-BARD1 counteracts the anti-resection and pro-non-homologous end-joining factor 53BP1, but whether it functions in resection directly has been unclear10-16. Using purified recombinant proteins, we show here that BRCA1-BARD1 directly promotes long-range DNA end resection pathways catalysed by the EXO1 or DNA2 nucleases. In the DNA2-dependent pathway, BRCA1-BARD1 stimulates DNA unwinding by the Werner or Bloom helicase. Together with MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 and phosphorylated CtIP, BRCA1-BARD1 forms the BRCA1-C complex17,18, which stimulates resection synergistically to an even greater extent. A mutation in phosphorylated CtIP (S327A), which disrupts its binding to the BRCT repeats of BRCA1 and hence the integrity of the BRCA1-C complex19-21, inhibits resection, showing that BRCA1-C is a functionally integrated ensemble. Whereas BRCA1-BARD1 stimulates resection in DSB repair, it paradoxically also protects replication forks from unscheduled degradation upon stress, which involves a homologous recombination-independent function of the recombinase RAD51 (refs. 4-6,8). We show that in the presence of RAD51, BRCA1-BARD1 instead inhibits DNA degradation. On the basis of our data, the presence and local concentration of RAD51 might determine the balance between the pronuclease and the DNA protection functions of BRCA1-BARD1 in various physiological contexts.

A novel RBBP8(p.E281*) germline mutation is a predisposing mutation in familial hereditary cancer syndrome

Screening tumor susceptibility genes helps in identifying powerful biomarkers for hereditary cancer monitoring, prevention, and diagnosis, providing opportunities for understanding potential molecular mechanisms and biomarkers for the precise treatment of hereditary cancer syndromes. Whole-exome sequencing of blood and bioinformatics analysis uncovered a novel RBBP8(p.E281*) germline mutation in a family with hereditary cancer syndrome, which was verified by Sanger sequencing. Cell proliferation, colony formation, cell migration, and in vivo tumorigenesis were investigated by CCK8, colony formation, Transwell, and in vivo xenograft assays. Protein localization and interaction were detected by immunofluorescence, nuclear and cytoplasmic protein extraction kits, and Co-IP. A new heterozygous germline mutation of the RBBP8(p.E281*) gene was found to be associated with familial hereditary cancer syndrome. RBBP8-WT was mainly detected in the nucleus and interacts with BRCA1. In contrast, RBBP8(p.E281*) is mainly located in the cytoplasm, with no interaction with BRCA1. RBBP8(p.E281*) variant plays an oncogenic role in the cytoplasm in addition to its loss of function in the nucleus, which promotes breast cancer proliferation, in vivo tumorigenesis, and migration. Compared with the control group, RBBP8(p.E281*) showed elevated cell death in response to cisplatin and olaparib treatment. A novel RBBP8(p.E281*) germline mutation was identified from familial hereditary cancer syndrome. RBBP8(p.E281*) is not able to enter the nucleus or interact with BRCA1 through the lost binding motif, and RBBP8(p.E281*) variant appears to promote tumorigenesis in the cytoplasm in addition to its loss of function in the nucleus. RBBP8(p.E281*) variant may promote tumor susceptibility and serve as a precision medicine biomarker in familial hereditary cancer syndrome. KEY MESSAGES: RBBP8(p.E281*) is a susceptibility gene in this familial hereditary cancer syndrome RBBP8(p.E281*) lost its ability to enter the nucleus and the BRCA1 binding motif A novel RBBP8(p.E281*) germline mutation promotes breast cancer tumorigenesis Patients with RBBP8(p.E281*) germline mutation may benefit from Olaparib, Cisplatin.

To indel or not to indel: Factors influencing mutagenesis during chromosomal break end joining

Chromosomal DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the effective lesion of radiotherapy and other clastogenic cancer therapeutics, and are also the initiating event of many approaches to gene editing. Ligation of the DSBs by end joining (EJ) pathways can restore the broken chromosome, but the repair junctions can have insertion/deletion (indel) mutations. The indel patterns resulting from DSB EJ are likely defined by the initial structure of the DNA ends, how the ends are processed and synapsed prior to ligation, and the factors that mediate the ligation step. In this review, we describe key factors that influence these steps of DSB EJ in mammalian cells, which is significant both for understanding mutagenesis resulting from clastogenic cancer therapeutics, and for developing approaches to manipulating gene editing outcomes.

Strand annealing and motor driven activities of SMARCAL1 and ZRANB3 are stimulated by RAD51 and the paralog complex

SMARCAL1, ZRANB3 and HLTF are required for the remodeling of replication forks upon stress to promote genome stability. RAD51, along with the RAD51 paralog complex, were also found to have recombination-independent functions in fork reversal, yet the underlying mechanisms remained unclear. Using reconstituted reactions, we build upon previous data to show that SMARCAL1, ZRANB3 and HLTF have unequal biochemical capacities, explaining why they have non-redundant functions. SMARCAL1 uniquely anneals RPA-coated ssDNA, which depends on its direct interaction with RPA, but not on ATP. SMARCAL1, along with ZRANB3, but not HLTF efficiently employ ATPase driven translocase activity to rezip RPA-covered bubbled DNA, which was proposed to mimic elements of fork reversal. In contrast, ZRANB3 and HLTF but not SMARCAL1 are efficient in branch migration that occurs downstream in fork remodeling. We also show that low concentrations of RAD51 and the RAD51 paralog complex, RAD51B–RAD51C–RAD51D–XRCC2 (BCDX2), directly stimulate the motor-driven activities of SMARCAL1 and ZRANB3 but not HLTF, and the interplay is underpinned by physical interactions. Our data provide a possible mechanism explaining previous cellular experiments implicating RAD51 and BCDX2 in fork reversal.

Bloom helicase mediates formation of large single-stranded DNA loops during DNA end processing

Bloom syndrome (BS) is associated with a profoundly increased cancer risk and is caused by mutations in the Bloom helicase (BLM). BLM is involved in the nucleolytic processing of the ends of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), to yield long 3' ssDNA tails that serve as the substrate for break repair by homologous recombination (HR). Here, we use single-molecule imaging to demonstrate that BLM mediates formation of large ssDNA loops during DNA end processing. A BLM mutant lacking the N-terminal domain (NTD) retains vigorous in vitro end processing activity but fails to generate ssDNA loops. This same mutant supports DSB end processing in cells, however, these cells do not form RAD51 DNA repair foci and the processed DSBs are channeled into synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SSA) instead of HR-mediated repair, consistent with a defect in RAD51 filament formation. Together, our results provide insights into BLM functions during homologous recombination.

Double-Stranded Break Repair in Mammalian Cells and Precise Genome Editing

In mammalian cells, double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired predominantly by error-prone non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), but less prevalently by error-free template-dependent homologous recombination (HR). DSB repair pathway selection is the bedrock for genome editing. NHEJ results in random mutations when repairing DSB, while HR induces high-fidelity sequence-specific variations, but with an undesirable low efficiency. In this review, we first discuss the latest insights into the action mode of NHEJ and HR in a panoramic view. We then propose the future direction of genome editing by virtue of these advancements. We suggest that by switching NHEJ to HR, full fidelity genome editing and robust gene knock-in could be enabled. We also envision that RNA molecules could be repurposed by RNA-templated DSB repair to mediate precise genetic editing.

The CDK1-TOPBP1-PLK1 axis regulates the Bloom's syndrome helicase BLM to suppress crossover recombination in somatic cells

Bloom's syndrome is caused by inactivation of the BLM helicase, which functions with TOP3A and RMI1-2 (BTR complex) to dissolve recombination intermediates and avoid somatic crossing-over. We show here that crossover avoidance by BTR further requires the activity of cyclin-dependent kinase-1 (CDK1), Polo-like kinase-1 (PLK1), and the DDR mediator protein TOPBP1, which act in the same pathway. Mechanistically, CDK1 phosphorylates BLM and TOPBP1 and promotes the interaction of both proteins with PLK1. This is amplified by the ability of TOPBP1 to facilitate phosphorylation of BLM at sites that stimulate both BLM-PLK1 and BLM-TOPBP1 binding, creating a positive feedback loop that drives rapid BLM phosphorylation at the G2-M transition. In vitro, BLM phosphorylation by CDK/PLK1/TOPBP1 stimulates the dissolution of topologically linked DNA intermediates by BLM-TOP3A. Thus, we propose that the CDK1-TOPBP1-PLK1 axis enhances BTR-mediated dissolution of recombination intermediates late in the cell cycle to suppress crossover recombination and curtail genomic instability.

CDK2 phosphorylation of Werner protein (WRN) contributes to WRN's DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice

Werner syndrome (WS) is an accelerated aging disorder characterized by genomic instability, which is caused by WRN protein deficiency. WRN participates in DNA metabolism including DNA repair. In a previous report, we showed that WRN protein is recruited to laser-induced DNA double-strand break (DSB) sites during various stages of the cell cycle with similar intensities, supporting that WRN participates in both non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). Here, we demonstrate that the phosphorylation of WRN by CDK2 on serine residue 426 is critical for WRN to make its DSB repair pathway choice between NHEJ and HR. Cells expressing WRN engineered to mimic the unphosphorylated or phosphorylation state at serine 426 showed abnormal DSB recruitment, altered RPA interaction, strand annealing, and DSB repair activities. The CDK2 phosphorylation on serine 426 stabilizes WRN's affinity for RPA, likely increasing its long-range resection at the end of DNA strands, which is a crucial step for HR. Collectively, the data shown here demonstrate that a CDK2-dependent phosphorylation of WRN regulates DSB repair pathway choice and cell cycle participation.

MAD2L2 dimerization and TRIP13 control shieldin activity in DNA repair

MAD2L2 (REV7) plays an important role in DNA double-strand break repair. As a member of the shieldin complex, consisting of MAD2L2, SHLD1, SHLD2 and SHLD3, it controls DNA repair pathway choice by counteracting DNA end-resection. Here we investigated the requirements for shieldin complex assembly and activity. Besides a dimerization-surface, HORMA-domain protein MAD2L2 has the extraordinary ability to wrap its C-terminus around SHLD3, likely creating a very stable complex. We show that appropriate function of MAD2L2 within shieldin requires its dimerization, mediated by SHLD2 and accelerating MAD2L2-SHLD3 interaction. Dimerization-defective MAD2L2 impairs shieldin assembly and fails to promote NHEJ. Moreover, MAD2L2 dimerization, along with the presence of SHLD3, allows shieldin to interact with the TRIP13 ATPase, known to drive topological switches in HORMA-domain proteins. We find that appropriate levels of TRIP13 are important for proper shieldin (dis)assembly and activity in DNA repair. Together our data provide important insights in the dependencies for shieldin activity.

Paving the way towards precise and safe CRISPR genome editing

As the possibilities of CRISPR-Cas9 technology have been revealed, we have entered a new era of research aimed at increasing its specificity and safety. This stage of technology development is necessary not only for its wider application in the clinic but also in basic research to better control the process of genome editing. Research during the past eight years has identified some factors influencing editing outcomes and led to the development of highly specific endonucleases, modified guide RNAs and computational tools supporting experiments. More recently, large-scale experiments revealed a previously overlooked feature: Cas9 can generate reproducible mutation patterns. As a result, it has become apparent that Cas9-induced double-strand break (DSB) repair is nonrandom and can be predicted to some extent. Here, we review the present state of knowledge regarding the specificity and safety of CRISPR-Cas9 technology to define gRNA, protein and target-related problems and solutions. These issues include sequence-specific off-target effects, immune responses, genetic variation and chromatin accessibility. We present new insights into the role of DNA repair in genome editing and define factors influencing editing outcomes. In addition, we propose practical guidelines for increasing the specificity of editing and discuss novel perspectives in improvement of this technology.

Kinetics model of DNA double-strand break repair in eukaryotes

This manuscript outlines the kinetics of two main repair pathways of DNA double-strand break (DSB) in eukaryotes: non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination repair (HRR). In this review, we discuss the precise study of recruitment kinetics of repair proteins based on the latest technologies in the past two decades. Then we simulate the theoretical description of the DNA repair process by mathematical models. In our study, the consecutive reactions chain (CRC) model and continuous-time random walk (CTRW) model have been unified by us, so that we can obtain the function of the number of intermediates with time in the same framework of equations, overcome the incompatibility between the two models. On this basis, we propose a data fitting workflow using these both models. Finally, we give an overview of different real-time quantitative methods and the new mechanism complexity that can be found from the corresponding dynamic models.

Phosphorylated CtIP bridges DNA to promote annealing of broken ends

The DNA of our cells is constantly exposed to various types of damaging agents. One of the most critical types of damage is when both strands of the DNA break, and thus such breaks need to be efficiently repaired. It is known that CtIP promotes nucleases in DNA break repair. Here we show that CtIP can also hold the two DNA strands together in solution when DNA is free to move, using novel methodology that allows the monitoring of thousands of single DNA molecules in nanofabricated devices. DNA bridging likely facilitates the enzymatic repair steps and identifies novel CtIP functions that are crucial for repairing broken DNA.

The early steps of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in human cells involve the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex and its cofactor, phosphorylated CtIP. The roles of these proteins in nucleolytic DSB resection are well characterized, but their role in bridging the DNA ends for efficient and correct repair is much less explored. Here we study the binding of phosphorylated CtIP, which promotes the endonuclease activity of MRN, to single long (∼50 kb) DNA molecules using nanofluidic channels and compare it to the yeast homolog Sae2. CtIP bridges DNA in a manner that depends on the oligomeric state of the protein, and truncated mutants demonstrate that the bridging depends on CtIP regions distinct from those that stimulate the nuclease activity of MRN. Sae2 is a much smaller protein than CtIP, and its bridging is significantly less efficient. Our results demonstrate that the nuclease cofactor and structural functions of CtIP may depend on the same protein population, which may be crucial for CtIP functions in both homologous recombination and microhomology-mediated end-joining.